Search

Background: Biolimus-eluting stents (BESs) with a biodegradable polymer in abluminal coating achieve more complete coverage at 9 months compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) with a durable polymer, as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Whether this advantage persists or augments after complete resorption of the polymer (>12 months) is unknown.Methods: The LEADERS trial compared the performance of BES with that of SES. Patients were randomly allocated to a sequential angiographic follow-up, including OCT in selected sites, at 9 and 24 months. Struts coverage was compared using Bayesian hierarchical models as the primary outcome for the OCT substudy.Results: Fifty-six patients (26 BES, 30 SES) were enrolled in the OCT substudy. Twenty-one patients (10 BES, 11 SES) agreed to perform a second OCT follow-up at 24 months. Eleven lesions and 12 stents were analyzed sequentially in the BES group (2,455 struts at 9 months, 2,131 struts at 24 months) and 11 lesions and 18 stents in the SES group (3,421 struts at 9 months, 4,170 struts at 24 months). The previously reported advantage of BES over SES in terms of better strut coverage at 9 months was followed by improvement in coverage of the SES, resulting in identical coverage in both BES and SES at 24 months: 1.5% versus 1.8% uncovered struts, difference -0.2%, 95% credibility interval, -3.2% to 2.6%, P = .84.Conclusions: More complete strut coverage of BES as compared with SES at 9 months was followed by improvement of coverage in SES between 9 and 24 months and a similar long-term coverage in both stent types at 24 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravenous coronary angiography with electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) allows for the non-invasive visualisation of coronary arteries. With dedicated computer hardware and software, three dimensional renderings of the coronary arteries can be constructed, starting from the individual transaxial tomograms. This article describes image acquisition, postprocessing techniques, and the results of clinical studies. EBCT coronary angiography is a promising coronary artery imaging technique. Currently it is a reasonably robust technique for the visualisation and assessment of the left main and left anterior descending coronary artery. The right and circumflex coronary arteries can be visualised less consistently. Improvements in image acquisition and postprocessing techniques are expected to improve visualisation and diagnostic accuracy of the technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The no-reflow phenomenon has been shown to have a significant effect on clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Angiographic features incorporated in the SYNTAX Score (SXScore) obtained on diagnostic angiography during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) may be associated with the occurrence of myocardial no-reflow. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the SXScore to predict no-reflow during PPCI. The SXScore was applied to 669 consecutive patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from November 2006 to February 2008. Angiographic analysis of the PPCI procedure was used to determine no-reflow. The median SXScore was 16 (range 9.5 to 23). No-reflow occurred in 77 patients (12%). On univariate logistic regression analysis, the SXScore showed a strong association (for each 10-unit increase in SXScore, odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.76, p <0.001). On multivariate logistic regression in a model including clinical variables, SXScore was an independent predictor of no-reflow (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.63, p <0.001). Classification and regression tree analysis identified SXScore >21 as the best cutoff, with patients having double the risk for no-reflow compared to those with SXScore ≤21 (events 9% vs 18%, p = 0.006). In conclusion, the SXScore obtained in the diagnostic phase of PPCI for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction can identify patients at risk for developing no-reflow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Previous studies investigated atherosclerotic changes induced by lipid-lowering therapy in extensive coronary segments irrespective of baseline disease burden (a vessel-level approach)., Objective: To investigate the effects of lipid-lowering therapy on coronary lesions with advanced atherosclerotic plaque features and presumably higher risk for future events., Design, Setting, and Participants: The PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial (enrollment: May 2017 to October 2020; final follow-up: October 2021) randomized patients with acute myocardial infarction to receive alirocumab or placebo in addition to high-intensity statin therapy. In this post hoc lesion-level analysis, nonculprit lesions were identified as segments with plaque burden 40% or greater defined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS, near-infrared spectroscopy, and optical coherence tomography images at baseline and the 52-week follow-up were manually matched by readers blinded to treatment allocation. Data for this study were analyzed from October 2022 to November 2023., Interventions: Alirocumab or placebo in addition to high-intensity statin therapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: Lesion-level imaging outcome measures, including high-risk plaque characteristics and phenotypes., Results: Of the 245 patients in whom lesions were found, 118 were in the alirocumab group (mean [SD] age, 58.2 [10.0] years; 101 [85.6%] male and 17 [14.4%] female) and 127 in the placebo group (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [8.8] years; 104 [81.9%] male and 23 [18.1%] female). Overall, 591 lesions were included: 287 lesions (118 patients, 214 vessels) in the alirocumab group and 304 lesions (127 patients, 239 vessels) in the placebo group. Lesion-level mean change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) was -4.86% with alirocumab vs -2.78% with placebo (difference, -2.02; 95% CI, -3.00 to -1.05; P < .001). At the minimum lumen area (MLA) site, mean change in PAV was -10.14% with alirocumab vs -6.70% with placebo (difference, -3.36; 95% CI, -4.98 to -1.75; P < .001). MLA increased by 0.15 mm2 with alirocumab and decreased by 0.07 mm2 with placebo (difference, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.41; P = .04). Among 122 lipid-rich lesions, 34 of 55 (61.8%) in the alirocumab arm and 27 of 67 (41.8%) in the placebo arm showed a less lipid-rich plaque phenotype at follow-up (P = .03). Among 63 lesions with thin-cap fibroatheroma at baseline, 8 of 26 (30.8%) in the alirocumab arm and 3 of 37 (8.1%) in the placebo arm showed a fibrous/fibrocalcific plaque phenotype at follow-up (P = .02)., Conclusions and Relevance: At the lesion level, very intensive lipid-lowering therapy induced substantially greater PAV regression than described in previous vessel-level analyses. Compared with statin therapy alone, alirocumab treatment was associated with greater enlargement of the lesion MLA and more frequent transition of presumably high-risk plaque phenotypes into more stable, less lipid-rich plaque phenotypes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03067844.

Background: Elevated Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) is a risk marker for atherosclerotic disease, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. We examined the association of Lp(a) with changes in coronary atherosclerosis following intensive lipid-lowering therapy., Methods: In the PACMAN-AMI trial (Effects of the PCSK9 Antibody Alirocumab on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction), 300 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive biweekly alirocumab 150 mg or placebo in addition to high-intensity statins. Patients underwent serial 2-vessel intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and near-infrared spectroscopy in the non-infarct-related arteries at baseline and after 52 weeks. The main end points were percent atheroma volume by intravascular ultrasound, minimum fibrous cap thickness by optical coherence tomography, and maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm (maxLCBI 4mm ) by near-infrared spectroscopy., Results: A total of 265 patients had serial intravascular ultrasound data (mean age, 58±9 years; 16% women). Alirocumab resulted in greater reductions in percent atheroma volume and maxLCBI 4mm , as well as a greater increase in minimum fibrous cap thickness, compared with placebo. In the alirocumab group, the reduction in maxLCBI 4mm was smaller in patients with higher baseline Lp(a), defined by the highest quartile (Q4, ≥98 nmol/L; n=30), than in those with lower baseline Lp(a) (Q1-Q3, <98 nmol/L; n=99; -40.2 [-91.1 to 10.7] versus -91.4 [-113.9 to -68.9], respectively; P =0.01 after adjustment for clinically relevant baseline variables), and was comparable to the maxLBI 4mm reduction in the placebo group (-37.60 [-57.40 to -17.80]; n=134). These findings were consistent when higher baseline Lp(a) was defined by cut-off values of ≥75 versus <75 nmol/L (n=35 versus 94, respectively, in the alirocumab group) and ≥125 versus <125 nmol/L (n=23 versus 106, respectively). Changes in percent atheroma volume and minimum fibrous cap thickness did not differ in relation to baseline Lp(a)., Conclusions: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, elevated Lp(a) at baseline is associated with attenuation of plaque lipid regression despite intensive treatment with alirocumab plus high-intensity statin. This finding may explain the residual cardiovascular risk associated with high Lp(a) despite optimal control of lipid levels., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03067844., Competing Interests: Dr Koskinas has received speaker fees from Amgen, Sanofi, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Kakizaki has received speaker fees from Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific, Philips, OrbusNeich Medical, Terumo, Eli Lilly, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Kowa, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Ono Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, AstraZeneca, and consulting fees from Infraredx. Dr van Geuns reported grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, and grants from InfraRedx. Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Polares Medical, Medira, and Siemens Healthineers. Dr Spirk reports personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis (Switzerland), outside the submitted work. Dr Lanz has received speaker fees to the institution from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Drs Heg and Losdat are employed by CTU Bern, University of Bern, which has a staff policy of not accepting honoraria or consultancy fees; however, CTU Bern is involved in the design, conduct, or analysis of clinical studies funded by not-for-profit and for-profit organizations. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Swiss, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave. He serves as an unpaid advisory board member and unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments from pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers. Dr Engstrøm has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr Lang has received consultancy fees and research grants from AOP Health, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, United Therapeutics, Sanofi, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Neutrolis, and Pulnovo. Dr Räber has received grants from Sanofi, Regeneron, and Infraredx to the institution, speaker fees from Sanofi, and grants from Abbott, HeartFlow, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik to the institution, as well as grants from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Occlutech, Sanofi, Canon, and Medtronic for speaker and consultation fees outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts.

Importance: An upper-extremity approach for secondary access during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may reduce clinically relevant secondary access site-related bleeding., Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of an upper-extremity approach compared with a lower-extremity approach in patients undergoing TAVI., Design, Setting, and Participants: The TAVI XS trial was a randomized clinical trial performed between November 28, 2022, and November 15, 2023, with a 30-day follow-up, in 4 TAVI centers in the Netherlands. Eligibility was determined first, and only those patients with severe aortic stenosis and no contraindication for upper- or lower-extremity secondary access were informed about the study and asked to participate., Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 between the upper-extremity approach (radial artery diagnostic access and upper-arm vein for temporary pacing lead placement) and lower-extremity approach (femoral artery diagnostic access and femoral vein for temporary pacing lead placement) for secondary access during TAVI., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point was clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5) of the randomized secondary access. Secondary end points included any clinically relevant bleeding, time to mobilization, duration of hospitalization, secondary access failure, and procedural time., Results: Of a total of 324 eligible patients, 238 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI (mean [SD] age, 79.4 [6.5] years; 150 male [63.0%]; median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score, 2.2% [IQR, 1.5%-3.5%]) were included. The primary end point occurred in 5 of 119 patients (4.2%) in the upper-extremity group and 16 of 119 (13.4%) in the lower-extremity group (odds ratio [OR], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.80]; P = .01). Incidence of any clinically relevant bleeding was decreased in the upper-extremity group (25 of 119 [21.0%] vs 41 of 119 [34.5%] patients; OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.91]; P = .02). There was no difference in time to mobilization or duration of hospitalization. Secondary access failure (14 of 119 [11.8%] vs 1 of 119 [0.8%] patients; OR, 15.73 [95% CI, 2.03-121.69]; P = .001) and procedural time (60.0 [IQR, 39.0-88.0; 95% CI, 53.0-70.0] vs 48.0 [IQR, 34.0-64.0; 95% CI, 40.0-55.0] minutes; P = .002) were higher in the upper-extremity cohort., Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI, the upper-extremity approach for secondary access was associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding compared with the conventional lower-extremity approach and should be considered to reduce periprocedural bleeding complications., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05672823.

Introduction: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have high event rates related to non-culprit (NC) lesions, therefore plaque composition of these lesions is of great interest. Although marginal atherosclerotic lesions were studied extensively, more significant lesions might have more high-risk characteristics., Aim: To compare differences in high-risk lesion characteristics between significant versus non-stenotic NC plaques in ACS and the discrepancies with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients., Methods: Non-culprit vessels of 26 ACS patients with 26 angiographically significant lesions and 37 patients (17 ACS and 20 CCS) with 48 non-stenotic lesions were investigated with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Overall, 74 segments of 30 mm length were analyzed in 1 mm intervals. External elastic lamina (EEM), plaque burden (PB), minimal luminal area (MLA), percent atheroma volume (PAV) and lipid core burden index maximum 4 mm (maxLCBI 4mm ) were determined for each segment., Results: Cardiovascular risk factors were similar in all groups. PB was higher and MLA smaller in significant non-culprit ACS lesions vs non-stenotic lesions: PB 73.5% (IQR 68.7-78.5) vs 59.2 (IQR 49.6-71.5), p = 0.003, MLA 3.0 mm 2 (IQR 2.3-3.9) vs 4.0 mm 2 (IQR 2.8-4.7). MaxLCBI 4mm was similar 308.1 (±155.4) vs 287.8 (±165.7), p = 0.67. Among non-stenotic plaques, MaxLCBI 4mm was comparable between ACS and CCS patients, 275.7 (±151.5) in CCS patients vs 287.8 (±165.7) in ACS patients, p = 0.79., Conclusion: Although visually significant non-culprit lesions had a higher plaque burden compared to non-stenotic lesions, a significant relation between MaxLCBI 4mm and hemodynamic significance of the plaques couldn't be established., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The long-term impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting to intended drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment for patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery lesions., Methods: REC-CAGEFREE I was an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial conducted at 43 sites in China. After successful lesion pre-dilatation, patients aged 18 years or older with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease (irrespective of target vessel diameter) and an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based centralised system with block randomisation (block size of two, four, or six) and stratified by site, to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with the option of rescue stenting due to an unsatisfactory result (DCB group) or intended deployment of second-generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stents (DES group). The primary outcome was the device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE; including cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically and physiologically indicated target lesion revascularisation) assessed at 24 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment). Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI for the absolute risk difference was smaller than 2·68%. Safety was assessed in the ITT population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04561739. It is closed to accrual and extended follow-up is ongoing., Findings: Between Feb 5, 2021, and May 1, 2022, 2272 patients were randomly assigned to the DCB group (1133 [50%]) or the DES group (1139 [50%]). Median age at the time of randomisation was 62 years (IQR 54-69), 1574 (69·3%) of 2272 were male, 698 (30·7%) were female, and all patients were of Chinese ethnicity. 106 (9·4%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group received rescue DES after unsatisfactory DCB angioplasty. As of data cutoff (May 1, 2024), median follow-up was 734 days (IQR 731-739). At 24 months, the DoCE occurred in 72 (6·4%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group and 38 (3·4%) of 1139 in the DES group, with a risk difference of 3·04% in the cumulative event rate (upper boundary of the one-sided 95% CI 4·52; p non-inferiority =0·65; two-sided 95% CI 1·27-4·81; p=0·0008); the criterion for non-inferiority was not met. During intervention, no acute vessel closures occurred in the DCB group and one (0·1%) of 1139 patients in the DES group had acute vessel closure. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in ten (0·9%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group and nine (0·8%) in the DES group., Interpretation: In patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease, irrespective of vessel diameter, a strategy of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting did not achieve non-inferiority compared with the intended DES implantation in terms of the DoCE at 2 years, which indicates that DES should remain the preferred treatment for this patient population., Funding: Xijing Hospital and Shenqi Medical., Translation: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PWS reports consulting fees from Sahajanand Medical Technologies, Novartis, Merillife, Xeltis, and Philips/Volcano. DC reports honoraria from Terumo, Sanofi Aventis, and Medtronic; and participation on the advisory board of Abbott Vascular. ZJia is the founder of Beijing KeyTech Statistical Consulting and has stock in the company. R-JvG reports an unrestricted research grant to Radboud UMC from AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: During transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), secondary access is required for angiographic guidance and temporary pacing. The most commonly used secondary access sites are the femoral artery (angiographic guidance) and the femoral vein (temporary pacing). An upper extremity approach using the radial artery and an upper arm vein instead of the lower extremity approach using the femoral artery and femoral vein may reduce clinically relevant secondary access site-related bleeding complications, but robust evidence is lacking., Trial Design: The TAVI XS trial is a multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. A total of 238 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI will be included. The primary endpoint is the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (i.e. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding) of the randomised secondary access site (either diagnostic or pacemaker access, or both) within 30 days after TAVI. Secondary endpoints include time to mobilisation after TAVI, duration of hospitalisation, any BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding, and early safety at 30 days according to Valve Academic Research Consortium‑3 criteria., Conclusion: The TAVI XS trial is the first randomised trial comparing an upper extremity approach to a lower extremity approach with regard to clinically relevant secondary access site-related bleeding complications. The results of this trial will provide important insights into the safety and efficacy of an upper extremity approach in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In at least one-half of the patients with angina or ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries undergoing coronary function testing, coronary artery spasm (CAS) is detected. CAS is associated with an adverse prognosis regarding recurrent complaints and ischemic events. Current treatment options are mainly focused on the complaints, not on the underlying pathophysiological process. In this review we discuss available evidence regarding the presence, amount, and morphology of atherosclerosis in CAS patients. The reviewed evidence confirmed that atherosclerosis and vulnerable plaque characteristics are often detected in patients with CAS. The amount of atherosclerosis is higher in patients with focal CAS compared with patients with diffuse CAS. Severity of atherosclerosis is associated with the presence of CAS and the prognosis in CAS patients with atherosclerotic stenosis is worse. Therefore, CAS patients with atherosclerosis might benefit from targeted atherosclerotic treatment. Longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate the exact relation between atherosclerosis and CAS., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Konst received a research grant from Abbott. Dr van de Hoef received speaker fees and institutional research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr Ong received funding from the Berthold-Leibinger-Foundation; and received speaking honoraria from Philips/Volcano, Pfizer, Medtronic, Abbott, Amgen, and Bayer Healthcare. Dr van Royen received speaker fees from Abbott; and has received institutional research grants from Philips and Abbott. Dr Elias-Smale received a research grant from Abbott. Dr van Geuns received grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Amgen, and Sanofi; and grants from InfraRedx. Dr Damman received research grants, consultancy, and speaker fees from Abbott; and research grants and speakers fees from Abbott, research grants from AstraZeneca. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background The femoral vein is commonly used as a pacemaker access site during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Using an upper arm vein as an alternative access site potentially causes fewer bleeding complications and shorter time to mobilization. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of an upper arm vein as a temporary pacemaker access site during TAVR. Methods We evaluated all patients undergoing TAVR in our center between January 2020 and January 2023. Upper arm, femoral, and jugular vein pacemaker access was used in 255 (45.8%), 191 (34.3%), and 111 (19.9%) patients, respectively. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to pacemaker access in the overall population and in a propensity-matched population involving 165 upper arm and 165 femoral vein patients. Primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 pacemaker access site-related bleeding. Results In the overall population, primary endpoint was lowest for upper arm, followed by femoral and jugular vein access (2.4% vs. 5.8% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.003). Time to mobilization was significantly longer ( p < 0.001) in the jugular cohort compared with the other cohorts. In the propensity-matched cohort, primary endpoint showed a trend toward lower occurrence in the upper arm compared with the femoral cohort (2.4% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.10). Time to mobilization was significantly shorter (480 vs. 1140 min, p < 0.001) in the upper arm cohort, with a comparable skin-to-skin time (83 vs. 85 min, p = 0.75). Cross-over from upper arm pacemaker access was required in 17 patients (6.3% of attempted cases via an upper arm vein). Conclusions Using an upper arm vein as a temporary pacemaker access site is safe and feasible. Its use might be associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter time to mobilization compared with the femoral vein.

Background: The frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of patients treated with high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy and showing concomitant atheroma volume reduction, lipid content reduction, and increase in fibrous cap thickness (ie, triple regression) are unknown., Objectives: This study was designed to investigate rates, determinants, and prognostic implications of triple regression in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and treated with high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy., Methods: The PACMAN-AMI (Effects of the PCSK9 Antibody Alirocumab on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial used serial intravascular ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy, and optical coherence tomography to compare the effects of alirocumab vs placebo in patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy. Triple regression was defined by the combined presence of percentage of atheroma volume reduction, maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm reduction, and minimal fibrous cap thickness increase. Clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were assessed., Results: Overall, 84 patients (31.7%) showed triple regression (40.8% in the alirocumab group vs 23.0% in the placebo group; P = 0.002). On-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were lower in patients with vs without triple regression (between-group difference: -27.1 mg/dL; 95% CI: -37.7 to -16.6 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Triple regression was independently predicted by alirocumab treatment (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.57-5.16; P = 0.001) and a higher baseline maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; P = 0.013). The composite clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization occurred less frequently in patients with vs without triple regression (8.3% vs 18.2%; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: Triple regression occurred in one-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction who were receiving high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy and was associated with alirocumab treatment, higher baseline lipid content, and reduced cardiovascular events. (Vascular Effects of Alirocumab in Acute MI-Patients [PACMAN-AMI]; NCT03067844)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was conducted in an independent academic setting and funded by Bern University Hospital. Dr Ueki has received personal fees and nonfinancial support from NIPRO; and has received personal fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbott Vascular, Kowa, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Kakizaki has received speaker fees from Abbott Medical Japan, Philips Japan, Mochida Pharmaceutical Japan, Novartis Japan, Kowa Japan, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical Japan, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Daiichi-Sankyo Japan, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Japan, and Eli Lilly Japan, outside the submitted work. Dr Hofbauer has received speaker fees from Sanofi. Dr Stortecky has received research grants paid to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific; and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific. Dr Bär has received research grants paid to the institution from Medis Medical Imaging, Abbott, and Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung, outside the submitted work; and has received a personal research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Spirk has received personal fees from Sanofi (Suisse), outside the submitted work. Dr Räber has received grants from Sanofi, Regeneron, and Infraredx paid to Inselspital; has received speaker fees from Sanofi during the conduct of the study; has received grants from Abbott, Heartflow, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik paid to Inselspital; and has received grants from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Occlutech, Sanofi, Canon, and Medtronic for speaker and consultation fees outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The SYNTAX trial demonstrated negative impact of repeat revascularization (RR) on 5-year outcomes following PCI/CABG in patients with three-vessel(3VD) and/or left main coronary artery disease(LMCAD). We aimed to investigate the impact of RR within 5 years, on 