Search

A prospective phase II trial was carried out to define the activity of a low-dose subcutaneous regimen of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon α-2b (IFN-α) in combination with intravenous administration of vinblastine (VLB) in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC). Thirty-one patients with advanced RCC who had received no prior biochemotherapy were treated with IL-2 4.5 MU × 2/24 h thrice weekly for 2 weeks, IFN-α 3 MU/24 h thrice weekly (alternating days) for 2 consecutive weeks and VLB 4 mg/m[sup 2] every 3 weeks. Patients were to have a 1-week rest period after each 2 weeks of therapy with cytokines. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Maximum duration of treatment was 1 year. Treatment was administered on an outpatient basis. There were 4 complete (12.9%) and 8 partial responses (25.8%), with an overall response rate of 38.7%. The median duration of response was 6.5 months. Responses were seen in lung, lymph nodes, bones, liver and other tumor metastases. Toxicity was mild to moderate, consisting of fever, anorexia, malaise and nausea-vomiting in >80% of patients. Hypotension and transient alopecia occurred in >20% of patients. Liver enzyme elevation was frequently observed. Treatment-induced eosinophilia occurred in the majority of patients, while in 52% of patients granulocytopenia grade II and grade III did not require dose modification of drugs. Transient inflammation and local induration at the injection sites was observed in the majority of patients. None of the patients experienced major VLB-related toxicity and no toxic deaths occurred. This three-drug combination immunochemotherapy may be a promising regimen with modest toxicity in advanced RCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin (GEMOX regimen) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with advanced NSCLC who had disease progression after a cisplatin- and taxane-based front-line regimen were treated with gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) on day 8) every 3 weeks. The patients' median age was 62 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 11, 1 for 17 and 2 for 4 patients. The treatment was second line for 22 (69%) and >or=third line for 10 (31%) patients., Results: Partial response was achieved in 5 (16%) patients, stable disease in 8 (25%) and progressive disease in 19 (59%). Two patients with stable disease and one patient with progressive disease while on previous chemotherapy experienced a partial response with GEMOX regimen. The median duration of response was 2.5 months (range, 1-11.5), the median time to tumor progression 3 months (range, 1-18) and the median survival 5.6 months (range, 1-31). Grade III neutropenia occurred in five (16%) patients, grade III thrombocytopenia in two (6%) and grade III anemia in three (9%); moreover, grades II-III asthenia was reported in eight (25%) patients and grades II-III neurotoxicity in three (9%)., Conclusion: The GEMOX combination is a relatively active and well tolerated second-line regimen in NSCLC patients pretreated with a taxane- and/or platinum-based chemotherapy.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine combination in pretreated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC)., Patients and Methods: Thirty-five pretreated patients (median age 59 years, PS: 0--1 in 97% and 2 in 3%) were treated with gemcitabine (1100 mg/m(2)) and vinorelbine (25mg/m(2)) on d1 and d8 every 3 weeks. Seven (20%) patients were treated with two prior regimens and 20 (57%) were refractory to front-line chemotherapy., Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis two (6%) partial responses (PR) were observed with a duration of 5.6 and 11.1 months. Stable disease (SD) was documented in 8 (23%) patients and progressive disease (PD) in 25 (71%). The overall median survival was 4.5 and the 6 months survival rate was 42.6%. Grades 3--4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 25 and 14% of the patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity consisted of grade 2 neurotoxicity occurring in 14% of the patients and grades 2--3 fatigue in 17%. Febrile neutropenia was observed in three (8.6%) patients and one of them died from sepsis., Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine cannot be considered as an effective salvage treatment in pretreated patients with SCLC.

