Search

The article discusses a unit-based, structured, interdisciplinary leader rounding team meant to improve the patient experience and help hospitals avoid monetary issues as of January 2025. Topics covered include the problem of nurse communication, and the process of leaders' self-introduction and stating of their visit's purpose to the patient, and their discussion on the patient's perception of nurse communication. Also noted is the theme of patients' lack of information on the plan of care.

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the concepts of value-based medicine (VBM) and value-based laboratory medicine (VBLM) are receiving increasing interest to improve the quality, sustainability and safety of healthcare. Laboratory medicine is well positioned to support the transition to value-based healthcare as it helps to improve clinical outcomes and healthcare sustainability by reducing the time to diagnosis, improving diagnostic accuracy, providing effective guidance for tailored therapies and monitoring, and supporting screening and wellness care. However, the perception of the value of laboratory medicine is still limited, to the extent that it has been defined a "profession without a face", often lacking visibility to patients and the public. In addition, in recent decades, clinical laboratories have sought to improve the ration between outcomes and costs by increasing efficiency and reducing the cost per test rather than improving clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to propose a 10-point manifesto for implementing value-based laboratory medicine in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to offer a comprehensive overview and explore the associated outcomes from imaging referral guidelines on various key stakeholders, such as patients and radiologists. Materials and methods: An electronic database search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to retrieve citations published between 2013 and 2023. The search was constructed using medical subject headings and keywords. Only full-text articles and reviews written in English were included. The quality of the included papers was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken for the selected articles. Results: The search yielded 4384 records. Following the abstract, full-text screening, and removal of duplication, 31 studies of varying levels of quality were included in the final analysis. Imaging referral guidelines from the American College of Radiology were most commonly used. Clinical decision support systems were the most evaluated mode of intervention, either integrated or standalone. Interventions showed reduced patient radiation doses and waiting times for imaging. There was a general reduction in radiology workload and utilisation of diagnostic imaging. Low-value imaging utilisation decreased with an increase in the appropriateness of imaging referrals and ratings and cost savings. Clinical effectiveness was maintained during the intervention period without notable adverse consequences. Conclusion: Using evidence-based imaging referral guidelines improves the quality of healthcare and outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. Imaging referral guidelines are one essential component of improving the value of radiology in the healthcare system. Clinical relevance statement: There is a need for broader dissemination of imaging referral guidelines to healthcare providers globally in tandem with the harmonisation of the application of these guidelines to improve the overall value of radiology within the healthcare system. Key Points: The application of imaging referral guidelines has an impact and effect on patients, radiologists, and health policymakers. The adoption of imaging referral guidelines in clinical practice can impact healthcare costs and improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Implementing imaging referral guidelines contributes to the attainment of value-based radiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study is to develop a method we call "cost mining" to unravel cost variation and identify cost drivers by modelling integrated patient pathways from primary care to the palliative care setting. This approach fills an urgent need to quantify financial strains on healthcare systems, particularly for colorectal cancer, which is the most expensive cancer in Australia, and the second most expensive cancer globally. Methods: We developed and published a customized algorithm that dynamically estimates and visualizes the mean, minimum, and total costs of care at the patient level, by aggregating activity-based healthcare system costs (e.g. DRGs) across integrated pathways. This extends traditional process mining approaches by making the resulting process maps actionable and informative and by displaying cost estimates. We demonstrate the method by constructing a unique dataset of colorectal cancer pathways in Victoria, Australia, using records of primary care, diagnosis, hospital admission and chemotherapy, medication, health system costs, and life events to create integrated colorectal cancer patient pathways from 2012 to 2020. Results: Cost mining with the algorithm enabled exploration of costly integrated pathways, i.e. drilling down in high-cost pathways to discover cost drivers, for 4246 cases covering approx. 4 million care activities. Per-patient CRC pathway costs ranged from $10,379 AUD to $41,643 AUD, and varied significantly per cancer stage such that e.g. chemotherapy costs in one cancer stage are different to the same chemotherapy regimen in a different stage. Admitted episodes were most costly, representing 93.34% or $56.6 M AUD of the total healthcare system costs covered in the sample. Conclusions: Cost mining can supplement other health economic methods by providing contextual, sequence and timing-related information depicting how patients flow through complex care pathways. This approach can also facilitate health economic studies informing decision-makers on where to target care improvement or to evaluate the consequences of new treatments or care delivery interventions. Through this study we provide an approach for hospitals and policymakers to leverage their health data infrastructure and to enable real time patient level cost mining. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background/Objectives: In the framework of the ValueCare project (funded by EC, ref 875215), the Valencia pilot site assessed the comprehensive health of 240 older people with frailty. ValueCare aims to deliver personalised integrated health and social care and better outcomes for older people. Methods: For the health evaluation, a comprehensive approach was adopted, based on validated questionnaires that address not only mental and physical health but also other key dimensions in older people's well-being, namely unwanted loneliness and nutrition. Results: This study provides an overview of the overall health status of 60-year-old people from March to December 2022 in the city of Valencia, allowing for a comparison between national and European health indicators. Conclusions: Older people in the city of Valencia reported good health, quality of life, independency, nutrition and social wellbeing, with some differences between gender. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Despite the unparalleled importance of value within healthcare, value-based models remain underutilised in the procurement of medical devices. Research is needed to understand what factors incentivise standard, low-priced device purchasing as opposed to value-adding devices with potentially higher overall health outcomes. Framed in agency theory, we examine the conditions under which different actors involved in purchasing decisions select premium-priced, value-adding medical devices over low-priced, standard medical devices. Design/methodology/approach: We conducted 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects scenario-based vignette experiments on three UK-based online samples of managers (n = 599), medical professionals (n = 279) and purchasing managers (n = 449) with subjects randomly assigned to three treatments: (1) cost-saving incentives, (2) risk-sharing contracts and (3) stronger (versus weaker) clinical evidence. Findings: Our analysis demonstrates the harmful effects of intra-organisational cost-saving incentives on value-based purchasing (VBP) adoption; the positive impact of inter-organisational risk-sharing contracts, especially when medical professionals are involved in decision-making; and the challenge of leveraging clinical evidence to support value claims. Research limitations/implications: Our results demonstrate the need to align incentives in a context with multiple intra- and inter-organisational agency relationships at play, as well as the difficulty of reducing information asymmetry when information is not easily interpretable to all decision-makers. Overall, the intra-organisational agency factors strongly influenced the choices for the inter-organisational agency relationship. Originality/value: We contribute to VBP in healthcare by examining the role of intra- and inter-organisational agency relationships and incentives concerning VBP (non-) adoption. We also examine how the impact of such mechanisms differs between medical and purchasing (management) professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The growing need for collaborative healthcare teams to meet complex health challenges has led to physical therapists (PTs) being embedded in adult primary care settings for many years now. However, this model of care has not been found in pediatrics. This qualitative study sought to gain insights from pediatricians on the potential of embedding pediatric PTs in primary care. Participants were nine pediatricians practicing in both urban and rural, hospital-based and private settings. Semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via thematic analysis per published methods, assuring trustworthiness. Three overarching themes emerged: pediatricians' priorities aligned with the Quadruple Aim of Healthcare, embedded PTs could fill multiple roles in pediatrics, and they could see a wide variety of patients, highlighting real potential benefits in primary care. Participants endorsed in-office focused treatments, screening to determine optimal care pathways, and ongoing patient follow-up as potential PT roles in this setting. Providers thought that PTs could help manage care for musculoskeletal complaints, high-risk infants, medically complex children, autism, and obesity. An advanced-trained PT having attributes of confidence, adaptability, and open-mindedness was desired. All participants endorsed pediatric primary care PTs as having potentially high value in their practice. This is the first known study on the potential of embedding a PT in the pediatric primary care setting, offering valuable insights from pediatricians to be leveraged in implementation planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly collected in melanoma research. However, they are not used to guide immediate clinical care in Australia. This study explored the views and experiences of patients with Stage III melanoma and clinic staff during implementation of an electronic Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures in melanoma (ePROMs‐MEL) pilot to assess distress and quality of life. Methods: A prospective mixed‐methods study in specialist melanoma clinics in Sydney, Australia between May 2021 and February 2023. Forty‐two post‐ePROMs implementation surveys and 17 semi‐structured interviews were undertaken among patients and staff (including oncologists, melanoma nurses and clinic managers). Survey responses were tabulated using Likert scales and interview transcripts analysed thematically. Results: Of the 31 patient survey responses, over 90% reported ePROMs were easy to complete and measured important components of their health and wellbeing. Of the 11 staff surveys, over 50% reported ePROMs to be useful when allied health referrals were accessible but found implementation disruptive to clinic workflows. Six themes about ePROMs in clinical care emerged during data analysis: (1) promoting self‐reflection; (2) conversation‐starters; (3) timing and setting; (4) fit for purpose questionnaires; (5) resource issues; (6) value and limitations of ePROMs. Conclusion: Patients overwhelmingly supported the real‐time collection of ePROMs for their immediate care. In contrast, staff support was conditional on resources to maximise clinical care efficiency and minimise administrative burden. Trial Registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12620001149954.aspx. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic became one of the main means for patients to access the health care system. Rules, regulations, and reimbursement policies were loosened, allowing for its expansion into the clinical arena. Since the end of the pandemic, virtual care models have expanded. With a larger emphasis on value-based care, there is a need to understand how telehealth can be utilized to increase value, improve access, enhance the patient experience, improve outcomes, and decrease health inequalities. The article explores the use of telehealth as it relates to a value-based care model, which includes the patient experience, quality of care (access and health equity), provider/clinical practice, and health system/financial. Recommendations for strengthening the use of telehealth to ensure value-based care are provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article emphasizes the critical relationship between patient safety and healthcare quality, advocating for their integration to achieve optimal care. Topics include the six dimensions of healthcare quality, the challenges of balancing safety with other quality aspects, and the importance of collaborative efforts and specialized expertise to address persistent safety issues.

This paper explores personal and professional development (PPD) as a key learning domain for the future of medical education and person-centered care. Guided by existing curriculum development models and lessons learned in practice, scenarios from academic and clinical learning environments will guide a theory-driven discussion of concepts and competencies that humanize the practice of medicine, such as emotional intelligence, professional identity formation, lifelong learning and inclusive practice. Factors contributing to contemporary curriculum implementation will be informed by a case study of a PPD program delivered to post-graduate medical students in Australia and propose an action-focused series of next steps to connect past, current and future directions for medical schools and graduates. Through reflections on iterative stages of program development and the incorporation of emerging concepts in PPD, this paper advocates for the true valuing of personal growth and professional development in medical education. If future doctors are to graduate as compassionate, socially informed, and critically reflective practitioners, they need dedicated PPD learning, opportunities to practice and active encouragement to remain curious towards and beyond their own experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Engaging patients with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a widely recognized and pressing challenge, yet our understanding of how to achieve this is limited. This study investigated strategies implemented by a Dutch university hospital aimed at enhancing response rates among outpatients from nearly 70 subdepartments. Response rates improved, but remained below desired levels. To deepen understanding and inform future strategies, we identified patient and consultation characteristics associated with response behavior. We investigated strategies and their underlying rationales through a document analysis of internal hospital documentation (2020-2023) using the COM-B model. We exploited electronic health record data to identify patient and consultation characteristics associated with PROMs completion, estimating a multivariate logistic regression model (n = 46 468 outpatient consultations). Thirteen strategies targeted outpatients' capability, opportunity, and motivation to complete PROMs. In 2023, PROMs were completed in more than half of the 46 468 unique consultations (56%) for which a PROM was sent. Challenges persisted in establishing effective feedback mechanisms and accommodating non-Dutch-speaking patients. The multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher response among patients of high or middle socioeconomic status and those with an in-person consultation, ie, not using telehealth. Women, patients attending a follow-up visit, or those having their consultation on a Friday were slightly less likely to complete PROMs. Response rates to PROMs improved but remained below desired levels, despite multiple strategies. Hospitals may benefit from effective patient feedback on PROMs and tailoring strategies to engage specific patient groups. These approaches can enhance successful implementation and promote equity in value-based healthcare. • Achieving high response rates to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a widely recognized and pressing challenge, yet understanding of how to accomplish this is limited. A leading Dutch university hospital aimed to enhance response rates by targeting patients' capability, opportunity, and motivation. • Response rates were higher among patients of high or middle socioeconomic status and those with an in-person consultation, ie, not using telehealth. Women and patients attending a follow-up visit were slightly less likely to complete PROMs. • Hospitals may benefit from establishing patient feedback mechanisms for PROMs and tailoring strategies to engage specific patient groups, thereby promoting equity in value-based healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim and Objectives: To provide an in‐depth insight into the barriers, facilitators and needs of district nurses and nurse assistants on using patient outcomes in district nursing care. Background: As healthcare demands grow, particularly in district nursing, there is a significant need to understand how to systematically measure and improve patient outcomes in this setting. Further investigation is needed to identify the barriers and facilitators for effective implementation. Design: A multi‐method qualitative study. Methods: Open‐ended questions of a survey study (N = 132) were supplemented with in‐depth online focus group interviews involving district nurses and nurse assistants (N = 26) in the Netherlands. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Different barriers, facilitators and needs were identified and compiled into 16 preconditions for using outcomes in district nursing care. These preconditions were summarised into six overarching themes: follow the steps of a learning healthcare system; provide patient‐centred care; promote the professional's autonomy, attitude, knowledge and skills; enhance shared responsibility and collaborations within and outside organisational boundaries; prioritise and invest in the use of outcomes; and boost the unity and appreciation for district nursing care. Conclusions: The preconditions identified in this study are crucial for nurses, care providers, policymakers and payers in implementing the use of patient outcomes in district nursing practice. Further exploration of appropriate strategies is necessary for a successful implementation. Relevance to clinical practice: This study represents a significant step towards implementing the use of patient outcomes in district nursing care. While most research has focused on hospitals and general practitioner settings, this study focuses on the needs for district nursing care. By identifying 16 key preconditions across themes such as patient‐centred care, professional autonomy and unity, the findings offer valuable guidance for integrating a learning healthcare system that prioritises the measurement and continuous improvement of patient outcomes in district nursing. Reporting Method: Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Patient of Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Addressing Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in health care is a multidimensional challenge. From a US perspective, the third‐party payment system has disempowered and depersonalized health‐care delivery. The net result is wasteful and inefficient use of human and financial resources, burnout among providers, as well as care inequities. Financial integration at the point of patient care is essential to aligning the needs of patients with advances in medical technology. Complexity theory offers valuable insights into the roles of government, intermediaries and patients. The government must focus on equity as a rule compiler and referee of the system. Patient and providers who are actively engaged in shared decision‐making will naturally address the diverse needs of multitudinous communities. Intermediaries address inclusion by connecting resources with the point of care. In a dynamic, emerging health‐care system that serves diverse communities, patient and community‐based financing, vouchers and defined contributions are necessary first steps in addressing cultural diversity, inclusion and equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Value-based healthcare payment models are an alternative insurance payment system that compensates healthcare providers based on their patients' outcomes rather than the individual services healthcare workers provide. This shift from the current fee-for-service model that predominates our medical system has received renewed popularity and attention within organized medicine such as the American Medical Association. Advocates believe that this new payment model will address many of the unsolved issues in healthcare such as medical waste and unsustainable healthcare costs. In practice, however, this model is plagued with a myriad of unresolved issues of its own. In this commentary, we outline these issues and suggest that the intentions of those advocating for value-based payment models are either misguided or disingenuous. We then offer solutions that preserve our current fee-for-service model while making necessary changes that will benefit both physicians and patients nationwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The principles of value-based healthcare (VBHC) have received widespread endorsement, leading healthcare organizations worldwide to shift their strategies towards them. However, despite growing recognition and acceptance, the actual implementation of value-based approaches varies widely. This research aims to identify studies that address the implementation of VBHC at different levels (healthcare policymakers, hospital administrators, and healthcare providers), focusing on each level's relative strategies. Methods: To this end, a scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension for the scoping reviews checklist. The electronic databases of Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched to identify relevant publications in English from January 2006 to 31 July 2023. Results: We identified 30 eligible studies. Findings are organized into four main macro strategic levels, each comprising specific dimensions and operational approaches. Fourteen articles analyzed the role of government commitment in VBHC implementation, while six articles focused on regional integrated care systems. The role of hospitals was described in sixteen records. Conclusions: Our study suggests that a comprehensive approach is necessary for the successful implementation of VBHC. Hospitals emerge as pivotal in this shift, requiring organizational and attitudinal changes among healthcare professionals. However, a complete transition towards VBHC that ensures seamless patient management throughout the entire care delivery value chain necessitates government involvement in terms of state legislation, reimbursement methods, and hospital networking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with dementia (PwD) nearing end of life (nEOL) do not always receive optimal end-of-life care, including timely specialist palliative care input. In hospitalized PwD likely to be nEOL, we aimed to determine the prevalence of goals of care discussions; the incidence and timing of referral to palliative care; factors associated with palliative care referral and timely (within 2 days) palliative care referral; and the prevalence of polypharmacy (>5 medications) and in-hospital deprescribing (cessation). Methods: A retrospective chart review of a cohort of PwD admitted under geriatric medicine 1 July 2021–30 June 2022 was conducted, screening to identify nEOL status. Results: A total of 298 patients (mean age of 83.5 [SD 7.4] and 51.3% females) were included in the final analysis. Eleven percent of eligible patients (33/298) died during admission. Overall, 80.9% had discussed an advance care plan (ACP). The mean time from admission to the discussion of an ACP was 1 day (SD = 5.02). One in twenty (5.4%) had their goals of care revised during admission, with 15 transitioning to palliation. Only 7.1% were referred to palliative care during admission. The mean time to referral was 9.8 days (SD 7.3; range 0–26). One in fourteen (7.4%) were discharged from hospital on an end-of-life pathway. In multivariable analysis, both the clinical frailty score (CFS) (aOR per unit increase 3.66; 95%CI 1.65–8.09, p = 0.001) and meeting ≥ 2 deterioration criteria (per CriSTAL tool) (OR 3.68; 95% CI 1.07–12.70, p = 0.039) were independently associated with referral to palliative care. Polypharmacy was common at admission (76.2%), with a mean number of medications of 8.4 (SD = 4). The median number of medications ceased during admission was two (IQR 0–4). Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, we found a high quality of care of PwD likely nEOL, reflected by frequent ACPs in hospital, but it fell short of palliative care specialist input. Polypharmacy on admission and discharge may be further improved by aligning medication use with goals of care among PwD approaching the end of life, and considering the hospital nurse-driven identification of practice gaps is encouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oncology is a complex clinical specialty often requiring the close interaction of teams of different medical specialists for a successful outcome. The field is rapidly evolving scientifically, with successive discoveries of oncologic driver mutations soon followed by therapeutic agents able to interrupt the neoplastic process. Unfortunately, objective quality measurement demonstrates that many patients are not receiving optimal care, from diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic, or end-of-life perspectives. Quality measurement, reporting, and payment programs have the potential to focus attention on these care gaps and drive improvement. The federal government, as the largest single payer of health care services in the United States, has a compelling national interest to ensure that the medical care of Americans is at the highest level achievable. Accordingly, quality reporting and payment programs have been established in federal health care payment programs to drive improvements in care. This article reviews the science of quality measurement, documented gaps in oncology care, and ways to use new information technologies to decrease clinician burden associated with quality reporting. The article reviews how a measure is developed and incorporated into a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) program. It also summarizes federal programs relevant to oncology care and the individual measures used in these programs. CMS looks forward to working jointly with the oncology community to drive continuous improvements in care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionValue-Based Health Care (VBHC) represents a pivotal shift from volume-based to outcome-driven quality metrics centered on patient-valued outcomes. This approach requires collaboration across all participants in the health care value chain; providers, payers, pharma, policymakers and patients (collectively known as the 5Ps). Despite substantial theoretical endorsement of VBHC’s potential for improving health outcomes and system efficiency, empirical evidence detailing its practical implementation remains limited. This field study evaluates the real-word implementation of VBHC within a health care organization.In 2022, a health care collaboration Think Tank initiated this investigation during a breakout session, gathering insights from 12 leading international organizations to construct an empirical VBHC transformation reference guide. Real-world data was collected through structured interviews over a 1-year period, covering the 5 P value chain in various healthcare settings. The VBHC initiatives were analyzed through four stages: initiation, data acquisition, collaborative frameworks, and results evaluation.The 12 interviews identified five key enablers for successful VBHC implementation: 1. Organizational Purpose: defining core motivators for change; 2. People: identifying pivotal roles and leadership to endorse change; 3. Resources: securing personnel and financial support; 4. Data Infrastructure: developing interoperable IT systems for effective data sharing and collection; 5. Execution: prioritizing sustained implementation processes.The findings highlight that VBHC implementation and adoption is complex and requires incremental advancements, dedicated leadership, and resilient strategic framework spanning over multiple years. A comprehensive understanding of patient populations, risk stratification, and appropriate outcome metrics are essential to measure and deliver the VBHC transformation. Executive endorsement and transition funding during the transformation process are paramount to support this systemic shift. Collaboration among all 5 P stakeholders is essential for success. This field study underscores the importance of continuous learning and adaptation, providing a practical guide to enhance health care quality and efficiency that serves all stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quality is central to value-based care, and measurement is essential for assessing performance and understanding improvement over time. Both value-based care and methods for quality measurement are evolving. Infectious diseases (ID) has been less engaged than other specialties in quality measure development, and ID providers must seize the opportunity to engage with quality measure development and research. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are an ideal starting point for ID-related quality measure development; antimicrobial stewardship program interventions and best practices are ID specific, measurable, and effective, yet they are grossly undercompensated. Herein, we provide a scheme for prioritizing research focused on development of ID-specific quality measures. Maturation of quality measurement research in ID, beginning with an initial focus on stewardship-related conditions and then expanding to non-stewardship topics, will allow ID to take control of its future in value-based care and promote the growth of ID through greater recognition of its value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information on a pilot program which aims to assess the feasibility of employing and expanding remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) services at an academic medical center. Topics discussed include the overall flow of the project, patients eligible for enrollment in the program, and pharmacist intervention.

The European healthcare sector is transforming toward patient-centred and value-based healthcare delivery. The European Health Data Space (EHDS) Regulation aims to unlock the potential of health data by establishing a single market for its primary and secondary use. This paper examines the legal challenges associated with the secondary use of health data within the EHDS and offers recommendations for improvement. Key issues include the compatibility between the EHDS and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), barriers to cross-border data sharing, and intellectual property concerns. Resolving these challenges is essential for realising the full potential of health data and advancing healthcare research and innovation within the EU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The transformation of healthcare from a fee-for-service model to value-based care is particularly crucial in managing complex and rare diseases like sarcoma, where data fragmentation and variability present significant challenges. This manuscript reviews strategies for structured and harmonized data integration—a critical precursor to precision medicine in sarcoma care. We demonstrate how standardizing data formats, ontologies, and coding systems enable seamless integration of clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes across institutions, paving the way for comprehensive predictive analytics. By establishing robust value-based healthcare (VBHC) frameworks through digital transformation and predictive models, including digital twins, we create the foundation for personalized sarcoma treatment and real-world-time clinical decision-making. The manuscript also addresses practical challenges, including the need for system standardization, overcoming regulatory and privacy concerns, and managing high costs. We propose actionable strategies to overcome these barriers and discuss the role of advanced analytics and future research directions that further enhance VBHC and precision medicine. This work outlines the necessary steps to build a cohesive, data-driven approach that supports the transition to precision medicine, fundamentally improving outcomes for sarcoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Policy makers and health professionals are grappling with the high costs of and demand for health care, questions of sustainability and value, and changing population demographics—in particular, ageing populations. Digital solutions, including the adoption of patient‐reported measures, are considered critical in achieving person‐centred and value‐based health care. However, the utility of patient‐reported measures and the data they produce may be subject to ageist beliefs, prejudices and attitudes, rendering these data ineffective at promoting improved patient experiences and outcomes for older adults. This article explores the ethical considerations raised in relation to patient‐reported measures and the digital agency of older patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A routine preoperative assessment is considered both ineffective and inefficient. Despite the widespread application of lean thinking in healthcare, there is little evidence of successful experiences in preoperative admissions in order to reduce "No value added" activities. A conceptual framework reporting the drivers (clinic, tools, innovation, organization, and governance) and impacts (patient, efficiency, sustainability, time, learning and growth) was developed. Methodology: Drawing on the experience of an Italian high complexity hospital, this paper analyzes the case study by reporting evidence on how to implement lean in preoperative assessment and how to evaluate the positive results obtained. Results: Applying lean principles, the identification of value improved the appropriateness of care by creating 40 personalized pathways; the value stream resulted in a reduction of "No Value Added Time" from 37% to 28%, chest X-rays from 41% to 14% and cardiac visits from 49% to 37%; the pursuit of continuous flow through innovation contributed to increase the use of digitalization; the new pull organization helped to reduce the average time spent per year by 1.5 h; the continuous improvement was ensured through the governance of results. Conclusion: The proposed framework should be used to improve the quality of care in preoperative admissions by adopting the lean drivers for successful implementation and reporting the impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Value-based healthcare delivery focuses on optimizing care provided by measuring the healthcare outcomes which are most important to the clients relative to the total care costs. However, the understanding of what adds value for clients during work disability assessment is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To explore what medical examiners (MEs) perceive as valuable during the work disability assessment process, by exploring possible: 1) facilitators, 2) barriers and 3) opportunities to add value for the client during the work disability assessment. METHODS: For this explorative qualitative study, 7 semi-structured interviews were conducted with MEs in the Netherlands. Thematic coding was performed for all interviews. RESULTS: A large variety of facilitators (n = 22), barriers (n = 17) and opportunities (n = 11) were identified and inductively subdivided into four main themes: 1) coherent process, including all time related aspects, 2) interdisciplinary collaboration, including all aspects related to the collaboration between the ME and other professionals, 3) client-centred interaction, including all aspects related to the supportive interplay from the ME towards the client, and 4) information provision on all aspects during the work disability assessment process towards the client to ensure a valuable work disability assessment process. CONCLUSIONS: The overview of identified possible facilitators, barriers and opportunities to add value for clients from the perspective of the ME may stimulate improvement in the current work disability assessment practice and to better match the client needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An outdated and burdensome fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement system has significantly compromised primary care delivery in the US for decades, leading to a dire shortage of primary care workers. Support for primary care must increase from all public and private payers with well-designed value-based primary care payment. Patient care enabled by value-based payment is typically described or "labeled" as value-based care and commonly viewed as distinctly different from other models of care delivery. Unfortunately, labels tend to put individuals in camps that can make the differences seem greater than they are in practice. Achieving the aims of value-based care, aligned with the quintuple aims of health care, is common across many delivery models. The shrinking primary care workforce is too fragile to be fragmented across competing camps. Seeing the alignment across otherwise separate disciplines, such as lifestyle medicine and value-based care, is essential. In this article, we point to the opportunities that arise when we widen the lens to look beyond these labels and make the case that a variety of models and perspectives can meld together in practice to produce the kind of high-quality primary care physicians, care teams, and patients are seeking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This paper summarizes the results from a forum of healthcare experts, academia representatives, and public agency officials from emerging and established market countries on Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Presentations from experts provided insights into current developments and challenges, followed by interactive roundtable discussions. Emerging markets have unique healthcare systems, patient populations, resource constraints and needs. Areas covered: Each roundtable explored specific topics including the role of HTA and Real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making, challenges in biosimilar value assessment and incorporating non-price criteria reflecting context-related specifications of emerging markets such as the multifaceted nature of value in healthcare decision-making, emphasizing stakeholder perspectives and system complexities. Expert opinion: RWE emerged as important in understanding biosimilar value recognition and decision-making processes, with insights into its applications and challenges. Recommendations were provided for utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in pharmaceutical procurement, particularly for off-patent medicines, underscoring the importance of comprehensive evaluation frameworks and adherence to value-based principles. Overall findings suggest avenues for collaboration between industry, academia, and public agencies to address implementation barriers and promote equitable, efficient, and high-quality healthcare systems in emerging markets through public–private partnerships, joint capacity building and training initiatives, and knowledge transfers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This observational study investigates the role of value-based healthcare (VBHC) principles in executive decision-making in Dutch hospitals. Methods: A total of 379 questionnaires were sent to executives in 69 Dutch hospitals. The survey included questions prioritizing VBHC and other elements in decision-making and the weight and frequency at which each VBHC element was considered. Results: Responses were received from 82.6% of hospitals (57/69) and 26.9% of executives (102/379). 