Search

Background Purpose GI‐specific psychological factors are important contributors to patients' symptom experience and quality of life across all disorders of gut‐brain interaction (DGBI). Clinicians' ability to recognize the role of these psychological factors is essential for formulating a biopsychosocial case conceptualization and informing treatment decisions.This article will familiarize gastroenterology providers with conceptualizing the role of GI‐specific psychological factors in DGBI and provides stepwise, practical guidance for how to assess these during clinical encounters in a time‐efficient manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a test of anal sphincter distensibility under evaluation by specialist centers. Two measurement protocols termed "stepwise" and "ramp" are used, risking a lack of standardization. This study aims to compare the performance of these protocols to establish if there are differences between them. Methods: Patients with fecal incontinence were recruited and underwent measurement with both protocols at a tertiary pelvic floor referral unit. Differences in minimum diameter, FLIP bag pressure, and distensibility index (DI) at rest and during squeeze were calculated at various FLIP bag volumes. Key Results: Twenty patients (19 female, mean age 61 [range: 38–78]) were included. The resting minimum diameter at 30 and 40 mL bag volumes were less in the stepwise protocol (mean bias: −0.55 mm and −1.18 mm, p < 0.05) along with the DI at the same bag volumes (mean bias: −0.37 mm2/mmHg and −0.55 mm2/mmHg, p < 0.05). There was also a trend towards greater bag pressures at 30 mL (mean bias: +2.08 mmHg, p = 0.114) and 40 mL (mean bias: +2.81 mmHg, p = 0.129) volumes in the stepwise protocol. There were no differences between protocols in measurements of minimum diameter, maximum bag pressure, or DI during voluntary squeeze (p > 0.05). Conclusion and Inferences: There are differences between the two commonly described FLIP measurement protocols at rest, although there are no differences in the assessment of squeeze function. Consensus agreement is required to agree the most appropriate FLIP measurement protocol in assessing anal sphincter function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Gut‐directed hypnotherapy is effective for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Despite its considerable evidence base, gut‐directed hypnotherapy is not widely available and remains a limited resource. This emphasises the need to select patients who are most likely to benefit. Aim: To determine whether baseline patient characteristics were predictive of response to gut‐directed hypnotherapy in patients with IBS Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of outcomes of 448 patients with refractory Rome III IBS who participated in a randomised study confirming non‐inferiority of 6 compared to 12 sessions of gut‐directed hypnotherapy. We compared baseline patient characteristics, including age, sex, IBS subtype, quality of life and IBS‐Symptom Severity Scale (IBS‐SSS), non‐colonic symptom score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) score between responders and non‐responders. We defined response as ≥50‐point decrease in IBS‐SSS or ≥30% reduction in pain severity scores. Results: Overall, 76.3% achieved ≥50‐point decrease in IBS‐SSS. Responders had a higher baseline non‐colonic symptom score (p = 0.005). Those who achieved ≥30% improvement in abdominal pain scores (59.8%) had higher baseline IBS‐SSS (p = 0.03), and lower baseline HAD‐depression score (p = 0.012). Fifty‐four patients (12%) dropped out of gut‐directed hypnotherapy. Compared to completers, dropouts had higher baseline HAD‐anxiety score (p = 0.034). Conclusions: These data suggest that patients with a higher burden of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms are most likely to benefit from gut‐specific behavioural intervention for refractory IBS. Clinical assessment of gastrointestinal, somatic and psychological symptom profiles may play a role in selecting patients for gut‐directed hypnotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The maintenance of fecal continence depends upon coordinated interactions between the pelvic floor, anorectum, and anal sphincter complex orchestrated by central and peripheral neural activities. The current techniques to objectively measure anorectal function rely on fixed diameter catheters placed inside the anal canal with a rectal balloon to obtain measurements of anal resting and squeeze function, and rectal compliance. Until recently it had not been possible to measure the distensibility of the anal canal, or in other words its ability to resist opening against an increasing pressure, which has been proposed as the main determinant of a biological sphincter's function. Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) and the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are two novel, provocative techniques that dynamically assess the anal sphincter complex under volume‐controlled distension. In doing so, both provide information on the viscoelastic properties of the anal canal and offer new insights into its function. Purpose: This review details the current and potential future applications of AAR and FLIP and highlights the unanswered questions relevant to these new technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]