1. [18F]FDG PET/MRI versus contrast-enhanced MRI in detecting regional HNSCC metastases
- Author
-
Cristina Campi, Roberto Di Carlo, Diego Cecchin, Giulia Oliveri, Enzo Emauelli, Roberto Stramare, Piero Nicolai, Laura Albertoni, Daniele Borsetto, Valentina Bodanza, Filippo Crimì, Arcangelo Merola, Carmelo Lacognata, and Pietro Zucchetta
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Receiver operating characteristic ,CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Gold standard (test) ,medicine.disease ,HNSCC ,Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,18f fdg pet ,Lymph nodes ,PET/MRI ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Histopathology ,Lymph ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Lymph node - Abstract
To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI using established dimensional and morphological criteria versus integrated [18F]FDG PET/MRI in identifying regional lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). For this purpose, we compare MRI and PET/MRI using the histopathological findings in dissected lymph nodes as the gold standard. We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with histologically proven HNSCC who underwent gadolinium-enhanced [18F]FDG PET/MRI as part of their staging. All neck lymph nodes were classified on MRI using dimensional and/or morphological criteria. Then, they were jointly assessed by a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist using integrated [18F]PET/MR images. ROC curves were obtained to compare the techniques. Lymph node histopathology was considered as the reference standard. Out of 865 lymph nodes, 35 were malignant at histopathology (3 with micro-metastases). Sensitivity and specificity were 48.6% and 99.5% for MRI using dimensional criteria; 60.0% and 99.6% for MRI using morphological criteria; 60.0% and 99.4% for MRI using both; and 74.3% and 97.6% for PET using MR as anatomic localization. The area under the ROC curve was higher for PET and MRI localization (0.859) than for MRI using dimensional (0.740; p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF