Search

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) are being treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and other endovascular techniques with increasing frequency. The endovascular procedures offer many potential advantages over open repair (OR). They are less invasive, eliminate damage to periaortic and abdominal structures, decrease bleeding from surgical dissection, minimize hypothermia, and lessen the requirement for deep anesthesia.

VORTEC (Viabahn Open Revascularisation TEChnique) und die Kaminprothesentechnik sind Verfahren zur Erhaltung oder Wiederherstellung des Blutflusses von Aortenästen, die geplant oder als Notlösung bei offener Operation oder endovaskulärem Vorgehen eingesetzt werden können. VORTEC ist eine stentbasierte vaskuläre Verbindungstechnik zur Herstellung einer End-zu-End-Anastomose, die insbesondere geeignet ist, wenn die herkömmliche Nahttechnik schwierig ist (sein könnte). Es handelt sich um ein schnelles Verfahren, das praktisch ohne Blutflussunterbrechung und ohne Anastomosenblutung ist, die Durchgängigkeitsraten sind ähnlich gut wie bei Nahtanastomosen. Die Kamin-Periskop-Sandwich-Prothesentechnik ("chimney/periscope and sandwich graft technique”, CHIMPES) ist ein endovaskuläres Verfahren, bei dem parallele Endoprothesen zur Erhaltung oder Wiederherstellung des Blutflusses von Aortenästen verwendet werden, während ein herkömmlicher Aortenstent oberhalb ihres Ursprungs platziert wird. Es ist ein relativ schnelles Verfahren mit der Möglichkeit, selbst in Notfällen handelsübliche Produkte zu verwenden. Bei der Sandwichtechnik verlaufen parallele Prothesen zwischen 2Aortenstents. Publizierten Erfahrungen zufolge scheinen diese beiden Techniken besonders für die Behandlung von Aneurysmen der Aortenäste und der Aorta thoracoabdominalis geeignet zu sein, vor allem in Hochrisiko- oder Akutfällen. Die englische Volltextversion dieses Beitrags ist über SpringerLink (unter "Supplemental") verfügbar

Objective: To present the combined 14-year experience of 2 university centers performing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) on 100% of noninfected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) over the last 32 months. Background: : Endovascular aneurysm repair for RAAA feasibility is reported to be 20% to 50%, and EVAR for RAAA has been reported to have better outcomes than open repair. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively gathered data on 473 consecutive RAAA patients (Zurich, 295; Örebro, 178) from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2011, treated by an "EVAR-whenever-possible" approach until April 2009 (EVAR/OPEN period) and thereafter according to a "100% EVAR" approach (EVAR-ONLY period).Straightforward cases were treated by standard EVAR. More complex RAAA were managed during EVAR-ONLY with adjunctive procedures in 17 of 70 patients (24%): chimney, 3; open iliac debranching, 1; coiling, 8; onyx, 3; and chimney plus onyx, 2. Results: Since May 2009, all RAAA but one have been treated by EVAR (Zurich, 31; Örebro, 39); 30-day mortality for EVAR-ONLY was 24% (17 of 70). Total cohort mortality (including medically treated patients) for EVAR/OPEN was 32.8% (131 of 400) compared with 27.4% (20 of 73) for EVAR-ONLY (P = 0.376). During EVAR/OPEN, 10% (39 of 400) of patients were treated medically compared with 4% (3 of 73) of patients during EVAR-ONLY. In EVAR/OPEN, open repair showed a statistically significant association with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-7.5; P = 0.004). For patients with no abdominal decompression, there was a higher mortality with open repair than EVAR (adjusted OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 1.9-16.7). In patients with abdominal decompression by laparotomy, there was no difference in mortality (adjusted OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.3-3.7). Conclusions: The "EVAR-ONLY" approach has allowed EVAR treatment of nearly all incoming RAAA with low mortality and turndown rates. Although the observed association of

The periscope and chimney graft technique provides a simpler, less invasive way to maintain blood flow to the renovisceral arteries during urgent endovascular aortic repairs. The very low 30-day mortality rate and the stability of the repairs in the midterm are encouraging. This technique has the potential to profoundly influence the treatment of acute aortic pathologies.

The value of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the setting of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm remains controversial owing to differing results. However, interpretation of published results remains difficult as there is a lack of generally accepted protocols or standard operating procedures. Furthermore, such protocols and standard operating procedures often are reported incompletely or not at all, thereby making interpretation of results difficult. We herein report our integrated logistic system for the endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Important components of this system are prehospital logistics, in-hospital treatment logistics, and aftercare. Further studies should include details about all of these components, and a description of these logistic components must be included in all future studies of emergency EVAR for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms may be compromised or even impossible due to short proximal and/or distal necks or landing zones, respectively. Supra-aortic branches may limit the proximal anchorage and visceral or renal arteries the distal anchorage of endografts. While solutions have been proposed to overcome the problem of a short proximal neck, no technique has been described that solves the problem of a short distal neck. We present the "periscope technique," which allows extension of the distal landing zone and complete endovascular treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aneurysms with short distal necks using devices already stocked in most centers performing EVAR procedures.