10-year mortality in patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD after PCI/CABG., Methods: The SYNTAXES study evaluated the vital status out to 10 years of patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD. Patients were stratified by RR within 5 years and randomized treatment. The association between RR within 5 years and 10-year mortality was assessed., Results: A total of 330 out of 1800 patients (18.3%) underwent RR within 5 years. RR occurred more frequently after initial PCI than after initial CABG (25.9% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Overall, 10-year mortality was comparable between patients undergoing RR and those not (28.2% vs. 26.1%, adjusted HR: 1.17, 95%CI 0.93-1.48, p = 0.187). In the PCI arm, RR was associated with a trend toward higher 10-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.29, 95%CI 0.97-1.72, p = 0.075), while in the CABG arm, the trend was opposite (adjusted HR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.46-1.20, p = 0.219). Among patients requiring RR, those who underwent PCI as initial revascularization had a higher risk of 10-year mortality compared to initial CABG (33.5% vs. 17.6%, adjusted HR: 2.09, 95%CI 1.21-3.61, p = 0.008)., Conclusion: In the SYNTAXES study, RR within 5 years had no impact on 10-year all-cause death in the population overall. Among patients requiring any repeat procedures, 10-year mortality was higher after initial treatment with PCI than after CABG. These exploratory findings should be investigated with larger populations in future studies., Trial Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov ; SYNTAXES Unique identifier: NCT03417050. URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov ; SYNTAX Unique identifier: NCT00114972., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: The very long-term mortality of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a randomized complex coronary artery disease population is unknown. This study aims to investigate the impact of on-pump and off-pump CABG versus PCI on 10-year all-cause mortality., Methods: The SYNTAX trial randomized 1800 patients with three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease to PCI or CABG and assessed their survival at 10 years. In this sub-study, the hazard of mortality over 10 years was compared according to the technique of revascularization: on-pump CABG (n = 725), off-pump CABG (n = 128) and PCI (n = 903)., Results: There was substantial inter-site variation in the use of off-pump CABG despite baseline characteristics being largely homogeneous among the 3 groups. The crude rate of mortality was significantly lower following on-pump CABG versus PCI [25.6% vs 28.4%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.96], while it was comparable between off-pump CABG and PCI (28.5% vs 28.4%, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69-1.40). After adjusting for the 9 variables included in the SYNTAX score II 2020, 10-year mortality remained significantly lower with on-pump CABG than PCI (HR 0.75 against PCI, P = 0.009)., Conclusions: In the SYNTAXES trial, 10-year mortality adjusted for major confounders was significantly lower following on-pump CABG compared to PCI. There was no evidence for unadjusted difference between off-pump CABG and PCI, although the unadjusted estimated HR had a wide CI. Site heterogeneity in the technique used in bypass surgery has had measurable effects on treatment performance., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Angiography alone is the most commonly used imaging modality for guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. Angiography is limited, however, by several factors, including that it only portrays a low resolution, two-dimensional outline of the lumen and does not inform on plaque composition and functional stenosis severity. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intracoronary imaging technique that has superior spatial resolution compared to all other imaging modalities. High-resolution imaging of the vascular wall enables precise measurement of vessel wall and luminal dimensions, more accurately informing about the anatomic severity of epicardial stenoses, and also provides input for computational models to assess functional severity. The very high-resolution images also permit plaque characterization that may be informative for prognostication. Moreover, periprocedural imaging provides valuable information to guide lesion preparation, stent implantation and to evaluate acute stent complications for which iterative treatment might reduce the occurrence of major adverse stent events. As such, OCT represent a potential future all-in-one tool that provides the data necessary to establish the indications, procedural planning and optimization, and final evaluation of percutaneous coronary revascularization., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Shockwave lithotripsy is a novel therapy to treat severely calcified lesions. The effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy to treat severely calcified lesions and stent underexpansion due to severe calcifications has been demonstrated. However, this is the first case to demonstrate the use of shockwave lithotripsy in stent underexpansion due to severely calcified in-stent restenosis. A woman in her early 50s presented with angina. The coronary angiogram showed severe three-vessel coronary artery disease with in-stent restenosis in the left anterior descending. After stent implantation in the left anterior descending, there was persisting stent underexpansion due to severely calcified in-stent restenosis. Shockwave lithotripsy contributed to the improvement of angiographic and haemodynamic results. Although evidence is still limited, shockwave lithotripsy could be a valuable tool for treatment of stent underexpansion as a result of severely calcified in-stent restenosis. More studies are needed to confirm the incremental value of shockwave lithotripsy in stent underexpansion., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)