Search

Background: First-line therapies based on immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improved survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Cabozantinib was shown to target kinases involved in immune-escape and to prolong survival in patients pre-treated with tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs). The impact of ICIs combinations in first line on subsequent therapies is still unclear. Methods: This is an open label, multicenter, single arm, phase II study designed to assess activity, safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients progressed after an adjuvant or first line anti-Programmed Death (PD)-1/PD-Ligand (PD-L) 1-based therapy. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: 31 patients were included in the analysis. After a median (m) follow-up of 11.9 months, mPFS was 8.3 months (90%CI 3.9-17.4) and mOS was 13.8 months (95%CI 7.7-29.0). ORR was 37.9% with an additional 13 patients achieving disease stability. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 47% of patients, including more frequently creatine phosphokinase (CPK) serum level elevation, neutropenia, hyponatremia, diarrhea, hand-food syndrome, oral mucositis and hypertension. Conclusions: The BREAKPOINT trial met its primary endpoint showing that cabozantinib as second line therapy after ICIs was active in mRCC. Safety profile was manageable. Trial registration number: NCT03463681 - A Study of CaBozantinib in Patients With Advanced or Unresectable Renal cEll cArcinoma (BREAKPOINT) - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03463681

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the fourteenth most common cancer worldwide. In about 55% of cases, it is diagnosed at a localised and/or locally advanced stage and therefore amenable to a curative approach. Although nephrectomy still represents the cornerstone of non-metastatic RCC (nmRCC) treatment, a relapse is observed in about 25-30% of patients undergoing curative surgery. Prognosis is drastically influenced by lymph nodal involvement. After the first disappointing results with a cytokine-based strategy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were tested as adjuvant agents. Despite their efficacy in the metastatic setting, results in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) are not unequivocal and the overall survival (OS) benefit has not been demonstrated. Moreover, their toxicity profile induced a remarkable percentage of patients to discontinue the treatment. On the contrary, the KEYNOTE-564 trial showed the benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo in terms of DFS with promising results in term of OS. Patients included were at intermediate or high risk of relapse, or patients with no evidence of disease after metastasectomy (M1 NED). The updated analysis presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Genito-Urinary (ASCO GU) 2022 confirmed the benefit of pembrolizumab versus placebo over time, although OS data are still immature. A longer follow-up and the several ongoing trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) will provide further data about adjuvant immuno-oncology (IO). Furthermore, the patients' selection based on clinical or biological features will be crucial in order to identify who benefits most from treatments.

Objective: To give an updated overview on clinical aspects and survival effects of lutetium-177–prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (177Lu-PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT), a novel treatment option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published up to March 2021. The search was restricted to English-language articles. Results: Current evidence from the literature consistently demonstrated the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of 177Lu-PSMA RLT in mCRPC. However, current data rely predominantly on retrospective analyses, showing heterogeneity of patient population and treatment protocols. More recently, results from the first randomized phase II study (TheraP) demonstrated that 177Lu-PMSA therapy significantly improved prostate-specific antigen response rate (66% vs 37%) and had fewer grade 3/4 adverse events when compared to cabazitaxel in patients with docetaxel-pretreated, progressive mCRPC. This review is intended to provide an updated overview of treatment protocols and responses, toxicity profile, and survival effects of 177Lu-PSMA RLT. Conclusions: 177Lu-PSMA RLT has emerged as a promising targeted treatment in mCRPC. It is currently applied in compassionate use programs and following exhaustion of approved therapies. Crucial for establishing this treatment in routine clinical management will be the results of the phase III VISION trial, which may confirm the encouraging patient outcomes reported to date.

TPS754 Background: Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare type of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma with an aggressive course and poor prognosis. The treatment of metastatic disease remains unsatisfactory as no standard-of-care has been established yet. The gap in the clinical management is certainly linked to the poor molecular characterization. To date, a comprehensive biological characterization of CDC and the identification of predictive biomarker is still lacking. Our previous studies proved that CDC is a molecularly heterogeneous disease composed of at least two subtypes distinguished by cell signalling, metabolic and immune-related alterations and featured by a prognostic signature associating T cell immunity and angiogenesis with good clinical outcome and sensitivity to cabozantinib (Gargiuli et al, Cancers 2021 Jun 10;13(12):2903; Todoerti et al, J Clin Oncol 40, no. 16_suppl (June 01, 2022) e16507-e16507; Verzoni et al, Ann Oncol 33:S1218-S121). The aim of CICERONE trial is to change the paradigm of CDC management providing therapies in a biologically informed manner starting from our previous findings. Methods: First, we will define a molecular taxonomy of CDC through comprehensive transcriptomic profiling of 100 CDC samples retrospectively collected within 12 months from the Italian Group of Uropathology Network and the European Union Hub Center. Pathologic review by genitourinary pathologist was required. RNA-Seq will be performed. Results will be merged to that already obtained by the same methodology from the BONSAI dataset (NCT03354884) and evaluated by unsupervised clustering analysis. We will identify differentially expressed genes and pathways. The immune and angiogenic signatures will be searched validating our preliminary results to identify predictive signatures for the subsequent prospective phase II trial. RNA-seq data will be also explored to detect fusion transcripts, as potential source of novel CDC oncogenic drivers, and study immune tumor content through Cybersort deconvolution. RT-qPCR on RNA derived from tumor and normal tissue will be performed to determine tumor specific origin of the fusion transcripts. Immune infiltrate will be also characterized by IHC, together with PDL-1 scoring. Subsequently we will conduct a prospective phase II trial in order to optimize treatment choice and validate prospectively the biological data. In this phase, previously untreated patients with metastatic CDC will be treated according to baseline tumor signature. Moreover, we will assess whether a new concept of immune liquid biopsy that includes the assessment of immunosuppressive vs antitumor immune cells may represent an accessible and compliant tool to test systemic immunity and its implications in response to treatment. This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of health (RF-2019-12369602). Clinical trial information: NCT05372302 .

In prostate cancer , there has recently been an emerging interest in mutations in genes belonging to the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway and in the inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins.Mutations in the HRR genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and Ataxia-Telangiesctasia mutated (ATM), have been reported in prostate cancer, with different incidence in the localized and advanced settings. The PARP enzyme complex is involved in repair of DNA damage and its inhibition causes the accumulation of DNA mutations in HRR deficient cells. Several PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are under development, such as olaparib, talazoparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and veliparib. In metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), olaparib has been the most studied and its clinical efficacy has been validated in a phase III clinical trial. Rucaparib and niraparib have also shown promising results in the preliminary analyzes of two phase II trials, while talazoparib is currently under development.PARPi have become part of the treatment of mCRPC. Early results of combination therapy with PARPi and new hormonal therapy are promising and are supported by a strong biological rationale. Current results need to be validated in randomized phase III-controlled trials in order to translate the use of PARPi into real world practice.

Objectives Despite the initial clinical benefit, resistance to antiangiogenic therapies develops through the activation of alternative pathways. We measured plasma levels of circulating angiogenic factors to explore their predictive role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with pazopanib. Materials and methods mRCC patients receiving first-line pazopanib were prospectively enrolled. The levels of circulating interleuchine (IL)-6, IL-8, stromal derived factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), osteopontin, and E-selectin were quantified at baseline and every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD). Patients were dichotomized into "low" and "high" subgroups by a cutoff point defined by the respective median circulating angiogenic factor (CAF) value at baseline. Then, association with the objective response was determined. Changes in CAF levels between baseline and PD were also compared. Results Among 25 patients included in the final data set, 6 patients were still on treatment. As best response, 12 patients presented a partial response (48%), 9 showed stable disease, and 4 showed PD. The median follow-up was 31.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 14.8 months. Low baseline levels of IL-6, IL-8, HGF, and osteopontin were found to be significantly associated with objective response. In addition, patients with low baseline levels of HGF showed longer progression-free survival and overall survival, whereas patients with low baseline levels of IL-8 showed longer overall survival. Among patients experiencing PD, the median plasma levels of stromal derived factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A were significantly higher compared with the baseline (P=0.01; P=0.011). Conversely, the median levels of E-selectin were significantly lower compared with the baseline (P=0.017). Conclusion Changes in levels of selected CAFs were associated with response/resistance to pazopanib in mRCC patients.

BACKGROUND Cabozantinib improves survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after prior antiangiogenics. The best treatment at disease progression (PD) is unknown. Being also a AXL/MET inhibitor, involved in acquired resistance, we hypothesized a prolonged tumor growth control in patients continuing cabozantinib despite PD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This retrospective multicenter study enrolled patients receiving cabozantinib after the first line between 2014 and 2020. We compared patients maintaining cabozantinib after first PD due to clinical benefit and good tolerability with those who changed therapy. The postprogression survival (PPS) of both was our primary endpoint. RESULTS We analyzed 89 patients: 45 received cabozantinib beyond PD and 44 switched therapy. 40.4%, 31.5%, and 28.1% of patients received 1, 2, or >2 prior treatment, respectively. 84.3% were intermediate-poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database risk. Patients continuing cabozantinib showed a higher response rate to cabozantinib before PD (46.7% vs 25%, p = 0.03) and were more heavily pretreated. Continuing cabozantinib showed a significantly longer PPS compared with switching therapy (median PPS 16.9 vs 13.2 months, HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS We observed longer PPS in patients continuing cabozantinib beyond PD, suggesting that this could be an effective option.

Although immunotherapy has recently revolutionized standard of care in different cancer types, prostate cancer has generally failed to show dramatic responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. As in other tumors, the goal in prostate cancer is now to target treatments more precisely on patient’s individual characteristics through precision medicine. Defects in mismatch repair, mutations in the exonuclease domain of the DNA polymerase epsilon ( POLE), high tumor mutational burden and the presence of biallelic loss of CDK12 among others, are predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy. In the present review, we summarize the evolving landscape of immunotherapy in prostate cancer, including precision approaches and strategies to define classes of responsive patients and scale up resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

To give an updated overview on clinical aspects and survival effects of lutetium-177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published up to March 2021. The search was restricted to English-language articles.Current evidence from the literature consistently demonstrated the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of

Currently, conventional treatments for metastatic RCC (mRCC) include immune-based combination regimens and/or targeted therapies, the latter mainly acting on angiogenesis, a key element of the process of tumor growth and spread. Although these agents proved able to improve patients’ outcomes, drug resistance and disease progression are still experienced by a substantial number of VEGFR-TKIs-treated mRCC patients. Following the inhibition of the VEGF/VEGFRs axis, two strategies have emerged: either specifically targeting resistance pathways, at the same time continuing to inhibit angiogenesis, or using a completely different approach aimed at re-activating the immune system through the use of inhibitors of specific negative immune checkpoints. These two approaches, practically represented by the use of either cabozantinib or nivolumab, seem to remain a rational therapeutic approach also when first-line immune-based combinations are used. The objective of this study is to design a preferential therapeutic pathway for the second-line treatment of mRCC. The procedure applied in this project was a group discussion, based on the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method in a meeting session, aimed at defining the therapeutic choice for the second-line treatment of mRCC. The NGT process defined the most relevant parameters that, according to the interviewed panelists, clinicians should consider for the selection of the second-line therapy in the context of advanced renal cell carcinoma of mRCC. The algorithm developed for the treatment selection as a result of this process should thus be considered by clinicians as reference for therapy selection. Plain language summary The result of this paper was the definition of an algorithm intended to suggest a preferential therapeutic pathway considering both the outputs of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) process and the actual clinical practice and the experience of selected panelists. During the NGT process and the discussion phase, panelists defined the most important parameters to be included in the algorithm that are important for the treatment definition. Cabozantinib and nivolumab are identified as the most reasonable therapeutic options for patients progressing after first-line treatment and are the medication options included in the algorithm for therapy selection.