Aortic arch surgery, which requires deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, has morbidity and mortality rate up to 30% [1]. Debranching of the supraaortic vessels combined with endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), so called hybrid procedures, have gained increasing acceptance as an alternative to open surgery. Unfortunately, aneurysm-related remodelling of the supraaortic vessel anatomy and/or disease extension to these vessels can make bypass surgery challenging. To minimize or avoid manipulation-related vascular complications and reduce clamping time during debranching, we have introduced a new non-sutured, Viabahn-based revascularisation technique of the supraaortic vessels. This paper reports about our experience in 20 cases where Viabahn debranching was performed through a sternotomy.

BACKGROUND: Case and single center reports have documented the feasibility and suggested the effectiveness of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs), but the role and value of such treatment remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: To clarify these we examined a collected experience with use of EVAR for RAAA treatment from 49 centers. METHODS: Data were obtained by questionnaires from these centers, updated from 13 centers committed to EVAR treatment whenever possible and included treatment details from a single center and information on 1037 patients treated by EVAR and 763 patients treated by open repair (OR). RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality after EVAR in 1037 patients was 21.2%. Centers performing EVAR for RAAAs whenever possible did so in 28% to 79% (mean 49.1%) of their patients, had a 30-day mortality of 19.7% (range: 0%-32%) for 680 EVAR patients and 36.3% (range: 8%-53%) for 763 OR patients (P < 0.0001). Supraceliac aortic balloon control was obtained in 19.1% +/- 12.0% (+/-SD) of 680 EVAR patients. Abdominal compartment syndrome was treated by some form of decompression in 12.2% +/- 8.3% (+/-SD) of these EVAR patients. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that EVAR has a lower procedural mortality at 30 days than OR in at least some patients and that EVAR is better than OR for treating RAAA patients provided they have favorable anatomy; adequate skills, facilities, and protocols are available; and optimal strategies, techniques, and adjuncts are employed.

Since the first successful attempts of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) for patients with ruptured AAAs in the mid 1990s, surgeons have had to decide whether to treat patients by conventional open surgery or by minimally invasive but technically more demanding eEVAR. To date, selection of patients for eEVAR is still heavily debated and factors like hemodynamic instability, fear of treatment delay for patient transfer or imaging procedures and logistic issues often lead to the exclusion of anatomically suitable patients from eEVAR. However, these adverse factors may be overcome by adherence to an appropriate (intention-to-treat) protocol employing the use of a hypotensive hemostatic approach, transfemoral aortic balloon occlusion technique (when needed), different types of devices and an appropriate plan to resolve logistic issues, leaving anatomic suitability as the single most important determinant of suitability for EVAR.

BACKGROUND: Open abdomen treatment (OAT) is considered a lifesaving procedure in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) after endovascular or open intervention for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA). Standardized treatment methods and algorithms for its use are still lacking. The high, published mortality rates may reflect difficulties in detecting and treating ACS, especially in patients treated by emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR). Presented are standardized algorithms for OAT, including a new technique using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system developed during 10 years of experience with eEVAR for RAAA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with RAAA treated by eEVAR from January 1998 to April 2008. Abdominal decompression was done when intravesical pressure >20 mm Hg or when abdominal perfusion pressure was <50 to 60 mm Hg and concomitant organ deterioration occurred. OAT was initially done with a subcutaneously sutured plastic bag or with a nonsutured zipper drape combined with a VAC device (VAC/ETHIZIP; KCI International Inc, Amstelveen, The Netherlands; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). All patients were switched to VAC/ETHIZIP as soon as possible. Dressings were generally changed every 3 to 5 days. Intra-abdominal pressure was monitored until stability was observed after delayed direct abdominal closure. RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality for eEVAR was 13% (13 of 102); 8% (7 of 82) for patients without ACS and 30% (6 of 20) for those with ACS. Decompression for ACS was needed in 20 patients (20%) primarily during the intervention (n = 14) or secondarily in the intensive care unit (n = 6). Six of 20 (30%) patients requiring OAT died

This article describes a new, less invasive prosthetic graft anastomotic technique that uses self-expanding stent grafts that are "telescoped" into aortic branches. This method, the VORTEC (Viabahn Open Revascularization TEChnique), obviates the need for potentially difficult complete vessel exposure and graft anastomoses, thereby reducing the duration of flow interruption and simplifying the performance of complex aortic reconstructions and so-called debranching procedures requiring reconstruction of major branches such as renal arteries. Minimal exposure of one surface of the renal artery allowed introduction and deployment of a self-expanding Viabahn (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) device using the Seldinger technique. The Viabahn devices used were 5 to 8 mm in diameter and 5 to 15 cm in length depending on individual anatomy (assessed by preoperative computed tomographic angiography). Overall, 82 renal arteries have been revascularized in 58 patients using the VORTEC. The technical success rate was 100%, with all of the stent grafts implanted as intended with maintenance of flow. The patency rates were 97% after 30 days and 96% after a mean follow-up of 18 months (range 1-38 months). The VORTEC allows performance of safe and expeditious revascularization of renal arteries. This new technique may represent significant improvement over the standard approach of surgical exposure and sutured anastomosis.