'Clinical outcomes' and 'costs' were most often considered in decision-making whereas 'integration of care delivery across separate facilities' and 'bundled payments' were considered the least. VBHC was reported as being considered in decision-making 8 out of 10 times and was given a median score of 8 out of 10. Members of the board of directors placed a higher priority on 'clinical outcomes', 'internal politics', 'the ambition of healthcare professionals' and 'integrating care delivery across separate facilities' and perceived that they include these elements more frequently than other direct colleagues. Conclusion: This study reveals that, although VBHC is generally considered in managerial decision-making, 'clinical outcomes' and 'costs' predominantly have priority. Action must be taken to ensure executives implement all VBHC elements in decision-making to maximize the effects of VBHC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Value-based health care (VBHC) argues that health-care needs to re-focus to maximise value creation, defining value as the quota when dividing the outcomes important for the patient, by the cost for health care to deliver such outcomes. This study aims to explore the perception of value among different stakeholders involved in the process of implementing VBHC at a Swedish hospital to support leaders to be more efficient and effective when developing health care. Design/methodology/approach: Participants comprised 19 clinicians and non-clinicians involved in the implementation of VBHC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and content analysis was performed. Findings: The clinicians described value as a dynamic concept, dependent on the patient and the clinical setting, stating that improving outcomes was more important than containing costs. The value for non-clinicians appeared more driven by the interplay between the outcome and the cost. Non-clinicians related VBHC to a strategic framework for governance or for monitoring different continuous improvement processes, while clinicians appreciated VBHC, as they perceived its introduction as an opportunity to focus more on outcomes for patients and less on cost containment. Originality/value: There is variation in how clinicians and non-clinicians perceive the key concept of value when implementing VBHC. Clinicians focus on increasing treatment efficacy and improving medical outcomes but have a limited focus on cost and what patients consider most valuable. If the concept of value is defined primarily by clinicians' own assumptions, there is a clear risk that the foundational premise of VBHC, to understand what outcomes patients value in their specific situation in relation to the cost to produce such outcome, will fail. Health-care leaders need to ensure that patients and the non-clinicians' perception of value, is integrated with the clinical perception, if VBHC is to deliver on its promise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Healthcare services and products are rapidly changing due to the development of new technologies, offering relevant solutions to improve patient outcomes. Patient-Generated Health Data and knowledge-sharing across the European Union (EU) has a great potential of making healthcare provision more effective and efficient by putting the patient at the centre of the healthcare process. While such initiatives have been taken before, a uniting and overarching approach is still missing. The EU-funded IMPROVE project will develop an evidence-based and actual framework to effectively leverage the added value of people-centred integrated healthcare solutions, using predominantly PROMs, PPI, PREMs, and other Patient-Generated Health Data (PGHD). As a result, the project facilitates the effective and efficient implementation of Value-Based Healthcare across the EU by putting the patient central in the healthcare process.

Abstract Background To conduct a comprehensive assessment of real patient data undergoing the procedure within a healthcare provider, integrating both costs and care stages related to bariatric surgery, emphasizing the relevance of analysis by Diagnosis-related group (DRG). Methods Prospective study of patients coded by DRG within a network of providers accredited to a Brazilian healthcare provider. All patients coded with metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) between 01/2019 and 06/2023 and undergoing gastrectomy procedure were included for analysis. The cost base used was derived from administrative payment information of the healthcare provider. Analyses were presented as mean, median, and standard deviation. Levene, Student’s t-test, Kendall’s tau, and Pearson’s chi-square tests were used. Results The study included a total of 1408 patients who underwent MBS in four prominent hospitals in the area during the specified period. Among these patients, an average of 74.8% were female, with a mean age of 37.31 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 40.3 kg/m2. Furthermore, 88.9% of the patients underwent gastric bypass. Although there were few acquired complications during hospital admission there were vascular complications following infusion, transfusion, and therapeutic injection, 22.45% (n = 11), hemorrhage and hematoma complicating procedure not classified elsewhere, 8.16% (n = 4), leakage, 8.16% (n = 4), and one death during this study. There were 67 readmissions within 30 days (4,75%). The total costs incurred throughout the patient’s journey, covering hospitalization and one-year post-procedure, exhibited a median value of $4,078.53. Additionally, a notable positive association was observed between post-discharge expenses and age, indicating a tendency for costs to rise as patients grow older. Conclusion The identified results highlight the complexity and challenges associated with bariatric surgery, including patient management and substantial costs involved. Therefore, a more comprehensive and personalized approach in postoperative management and resource allocation may be necessary to optimize clinical and economic outcomes.

Abstract Background The integration of patient-centered care (PCC) and value-based healthcare (VBHC) principles, emphasizing personalized, responsive care and cost efficiency, is crucial in modern healthcare. Despite advocation from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) for the global adoption of these principles through patient-reported measures (PRMs), their implementation, especially the pregnancy and childbirth (PCB) set, remains limited in maternity care. This study focuses on understanding the optimal organizational entity for integrating standard ICHOM-PCB-PRMs into routine maternity care in Finland. It aims to clarify the distribution of tasks among stakeholders and gather Finnish maternity healthcare professionals’ perspectives on organizational responsibility in PRM collection. The emphasis was on identifying the optimal organizational framework for managing PRMs in maternity care. Results A total of 66 maternity healthcare professionals participated in the study, reaching a consensus that public maternity care centers in Finland should be the primary entity responsible for managing PRMs in the maternity sector. Key aspects such as confidence with the role as a mother, maternal confidence with breastfeeding, and satisfaction with the result of care were identified as crucial and should be inquired about in both public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards. The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive and consistent attention to these PRMs across public maternity care centers and hospital maternity settings to ensure holistic and effective maternal care. Conclusions The study highlights the central role of public maternity care centers in the collection and management of PRMs within Finnish maternity care, as agreed upon by the professional consensus. It underscores the importance of a consistent and holistic approach to PRM inquiry across different care settings to enhance the quality and effectiveness of maternity care. This finding is crucial for policymakers and healthcare practitioners, suggesting that reinforcing the collaborative efforts between public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards is vital for a patient-centric, efficient healthcare system. Aligning with PCC and VBHC principles, this approach aims to improve healthcare outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women in Finland, emphasizing the need for a unified strategy in managing maternity care.

Abstract Background Clinical quality registries (CQR) aid in measuring, collecting and monitoring outcome data but it is still unknown how these data are used by hospitals to improve the quality of care. This study assessed the current state of outcome-based quality improvement in the Netherlands in 2022 based on data from multiple disease areas and CQRs; cardiothoracic surgery (Netherlands Heart Registration [NHR]), cardiology (NHR), nephrology, (Nefrovision), intensive care (National Intensive Care Evaluation [NICE]), and orthopaedic surgery (Dutch Arthroplasty Register [LROI]). Methods & results The Health Outcomes Management Evaluation (HOME) model was used to assess the current state of outcome-based quality improvement. A questionnaire with 36 questions was sent to healthcare departments of the six disease areas in participating hospitals within five quality registrations in the Netherlands. In total, 124 responses were received; 20 within cardiology, 12 within cardiothoracic surgery, 30 within nephrology, 35 within intensive care and 27 within orthopaedic surgery. Results showed outcome measures were actively used to improve the quality of care, several improvement initiatives were implemented, but outcomes were not always monitored regularly. Results differed between hospitals, but differences were limited between disease areas. Conclusion The current state of outcome-based quality improvement in all five disease areas is that outcome measures were consequently employed and used on a frequent basis aiming to achieve quality improvement in healthcare. Results can be improved by structurally embedding the entire improvement cycle into the organisation.

Abstract Background Long-term care insurance (LTCI) was implemented in China to solve the elderly care problems caused by the aging population. It is crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of LTCI implementation from the perspective of value-based healthcare. Objective This study aimed to investigate the impact of LTCI on medical care expenditure and health status in China. Methods We used staggered difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to analyze the effect of LTCI policy on medical expenditure and health status based on China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study data from 2011 to 2018. Results Our findings confirmed the positive contribution of LTCI policies to medical expenditures and health status. We found that the implementation of LTCI significantly reduced inpatient and outpatient expenditure, scores of self-report of health, and CESD scores by 26.3%, 12.3%, 0.103, and 0.538, respectively. It also decreased ADL scores, but the decrease was not significant. The impact of LTCI on reducing inpatient expenditure was greater for individuals aged between 65 and 80 and those residing in urban areas and eastern cities. In terms of outpatient costs, the effect of LTCI was more pronounced among median and high-income people and people living in central and eastern cities. The impact of LTCI on self-report of health is stronger for rural populations, individuals under 80, and those in central and eastern cities. For ADL scores, LTCI affected those aged 65–80 the most. About the CESD scores, LTCI had a greater impact on rural populations, people aged 45–65, median income groups, and those in eastern cities. Conclusions Our study underscored LTCI’s effectiveness in curbing medical expenditures and enhancing health status, offering valuable insights for future LTCI development in China and beyond. Accelerating the development of LTCI is conducive to improving the quality of life of the disabled elderly, enhancing the well-being of people’s livelihoods, and realizing the goal of value-based healthcare.

Abstract Background Quebec’s healthcare system faces significant challenges due to labour shortage, particularly in long-term care facilities (CHSLDs). The aging population and increasing demand for services compound this issue. Teleconsultation presents a promising solution to mitigate labour shortage, especially in small CHSLDs outside urban centers. This study aims to evaluate the cost and cost savings associated with teleconsultation in CHSLDs, utilizing the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) model within the framework of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC). Methods This study focuses on CHSLDs with fewer than 50 beds in remote regions of Quebec, where teleconsultation for nighttime nursing care was implemented. Time and cost data were collected from three CHSLDs over varying periods. The TDABC model, aligned with VBHC principles, was applied through five steps, including process mapping, estimating activity times, calculating resource costs, and determining total costs. Results Teleconsultation increased the cost per minute for nursing care compared to traditional care, attributed to additional tasks during remote consultations and potential technical challenges. However, cost savings were realized due to reduced need for onsite nursing staff during non-eventful nights. Overall, substantial savings were observed over the project duration, aligning with VBHC’s focus on delivering high-value healthcare. Conclusions This study contributes both theoretically and practically by demonstrating the application of TDABC within the VBHC framework in CHSLDs. The findings support the cost savings from the use of teleconsultation in small CHSLDs. Further research should explore the long-term sustainability and scalability of teleconsultation across different CHSLD sizes and settings within the VBHC context to ensure high-value healthcare delivery.

الملخص: الأهداف: تمثل الرعاية الصحية الحكيمة تحولًا في تقديم الرعاية الصحية في المملكة العربية السعودية، حيث تهدف إلى تحسين نتائج المرضى مقارنةً بتكاليف تحقيق تلك النتائج. تهدف هذه المراجعة التفحصية إلى كشف الرؤى حول تصور وإنشاء الرعاية الصحية الحكيمة في سياق المملكة العربية السعودية، مما يعكس وضعًا حرجًا للدولة في مرحلة تحول صحي حاسمة. طرق البحث: تم إجراء هذه المراجعة التفحصية باستخدام قواعد البيانات عبر الإنترنت والمواقع الرسمية خلال فترة زمنية تمتد من عام 2017 إلى عام 2023. شملت هذه المراجعة مجموعة من 14 دليلاً: 6 مقالات بحثية و6 وثائق حكومية وتقريرين. النتائج: تسلط النتائج الضوء على تزايد التوافق المحلي في تعريفات مبادئ الرعاية الصحية الحكيمة مع التعريفات العالمية، لا سيما التركيز على نتائج المرضى كمقياس أساسي للرعاية الصحية الحكيمة. إضافة إلى ذلك، تظهر المراجعة أن الإصلاحات المالية تشير إلى تحرك حقيقي نحو الرعاية الصحية الحكيمة في المملكة، مع تحول تدريجي من الصرف المبني على الكمية إلى الصرف المبني على القيمة. ومع ذلك، فإن التفسيرات والتطبيقات المتنوعة للرعاية الصحية الحكيمة في المراجعة المدروسة تشير إلى مرحلة واعدة من التنفيذ، تتميز بتعريفات وممارسات متطورة تتكيف مع الاحتياجات والقيود المحلية. الخلاصة: أضاءت هذه المراجعة التفحصية المشهد الحالي لتصور وإنشاء الرعاية الصحية الحكيمة، مبرزة التقدم الكبير الذي تم تحقيقه والتحديات التي قد تواجهنا في المستقبل. Abstract: Objectives: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) represents a paradigm shift in healthcare delivery through optimizing patient outcomes relative to the costs of achieving those outcomes. This scoping review is aimed at revealing critical insights into the conceptualization and establishment of VBHC in the context of Saudi Arabia, a nation in a critical stage of healthcare transformation. Methods: A scoping review was conducted by using online databases and official websites with a timeframe of 2017–2023. This review included 14 pieces of literature, comprising six research articles, six government documents, and two reports. Results: The findings highlight increasing alignment with the definition of global VBHC principles, notably the emphasis on patient outcomes as a primary metric of healthcare value. Furthermore, financial reform has signaled a real move toward VBHC in the Kingdom, through a gradual shift from volume-based payments to value-based payments. However, the diverse interpretations and applications of VBHC across the examined literature indicate a promising stage of implementation characterized by evolving definitions and practices tailored to local needs and constraints. Conclusion: This scoping review describes the current landscape of VBHC conceptualization and establishment, highlighting the substantial progress achieved and the future challenges.

Background: Clinical quality registries (CQR) aid in measuring, collecting and monitoring outcome data but it is still unknown how these data are used by hospitals to improve the quality of care. This study assessed the current state of outcome-based quality improvement in the Netherlands in 2022 based on data from multiple disease areas and CQRs; cardiothoracic surgery (Netherlands Heart Registration [NHR]), cardiology (NHR), nephrology, (Nefrovision), intensive care (National Intensive Care Evaluation [NICE]), and orthopaedic surgery (Dutch Arthroplasty Register [LROI]). Methods & results: The Health Outcomes Management Evaluation (HOME) model was used to assess the current state of outcome-based quality improvement. A questionnaire with 36 questions was sent to healthcare departments of the six disease areas in participating hospitals within five quality registrations in the Netherlands. In total, 124 responses were received; 20 within cardiology, 12 within cardiothoracic surgery, 30 within nephrology, 35 within intensive care and 27 within orthopaedic surgery. Results showed outcome measures were actively used to improve the quality of care, several improvement initiatives were implemented, but outcomes were not always monitored regularly. Results differed between hospitals, but differences were limited between disease areas. Conclusion: The current state of outcome-based quality improvement in all five disease areas is that outcome measures were consequently employed and used on a frequent basis aiming to achieve quality improvement in healthcare. Results can be improved by structurally embedding the entire improvement cycle into the organisation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/objectives: Understanding the factors that influence physiotherapy (PT) service use among patients with nonspecific lower back pain (LBP) is necessary to optimize treatment strategies, healthcare resource allocation, and the planning of value-based initiatives. We report factors that influence the number of PT visits per episode of care (defined as a referral from a physician) for an LBP population in Saudi Arabia, and compare them with patients experiencing their first and recurrent episodes of LBP. Methods: LBP patients were retrospectively enrolled from a clinical dataset derived from an outpatient PT clinic in Saudi Arabia. The primary outcome variable was the number of PT visits performed per episode of care. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the relationships between the numbers of PT visits per episode of care and independent variables. Results: The number of PT sessions per week (β 0.34, p < 0.001), compliance with PT sessions (β 0.31, p < 0.001), and pre-pain scores (β 0.29, p < 0.001) explained 41.8% (adjusted R2 0.32) of the variance in the total number of PT visits per episode of care (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Factors that might improve value-based care for LBP patients are reported. The more PT sessions per week, compliance with these sessions, and higher baseline pain scores predict a higher number of PT visits per episode of care among these patients. While reported for a Saudi Arabian population, there is no reason to believe that these findings do not apply internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The integration of patient-centered care (PCC) and value-based healthcare (VBHC) principles, emphasizing personalized, responsive care and cost efficiency, is crucial in modern healthcare. Despite advocation from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) for the global adoption of these principles through patient-reported measures (PRMs), their implementation, especially the pregnancy and childbirth (PCB) set, remains limited in maternity care. This study focuses on understanding the optimal organizational entity for integrating standard ICHOM-PCB-PRMs into routine maternity care in Finland. It aims to clarify the distribution of tasks among stakeholders and gather Finnish maternity healthcare professionals' perspectives on organizational responsibility in PRM collection. The emphasis was on identifying the optimal organizational framework for managing PRMs in maternity care. Results: A total of 66 maternity healthcare professionals participated in the study, reaching a consensus that public maternity care centers in Finland should be the primary entity responsible for managing PRMs in the maternity sector. Key aspects such as confidence with the role as a mother, maternal confidence with breastfeeding, and satisfaction with the result of care were identified as crucial and should be inquired about in both public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards. The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive and consistent attention to these PRMs across public maternity care centers and hospital maternity settings to ensure holistic and effective maternal care. Conclusions: The study highlights the central role of public maternity care centers in the collection and management of PRMs within Finnish maternity care, as agreed upon by the professional consensus. It underscores the importance of a consistent and holistic approach to PRM inquiry across different care settings to enhance the quality and effectiveness of maternity care. This finding is crucial for policymakers and healthcare practitioners, suggesting that reinforcing the collaborative efforts between public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards is vital for a patient-centric, efficient healthcare system. Aligning with PCC and VBHC principles, this approach aims to improve healthcare outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women in Finland, emphasizing the need for a unified strategy in managing maternity care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To integrate a parenting assessment into primary care and assess pediatric providers' time needed to review it and their perceptions of the process. Description: The Quick Parenting Assessment (QPA) is a validated, 13 item parent support tool that assesses for healthy and unhealthy parenting practices. Higher QPAs indicate more unhealthy parenting being used. In a clinic serving low-income parents, the QPA was integrated into the 15 month, 30 month, 5 year, and 8 year well child visits. After each well child visit in which the QPA was administered, providers were invited to complete a one-page survey—315 surveys were included in the analysis. Assessment: Most QPAs (78.7%) were low risk (QPA < = 2), 14.6% were medium risk (QPA = 3–4), and 6.7% were high risk (QPA > 4). The median time was 15–30 s to review low risk QPAs and 30 s to 1 min to review high risk QPAs. For most QPA reviews, health care providers reported that the QPA increased their objectivity in determining the level of support needed (68%), facilitated communication about parenting (77%), and increased the value of the visit (68%). Conclusion: A validated parenting assessment tool, integrated into pediatric primary care, appears to work for pediatric health care providers. These findings have implications for supporting parents in pediatrics, value-based care, and disease prevention. Significance: What is Already Known on this Subject?: Parenting assessments, integrated into primary care, could support parents and reduce poor outcomes, but they are not used routinely. The Quick Parenting Assessment (QPA) is a validated 13-item parenting assessment, associated with an increased risk of behavior problems. What this Study Adds?: A validated parenting assessment tool was integrated into the well visit in a pediatric clinic. Providers reviewed the tool in less than a minute or two and responded positively to the integration process, suggesting a way to mitigate ACEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) gave rise to the State Innovation Models (SIMs). Medicaid Integrated Purchasing for Physical and Behavioral Health, referred to as Payment Model 1 (PM1), was a core payment redesign area of the Washington State SIM project under which our research team was contracted to provide an evaluation. In doing so, we leveraged an open systems conceptual model to assess qualitatively Early Adopter stakeholders' perceived effects of implementation. Between 2017 and 2019, we conducted three rounds of interviews, examining themes of care coordination, common facilitators and barriers to integration, and potential concerns for sustaining the initiative into the future. Further, we noted the initiative's complexity may require the establishment of enduring partnerships, secure funding sources, and committed regional leadership to ensure longer-term success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The health care industry is experiencing a transformative shift from traditional fee-for-service models to value-based care (VBC), emphasizing improved patient outcomes, enhanced quality, and reduced costs. While Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center models focus on financial and quality outcomes, a critical opportunity for reform lies in organizational culture. VBC signifies a cultural and systemic evolution aligned with the quintuple aim of enhancing equitable patient outcomes, improving