e16507 Background: The phase II BONSAI trial ( n = 25 ; NCT 03354884) met the primary endpoint demonstrating activity of cabozantinib in untreated metastatic collecting ducts carcinoma (mCDC), a rare and biologically poorly characterized disease. Here we report on molecular analyses of baseline tissue samples. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 18 mCDC patients enrolled in BONSAI were sequenced by TruSeq RNA Exome kit (Illumina). The data were mapped and quantified using STAR and htseq, respectively. Globaltest and edgeR packages in R were used to assess the correlation between transcriptional profiles and survival data. Nineteen samples underwent DNA Sequencing with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus (ThermoFisher Scientific). The reads were aligned to the human genome reference (hg19) and analyzed with Opencravat and IonReporter software. Germline variants were excluded based on 1000 Genomes, GnomAd and Exac databases, and Clinical annotation of somatic variants was performed using ClinVar. Results: The global expression levels of thirty-one genes have been found significantly associated with overall survival (OS). The natural grouping of the 18 tumor samples based on the 31-gene signature identified a main group of 11 cases, showing global higher expression levels in 22 out of the 31 genes. This group displayed overall a significant higher OS rate in comparison to the remaining 7 patients, carrying opposite expression trend and mostly undergoing to disease progression. The identified signature was enriched in biological processes like cell junction, cytoskeleton organization and methylation. FOS oncogene was among the 9 genes negatively associated to OS, showing common higher expression in the poorer survival rate group. Furthermore, a 22-gene signature was found significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS), involving mainly genes associated to cell cycle regulation or recognized as components of Golgi apparatus. Only three genes were globally up-regulated in the group of 9 patients characterized by shorter PFS. Finally, heterogeneous pattern of somatic mutations was identified in 19 tumor samples, with at least 8 genes recurrently affected in more than three patients. Notably, mutated genes were mostly involved in DNA repair and chromatin modification processes. Conclusions: Our findings for the first time define specific molecular signatures that differentiate therapy-specific outcomes in first-line mCDC, warranting further investigation of their involvement in the tumor biology. Clinical trial information: NCT 03354884.

IMPORTANCE: Metastatic collecting duct carcinoma (mCDC) is a rare type of non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ncRCC) with poor prognosis and no standard treatments. Despite retrospective series that have documented the benefit of cabozantinib in ncRCC, no prospective trials have evaluated this treatment in mCDC. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cabozantinib is an active treatment in patients with mCDC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The caBozantinib in cOllectiNg ductS Renal Cell cArcInoma (BONSAI) trial was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial carried out between January 2018 and November 2020 at a single academic center with data cut off in September 2021 on behalf of the the Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology (Meet-URO 2). Eligible patients had histologic diagnosis of centrally confirmed mCDC with measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). In total, 25 patients were screened. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received cabozantinib, 60 mg orally once daily, until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST, version 1.1. RESULTS: At data cut off, of 25 patients enrolled, 23 started treatment because 2 were excluded after failing the screening process at pathologic review. The median follow-up cannot be estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator. The median time to censoring was 11 months (95% CI, 0-22 months). Median (range) age was 66 (53-74) years. As best overall response, 3 patients presented stable disease, 1 patient achieved a complete response, and 7 a partial response. The ORR was 35% (95% CI, 16%-57%). The median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI, 3-13 months). The median OS was 7 months (95% CI, 3-31 months). All patients reported at least 1 grade (G) 1 to 2 adverse event (AE). The most common G1 to G2 AEs were fatigue (14 [60%]), anorexia (9 [39%]), hand-foot syndrome (7 [30%]), hypothyroidism (7 [30%]), mucositis (7 [30%]), diarrhea (5 [22%]), and hypertension (3 [13%]). Six G3 AEs were reported: 2 arterial hyperthension, 1 pulmonary thromboembolism, 1 bleeding, and 2 fatigue. There were no permanent discontinuations from the study owing to AEs. Four patients (17%) required dose reduction to 40 mg, and 4 (17%) required a transitory interruption to manage toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The study met the ORR primary end point, showing encouraging efficacy of cabozantinib in untreated patients with mCDC. Further investigations to advance the molecular understanding of this tumor are ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03354884

Background: The RESORT trial showed no longer relapse free survival (RFS) with sorafenib following radical metastasectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We present the updated 42-month follow-...

The aim of this review is to sum up the state of the art of urachal carcinoma (UC) in order to easily guide clinicians. UC is a rare and aggressive disease with consequent few data about diagnosis and treatment. Dates are mainly based on retrospective trial and case reports with limited prospective trial. Clinical presentation is not specific, often with urinary symptoms. Diagnosis is mainly based on CT scan and MRI, useful to evaluate local invasion and nodal status and to detect the presence of distant metastases. Therefore, biopsy is needed to obtain histological confirmation. Surgery is the gold standard for localized disease, while different chemotherapy schemes have been used in metastatic setting. Novel findings based on mutational analysis of the tumor include the use of biological treatment, such as cetuximab, and immunotherapy, such as atezolizumab, with satisfactory responses, suggesting that personalized treatment could be the most suitable option for UC.

Background:This prospective, multicentre, observational INVIDIa-2 study is investigating the clinical efficacy of influenza vaccination in advanced-cancer patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), enrolled in 82 Italian centres, from October 2019 to January 2020. The primary endpoint was the incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) until 30 April 2020. All the ILI episodes, laboratory tests, complications, hospitalizations and pneumonitis were recorded. Therefore, the study prospectively recorded all the COVID-19 ILI events.Patients and methods:Patients were included in this non-prespecified COVID-19 analysis, if alive on 31 January 2020, when the Italian government declared the national emergency. The prevalence of confirmed COVID-19 cases was detected as ILI episode with laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2. Cases with clinical-radiological diagnosis of COVID-19 (COVID-like ILIs), were also reported.Results:Out of 1257 enrolled patients, 955 matched the inclusion criteria for this unplanned analysis. From 31 January to 30 April 2020, 66 patients had ILI: 9 of 955 cases were confirmed COVID-19 ILIs, with prevalence of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3–2.4], a hospitalization rate of 100% and a mortality rate of 77.8%. Including 5 COVID-like ILIs, the overall COVID-19 prevalence was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.5–3.1), with 100% hospitalization and 64% mortality. The presence of elderly, males and comorbidities was significantly higher among patients vaccinated against influenza versus unvaccinated ( p = 0.009, p Conclusion:COVID-19 has a meaningful clinical impact on the cancer-patient population receiving ICIs, with high prevalence, hospitalization and an alarming mortality rate among symptomatic cases. Influenza vaccination does not protect from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Background: During COVID pandemic, many cancer patients (pts) refused to come to hospital, suspending therapies, with ominous consequences. Based on positive (+) results of DOMONCOVID, our homecare project for COVID+ cancer pts, we created a new model of assistance, ONCOHOME, delivering cancer care at home to immune-compromised pts. We aim to provide data on feasibility, efficacy and costs of this innovative model. Methods: ONCOHOME is a multicenter project involving 3 Cancer Center (CC) of the North of Italy: National Cancer Institute, San Raffaele in Milan and Cremona CC. We created an organizational homecare model based on a medical and nursing team with a car equipped for home visits and a secretariat managing patient calls, with a dedicated phone number. The team administers cancer care at home and provides pts with the same assistance usually delivered in hospital. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment is performed. Results: From August 3rd 2020 to May 5th 2021, 79 cancer pts were assisted at home by Cremona team, receiving oral (62 pts), subcutaneous (10pts) or intravenous therapy (7 pts). All types of cancer were included. 77% of pts had a metastatic disease, 88% had a PS ECOG 0-1. Median duration of assistance was 126 days [range 2-270 days]. Most of the pts received oral chemotherapy (41pts). TKIs (25 pts), hormonal therapy (12 pts), supportive care with denosumab and zolendronic acid (5 pts ) and immunotherapy (1 patient, pt) were successfully administered at home, too. 13 pts required hospitalization due to clinical complications. In this group, only 2 pts were admitted to hospital due to severe toxicity;in particular, 1 pt treated with trifluridin/tipiracil developed febrile neutropenia and 1 pt treated with gefitinib reported Grade 3 diarrhea. Both pts were discharged and continued to be assisted at home. Conclusions: ONCOHOME showed that inpatient or outpatient cancer drug administration could be successfully replaced by home administration, for appropriate therapies and selected pts. This model is feasible at an affordable cost. The project is ongoing, planning to accrue other 100 pts for each center. ONCOHOME will be implemented with electronic devices for PRO evaluation, certified telemedicine service and non-invasive wearable smart tissue monitoring physiological parameters devices. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enters into target cells by exploiting the cellular transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) for spike protein cleavage. Male gender, age, obesity, diabetes, hypertension are some of the factors related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and mortality. Prostate cancer (PCa) patients (pts) are expected to be at higher risk for COVID-19 due to age and disease related comorbidities. TMPRSS2 transcription depends on androgens and androgen receptor and it is significantly downregulated by hormone therapies commonly used to treat PCa in different settings. Supposing that in PCa pts androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) could hamper SARS-CoV-2 cell entry, we aim to evaluate if the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the androgen responsive elements (AREs) in the TMPRSS2 promoter is associated to COVID-19 outcomes. Trial design: The present exploratory biological study is part of an ongoing retrospective-prospective multicenter cohort trial designed to verify whether PCa pts on ADT develop milder clinical presentation of COVID-19 than the general male population. The cohort trial collects real world data since February 2020 through regional databases that identified 200,000 potential pts to be enrolled to compare the clinical outcome of COVID-19 between PCa pts on active therapy (Study Group) and non-PCa pts (Control Group). Within the Study Group, we will compare the COVID-19 outcome between treatment subgroups: ADT alone, ADT plus antiandrogens, CYP17 inhibitors or chemotherapy. To identify SNPs in AREs of the TMPRSS2 gene and to describe possible associations with COVID-19 outcome, blood samples will be collected from 50 PCa pts treated at selected centers. Pts will participate voluntarily and sign an informed consent approved by local ethical committees. We will centrally perform PBMCs isolation and DNA extraction by using quiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit. SNPs will be evaluated with the Axiom™ Human Genotyping SARS-CoV-2 array. The effect of ADT will be corrected depending on identified SNPs and associated to COVID-19 outcome. The study is ongoing: we processed blood samples from 21 pts. Final results are awaited by the end of 2021. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Simple Summary Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ncRCC) make up a heterogeneous group subclassified into different subtypes that differ in genetic and biochemical characteristics from each other and from ccRCC. ncRCC are a rare finding in clinical practice, and no standard-of-care has yet been established. Treatment choices are in fact based on extrapolating results from clear cell RCC trials, retrospective data, or case reports. The aim of this review is to supplyt precise recommendations for each histological type focusing on pathogenetic mechanisms of nc-RCC, summarizing the therapeutic strategies adopted over the last few decades, and exploring the emerging role of immunotherapy and new targeted drugs as future potential treatment options. Abstract Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) comprise several rare and poorly described diseases, often characterized by bad prognosis and with no standard treatments available. The gap in their clinical management is linked to the poor molecular characterization in handling the treatment of non clear-cell RCC with untailored therapies. Due to their rarity, non-clear RCC are in fact under-represented in prospective randomized trials. Thus, treatment choices are based on extrapolating results from clear cell RCC trials, retrospective data, or case reports. Over the last two decades, various options have been considered as the mainstay for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC), including angiogenesis inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), as well as MET inhibitors and mammalian targeting of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. More recently, the therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with immunotherapy, alone or in combination with targeted agents that have been shown to significantly improve outcomes of mRCC patients, if compared to TKI single-agent. It has been widely proven that non-clear cell RCC is a morphologically and clinically distinct entity from its clear cell counterpart but more knowledge about its biology is certainly needed. Histology-specific collaborative trials are in fact now emerging to investigate different treatments for non-clear cell RCC. This review summarizes pathogenetic mechanisms of non-clear cell RCC, the evolution of treatment paradigms over the last few decades, with a focus on immunotherapy-based trials, and future potential treatment options.

4571 Background: Metastatic collecting ducts carcinoma (mCDC) is a rare disease with bad prognosis and no standard treatments. Due to its rarity, mCDC is biologically poorly characterized and under-represented in prospective randomized trials. We recently identified two different molecular subtypes of mCDC based on relative expression levels of angiogenesis, metabolic and immune-related genes. Methods: : This prospective, monocentric, phase II trial evaluated cabozantinib (cabo) 60 mg orally once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity in untreated mCDC patients (pts). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as the proportion of pts with best overall response of confirmed complete (CR) or partial responses (PR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and safety profile. Exploratory objectives were: to identify somatic mutations by targeted NGS-based sequencing; to define molecular subtypes, signatures and transcript fusions genes by RNA sequencing; to monitor circulating immune cells and study the immunological context of tumor cells. A central pathological review was mandatory. The study was based on a Simon’s two stage optimal design: at least 2 responses in 9 pts in the first stage were needed to proceed to the second stage where at least 6 responses in 14 additional pts were needed to prove activity of cabo. Results: From January 2018 to November 2020, 25 pts were enrolled, of whom 23 started treatment. Median age was 66 years, 19 pts were male. 19 (83%) pts received a previous nephrectomy. 9 pts presented with only one metastatic site, 8 pts with two, while the remaining part with multiple sites. The most common metastatic sites were lymphnodes and bone (15 and 13 pts respectively), followed by lung and liver (10 and 4 pts respectively). Median follow up was 8 months. As best overall response, 6 pts presented a stable disease (26%),1 pt achieved a confimed CR and 7 a PR for an ORR of 35%. Median PFS was 6 months. Treatment was feasible and well tolerated. All pts reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 adverse event (AE): the most common were fatigue (43%), hypotiroidism (28%), stomatitis (28%), anorexia (26%), Hand-Foot Syndrome (13%), hypertension (17%), and diarrhea (13%). 5 pts reported G3 AEs (2 thromboembolic events, 2 arterial hypertension, 1 fatigue), while no G4-5 AEs were reported. 17% of pts required dose reduction. DNA sequencing on CDC showed to be feasible, finding 256 mutations in 119 genes (missens mutations the majority). Altered genes, molecular subtypes and signatures will be associated to different outcomes and responses to cabo. Conclusions: The study met its primary endpoint showing promising efficacy and acceptable tolerability of cabo in mCDC pts. Mature results according to mutational profiles and gene signatures will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03354884.

4569 Background: For many years, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy (tp) has been a milestone for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Recently, first line tp based on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (IO-TKI) and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combos (IO-IO) significantly improved survival of mRCC patients (pts). Prospective data are lacking to determine the efficacy of anti-VEGF tp after IO-IO or IO-TKI. Cabozantinib (Cabo) showed to prolong survival in mRCC pts pre-treated with TKIs and to target kinases involved in immune-escape. So, it may represent an ideal agent to be used sequentially after ICIs. Methods: This is an open label, single arm, multicenter, phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of Cabo in mRCC pts who received an anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based adjuvant (adj) or first line tp. Cabo 60 mg/daily was administered until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) by Brookmeyer-Crowley test, secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Exploratory endopoints were to investigate tissue PD-L1 expression, to assess the modulating activity of Cabo on local and systemic tumor immunity and to explore bone formation and reabsorption markers. Results: From July 2018, 49 pts were enrolled and 48 were included in the analysis. Median age was 62.5 years (range: 30-78), 63% of pts were male. At baseline, 26% of pts had a good Heng risk score, 47% intermediate and 28% a poor risk, while in 2% of pts the class of risk was undetermined. 74% of pts received an IO-IO combo as first line tp, 17% IO-TKI, 9% pts an adj IO monotherapy. Pts received a median of 10 cycles of Cabo (range 5-17 cycles). 25 pts (53%) are still on tp, 1 patient discontinued Cabo for AEs, 13 pts for radiological PD, 6 pts discontinued for clinical PD or death, while 2 pts for reasons other than AEs or PD. Among evaluable cases, 17 pts (43%) achieved a partial response and 15 pts (37%) stable disease. Complete responses were not observed. At a median (m) follow-up of 8.0 months (mo) (4.4-13.5 mo), 71% of pts were alive and mPFS was 9.3 mo (95% CI 7.1-29.0 mo). Grade (G) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 34% of pts, including more frequently serum bilirubin increase, hypertension, calcium and sodium serum levels alterations and oral mucositis. G1-2 were observed in 61% of pts, including in most of cases diarrhoea, nausea, oral mucositis, disgeusia, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue and hypothyroidism. Due to AEs, transitory withholding of Cabo was observed in 53.5% of pts and for 23 pts (48%) dose reductions were needed. Conclusions: So far, Cabo tp after IO-IO or IO-TKI showed promising results and was well tolerated. Longer follow-up is needed for final OS and exploratory endpoints results. Clinical trial information: NCT03463681.

5052 Background: Enzalutamide is a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor that showed to prolong survival in different setting of prostate cancer. Visceral metastases, occurring in 10–30% of mCRPC pts, have been associated with poor outcomes. Given the poor prognosis, trial investigating hormone therapies often excluded men with visceral disease, especially in the pre-docetaxel setting. To date, there are no prospective studies designed ad hoc to test hormone therapies in this subgroup of pts. Methods: In this open label phase II multicentre study mCRPC pts with visceral metastases were treated with enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily as first or second line after docetaxel until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were eligible if they had documented measurable metastatic visceral disease (according to RECIST 1.1 criteria), including lesions in lung or liver or extraregional lymphnodes. Pts must have PSA progression or radiographic progression (according to PCWG2). Primary endpoint was to determine the clinical benefit, as measured by 3-months (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of pts with best overall response of confirmed complete (CR) or partial responses (PR) or stable disease as per RECIST 1.1 at mo 3. Secondary endpoints were safety, quality of life (assessed by EQ-5D-5L e FACT-P questionnaire), pain assessment (by BPI-SF questionnaire). Exploratory objectives were to assess the association between ARv7 splicing variants (in CTCs samples) and treatment response/resistance. For CTC and ARv7 detection, we used the Adna test Prostate Cancer Panel. Results: From March 2017 through January 2021, 68 pts were enrolled at 6 Italian centres. One pt never started treatment because of withdrawal of consent. Median age was 70 years (IQR 65- 78). All pts presented with visceral disease at baseline: 27, 6, 55 pts presented with lung, liver and lymphnodes lesions, respectively. 26 pts presented with only one metastatic site, 22 pts with two, while the remaining part with multiple sites. 15 pts received a previous treatment with docetaxel in the mCRPC phase. The median follow-up was 10 mo. The median time on treatment was 8 mo. At mo 3, 24 pts presented a stable disease, 1 pt achieved a confirmed CR and 20 pts a PR for a 3 mo-DCR of 67% (45/67). Discontinuations due to adverse-events, disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 6%, 7%, and 40% of pts, respectively. So far, only 26 patients were evaluated for baseline CTC and ARv7. Interestingly, 75% of patients experiencing a progression at month 3 were classified as ARv7 positive at baseline. Conclusions: The study met its primary endpoint showing enzalutamide is an active treatment option for men with mCRPC and visceral disease in both pre or post-docetaxel setting. CTCs status combined with ARv7 detection could be useful to personalize treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT03103724.

