1. Flight-Time Method Modified: Development of a Novel and More Accurate Method for Measuring Vertical Jump Height Using a Smartphone Application.
- Author
-
Nishioka, Takuya, Yamaguchi, Shota, and Inami, Takayuki
- Subjects
LEG physiology ,BIOMECHANICS ,MOBILE apps ,STATISTICAL correlation ,PEARSON correlation (Statistics) ,EFFECT sizes (Statistics) ,SMARTPHONES ,DATA analysis ,T-test (Statistics) ,RESEARCH evaluation ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,MANN Whitney U Test ,STATISTICS ,ONE-way analysis of variance ,FRIEDMAN test (Statistics) ,EXERCISE tests ,JUMPING ,COMPARATIVE studies ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,DATA analysis software ,RANGE of motion of joints ,VIDEO recording ,EVALUATION - Abstract
Purpose: The flight-time method (FT) is used for measuring vertical jump height (JH) in the field because of its convenience; however, FT overestimates JH when the lower limb is flexed at landing. Herein, we proposed a new method (ie, flight-time method modified [FTM]) to address the problem of FT and evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods: A total of 24 men performed 6 countermovement jumps on force plates (sampling rate: 1000 Hz) while being recorded with a smartphone high-speed camera at 240 frames·s
–1 . JH was calculated by the impulse–momentum method (IM), FT, and FTM. For FTM, the flight time and JH were calculated based on the displacement of the greater-trochanter marker using a smartphone application. Results: JH calculated using FT was significantly higher (P <.001) compared with JH calculated by IM; however, JH calculated by FTM showed no significant difference with JH calculated by IM. Furthermore, JH calculated by FTM, compared with JH calculated by FT (ρ =.882; 95% CI,.838–.914), exhibited a stronger, nearly perfect, and significantly positive correlation (ρ =.987; 95% CI,.982–.991) with JH calculated by IM and showed high reliability. Conclusions: The FTM proposed in this study had higher concurrent validity compared with FT and a high reliability for measuring countermovement JH because it was not affected by lower-extremity flexion at landing. Therefore, practitioners should consider using FTM as a convenient, low-cost, reliable, and more valid method for measuring JH in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF