Search

In yeasts, small intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) modulate ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) activity to ensure an optimal supply of dNTPs for DNA synthesis. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Spd1 protein can directly inhibit the large RNR subunit (R1), import the small subunit (R2) into the nucleus and induce an architectural change in the R1-R2 holocomplex. Here, we report the characterization of Spd2, a protein with sequence similarity to Spd1. We show that Spd2 is a CRL4(Cdt2)-controlled IDP that functions together with Spd1 in the DNA damage response and in modulation of RNR architecture. However, Spd2 does not regulate dNTP pools and R2 nuclear import. Furthermore, deletion of spd2 only weakly suppresses the Rad3(ATR) checkpoint dependency of CRL4(Cdt2) mutants. However, when we raised intracellular dNTP pools by inactivation of RNR feedback inhibition, deletion of spd2 could suppress the checkpoint dependency of CRL4(Cdt2) mutant cells to the same extent as deletion of spd1. Collectively, these observations suggest that Spd1 on its own regulates dNTP pools, whereas in combination with Spd2 it modulates RNR architecture and sensitizes cells to DNA damage., (© 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.)

Cullin4, Ddb1 and Cdt2 are core subunits of the ubiquitin ligase complex CRL4(Cdt2), which controls genome stability by targeting Spd1 for degradation during DNA replication and repair in fission yeast. Spd1 has an inhibitory effect on ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), the activity of which is required for deoxynucleotide (dNTP) synthesis. The failure to degrade Spd1 in mutants where CRL4(Cdt2) is defective leads to DNA integrity checkpoint activation and dependency. This correlates with a lower dNTP pool. Pools are restored in a spd1-deleted background and this also suppresses checkpoint activation and dependency. We hypothesized that fission yeast with RNR hyperactivity would display a mutator phenotype on their own, but also possibly repress aspects of the phenotype associated with the inability to target Spd1 for degradation. Here, we report that a mutation in the R1 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase cdc22 (cdc22-D57N), which alleviated allosteric feedback inhibition, caused a highly elevated dNTP pool that was further increased by deleting spd1. The Δspd1 cdc22-D57N double mutant had elevated mutation rates and was sensitive to damaging agents that cause DNA strand breaks, demonstrating that Spd1 can protect the genome when dNTP pools are high. In ddb1-deleted cells, cdc22-D57N also potently elevated RNR activity, but failed to allow cell growth independently of the intact checkpoint. Our results provide evidence that excess Spd1 interferes with other functions in addition to its inhibitory effect on ribonucleotide reduction to generate replication stress and genome instability.

In both Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mms22 and Mms1 form a complex with important functions in the response to DNA damage, loss of which leads to perturbations during replication. Furthermore, in S. cerevisiae, Mms1 has been suggested to function in concert with a Cullin-like protein, Rtt101/Cul8, a potential paralog of Cullin 4. We performed epistasis analysis between Δmms1 and mutants of pathways with known functions in genome integrity, and measured the recruitment of homologous recombination proteins to blocked replication forks and recombination frequencies. We show that, in S. pombe, the functions of Mms1 and the conserved components of the Cullin 4 ubiquitin ligase, Pcu4 and Ddb1, do not significantly overlap. Furthermore, unlike in S. cerevisiae, the function of the H3K56 acetylase Rtt109 is not essential for Mms1 function. We provide evidence that Mms1 function is particularly important when a single strand break is converted into a double strand break during replication. Genetic data connect Mms1 to a Mus81 and Rad22(Rad52) dependent, but Rhp51 independent, branch of homologous recombination. This is supported by results demonstrating that Mms1 is recruited to a site-specific replication fork barrier and that, in a Δmms1 strain, Rad22(Rad52) and RPA recruitment to blocked forks are reduced, whereas Rhp51 recruitment is unaffected. In addition, Mms1 appears to specifically promote chromosomal rearrangements in a recombination assay. These observations suggest that Mms1 acts to channel repair of perturbed replication into a particular sub-pathway of homologous recombination., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)