Search

To compare long-term outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair utilizing the Cabrol annuloplasty versus valve sparing Reimplantation technique. From 1996 to 2018, 340 consecutive patients underwent BAV repair. Eighty underwent Cabrol annuloplasty and 189 underwent Reimplantation. Exclusion criteria were re-repairs (n = 6), active endocarditis (n = 4), no annuloplasty (n = 41) and ring or suture annuloplasty (n = 20). We compared both groups for survival, reoperations, valve related events and recurrent severe aortic regurgitation (AR > 2+). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance the 2 groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify outcome predictors. After weighting, pre- and intraoperative characteristics were similar between groups, except for aorta replacement techniques and operative time, which was longer in the Reimplantation group (P < 0.001). At 12 years, overall survival was similar between groups (IPW: Cabrol 97 ± 2% vs Reimplantation 94 ± 3%, P = 0.52). Freedom from reoperation and freedom from AR > 2+ were significantly lower in the Cabrol group (reoperation IPW: 69 ± 9% vs 91 ± 4%, P = 0.004 and AR > 2+ IPW: 71 ± 8% vs 97 ± 2%, P < 0.001). The Reimplantation technique was the only independent predictor of reoperation (hazard ratio 0.31; confidence interval 0.19-0.7; P = 0.005). In this study, comparing 2 annuloplasty strategies for BAV repair, we found statistically significant differences in long-term durability favouring the Reimplantation technique, and no differences in overall survival. The results support our current strategy of Reimplantation technique and repair of AR in patients with BAV. Cabrol annuloplasty is obsolete and should be generally abandoned in patients undergoing BAV repair for AR.

Background : During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers were facing shortage in personal protective equipment, especially adequate respirators. Alternative do-it-yourself respirators emerged, without any proof of protection

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess the aortic leaflet free margin length (FML) and geometric height (gH) in a normal aortic valve (AV), aorta dilatation and aortic leaflet prolapse. METHODS: We measured the FML and gH intraoperatively in 132 patients operated on for aortic insufficiency, aortic dilatation, endocarditis or fibroelastoma. Patients were divided into 3 groups: normal tricuspid AV (group 1, n = 12), aortic dilatation (group 2, tricuspid = 43, bicuspid = 18) and leaflet prolapse (group 3, tricuspid = 32, bicuspid = 27). The FML and gH were compared between the groups and between the leaflets within each group. RESULTS: In a normal tricuspid AV, the mean FML and gH were 34.7 ± 3.1 mm and 18.8 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. In group 2 tricuspid, the FML and gH were greater than those in group 1 (FML 43.7 ± 4.4, P < 0.001; gH 21.2 ± 1.8, P = 0.003). In group 3, tricuspid, the FML of the prolapsing leaflet was greater than the FML of the non-prolapsing leaflet (48.3 ± 5.4 vs 42.2 ± 3.6; P < 0.001). In group 2, bicuspid, FML of both leaflets were similar in group 2, but augmented on the fused leaflet compared to the non-fused leaflet in group 3 (fused 55.4 ± 6.3; non-fused 46.2 ± 6.2; P < 0.001). In groups 2 and 3 bicuspid, the gH of the non-fused leaflet was systematically greater than the fused leaflet (group 2 non-fused 24.6 ± 2.5 vs fused 20.4 ± 2.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In aortic dilatation and leaflet prolapse, FML and, to a lesser extent, gH increased significantly compared to those of normal AV function. FML and gH dimensions also depended on the valve configuration (tricuspid/bicuspid). These data provide new insight into the pathomorphology of AV disease and will serve to further develop new methods of AV repair based on intraoperative measurements of the FML.

In the originally published version of this article there was some unclear syntax in the first sentence of the Conclusions of the Abstract, which should read: In aortic dilatation and leaflet prolapse, FML and, to a lesser extent, gH increased significantly compared to those of normal AV function. This has now been corrected.

OBJECTIVE: Delta pulse pressure and delta down are used as dynamic preload indicators of fluid responsiveness during closed chest surgery. There are few data regarding their accuracy in open chest surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of sternotomy on the accuracy of both delta pulse pressure and delta down. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Single institution, nonacademic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 127 adult patients scheduled for elective open chest cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Delta pulse pressure and delta down were calculated for all patients before and 10 minutes after sternotomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Statistical analyses were performed to assess the influence of sternotomy on the accuracy of delta down and delta pulse pressure. Mann-Whitney and Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated a significant influence of sternotomy on delta pulse pressure values but not on delta down values. Among patients who had a positive delta down and/or delta pulse pressure before sternotomy, sternotomy significantly modified the delta pulse pressure value (p = 0.02), but not the delta down value (p = 0.22). The kappa coefficient indicated a very good agreement between delta down before and after sternotomy (0.83) and a fair agreement between delta pulse pressure before and after sternotomy (0.4). The difference between kappa coefficients was highly significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within the study population, sternotomy significantly influenced delta pulse pressure but not delta down. In this preliminary study, delta down appeared to be more accurate to evaluate fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery than did delta pulse pressure. Before promoting delta down in current practice, confirmation is needed on a larger scale.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the hemostatic effects of fibrinogen administration in cardiac surgery are not conclusive. AIMS: We investigated whether the use of a low-dose human fibrinogen in case of clinical bleeding after protamine administration and concomitant low FIBTEM values is effective in reducing postoperative bleeding. Secondary end-point was to investigate the consumption of allogeneic blood products. SETTING AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective matched study conducted at university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 2257 patients undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary (CPB) bypass, 73 patients received a median dose of 1 g human fibrinogen (ROTEM-Fibri group). This group was matched with 73 patients who had not received human fibrinogen (control group) among 390 patients having undergone surgery at the moment FIBTEM analysis was unavailable. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Matching was performed for the type and the presence of redo surgery. McNemar and Wilcoxon paired tests were used to respectively compare the categorical and quantitative variables. RESULTS: The CPB bypass time was significantly higher in the ROTEM-Fibri group (P = 0.006). This group showed significantly higher bleeding in the first 12 and 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001) and required significantly more transfusion of blood products (P < 0.001) and surgical revision (P = 0.007) when compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in the number of thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the administration of 1 g of fibrinogen based on low-FIBTEM values and clinical bleeding after protamine administration does not stop bleeding and the need for transfusion of allogeneic blood products.

Les progrès en anesthésie n’ont pas été brutaux mais progressifs. S‘il n’y a pas de réelle innovation, on peut cependant parler d’une évolution de la pratique qui, grâce à une meilleure compréhension de l’anatomie, de la physiologie et de la pharmacologie, associée à de grands progrès dans le domaine de la surveillance (monitoring) peropératoire, améliore la sécurité pendant toute la période périopératoire. Nous épinglons en 2017 l’utilisation croissante du monitoring EEG et l’évaluation continue de la profondeur de l’anesthésie, permettant d’éviter une anesthésie trop légère mais aussi trop profonde. Nous évoquerons aussi la nécessité d’une utilisation plus sûre des curares et les énormes progrès que les développements de l’échographie ont permis.

OBJECTIVES: We report the outcomes of robotic valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) in our Institution. METHODS: Between February 2012 and July 2016, 134 patients underwent robotic mitral valve (MV) repair with the da Vinci Si system. All the operations were performed through a mini-thoracotomy in the fourth right intercostal space, cardiopulmonary bypass and mild hypothermia. The clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS: There was no hospital death. The mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time were 112±23 and 159±33 min, respectively. Pre-discharge echocardiograms showed none-to-mild residual MR in all patients. Median follow-up was 24.1 months. We observed 1 early and 4 late reoperations on the MV for an overall freedom from reoperation of 98.2% and 94.1% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Furthermore, echocardiographic follow-up revealed freedom from recurrence of MR greater than Grade 1+ of 92.5% and 80.7% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Nevertheless freedom from recurrence of MR greater than Grade 2+ was 97.2% at 12 and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic MV repair is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of degenerative MR in selected patients with excellent perioperative outcomes. Early and midterm results are remarkable and are associated with low risk of late recurrence of MR and reoperation. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm the durability of valve repair.

BACKGROUND: The value of simulation in medical education is increasingly obvious. Nevertheless, the high cost of running a simulation center and the time's availability for students to get to simulation center remain a major problem. Technological developments and miniaturization of computer systems now allow handling of simulation manikins. Therefore, "in situ" simulation seems a valuable alternative to center simulation. OBJECTIVE(S): To identify the costs and feasibility of "in situ" simulation. To conduct an evaluation of the sessions by participants in order to adapt the educational objectives. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: 118 "in situ" simulation sessions were organized between March 2011 and February 2013 in the university hospital of Université Catholique de Louvain. Sessions took place in OR facilities. At the end of each session, a questionnaire was given to each participant. PARTICIPANTS: 357 of 368 participants completed a questionnaire. For each session, one or two nurses and 2 residents in anesthesia were invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs for organizing the sessions. Number of realized sessions. Global satisfaction of participants. RESULTS: Total cost for organizing the sessions is 18 414 Euro. One hundred and one among the 118 scheduled sessions were performed, which corresponds to a rate of 85%. Three hundred and sixty-five people participated in training simulations. During the sessions, 357 questionnaires were completed. The global satisfaction was high with a median Likert scale of 5 (5-5) to the question "I would like to participate in other sessions in the future". CONCLUSION: The "in situ" simulation in anesthesia is feasible in a university hospital using the available facilities of the operating theater during the working hours of both participants and trainers. However, the number of annual sessions may be limited by the availability of the simulation room or staff.