Search

This article provides best practice guidelines regarding nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and OHNS clinic reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim is to provide evidence-based recommendations defining the risks of COVID-19 in clinic, the importance of pre-visit screening in addition to testing, along with ways to adhere to CDC guidelines for environmental, source, and engineering controls.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a 10-year single center experience with parotid gland malignancies and to determine factors affecting outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: The institutional cancer registry was used to identify patients treated surgically for malignancies of the parotid gland between January 2005 and December 2014. Clinical and pathologic data were collected retrospectively from patient charts and analyzed for their association with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Two hundred patients were identified. Mean age at surgery was 57.8 years, and mean follow-up time was 52 months. One hundred two patients underwent total parotidectomy, while 77 underwent superficial parotidectomy, and 21 underwent deep lobe resection. Seventy patients (35%) required facial nerve (FN) sacrifice. Acinic cell carcinoma was the most common histologic type (22%), followed by mucoepidermoid carcinoma (21.5%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (12.5%). Twenty-nine patients (14.5%) experienced recurrences, with mean time to recurrence of 23.6 months (range: 1-82 months). Five- and 10-year OS were 81% and 73%, respectively. Five- and 10-year DFS were 80% and 73%, respectively. In univariate analyses, age > 60, histologic type, positive margins, high grade, T-stage, node positivity, perineural invasion, and FN involvement were predictors of OS and DFS. In the multivariate analysis, histology, positive margins, node positivity, and FN involvement were independent predictors of OS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-center experience of 200 patients suggests that histology, positive margins, node positivity, and FN involvement are independently associated with outcomes in parotid malignancies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Background: Following total laryngectomy (TL) or laryngopharyngectomy (TLP), patients may develop strictures that require multiple dilations to treat. However, the risk factors associated with dysphagia refractory to a single dilation are unknown. Methods: Single‐institution retrospective review of patients who underwent at least one stricture dilation after TL/TLP between March 2013 and March 2022. Results: A total of 49 patients underwent stricture dilation after TL/TLP. Thirty‐five (71%) underwent multiple dilations. Pharyngocutaneous fistula, primary chemoradiation therapy, and a shorter time interval from TL/TLP to first dilation were independently associated with dysphagia requiring multiple dilations. Patients in the multiple dilations group had a higher rate of limited diet and G‐tube dependence compared to patients in the single dilation group. Conclusions: Shorter time interval to stricture formation is a prognostic indicator of the need for multiple dilations following TL/TLP. Patients requiring multiple dilations are at increased risk of persistent dysphagia long‐term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reputation score has been shown to be the strongest predictor of ranking in the US News & World Reports (USNWR) Best Hospitals report. However, the extent to which physicians participate in the underlying USNWR reputation survey is not well‐characterized. We conducted a retrospective cross‐sectional study of USNWR public methodology reports from 2015 to 2023 to characterize trends in physician response rates by specialty, region, and Doximity membership. Overall response rates declined between 2015 (24.0%) and 2023 (8.9%). In 2023, rates ranged from 4.7% (psychiatry) to 13.9% (otolaryngology). Otolaryngology had the highest response rate among all specialties between 2017 and 2023. Within otolaryngology, both response rates (25.0% to 13.9%) and count (2106 to 1724 physicians) declined between 2015 and 2023. Among Doximity members, response rates were consistently higher for otolaryngologists in the Northeast and Midwest compared to other regions. Though hospital rankings often influence where patients seek care, our findings suggest USNWR reputation scores may not be reliable or representative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To understand the accuracy of pre‐ and intraoperative estimation of tumor depth of invasion (DOI). Study Design: A retrospective case‐control study. Setting: Patients who presented at 1 institution with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma that underwent oncologic resection between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Methods: Patients that met the inclusion criteria were included. Patients with nodal, distant, or recurrent disease, prior history of head and neck cancer, or preoperative tumor assessment and/or final histopathology that did not include DOI were excluded. Preoperative DOI estimation and technique and pathology reports were obtained. Our primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of DOI estimation modalities including full‐thickness biopsy (FTB), manual palpation (MP), punch biopsy (PB), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS). Results: Tumor DOI was assessed quantitatively preoperatively in 40 patients by FTB (n = 19, 48%), MP (n = 17, 42%), or PB (n = 4, 10%). Additionally, 19 patients underwent IOUS to assess DOI. The sensitivities of FTB, MP, and IOUS for DOI ≥ 4 mm were 83% (confidence interval [CI]: 44%‐97%), 83% (CI: 55%‐95%), and 90% (CI: 60%‐98%), respectively, and the specificities were 85% (CI: 58%‐96%), 60% (CI: 23%‐88%), and 78% (CI: 45%‐94%). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that DOI assessment tools measured had similar sensitivity and specificity in stratifying patients with DOI ≥4 mm, with no statistically superior diagnostic test. Our results support the need for additional research into nodal disease prediction and continued refinement of ND decisions with respect to DOI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]