Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has strained surgical systems worldwide and placed healthcare providers at risk in their workplace. To protect surgical care providers caring for patients with COVID-19, in May 2020 we developed a COVID-19 Surgical Patient Checklist (C19 SPC), including online training materials, to accompany the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist. In October 2020, an online survey was conducted via partner and social media networks to understand perioperative clinicians' intraoperative practice and perceptions of safety while caring for COVID-19 positive patients and gain feedback on the utility of C19 SPC. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise responses by World Bank income classification. Qualitative analysis was performed to describe respondents' perceptions of C19 SPC and recommended modifications. Respondents included 539 perioperative clinicians from 63 countries. One-third of respondents reported feeling unsafe in their workplace due to COVID-19 with significantly higher proportions in low (39.8%) and lower-middle (33.9%) than higher income countries (15.6%). The most cited concern was the risk of COVID-19 transmission to self, colleagues and family. A large proportion of respondents (65.3%) reported that they had not used C19 SPC, yet 83.8% of these respondents felt it would be useful. Of those who reported that they had used C19 SPC, 62.0% stated feeling safer in the workplace because of its use. Based on survey results, modifications were incorporated into a subsequent version. Our survey findings suggest that perioperative clinicians report feeling unsafe at work during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, adjunct tools such as the C19 SPC can help to improve perceived safety.

Access to emergency obstetric care, including assisted vaginal birth and caesarean birth, is crucial for improving maternal and childbirth outcomes. However, although the proportion of births by caesarean section has increased during the last few decades, the use of assisted vaginal birth has declined. This is particularly the case in low- and middle-income countries, despite an assisted vaginal birth often being less risky than caesarean birth. We therefore conducted a three-step process to identify a research agenda necessary to increase the use of, or reintroduce, assisted vaginal birth: after conducting an evidence synthesis, which informed a consultation with technical experts who proposed an initial research agenda, we sought and incorporated the views of women's representatives of this agenda. This process has allowed us to identify a comprehensive research agenda, with topics categorized as: (i) the need to understand women's perceptions of assisted vaginal birth, and provide appropriate and reliable information; (ii) the importance of training health-care providers in clinical skills but also in respectful care, effective communication, shared decision-making and informed consent; and (iii) the barriers to and facilitators of implementation and sustainability. From women's feedback, we learned of the urgent need to recognize labour, childbirth and postpartum experiences as inherently physiological and dignified human processes, in which interventions should only be implemented if necessary. The promotion and/or reintroduction of assisted vaginal birth in low-resource settings requires governments, policy-makers and hospital administrators to support skilled health-care providers who can, in turn, respectfully support women in labour and childbirth. L'acces aux soins obstetriques d'urgence, y compris l'accouchement vaginal assiste et la cesarienne, est essentiel pour ameliorer les effets de la maternite et de l'accouchement. Toutefois, bien que la proportion de cesariennes ait augmente ces dernieres decennies, le recours a l'accouchement vaginal assiste a diminue. C'est particulierement le cas dans les pays a revenu faible ou intermediaire, bien que l'accouchement vaginal assiste soit souvent moins risque qu'une cesarienne. Nous avons donc mene un processus en trois etapes afin d'imaginer un programme de recherche qui permettrait d'augmenter le recours a l'accouchement vaginal assiste ou de le reintroduire. Apres avoir realise une synthese des donnees probantes, qui a servi de base a une consultation avec des experts techniques qui ont propose un programme de recherche initial, nous avons sollicite et incorpore les avis des representantes des femmes pour ce programme. Ce processus nous a permis d'imaginer un programme de recherche complet, avec des sujets classes comme suit: (i) la necessite de comprendre la perception qu'ont les femmes de l'accouchement vaginal assiste et de fournir des informations appropriees et fiables; (ii) l'importance de la formation des prestataires de soins de sante en matiere de competences cliniques, mais aussi de respect dans les soins de sante, de communication efficace, de prise de decision partagee et de consentement eclaire; ou (iii) les obstacles a la mise en reuvre et a la durabilite et les facteurs qui les facilitent. Les reactions de femmes nous ont appris qu'il etait urgent de reconnaitre que l'accouchement, la naissance et le post-partum sont des processus humains intrinsequement physiologiques et dignes au cours desquels les