e16529 Background: Combining anti-VEGFR drugs with checkpoint inhibitors have shown synergistic effect in pts with UC. ARCADIA is a phase 2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of combination of CABO, a multikinase inhibitor, with the anti-PDL1 DURVA in pts with platinum-refractory advanced UC or variant histology (NCT03824691). Herein we report the preliminary results. Methods: Pts received CABO 40 mg daily, orally, in combination with DURVA 1500 mg, intravenously, every 28 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Key inclusion criteria were: ECOG-PS 0-1, UC or variant histology, failure of 1 or 2 platinum-based regimen for metastatic disease, non-measurable disease was permitted. Response was evaluated by RECIST criteria v.1.1 every 2 cycles by CT and 18FDG PET/CT scans. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS). Other endpoints included safety, objective response-rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS). PD-L1 expression was assessed by Ventana SP142 assay. Next-generation sequencing tests (FoundationOne) on pre-therapy tumor samples were performed. Results: From September 2019 to February 2021, 26 pts were enrolled with a median follow-up of 5 mo. Median age was 64 yrs (range 44-74), 69% were male, and 23% had ECOG PS 1. 8 pts presented variant histology. Five pts (19%) had received 2 prior systemic anticancer therapies. In pts evaluable for efficacy analyses, 3 (11.5%) complete responses (CR) and 6 (23.1%) partial responses (PR) were observed. The ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 57.7% respectively. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 17 pts (65%), including 2 (8%) grade 3 TRAEs, within the first 2 cycles. 7 pts (27%) discontinued CABO due to toxicity, no interruption of DURVA was observed. The most common AEs by any grade were transaminase increase (35.7%), asthenia (27%), diarrhea (27%), and hypertension (15%). Conclusions: Combination of CABO and DURVA demonstrated promising preliminary activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced UC and variant histology. More mature results according to biomarkers and histology will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03824691.

299 Background: Bone is one of the most common site of metastasis occurring in 30% of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts)3,4. Skeletal metastases from mRCC are usually osteolytic and associated to high rate of morbidity and complication through skeletal related events (SRE). Bone-targeted therapies (BTT) such as zolendronic acid (ZOL AC) and denosumab (Dmab), shown to decrease the time-to-first and subsequent SREs12. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but potentially serious adverse event associated with BTT. It occurs in 1-2% of pts treated with BTT and in 10-17% of mRCC pts treated with ZOL AC or Dmab. Vascular endothelial growth factor-Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKI) represent the backbone treatment for mRCC. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether the association of DMAB and ZOL AC to VEGF-TKITTagents could be associated to higher incidence of ONJ. Methods: We retrospectively collected data, from 2 Italian referring centers for mRCC, about 74 pts with bone metastases from mRCC who received, concurrently or sequentially to VEGF-TKI or immune-oncology (IO), AC ZOL and DMAB from January 2013 to January 2020. All pts provided informed consent for inclusion in the study. Results: All pts received VEGF-TKI as first line treatment. 17 pts received AC ZOL whereas 57 received DMAB. All pts received odontological consultation and orthopantomography before start BTT. The median time of Dmab and AC ZOL exposure was 11.6 months. ONJ occurred in 10/74 pts (7.4%): 6/10 pts were on first line treatment and 4/10 on second line. Treatments administered at the time of ONJ diagnosis were nivolumab (1/10), cabozantinib (2/10), sorafenib (1/10), sorafenib (1/10), sunitinib (4/10) and one pts was off therapy. Conclusions: In this real-life Italian population, treatment with BTT in mRCC pts treated with VEGF-TKI inhibitors and IO is associated to higher incidence of ONJ compared to previous report of pts treated with BTT for bone metastasis and lower compared to previous reports in mRCC. Despite the retrospective collection, we provided one of the largest sample of pts treated concurrently with VEGF-TKI or IO and BTT. Physicians should be careful in the use of BTT combined with other treatments in mRCC pts.

326 Background: Antiangiogenic therapy has been a milestone in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for years. The positive results with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are changing the frontline standard of care of mRCC patients (pts). To date, prospective data are lacking to determine the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in pts progressed to ICI. The multikinase inhibitor Cabozantinib (cabo) has shown prolonged survival in pre-treated mRCC pts. Moreover, by targeting multiple pathways and crucial kinases involved in microenvironment-driven immune-escape, it may represent an ideal agent to be used sequentially after ICI. Methods: This is the first prospective open label, single arm, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Cabo in pts with mRCC pre-treated with adjuvant or first line PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy (as monotherapy or in combination with an TKI or anti CTLA-4). Cabo 60 mg once daily was administered until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Among 23 patients enrolled, 22 were included in the analysis (one was excluded for screening failure). Median age was 59.5 years (range: 29-74), 69.5% were male. At baseline, Karnofsky performance status was 100 in 59% of pts, 80-90 in 31.8% and 70-80 in 9%. 22.7% of pts had a good Heng score, 50% intermediate and 27.2% poor. Median duration of the previous therapy with anti PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 compounds was 4.3 months. Pts received an average of 4.7 months of Cabo. Among evaluable cases, 6 pts (27.2%) achieved a partial response and 5 pts (22.7%) stable disease. The median follow-up was 7.2 months and the median PFS was 7.2 months. 2 pts discontinued treatment for toxicity, 8 pts for PD, 1 patient discontinued treatment for different reason than PD, 11 pts are still on treatment. Grade (G) 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22.7% of pts; the most common AEs were hand and foot syndrome (HFS) (G1 in 36.3% of pts, G2 18.1%, G3 4.5%), diarrhea (G1 31.8%, G2 18.1%), hypothyroidism (G1 9.09 %, G2 22.7 %), mucositis (G1 36.3%, G2 4,5%), and fatigue (G1 18.1%, G2 18.1%). Transitory withholding of cabo was observed in 63.6% of pts (14/22) and it was due to AEs in the 90% of the cases. For 5/22 pts (22.7 %), dose reduction was needed to manage AEs. The most common AEs leading to temporary drug interruption were HFS G1-3 (13.9%), liver disfunction G1-G2 (13.9%), diarrhea G1-G2 (11.6%), nausea and vomiting G2 (11.6 %) and fatigue G2 (9.3%). Conclusions: So far, the treatment with cabo after a I line anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy resulted active and well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT03463681 .