quality, reducing costs, and prioritizing provider well-being. Cultural impacts play a pivotal role in this transformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop the Remote Health Value Framework to evaluate the models of healthcare provision for workers in the oil and gas sector, predominantly situated in rural and remote areas. Methods: The framework was co-designed with the leadership team in one global oil and gas company using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach with a conjoint analysis component. This was used to elicit and understand preferences and trade-offs among different value domains that were important to the stakeholders with respect to the provision of healthcare for its workers. Preference elicitation and interviews were conducted with a mix of health, safety, and environment (HSE) team and non-HSE managers and leaders. Results: Out of five presented value domains, participants considered the attribute 'Improving health outcomes of employees' the most important aspect for the model of healthcare which accounted for 37.3% of the total utility score. Alternatively, the 'Program cost' attribute was least important to the participants, accounting for only 11.0% of the total utility score. The marginal willingness-to-pay analysis found that participants would be willing to pay A$9090 per utile for an improvement in a particular value attribute. Conclusions: This is the first value framework for healthcare delivery in the oil and gas industry, contextualised by its delivery within rural and remote locations. It provides a systematic and transparent method for creating value-based healthcare models. This approach facilitates the evaluation of healthcare investments, ensuring they align with value domains prioritised by the HSE and leadership teams. What is known about the topic? It has been challenging for oil and gas companies to deliver and evaluate value-based healthcare services to improve workers' wellbeing, supplementing essential emergency services and occupational health. What does this paper add? The Remote Health Value Framework (RHVF), developed and tested in this work, offers a blueprint for designing and evaluating models of care considering the companies' and workers' priorities. What are the implications for practitioners? The RHVF's application has the potential to improve industry standards, enabling a data-driven approach to healthcare investments that closely align with both corporate objectives and employee wellbeing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To provide the first document map of sustainability and decarbonisation actions across the Australian healthcare sector, as reported in publicly available documents online, and to identify gaps in actions. Methods: Healthcare providers were identified across all state and territories. Structured Google searches between August and December 2022 were followed by document searches. Updates were undertaken, most recently in December 2023. Targeted documents included position statements, strategies, and reports. Key points from these documents pertaining to sustainability and/or decarbonisation were extracted and descriptively analysed. Results: A total of 294 documents were included, mostly focused on power generation, transport, building design, and circular procurement/waste pathways. In contrast, relatively few plans for decarbonisation of clinical care were identified (n = 42). National and two state governments (New South Wales, Western Australia) have established healthcare sustainability and decarbonisation units, and two further states have publicly committed to doing so (Queensland, Tasmania). However, these documents generally reported separate, siloed actions. While attempts were made to make this review comprehensive, some documents may have been missed or are only available inside an organisation, and new actions will continue to emerge. Conclusion: Broad sustainability plans have been developed by many healthcare providers; however, to achieve net zero, decarbonising of clinical practices is also needed, and this is where the least action is currently occurring. To decarbonise clinical care, the sector needs to come together in a more coordinated way. What is known about the topic? Little is known about what actions are occurring to make healthcare more sustainable and to reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare in Australia. What does this paper add? This paper provides a snapshot of publicly available documents from healthcare providers and professional organisations as they relate to healthcare sustainability and helps reveal the gaps and siloed nature of current actions. What are the implications for practitioners? This paper can help jurisdictions identify gaps or areas for improvement and may aid in targeted and coordinated interventions, especially as they relate to decarbonised clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The era of value-based health care is characterized by an increasing interest in patient-reported health outcomes. For this purpose we developed the rhinoplasty health care monitor (RHM), a streamlined outcome measurement protocol, including all rhinoplasty patients since 2014. Statistical analyses of patient-reported outcome data are automated and visually presented on a custom web-based dashboard. We describe the clinical and practical benefits of the RHM and discuss how routine prospective outcome measurements have upgraded our care standards. For this prospective study, 979 consecutive patients referred for functional (revision) rhinoplasty from April 2014 to August 2023 were included. Preoperative and 3- and 12-month postoperative scores on the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale (NOSE), Utrecht Questionnaire (UQ), and visual analog scales (VAS) were obtained. Of 979 referred patients, 599 (61.2%) were eligible for rhinoplasty. One year postoperatively, mean NOSE scale sum score improved from 69.1 ± 22.8 to 23.1 ± 23.5 (p < 0.001). Functional VAS scores improved from 4.1 ± 2.8 (left) and 4.1 ± 2.8 (right) to 7.5 ± 1.9 (left) and 7.3 ± 2.0 (right; p < 0.001). Mean UQ sum score improved from 12.0 ± 6.4 to 6.8 ± 3.3 and aesthetic VAS score improved from 4.5 ± 2.5 to 7.4 ± 1.7 (p < 0.001) 1 year postoperatively. Benefits of the outcome routine were improved patient selection, data-driven expectation management and patient empowerment, and targeted critical appraisals of surgical performance. In conclusion, routine, automated, prospective outcome monitoring provides physicians with a response to the increasing demand for data-driven insights in health outcomes. The limited effort that is needed to gather and monitor outcome data is heavily repaid by valuable insights into aspects of care that can be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: High variation in clinical practice may indicate uncertainty and potentially low-value care. Methods to identify low value care are often not well defined or transparent and can be time intensive. In this paper we explore the usefulness of variation analysis of routinely-collected data about surgical procedures in England to identify potentially low-value surgical care. Methods: This is a national ecological study using Hospital Episode Statistics linked to mid-year population estimates and indices of multiple deprivation in England, 2014/15-2018/19. We identified the top 5% of surgical procedures in terms of growth in standardised procedure rates for 2014/15 to 2018/19 and variation in procedure rates between clinical commissioning groups as measured by the systematic component of variance (SCV). A targeted literature review was conducted to explore the evidence for each of the identified techniques. Procedures without evidence of cost-effectiveness were viewed as of potentially low value. Results: We identified six surgical procedures that had a high growth rate of 37% or more over 5 years, and four with higher geographical variation (SCV >1.6). There was evidence for two of the 10 procedures that surgery was more cost-effective than non-surgical treatment albeit with uncertainty around optimal surgical technique. The evidence base for eight procedures was less clear cut, with uncertainty around clinical- and/or cost-effectiveness. These were: deep brain stimulation; removing the prostate; surgical spine procedures; a procedure to alleviate pain in the spine; surgery for dislocated joints due to trauma and associated surgery for traumatic fractures; hip joint replacement with cemented pelvic component or cemented femoral component; and shoulder joint replacement. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that variation analysis could be regularly used to identify potentially low-value procedures. This can provide important insights into optimising services and the potential de-adoption of costly interventions and treatments that do not benefit patients and the health system more widely. Early identification of potentially low value care can inform prioritisation of clinical trials to generate evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness before treatments become established in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]