Search

BH3 mimetic drugs, which inhibit prosurvival BCL2 family proteins, have limited single-agent activity in solid tumor models. The potential of BH3 mimetics for these cancers may depend on their ability to potentiate the apoptotic response to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Using a novel class of potent and selective MCL1 inhibitors, we demonstrate that concurrent MEK + MCL1 inhibition induces apoptosis and tumor regression in KRAS-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models, which respond poorly to MEK inhibition alone. Susceptibility to BH3 mimetics that target either MCL1 or BCL-xL was determined by the differential binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1 or BCL-xL, respectively. The efficacy of dual MEK + MCL1 blockade was augmented by prior transient exposure to BCL-xL inhibitors, which promotes the binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1. This suggests a novel strategy for integrating BH3 mimetics that target different BCL2 family proteins for KRAS-mutant NSCLC.Significance:Defining the molecular basis for MCL1 versus BCL-xL dependency will be essential for effective prioritization of BH3 mimetic combination therapies in the clinic. We discover a novel strategy for integrating BCL-xL and MCL1 inhibitors to drive and subsequently exploit apoptotic dependencies of KRAS-mutant NSCLCs treated with MEK inhibitors.See related commentary by Leber et al., p. 1511.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494

Supplementary Data and Methods

Supplementary Figure 1-5, Supplementary Tables 1-3

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Figure 1

Purpose:KRAS-mutant lung cancers have been recalcitrant to treatments including those targeting the MAPK pathway. Covalent inhibitors of KRAS p.G12C allele allow for direct and specific inhibition of mutant KRAS in cancer cells. However, as for other targeted therapies, the therapeutic potential of these inhibitors can be impaired by intrinsic resistance mechanisms. Therefore, combination strategies are likely needed to improve efficacy.Experimental Design: To identify strategies to maximally leverage direct KRAS inhibition we defined the response of a panel of NSCLC models bearing the KRAS G12C–activating mutation in vitro and in vivo. We used a second-generation KRAS G12C inhibitor, ARS1620 with improved bioavailability over the first generation. We analyzed KRAS downstream effectors signaling to identify mechanisms underlying differential response. To identify candidate combination strategies, we performed a high-throughput drug screening across 112 drugs in combination with ARS1620. We validated the top hits in vitro and in vivo including patient-derived xenograft models.Results:Response to direct KRAS G12C inhibition was heterogeneous across models. Adaptive resistance mechanisms involving reactivation of MAPK pathway and failure to induce PI3K–AKT pathway inactivation were identified as likely resistance events. We identified several model-specific effective combinations as well as a broad-sensitizing effect of PI3K-AKT–mTOR pathway inhibitors. The G12Ci+PI3Ki combination was effective in vitro and in vivo on models resistant to single-agent ARS1620 including patient-derived xenografts models.Conclusions:Our findings suggest that signaling adaptation can in some instances limit the efficacy of ARS1620 but combination with PI3K inhibitors can overcome this resistance.

Supplementary Table 1

Legends to supplementary table, data and figures

Many cancers harbor pro-proliferative mutations of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and many targeted inhibitors now exist for clinical use, but drug resistance remains a major issue. We recently showed that BRAF-driven melanoma cells treated with BRAF inhibitors can non-genetically adapt to drug within 3-4 days to escape quiescence and resume slow proliferation. Here we show that this phenomenon is not unique to melanomas treated with BRAF inhibitors but rather is widespread across many clinical MAPK inhibitors and cancer types driven by EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations. In all treatment contexts examined, a subset of cells can escape drug-induced quiescence within four days to resume proliferation. These escapee cells broadly experience aberrant DNA replication, accumulate DNA lesions, spend longer in G2-M cell cycle phases, and mount an ATR-dependent stress response. We further identify the Fanconi anemia (FA) DNA repair pathway as critical for successful mitotic completion in escapees. Long-term cultures, patient samples, and clinical data demonstrate a broad dependency on ATR- and FA-mediated stress tolerance. Together, these results highlight the pervasiveness with which MAPK-mutant cancers are able to rapidly escape drug and the importance of suppressing early stress tolerance pathways to potentially achieve more durable clinical responses to targeted MAPK pathway inhibitors.

Many cancers harbor pro-proliferative mutations of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and many targeted inhibitors now exist for clinical use, but drug resistance remains a major issue. We previously showed that BRAF-driven melanoma cells treated with BRAF inhibitors can non-genetically adapt to drug within 3-4 days to escape quiescence and resume slow proliferation. Here we show that this phenomenon is not unique to melanomas treated with BRAF inhibitors but rather is widespread across many clinical MAPK inhibitors and cancer types driven by EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations. In all treatment contexts examined, a subset of cells can escape drug-induced quiescence within four days to resume proliferation. These escapee cells broadly experience aberrant DNA replication, accumulate DNA lesions, spend longer in G2-M cell cycle phases, and mount an ATR-dependent stress response. We further identify the Fanconi anemia (FA) DNA repair pathway as critical for successful mitotic completion in escapees. Long-term cultures, patient samples, and clinical data demonstrate a broad dependency on ATR- and FA-mediated stress tolerance. Together, these results highlight the pervasiveness with which MAPK-mutant cancers are able to rapidly escape drug and the importance of suppressing early stress tolerance pathways to potentially achieve more durable clinical responses to targeted MAPK pathway inhibitors. Citation Format: Timothy E. Hoffman, Chen Yang, Varuna Nangia, Christopher Ryland Ill, Sabrina L. Spencer. Multiple cancer types rapidly escape from multiple MAPK inhibitors to generate mutagenesis-prone subpopulations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3865.

CDK2 is a core cell-cycle enzyme that phosphorylates a variety of substrates to drive progression through the cell cycle. CDK2 is hyperactivated in multiple cancers and is therefore an attractive therapeutic target. Here, application of a novel small molecule CDK2/4/6 inhibitor, PF-06873600, enabled in-depth interrogation of CDK2 substrate phosphorylation, cell-cycle progression, and drug adaptation in preclinical models. CDK2-specific inhibition leads to rapid loss of substrate phosphorylation, but unexpectedly, CDK2 substrate phosphorylation rebounds within several hours. Whereas CDK1 is known to compensate for loss of CDK2 in Cdk2-/- mice, here we demonstrate an early dependence on CDK4/6 activity. CDK2 inhibition reveals latent CDK4/6 activity throughout S phase that backstops the proliferative program by maintaining Rb1 hyperphosphorylation, active E2F transcription, and Cyclin A2 expression, enabling re-activation of CDK2. Our results augment our understanding of CDK plasticity and indicate that co-inhibition of CDK2 and CDK4/6 is required to suppress adaptation to CDK2 inhibitors. Citation Format: Mansi Arora, Justin Moser, Timothy E. Hoffman, Lotte P. Watts, Mingwei Min, Monica Musteanu, Yao Rong, Jordan Schneider, C Ryland Ill, Varuna Nangia, Manuel Sanclemente, John Lapek, Lisa Nguyen, Sherry Niessen, Stephen Dann, Todd van Arsdale, Mariano Barbacid, Nichol Miller, Sabrina L. Spencer. Cells rapidly adapt to CDK2 inhibitors via plasticity of the CDK2/4/6-Rb-E2F axis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5992.

Evolved resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-targeted therapies remains a major clinical challenge. In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), failure of EGFR TKIs can result from both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of acquired drug resistance. Widespread reports of histologic and gene expression changes consistent with an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) have been associated with initially surviving drug-tolerant persister cells, which can seed bona fide genetic mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs. While therapeutic approaches targeting fully resistant cells, such as those harboring an EGFRT790M mutation, have been developed, a clinical strategy for preventing the emergence of persister cells remains elusive. Using mesenchymal cell lines derived from biopsies of patients who progressed on EGFR TKI as surrogates for persister populations, we performed whole-genome CRISPR screening and identified fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) as the top target promoting survival of mesenchymal EGFR mutant cancers. Although numerous previous reports of FGFR signaling contributing to EGFR TKI resistance in vitro exist, the data have not yet been sufficiently compelling to instigate a clinical trial testing this hypothesis, nor has the role of FGFR in promoting the survival of persister cells been elucidated. In this study, we find that combining EGFR and FGFR inhibitors inhibited the survival and expansion of EGFR mutant drug-tolerant cells over long time periods, preventing the development of fully resistant cancers in multiple vitro models and in vivo. These results suggest that dual EGFR and FGFR blockade may be a promising clinical strategy for both preventing and overcoming EMT-associated acquired drug resistance and provide motivation for the clinical study of combined EGFR and FGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs.