Purpose: To study the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of methotrexate, etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MVIP) in patients with germ-cell tumors (GCTs) refractory to or relapsed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Between 1989 and 2001 22 male patients with GCTs refractory (n=7) or relapsed (n=15) after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy entered prospectively the study. Their median age was 29 years. Methotrexate 250 mg/m(2) as 4-hour infusion plus folinic acid were administered on day 1. On day 3 cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) with pre and posthydration was given as 30-min infusion; and ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) with mesna as 24-hour infusion. Etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/day as 1-hour infusion was administered on days 3-5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was administered either therapeutically (grade 3-4 neutropenia-/+antibiotics) or prophylactically (nadir grade 3-4 neutropenia in the previous chemotherapy cycle)., Results: All patients were evaluable for response, toxicity and survival. A total of 95 cycles (median 4 cycles per patient) of MVIP were administered. Fourteen (63.6%) patient achieved complete response (CR), and 8 (36.4%) were treatment failures. Long-term disease-free survival (DFS) with MVIP was achieved in 11 out of 14 (78.6%) CR patients or 50% of all patients. After a median follow-up period of 55.04(+) months (range 4-147(+) months) overall survival is 59.09%. Good performance status (PS) was the only significant predictor for survival. Toxicity was easily manageable with no deaths or therapy delays., Conclusion: MVIP conventional chemotherapy proved particularly effective in terms of CR rate, overall survival and long-term DFS in this very poor prognosis patient population. Toxicity was tolerable. The results obtained are equal or even superior compared with those taken by more intensive regimens, including high-dose chemotherapy. MVIP justifies further studies in patients with refractory/ relapsed GCTs.

Purpose: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of methotrexate (M), etoposide (V), ifosfamide (I) and cisplatin (P) combination chemotherapy (MVIP) administered to chemotherapy-naive patients with intermediate / poor prognosis germ-cell tumors (GCT) according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) consensus classification system (IGCCC)., Patients and Methods: From 1992 to 2001 24 consecutive intermediate (n=14)/poor prognosis (n=10) GCT male patients entered prospectively this phase II trial. Patients received methotrexate 250 mg/m(2), day 1, with folinic acid rescue; cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) with appropriate hydration, day 3; ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) with mesna uroprotection, day 3; and etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/day, days 3-5. MVIP was repeated every 3 weeks., Results: After 120 cycles of MVIP (median 5, range 2- 7) 18 (75%) patients achieved complete remission (CR). CR was attained by 12 out of 14 (86%) intermediate prognosis and 6 out of 10 (60%) poor prognosis patients. Three CR patients (2 intermediate, 1 poor prognosis) of out 18 (16.7%) relapsed after a median of 6 months and 1 of them (poor prognosis) achieved a durable CR with second-line chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 37 months (range 5-115 months) 16 patients (10, 71% intermediate and 6, 60% poor prognosis) are long-term survivors with no evidence of disease (NED), and 2 (one of each group) are alive with disease. Actuarial overall survival at 3 and more years is 75% and NED survival is 67%. Hematologic toxicity was most common and easily manageable (grade 3-4 neutropenia 46% of the cycles and thrombocytopenia 25% of the cycles). There were no deaths, withdrawals or delays in chemotherapy administration because of toxicity., Conclusion: MVIP conventional chemotherapy proved very effective in terms of CR rate, overall survival and longterm NED survival in these unfavorable groups of GCT patients. The results obtained are encouraging and compare favorably with those taken by more intensive regimens including high-dose chemotherapy. We believe that MVIP justifies further studies.

Forty patients with previously untreated epithelial ovarian cancer (OC), with FIGO stages Ic-IV, were randomly allocated to receive intravenously either carboplatin (C) 400 mg/m2 every three weeks (C arm, 20 patients) or a combination of C 350 mg/m2, ifosfamide (I) 5 g/m2 with mesna every three weeks, vincristine (V) 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum total dose 2 mg) and bleomycin (B) 30 mg every ten days (CIVB arm, 20 patients). Responding patients received 6 courses of chemotherapy and all 40 patients were evaluable for toxicity, response and survival. Clinical characteristics of patients were similar in both arms. Clinico-imaging results with chemotherapy were as follows: in C arm, clinical complete remission (cCR) 11 (55%) and partial remission (cPR) five (25%) patients for an overall response rate (ORR) 80%. For CIVB arm, cCR ten (50%) and cPR four (20%) patients for an ORR 70%. Second look operation (SLO) was performed in three of the 11 cCR patients in the C arm and six of the ten cCR patients in the CIVB arm. Pathological CR (pCR) was confirmed in two of the three cCR C arm patients and two of the six in the CIVB patients. In the first interim analysis statistically significant differences, all favoring monochemotherapy, were seen in response duration, time to progression, disease-free and overall survival. These results along with the severe myelotoxicity resulting in dose reductions in the CIVB patients led us to stop enrolling new patients and follow this population closely for long-term results. These confirmed the first observations of the superiority of single-agent carboplatin in response duration (p = 0.034), time to progression (p = 0.028), disease-free survival (p = 0.010) and overall survival (p = 0.043). Because of the above reasons we have concluded that monochemotherapy with carboplatin is to be preferred over carboplatin in combination with other drugs.