Despite advances in metastatic prostate cancer therapy, expected survival for patients in the castration-resistant phase of disease is poor. Immune-checkpoints inhibitors significantly prolonged life expectancy in some solid tumors and have been evaluated also in advanced stage prostate cancer. The majority of data available derive from preliminary phase I and II trials evaluating CTLA-4 and PD-1 as monotherapy or in combination with each other, vaccines, radiotherapy or targeted/hormonal therapy, achieving only limited benefits in terms of biochemical and radiologic responses. There are many reasons that may explain why prostate cancer responds poorly to modern immunotherapies, such as its characteristic low tumor mutational burden or immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment. The present review summarizes the results obtained treating advanced prostate cancer patients with immune-checkpoints inhibitors and analyzes potential mechanisms of both resistance and sensitivity, in order to hypothesize possible avenues of special interest for future research.

The frontline treatment options for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are evolving rapidly since the approval of combination immunotherapies by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). In particular, in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the outcome of patients with mRCC compared to TKI monotherapy. Here, we review the preclinical data supporting the combination of ICIs with VEGFR TKIs. The VEGF-signaling inhibition could ideally sustain immunotherapy through a positive modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Antiangiogenetics, in fact, with their inhibitory activity on myelopoiesis that indirectly reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells’ (Tregs) frequency and function, could have a role in determining an effective anti-tumor immune response. These findings are relevant for the challenges posed to clinicians concerning the clinical impact on treatment strategies for mRCC.

714 Background: Collecting duct carcinoma is a rare, highly aggressive and molecularly uncharacterized kidney disease with poor outcome. To date, no standard therapies are available and treatment choice is based on retrospective data. Identifying molecular features of this tumor could provide a biologic rationale for novel targeted systemic therapies. Methods: Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of 6 CDCs, 5 clear cell renal carcinomas (ccRCCs) and 4 adjacent normal tissues. Samples were profiled by GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (Affymetrix) and constituted the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT) dataset. Data were pre-processed using the robust multi-array average method and differentially expressed genes were identified according to the limma pipeline. Genes with a false discovery rate < 0.25 were selected. Pathway analysis was performed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), single sample (ss) GSEA, DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 and Pathfinder Bioconductor package. Moreover, a list of genes representing angiogenesis and immune biology, previously used in the IMmotion150 study, was chosen to explore further functional subcategories of CDC. Available RNA-Seq data of 7 CDCs and 5 matched normal tissue from GSE89122 dataset were used for validation. Results: Comparison of transcriptome profiles of CDCs and ccRCCs versus normal tissue led to the identification of a core of 14 genes specifically up-regulated in CDC, 5 of which (SFN, S100A11, CKAP5, CDH1 and CD44) were significantly involved in extracellular matrix organization. Other deregulated genes were related to immune system, cell cycle progression, glucose and pentose phosphate metabolism and EGFR-signaling. In addition, ssGSEA permitted to identify two major distinct biological subgroups in CDC of both INT and GSE89122 datasets, based on relative expression levels of angiogenesis and immune genes. Conclusions: Our study reveals novel insights into the biology and heterogeneity of CDCs. Although further validation using larger samples is needed, the current findings suggest that this heterogeneity could have clinical implications for the treatment of patients with this rare kidney cancer.

Granulosa cell tumors (GCT) of the ovary represent less than 5% of malignant ovarian tumors. Primary treatment of GCT is surgery. GCT present indolent growth and also tend to relapse many years after diagnosis. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy are of little benefit. We report a case of a 60-year-old woman with a heavily pretreated recurrent, c-kit positive, GCT of the ovary who underwent an experimental therapy with imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Imatinib (400 mg/day during the first 2 months; 800 mg/day after) was given, without notable side-effects. Monthly positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan evaluations were performed revealing a marked reduction of disease after 6 months of treatment. To our knowledge this is the first case of highly recurrent and unresponsive GCT of the ovary responding to imatinib. Further studies evaluating this drug in recurrent and/or aggressive GCT are warranted.

Study Type – Therapy (retrospective cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Various targeted agents with differing mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles have now been approved for the treatment of advanced RCC. However, the optimal use of these agents remains a challenge. Since the approval of sorafenib and sunitinib, many patients have been treated with these two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in sequence, with current evidence suggesting that this approach is associated with continued clinical benefit, with limited or no cross-resistance between the two agents. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, has been shown to be as effective after two TKIs as it is after one TKI, emphasizing the importance of understanding the optimal TKI sequence before switching to an mTOR inhibitor, to provide patients with the longest progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. This retrospective analysis of 189 patients treated sequentially with sorafenib (800 mg/day) and sunitinib (50 mg/day; 4 weeks on 2 weeks off) showed that initial therapy with either agent was associated with similar PFS benefits (median PFS 8.4 months [sorafenib] vs 7.8 months [sunitinib]; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.78–1.40; P = 0.758). However, patients treated with sorafenib followed by sunitinib (SoSu) appeared to derive a greater PFS benefit than those treated with SuSo (median PFS with second TKI: 7.9 months [SoSu] vs 4.2 months [SuSo]; HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39–0.74; P

OBJECTIVE • To assess the efficacy of ketoconazole in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS • From April 2008 to November 2009, 37 patients with CRPC have been treated with ketoconazole. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety profile. • Ketoconazole was administered by oral route at a dose of 200 mg every 8 h continuous dosing until the onset of serious adverse events or disease progression. • The study was based on a two-step design with an interim efficacy analysis carried out on the first 12 patients accrued. RESULTS • Main characteristics of population were: median age 75 years (range 60-88); baseline mean PSA 28.8 ng/mL (4.3-1000); 30 patients previously challenged with at least two lines of hormone therapy; 15 patients previously treated with chemotherapy. • Biochemical responses accounted for: two complete responses (5%), six partial responses (16%), 13 patients with stable disease (35%), and 14 with progressive disease (38%). Of 15 patients resistant to chemotherapy, overall disease control (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease) was recorded in seven of them. • Treatment was feasible without inducing grade 3-4 adverse events. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were asthenia (27%), vomiting (8%) and abdominal pain (8%). CONCLUSION • Treatment with low-dose ketoconazole is feasible and well tolerated. The efficacy was satisfactory in patients previously treated with chemotherapy.