BackgroundResistance to therapy is a major problem in treating head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Complement system inhibition has been shown to reduce tumor growth, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance in other tumor models, but has yet to be explored in the context of HNSCC. Here, we tested the effects of complement inhibition and its therapeutic potential in HNSCC.MethodsWe conducted our studies using two Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-negative HNSCC orthotopic mouse models. Complement C3aR and C5aR1 receptor antagonists were paired with radiation therapy (RT). Tumor growth was measured and immune populations from tumor, lymph node, and peripheral blood were compared among various treatment groups. Genetically engineered mouse models DEREG and C3-/- were used in addition to standard wild type models. Flow cytometry, clinical gene sets, and in vitro assays were used to evaluate the role complement receptor blockade has on the immunological makeup of the tumor microenvironment.ResultsIn contrast to established literature, inhibition of complement C3a and C5a signaling using receptor antagonists accelerated tumor growth in multiple HNSCC cell lines and corresponded with increased frequency of regulatory T cell (Treg) populations. Local C3a and C5a signaling has importance for CD4 T cell homeostasis and eventual development into effector phenotypes. Interruption of this signaling axis drives a phenotypic conversion of CD4+ T cells into Tregs, characterized by enhanced expression of Foxp3. Depletion of Tregs reversed tumor growth, and combination of Treg depletion and C3a and C5a receptor inhibition decreased tumor growth below that of the control groups. Complete knockout of C3 does not harbor the expected effect on tumor growth, indicating a still undetermined compensatory mechanism. Dexamethasone is frequently prescribed to patients undergoing RT and inhibits complement activation. We report no deleterious effects associated with dexamethasone due to complement inhibition.ConclusionsOur data establish Tregs as a pro-tumorigenic driver during complement inhibition and provide evidence that targeted C3a and C5a receptor inhibition may add therapeutic advantage when coupled with anti-Treg therapy.

Acquired drug resistance to even the most effective anti-cancer targeted therapies remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although many drivers of acquired drug resistance have been identified1‒6, the underlying molecular mechanisms shaping tumor evolution during treatment are incompletely understood. The extent to which therapy actively drives tumor evolution by promoting mutagenic processes7 or simply provides the selective pressure necessary for the outgrowth of drug-resistant clones8 remains an open question. Here, we report that lung cancer targeted therapies commonly used in the clinic induce the expression of cytidine deaminase APOBEC3A (A3A), leading to sustained mutagenesis in drug-tolerant cancer cells persisting during therapy. Induction of A3A facilitated the formation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) in cycling drug-treated cells, and fully resistant clones that evolved from drug-tolerant intermediates exhibited an elevated burden of chromosomal aberrations such as copy number alterations and structural variations. Preventing therapy-induced A3A mutagenesis either by gene deletion or RNAi-mediated suppression delayed the emergence of drug resistance. Finally, we observed accumulation of A3A mutations in lung cancer patients who developed drug resistance after treatment with sequential targeted therapies. These data suggest that induction of A3A mutagenesis in response to targeted therapy treatment may facilitate the development of acquired resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Thus, suppressing expression or enzymatic activity of A3A may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent or delay acquired resistance to lung cancer targeted therapy.

Purpose: KRAS-mutant lung cancers have been recalcitrant to treatments including those targeting the MAPK pathway. Covalent inhibitors of KRAS p.G12C allele allow for direct and specific inhibition of mutant KRAS in cancer cells. However, as for other targeted therapies, the therapeutic potential of these inhibitors can be impaired by intrinsic resistance mechanisms. Therefore, combination strategies are likely needed to improve efficacy. Experimental Design: To identify strategies to maximally leverage direct KRAS inhibition we defined the response of a panel of NSCLC models bearing the KRAS G12C–activating mutation in vitro and in vivo. We used a second-generation KRAS G12C inhibitor, ARS1620 with improved bioavailability over the first generation. We analyzed KRAS downstream effectors signaling to identify mechanisms underlying differential response. To identify candidate combination strategies, we performed a high-throughput drug screening across 112 drugs in combination with ARS1620. We validated the top hits in vitro and in vivo including patient-derived xenograft models. Results: Response to direct KRAS G12C inhibition was heterogeneous across models. Adaptive resistance mechanisms involving reactivation of MAPK pathway and failure to induce PI3K–AKT pathway inactivation were identified as likely resistance events. We identified several model-specific effective combinations as well as a broad-sensitizing effect of PI3K-AKT–mTOR pathway inhibitors. The G12Ci+PI3Ki combination was effective in vitro and in vivo on models resistant to single-agent ARS1620 including patient-derived xenografts models. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that signaling adaptation can in some instances limit the efficacy of ARS1620 but combination with PI3K inhibitors can overcome this resistance.

We present a cohort of 41 patients with osimertinib resistance biopsies, including 2 with an acquired CCDC6–RET fusion. Although RET fusions have been identified in resistant EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), their role in acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors is not well described. To assess the biological implications of RET fusions in an EGFR-mutant cancer, we expressed CCDC6–RET in PC9 (EGFR del19) and MGH134 (EGFR L858R/T790M) cells and found that CCDC6–RET was sufficient to confer resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The selective RET inhibitors BLU-667 and cabozantinib resensitized CCDC6–RET-expressing cells to EGFR inhibition. Finally, we treated 2 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and RET-mediated resistance with osimertinib and BLU-667. The combination was well tolerated and led to rapid radiographic response in both patients. This study provides proof of concept that RET fusions can mediate acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and that combined EGFR and RET inhibition with osimertinib/BLU-667 may be a well-tolerated and effective treatment strategy for such patients. Significance: The role of RET fusions in resistant EGFR-mutant cancers is unknown. We report that RET fusions mediate resistance to EGFR inhibitors and demonstrate that this bypass track can be effectively targeted with a selective RET inhibitor (BLU-667) in the clinic. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494

BH3 mimetic drugs, which inhibit prosurvival BCL2 family proteins, have limited single-agent activity in solid tumor models. The potential of BH3 mimetics for these cancers may depend on their ability to potentiate the apoptotic response to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Using a novel class of potent and selective MCL1 inhibitors, we demonstrate that concurrent MEK + MCL1 inhibition induces apoptosis and tumor regression in KRAS-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models, which respond poorly to MEK inhibition alone. Susceptibility to BH3 mimetics that target either MCL1 or BCL-xL was determined by the differential binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1 or BCL-xL, respectively. The efficacy of dual MEK + MCL1 blockade was augmented by prior transient exposure to BCL-xL inhibitors, which promotes the binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1. This suggests a novel strategy for integrating BH3 mimetics that target different BCL2 family proteins for KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Significance: Defining the molecular basis for MCL1 versus BCL-xL dependency will be essential for effective prioritization of BH3 mimetic combination therapies in the clinic. We discover a novel strategy for integrating BCL-xL and MCL1 inhibitors to drive and subsequently exploit apoptotic dependencies of KRAS-mutant NSCLCs treated with MEK inhibitors. See related commentary by Leber et al., p. 1511. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494

We present a cohort of 41 patients with osimertinib resistance biopsies, including two with an acquired CCDC6-RET fusion. While RET fusions have been identified in resistant EGFR-mutant NSCLC, their role in acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors is not well described. To assess the biological implications of RET fusions in an EGFR-mutant cancer, we expressed CCDC6-RET in PC9 (EGFR del19) and MGH134 (EGFR L858R/T790M) cells and found that CCDC6-RET was sufficient to confer resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The selective RET inhibitors BLU-667 or cabozantinib resensitized CCDC6-RET-expressing cells to EGFR inhibition. Finally, we treated two patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and RET-mediated resistance with osimertinib and BLU-667. The combination was well-tolerated and led to rapid radiographic response in both patients. This study provides proof-of-concept that RET fusions can mediate acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and that combined EGFR and RET inhibition with osimertinib/BLU-667 may be a well-tolerated and effective treatment strategy for such patients.

