Search

Imbalanced immune responses are a prominent hallmark of cancer and autoimmunity. Myeloid cells can be overly suppressive, inhibiting protective immune responses or inactive not controlling autoreactive immune cells. Understanding the mechanisms that induce suppressive myeloid cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and tolerogenic dendritic cells (TolDCs), can facilitate the development of immune-restoring therapeutic approaches. MDSCs are a major barrier for effective cancer immunotherapy by suppressing antitumor immune responses in cancer patients. TolDCs are administered to patients to promote immune tolerance with the intent to control autoimmune disease. Here, we investigated the development and suppressive/tolerogenic activity of human MDSCs and TolDCs to gain insight into signaling pathways that drive immunosuppression in these different myeloid subsets. Moreover, monocyte-derived MDSCs (M-MDSCs) generated in vitro were compared to M-MDSCs isolated from head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. PI3K-AKT signaling was identified as being crucial for the induction of human M-MDSCs. PI3K inhibition prevented the downregulation of HLA-DR and the upregulation of reactive oxygen species and MerTK. In addition, we show that the suppressive activity of dexamethasone-induced TolDCs is induced by β-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling. The identification of PI3K-AKT and Wnt signal transduction pathways as respective inducers of the immunomodulatory capacity of M-MDSCs and TolDCs provides opportunities to overcome suppressive myeloid cells in cancer patients and optimize therapeutic application of TolDCs. Lastly, the observed similarities between generated- and patient-derived M-MDSCs support the use of in vitro-generated M-MDSCs as powerful model to investigate the functionality of human MDSCs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cancer immunotherapies have induced long-lasting responses in cancer patients including those with melanoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the majority of treated patients does not achieve clinical benefit from immunotherapy because of systemic tumor-induced immunosuppression. Monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) are implicated as key players in inhibiting anti-tumor immune responses and their frequencies are closely associated with tumor progression. Tumor-derived signals, including signaling via STAT3-COX-2, induce the transformation of monocytic precursors into suppressive M-MDSCs. In a retrospective assessment, we observed that survival of melanoma patients undergoing dendritic cell vaccination was negatively associated with blood M-MDSC levels. Previously, it was shown that platinum-based chemotherapeutics inhibit STAT signaling. Here, we show that cisplatin and oxaliplatin treatment interfere with the development of M-MDSCs, potentially synergizing with cancer immunotherapy. In vitro , subclinical doses of platinum-based drugs prevented the generation of COX-2 + M-MDSCs induced by tumor cells from melanoma patients. This was confirmed in HNSCC patients where intravenous cisplatin treatment drastically lowered M-MDSC frequency while monocyte levels remained stable. In treated patients, expression of COX-2 and arginase-1 in M-MDSCs was significantly decreased after two rounds of cisplatin, indicating inhibition of STAT3 signaling. In line, the capacity of M-MDSCs to inhibit activated T cell responses ex vivo was significantly decreased after patients received cisplatin. These results show that platinum-based chemotherapeutics inhibit the expansion and suppressive activity of M-MDSCs in vitro and in cancer patients. Therefore, platinum-based drugs have the potential to enhance response rates of immunotherapy by overcoming M-MDSC-mediated immunosuppression., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Current treatment for patients with autoimmune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes, often consists of long-term drug regimens that broadly dampen immune responses. These non-specific treatments are frequently associated with severe side effects creating an urgent need for safer and more effective therapy to promote peripheral tolerance in autoimmune diseases. Cell-based immunotherapy may offer an encouraging alternative, where tolerogenic CD14 + myeloid cells are infused to inhibit autoreactive effector cells. In this review, we compared in depth three promising tolerogenic CD14 + candidates for the treatment of autoimmune disease: 1) tolerogenic dendritic cells, 2) monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and 3) CD14 + type 2 conventional dendritic cells. TolDC-based therapy has entered clinical testing whereas evidence from the latter two cell types m-MDSCs and CD14 + cDC2s is predominantly coming from cancer immunology research. These three cell types have distinct cellular properties and immunosuppressive mechanisms offering unique opportunities to be explored. However, these cells differ in stage of development towards immunotherapy each facing additional hurdles. Therefore, we speculate on the potential benefits and risks of these cell types as novel cell-based immunotherapies to control autoimmune disease in patients., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The tumour microenvironment (TME) forms a major obstacle in effective cancer treatment and for clinical success of immunotherapy. Conventional co-cultures have shed light onto multiple aspects of cancer immunobiology, but they are limited by the lack of physiological complexity. We develop a human organotypic skin melanoma culture (OMC) that allows real-time study of host-malignant cell interactions within a multicellular tissue architecture. By co-culturing decellularized dermis with keratinocytes, fibroblasts and immune cells in the presence of melanoma cells, we generate a reconstructed TME that closely resembles tumour growth as observed in human lesions and supports cell survival and function. We demonstrate that the OMC is suitable and outperforms conventional 2D co-cultures for the study of TME-imprinting mechanisms. Within the OMC, we observe the tumour-driven conversion of cDC2s into CD14 + DCs, characterized by an immunosuppressive phenotype. The OMC provides a valuable approach to study how a TME affects the immune system.

Staphylococcus aureus is a major human and animal pathogen and a common cause of mastitis in cattle. S. aureus secretes several leukocidins that target bovine neutrophils, crucial effector cells in the defence against bacterial pathogens. In this study, we investigated the role of staphylococcal leukocidins in the pathogenesis of bovine S. aureus disease. We show that LukAB, in contrast to the γ-hemolysins, LukED, and LukMF', was unable to kill bovine neutrophils, and identified CXCR2 as a bovine receptor for HlgAB and LukED. Furthermore, we assessed functional leukocidin secretion by bovine mastitis isolates and observed that, although leukocidin production was strain dependent, LukMF' was most abundantly secreted and the major toxin killing bovine neutrophils. To determine the role of LukMF' in bovine mastitis, cattle were challenged with high (S1444) or intermediate (S1449, S1463) LukMF'-producing isolates. Only animals infected with S1444 developed severe clinical symptoms. Importantly, LukM was produced in vivo during the course of infection and levels in milk were associated with the severity of mastitis. Altogether, these findings underline the importance of LukMF' as a virulence factor and support the development of therapeutic approaches targeting LukMF' to control S. aureus mastitis in cattle., Competing Interests: E.B., T.M.V. and P.N. are employed by MSD-AH, a pharmaceutical company producing veterinary vaccines. M.V., G.W., K.K., C.H., P.A., I.D., K.v.K., A.K., V.R., J.S., L.B. do not have any competing interests.