interventions ne devraient etre mises en reuvre qu'en cas de necessite. La promotion et/ou la reintroduction de l'accouchement vaginal assiste dans les regions a faibles ressources necessitent que les pouvoirs publics, les decideurs politiques et les administrations d'hopitaux soutiennent les prestataires de soins de sante qualifies, qui pourront a leur tour soutenir respectueusement les femmes pendant l'accouchement. El acceso a la atencion obstetrica de emergencia, incluido el parto vaginal asistido y el parto por cesarea, es crucial para mejorar los resultados de la maternidad y el parto. No obstante, aunque el porcentaje de partos por cesarea ha aumentado en las ultimas decadas, el uso del parto vaginal asistido ha disminuido. Esto ocurre especialmente en los paises de ingresos bajos y medios, a pesar de que un parto vaginal asistido suele ser menos arriesgado que un parto por cesarea. Por lo tanto, llevamos a cabo un proceso de tres pasos para identificar un programa de investigacion necesario para aumentar el uso del parto vaginal asistido o volver a incorporarlo: tras realizar una sintesis de la evidencia, que sirvio de base para una consulta con expertos tecnicos que propusieron un programa de investigacion inicial, buscamos e integramos las opiniones de las representantes de las mujeres sobre este programa. Este proceso nos ha permitido identificar un programa de investigacion exhaustivo, con temas categorizados como: (i) la necesidad de comprender las percepciones de las mujeres sobre el parto vaginal asistido, y proporcionar informacion adecuada y fiable; (ii) la importancia de formar a los profesionales sanitarios en habilidades clinicas, pero tambien en atencion respetuosa, comunicacion efectiva, toma de decisiones compartida y consentimiento informado; o (iii) las barreras y los facilitadores de la implementacion y la sostenibilidad. A partir de las opiniones de las mujeres, nos enteramos de la urgente necesidad de reconocer las experiencias del parto, el alumbramiento y el posparto como procesos humanos inherentemente fisiologicos y dignos, en los que las intervenciones solo deben aplicarse si son necesarias. La promocion o la reincoporacion del parto vaginal asistido en regiones de escasos recursos exige que los gobiernos, los responsables de formular politicas y los administradores de hospitales apoyen a los profesionales sanitarios capacitados que, a su vez, pueden ayudar a las mujeres en el trabajo de parto y el alumbramiento de manera respetuosa. [phrase omitted], Introduction Assisted vaginal birth, also known as instrumental or operative vaginal birth, refers to a vaginal birth conducted with the help of an instrument such as forceps or a vacuum [...]

BackgroundIndicators to evaluate progress towards timely access to safe surgical, anaesthesia, and obstetric (SAO) care were proposed in 2015 by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. These aimed to capture access to surgery, surgical workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality rate, and catastrophic and impoverishing financial consequences of surgery. Despite being rapidly taken up by practitioners, data points from which to derive the indicators were not defined, limiting comparability across time or settings. We convened global experts to evaluate and explicitly define-for the first time-the indicators to improve comparability and support achievement of 2030 goals to improve access to safe affordable surgical and anaesthesia care globally.Methods and findingsThe Utstein process for developing and reporting guidelines through a consensus building process was followed. In-person discussions at a 2-day meeting were followed by an iterative process conducted by email and virtual group meetings until consensus was reached. The meeting was held between June 16 to 18, 2019; discussions continued until August 2020. Participants consisted of experts in surgery, anaesthesia, and obstetric care, data science, and health indicators from high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Considering each of the 6 indicators in turn, we refined overarching descriptions and agreed upon data points needed for construction of each indicator at current time (basic data points), and as each evolves over 2 to 5 (intermediate) and >5 year (full) time frames. We removed one of the original 6 indicators (one of 2 financial risk protection indicators was eliminated) and refined descriptions and defined data points required to construct the 5 remaining indicators: geospatial access, workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality, and catastrophic expenditure. A strength of the process was the number of people from global institutes and multilateral agencies involved in the collection and reporting of global health metrics; a limitation was the limited number of participants from low- or middle-income countries-who only made up 21% of the total attendees.ConclusionsTo track global progress towards timely access to quality SAO care, these indicators-at the basic level-should be implemented universally as soon as possible. Intermediate and full indicator sets should be achieved by all countries over time. Meanwhile, these evolutions can assist in the short term in developing national surgical plans and collecting more detailed data for research studies.