Over 30% of lung adenocarcinomas harbor KRAS mutation. Despite progress in targeted therapies for specific genetic subsets of lung cancer (e.g. EGFR or ALK), there are no clinically effective targeted therapies for KRAS non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interpatient heterogeneity of KRAS mutant lung cancers, with large variability in co-occurring mutations, may contribute to its refractory phenotype. Specifically, KRAS mutant lung cancers with concurrent loss of the tumor suppressor LKB1 (KRAS-LKB1) have increased metastatic frequency and resistance to chemotherapy in pre-clinical models, and these patients have poor responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor. Thus, there is a critical need to develop novel therapeutic approaches for this subset of NSCLC. Intrinsic resistance to apoptosis limits the efficacy of therapies targeting KRAS signaling. Previous studies reported BCL-2/BCL-XL + MEK inhibition can increase apoptotic responses of some KRAS mutant cancers. Recently, potent and selective inhibitors of MCL-1 have been developed, creating additional possibilities for targeting apoptotic machinery for cancers that dependent upon MCL-1 for survival. We recently reported that novel MCL-1 inhibitor AMG-176 combined with MEK inhibitor trametinib can induce tumor regression in subsets of KRAS mutant NSCLC pre-clinical tumor models. In addition to commercially available cell lines, we established 20 patient-derived cell line/xenograft mouse model and showed that KRAS-LKB1 cell lines are particularly sensitive to MEK + MCL1 inhibition with high synergy score. Moreover, restoring LKB1 expression in LKB1-/- cell lines hampers the synergy and blocks mitochondrial depolarization and apoptosis. BH3-profiling reveals high dependency on MCL-1 in KRAS-LKB1 cell lines. We reported that trametinib increase intercellular Bim (pro-apoptotic protein) and subsequent loading of Bim onto pro-survival proteins BCL-XL and/or MCL1. MCL1 inhibitor releases Bim from MCL1 and initiates the apoptotic cascade. Interestingly, trametinib induces preferential sequestration of Bim by MCL-1 in KRAS-LKB1 models. Restoration of LKB1 in LKB1-/- cell lines reduces the trametinib-induced Bim:MCL-1 protein-protein interactions. Combined inhibition of MEK + MCL1 caused dramatic tumor regression in LKB1-deficient xenograft mouse models compared to LKB1-restored models. Our results reveal fundamental insights into a novel role for LKB1 in the regulation of mitochondrial apoptosis and will lay a solid pre-clinical foundation for the clinical investigation of the MEK + MCL-1 inhibitor combination. Our data may also support using LKB1 as a genetic biomarker for guiding the selection of BH3 mimetics in targeting KRAS mutant NSCLC. Citation Format: Chendi Li, Audris Oh, Varuna Nangia, Aaron N. Hata. LKB1 regulates BH3-mimetics vulnerability of KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer by alternating mitochondrial apoptotic protein interactions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2049.

There are currently no effective targeted therapeutic strategies for KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Single agent MEK inhibitors have demonstrated showed disappointing clinical activity, partly due to inability to induce a robust apoptotic response. Combining MEK inhibitors with BCL-XL/BCL-2 inhibitors may be effective for a subset of KRAS mutant cancers that are dependent on BCL-XL for survival, however this combination is unlikely to be an effective strategy for cancers dependent on MCL-1. We investigated the effect of combining the MEK inhibitor trametinib with a novel MCL-1 inhibitor (compound A), which possesses potent and selective anti-MCL-1 activity in vitro and in vivo, on KRAS mutant cancers. In contrast to colorectal cancer models, which are largely sensitive to combined MEK + BCL-XL inhibition, a subset of cell line and patient-derived mouse xenograft (PDX) KRAS mutant NSCLC models were significantly more sensitive to MEK + MCL-1 inhibition compared to MEK + BCL-XL. To model potential clinical strategies, we tested intermittent dosing regimens and unexpectedly discovered a method strategy for dramatically sensitizing KRAS mutant NSCLC cells to the MEK + MCL-1 combination. These studies provide rationale for the clinical evaluation of combined MEK + MCL-1 inhibitors for KRAS mutant NSCLC. Citation Format: Aaron N. Hata, Faria M. Siddiqui, Maria Gomez-Caraballo, Samantha J. Bilton, Daria Timonina, Varuna Nangia, Angela Coxon, Sean Caenepeel, Paul Hughes. Combined targeting of MEK and MCL-1 induces apoptosis and tumor regression of KRAS mutant NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2163. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2163