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two different doses of ondansetron (8 mg vs. 24 mg) plus dexamethasone in the prevention of cisplatin (CDDP)-induced emesis and nausea (acute and delayed). The persistence of the anti-emetic efficacy during the second cycle of chemotherapy was also assessed. Eighty patients receiving high-dose CDDP (>80 mg/m2) were randomized to have either ondansetron 8 mg plus dexamethasone 20 mg (8 mg group) or ondansetron 24 mg plus dexamethasone 20 mg (24 mg group), given intravenously as a single dose before the CDDP infusion. From days 2-5, all patients received oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily. Seventy-five patients (38 in the 8 mg group and 37 in the 24 mg group) were evaluable for analysis. Among these, there were 24 patients who received ifosfamide (IFO) on the 2nd day of treatment; these patients were evaluated separately for delayed emesis. Complete protection from acute emesis was obtained in 26 (68.4%) and 26 (70.3%) patients, in the two groups, respectively. Complete protection against acute nausea was achieved in 23 (60.5%) and 24 (64.9%) patients, respectively. With respect to the delayed emesis, complete protection was achieved in 14 (56%) and 13 (50%) patients not receiving IFO and in 4 (30.8%) and 3 (27.3%) of those receiving IFO. The figures for the delayed nausea were: 12 (48%) and 13 (50%), 2 (15.4%) and 2 (18.2%), respectively. Similar protection against emesis and nausea was recorded during the second cycle of chemotherapy. Both regimens have the same efficacy and thus, taking into account the cost-effectiveness, 8 mg of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in a single intravenous dose should be used for the prevention of high-dose CDDP-induced emesis.

A total of 76 patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were prospectively monitored with simultaneous serum value estimations of tumor polypeptide antigen (TPA), tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG), prostatic specific antigen (PSA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), and CA 19-9 in different stages and phases of their disease. In locally advanced disease positive values were noted for TATI in 22/28 patients (78.5%), for TPA in 17/28 (60.7%), for CA 19-9 in 10/28 (35.7%), for CEA 11/28 (39.2%), for beta-HCG in 3/28 (10.7%), for PSA in 6/28 (21.4%), for SCC in 6/28 (21.4%), and for AFP in 0/28. In metastatic disease elevated levels were observed for TATI in 43/48 patients (89.5%), for TPA in 41/48 (85.4%), for CA 19-9 in 19/48 (39.5%), for CEA in 20/48 (41.6%), for beta-HCG in 6/48 (12.5%), for PSA in 7/48 (14.5%), for SCC in 8/48 (16.6%), and for AFP in 1/48 (2.1%). In metastatic disease TATI and TPA values were significantly modified in patients with complete remission and TATI, TPA, and CA 19-9 in patients with partial remission and nonresponders. In T2-T4-N0M0 tumors, TPA, TATI, CA 19-9, and CEA were significantly increased in nonresponders. In patients with complete remission, a change in serum TATI, TPA, and CA 19-9 levels cannot be evidenced with the available numbers. The concurrent determination of TATI and TPA in T2-T4N0M0 tumors and TATI, TPA, and CA 19-9 in generalized disease could predict the response to chemotherapy. This study indicates that only the determination of TATI and TPA and in some degree the CA 19-9 is a potential tool for monitoring the efficacy of treatment.