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a group of neoplasias characterized by significant histopathological and biological heterogeneity. Diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours relies upon histological examination augmented by newer techniques, such as pet-dotatoc scan. Surgery represents the only curative therapeutic approach. In advanced unresectable disease, medical treatment is the best choice. Somatostatin analogues allow adequate control of the carcinoid syndrome with a low effect on tumour cell growth. Chemotherapy has a good activity only in poor prognosis patients. According to the clinical course of the disease, a multimodal approach could be evaluated in selected cases. New target therapy including multikinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibody and m-tor inhibitors is now under clinical investigation for the treatment of advanced NETs. Preliminary results demonstrated a good activity in terms of disease control rate and tumour shrinkage.

Targeted therapies have improved survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC); however, expert opinion on the optimal therapeutic strategy is divided. This retrospective study evaluates different sequential schemes of targeted therapies in 310 patients with advanced/metastatic RCC who received different systemic agents - sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, everolimus, temsirolimus and axitinib - alone or in different sequences, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (median follow-up: 37 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months and the 5-year OS was 23.4%; differential therapeutic schemes were not associated with differences in OS. A worse performance status, no nephrectomy and a poor-risk classification according to the Motzer criteria was associated with a shorter OS. These findings support the use of targeted therapies in the treatment of RCC, even in a large unselected population from a single institution, and suggest that treatment should be tailored to meet individual circumstances and needs.

•To conduct a retrospective, multicentre, cohort analysis to assess the sequential use of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and sunitinib.•Records of 189 patients with renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) who were treated with sorafenib and sunitinib sequentially between March 2004 and April 2009 at 12 Italian study centres were analysed. •Patients were treated under European Expanded Access Programmes or, following market approval, in general clinical practice. •Interventions were sorafenib (800 mg/day) and sunitinib (50 mg every day; 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off). •Progression-free survival (PFS) during treatment with the first and second TKI was evaluated.•In all, 99 patients were treated with sunitinib followed by sorafenib (SuSo) and 90 were treated with sorafenib followed by sunitinib (SoSu); 104 (55%) patients had received prior systemic therapy, mostly with cytokines. •The median (range) PFS on the first TKI was similar between treatment groups [sorafenib 8.4 (1.1-28.9) months; sunitinib 7.8 (0.5-30.4) months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.40, P=0.758]. Multivariate analysis showed that good Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center status was associated with increased PFS. •After the second TKI, patients in the SoSu group had a longer median PFS than those in the SuSo group (7.9 months vs 4.2 months, respectively; HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.74, P0.001). •Multivariate analysis showed only treatment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (and not age, gender, study centre or previous treatment) were significantly associated with duration of PFS.•Our findings suggest a limited cross-resistance between sorafenib and sunitinib and that the sequence SoSu may result in a longer combined PFS than SuSo. This is the largest retrospective study to date, though its findings are limited in part by the retrospective nature.

• To assess the efficacy of ketoconazole in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).• From April 2008 to November 2009, 37 patients with CRPC have been treated with ketoconazole. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety profile. • Ketoconazole was administered by oral route at a dose of 200 mg every 8 h continuous dosing until the onset of serious adverse events or disease progression. • The study was based on a two-step design with an interim efficacy analysis carried out on the first 12 patients accrued.• Main characteristics of population were: median age 75 years (range 60-88); baseline mean PSA 28.8 ng/mL (4.3-1000); 30 patients previously challenged with at least two lines of hormone therapy; 15 patients previously treated with chemotherapy. • Biochemical responses accounted for: two complete responses (5%), six partial responses (16%), 13 patients with stable disease (35%), and 14 with progressive disease (38%). Of 15 patients resistant to chemotherapy, overall disease control (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease) was recorded in seven of them. • Treatment was feasible without inducing grade 3-4 adverse events. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were asthenia (27%), vomiting (8%) and abdominal pain (8%).• Treatment with low-dose ketoconazole is feasible and well tolerated. The efficacy was satisfactory in patients previously treated with chemotherapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide with approximately 500,000 new cases per year, ranking as the third cause of cancer deaths. Until the very recent past no systemic therapy was available for patients with advanced HCC. However, advances achieved in the understanding of the molecular cancer biology and the subsequent introduction of molecularly targeted agents have disclosed promising and interesting possibilities for the treatment of this highly vascularized tumor in which the inhibition of angiogenesis is likely to represent the main potential therapeutic target. In this regard, sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor endowed with significant activity against several tyrosine-kinase receptors involved in blood vessel development, has shown to be very active in the treatment of advanced HCC. This review makes a survey of pharmacology, mode of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical value and safety of sorafenib when employed in the treatment of advanced HCC.

Background: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety in unresectable or advanced renal carcinoma treated with sorafenib, in a situation closely similar to the everyday medical practice. Patients and Methods: One hundred and thirty-six patients have been treated with 400 mg b.i.d. of sorafenib administered orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. They were either previously untreated or relapsed after one or more previous treatments with systemic therapy. Most of them had clear cell renal carcinoma (RCC), but other histological types such as papillary, chromophobe, Bellini ducts, sarcomatoid and mixed forms were also represented. Results: Overall disease control of 70.6% was achieved with 7.9% of partial remissions. Response was observed in the majority of patients with RCC, but also in some patients with non-clear cell RCC. Safety was acceptable, with the most common adverse events consisting of hand-foot skin reaction, cutaneous rash, diarrhoea, fatigue and hypertension. Conclusions: The results confirm previous ones reported in the literature concerning the efficacy and the safety of sorafenib as second-line treatment in patients with RCC. In addition, they disclose the hypothesis that sorafenib could be effective also in patients who underwent multiple previous treatments and in those with histology different from clear cells.