Search

Objectives. We sought to identify cross-sectional hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV prevalence among Asian Americans at a community health fair and to assess referral rates. Methods. We determined HBV prevalence with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), and antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). We determined HCV prevalence with hepatitis C antibodies. Successful referral occurred when participants with HBV or HCV were contacted, medically evaluated, and given contact information of liver specialists for care. Results. Of 202 people screened, 118 were Asian Americans (65 Chinese and 39 Vietnamese). Twelve had chronic HBV with positive HBsAg. However, chronic HBV prevalence increased from 10.2% to 13.6% by concomitant HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs testing. Prevalence of HCV was 6% overall but 15.4% among Vietnamese. Overall, 83% of patients with chronic HBV and 100% of patients with occult HBV or HCV were successfully referred. Conclusions. Concomitant HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs testing permits diagnosis of chronic, occult HBV infections missed by testing with HBsAg alone. Persons identified with HBV or HCV at community health fairs can be successfully referred. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Peginterferon plus ribavirin achieves sustained virological response (SVR) in fewer than half of patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection treated for 48 weeks. We tested the efficacy of boceprevir, an NS3 hepatitis C virus oral protease inhibitor, when added to peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin.Methods: In part 1 of this trial, undertaken in 67 sites in the USA, Canada, and Europe, 520 treatment-naive patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection were randomly assigned to receive peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 mug/kg plus ribavirin 800-1400 mg daily for 48 weeks (PR48; n=104); peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin daily for 4 weeks, followed by peginterferon alfa-2b, ribavirin, and boceprevir 800 mg three times a day for 24 weeks (PR4/PRB24; n=103) or 44 weeks (PR4/PRB44; n=103); or peginterferon alfa-2b, ribavirin, and boceprevir three times a day for 28 weeks (PRB28; n=107) or 48 weeks (PRB48; n=103). In part 2, 75 patients were randomly assigned to receive either PRB48 (n=16) or low-dose ribavirin (400-1000 mg) plus peginterferon alfa-2b and boceprevir three times a day for 48 weeks (low-dose PRB48; n=59). Randomisation was by computer-generated code, and study personnel and patients were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was SVR 24 weeks after treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00423670.Findings: Patients in all four boceprevir groups had higher rates of SVR than did the control group (58/107 [54%, 95% CI 44-64], p=0.013 for PRB28; 58/103 [56%, 44-66], p=0.005 for PR4/PRB24; 69/103 [67%, 57-76], p<0.0001 for PRB48; and 77/103 [75%, 65-83], p<0.0001 for PR4/PRB44; vs 39/104 [38%, 28-48] for PR48 control). Low-dose ribavirin was associated with a high rate of viral breakthrough (16/59 [27%]), and a rate of relapse (six of 27 [22%]) similar to control (12/51 [24%]). Boceprevir-based groups had higher rates of anaemia (227/416 [55%] vs 35/104 [34%]) and dysgeusia (111/416 [27%] vs nine of 104 [9%]) than did the control group.Interpretation: In patients with untreated genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection, the addition of the direct-acting antiviral agent boceprevir to standard treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin after a 4-week lead-in seems to have the potential to double the sustained response rate compared with that recorded with standard treatment alone.Funding: Merck. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Addressing drug-induced liver injury is crucial in drug development, often causing Phase III trial failures and market withdrawals. Traditional animal models fail to predict human liver toxicity accurately. Virtual twins of human organs present a promising solution. We introduce the Virtual Hepatic Lobule, a foundational element of the Living Liver, a multi-scale liver virtual twin. This model integrates blood flow dynamics and an acetaminophen-induced injury model to predict hepatocyte injury patterns specific to patients. By incorporating metabolic zonation, our predictions align with clinical zonal hepatotoxicity observations. This methodology advances the development of a human liver virtual twin, aiding in the prediction and validation of drug-induced liver injuries., Competing Interests: Competing interests: S.M.L. is a Dassault Systemes employee. J.M.V. is a member of IQDILI and the NIH NIDDK Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network Data Safety and Management Board. N.R.G. has served as a consultant for Dassault Systemes. The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: Homozygous ZZ alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency produces mutant AAT (Z-AAT) proteins in hepatocytes, leading to progressive liver fibrosis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an investigational RNA interference therapeutic, fazirsiran, that degrades Z-AAT messenger RNA, reducing deleterious protein synthesis., Methods: This ongoing, phase 2 study randomized 40 patients to subcutaneous placebo or fazirsiran 25, 100, or 200 mg. The primary endpoint was percent change in serum Z-AAT concentration from baseline to week 16. Patients with fibrosis on baseline liver biopsy received treatment on day 1, at week 4, and then every 12 weeks and had a second liver biopsy at or after weeks 48, 72, or 96. Patients without fibrosis received 2 doses on day 1 and at week 4., Results: At week 16, least-squares mean percent declines in serum Z-AAT concentration were -61%, -83%, and -94% with fazirsiran 25, 100, and 200 mg, respectively, vs placebo (all P < .0001). Efficacy was sustained through week 52. At postdose liver biopsy, fazirsiran reduced median liver Z-AAT concentration by 93% compared with an increase of 26% with placebo. All fazirsiran-treated patients had histologic reduction from baseline in hepatic globule burden. Portal inflammation improved in 5 of 12 and 0 of 8 patients with a baseline score of >0 in the fazirsiran and placebo groups, respectively. Histologic meta-analysis of histologic data in viral hepatitis score improved by >1 point in 7 of 14 and 3 of 8 patients with fibrosis of >F0 at baseline in the fazirsiran and placebo groups, respectively. No adverse events led to discontinuation, and pulmonary function tests remained stable., Conclusions: Fazirsiran reduced serum and liver concentrations of Z-AAT in a dose-dependent manner and reduced hepatic globule burden. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT03945292)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Primary biliary cholangitis is a chronic, autoimmune, cholestatic disease that mainly affects women aged 40-70 years. Recent epidemiological studies have shown an increasing incidence worldwide despite geographical heterogeneity and a decrease in the female-to-male ratio of those the disease affects. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, primary biliary cholangitis occurs in genetically predisposed individuals upon exposure to environmental triggers, specifically xenobiotics, smoking, and the gut microbiome. Notably, the diversity of the intestinal microbiome is diminished in individuals with primary biliary cholangitis. The intricate interplay among immune cells, cytokines, chemokines, and biliary epithelial cells is postulated as the underlying pathogenic mechanism involved in the development and progression of primary biliary cholangitis, and extensive research has been dedicated to comprehending these complex interactions. Following the official approval of obeticholic acid as second-line treatment for patients with an incomplete response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid, clinical trials have indicated that peroxisome proliferator activator receptor agonists are promising additional second-line drugs. Future dual or triple drug regimens might reach a new treatment goal of normalisation of alkaline phosphatase levels, rather than a decrease to less than 1·67 times the upper limit of normal levels, and potentially improve long-term outcomes. Improvement of health-related quality of life with better recognition and care of subjective symptoms, such as pruritus and fatigue, is also an important treatment goal. Promising clinical investigations are underway to alleviate these symptoms. Efforts to facilitate better access to medical care and dissemination of current knowledge should enable diagnosis at an earlier stage of primary biliary cholangitis and ensure access to treatments based on risk stratification for all patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests ATan received support from the Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant (research on intractable hepatobiliary disease) issued by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan (grant number JPMH 23FC1026); consultant fees from EA Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and Kowa; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie and Gilead Sciences; received support for attending meetings and travel from GSK and Kowa; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for GSK, EA Pharma, and Kowa. JMV received grants or contracts from CymaBay, Enanta, Escient, Genfit/Ipsen, Gilead, Intercept, NGM Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pliant, and Zydu; consulting fees from Arena, CymaBay, Intercept, Lilly, Moderna, and Novartis; is the Chairman of the Fractyl data and safety monitoring board; and is a member of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network, and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. XM and ATak declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Autoimmune liver diseases include primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis, a family of chronic immune-mediated disorders that target hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. Treatments remain nonspecific, variably effective, and noncurative, and the need for liver transplantation is disproportionate to their rarity. Development of effective therapies requires better knowledge of pathogenic mechanisms, including the roles of genetic risk, and how the environment and gut dysbiosis cause immune cell dysfunction and aberrant bile acid signaling. This review summarizes key etiologic and pathogenic concepts and themes relevant for clinical practice and how such learning can guide the development of new therapies for people living with autoimmune liver diseases., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: The effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis is limited, due to inadequate risk stratification and suboptimal performance of current screening modalities., Methods: We developed a multicenter prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis undergoing surveillance with MRI and applied global untargeted metabolomics to 612 longitudinal serum samples from 203 patients. Among them, 37 developed HCC during follow-up., Results: We identified 150 metabolites with significant abundance changes in samples collected prior to HCC (Cases) compared to samples from patients who did not develop HCC (Controls). Tauro-conjugated bile acids and gamma-glutamyl amino acids were increased, while acyl-cholines and deoxycholate derivatives were decreased. Seven amino acids including serine and alanine had strong associations with HCC risk, while strong protective effects were observed for N-acetylglycine and glycerophosphorylcholine. Machine learning using the 150 metabolites, age, gender, and PNPLA3 and TMS6SF2 single nucleotide polymorphisms, identified 15 variables giving optimal performance. Among them, N-acetylglycine had the highest AUC in discriminating Cases and Controls. When restricting Cases to samples collected within 1 year prior to HCC (Cases-12M), additional metabolites including microbiota-derived metabolites were identified. The combination of the top six variables identified by machine learning (alpha-fetoprotein, 6-bromotryptophan, N-acetylglycine, salicyluric glucuronide, testosterone sulfate and age) had good performance in discriminating Cases-12M from Controls (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93). Finally, 23 metabolites distinguished Cases with LI-RADS-3 lesions from Controls with LI-RADS-3 lesions, with reduced abundance of acyl-cholines and glycerophosphorylcholine-related lysophospholipids in Cases., Conclusions: This study identified N-acetylglycine, amino acids, bile acids and choline-derived metabolites as biomarkers of HCC risk, and microbiota-derived metabolites as contributors to HCC development., Impact and Implications: The effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis is limited. There is an urgent need for improvement in risk stratification and new screening modalities, particularly blood biomarkers. Longitudinal collection of paired blood samples and MRI images from patients with cirrhosis is particularly valuable in assessing how early blood and imaging markers become positive during the period when lesions are observed to obtain a diagnosis of HCC. We generated a multicenter prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis under surveillance with contrast MRI, applied untargeted metabolomics on 612 serum samples from 203 patients and identified metabolites associated with risk of HCC development. Such biomarkers may significantly improve early-stage HCC detection for patients with cirrhosis undergoing HCC surveillance, a critical step to increasing curative treatment opportunities and reducing mortality., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) during and after immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory (IS/IM) therapy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including hepatic decompensation and acute liver failure. The risk of HBVr with IS/IM has been heterogeneous and often unpredictable. As a result, patients with active or previous HBV infection are often excluded from clinical drug trials of such agents. Thorough screening for HBV infection, antiviral prophylaxis, and careful monitoring for HBVr have proven to be effective in reducing the rate of HBVr and improving its outcome in the context of IS/IM. Therefore, safe enrollment and management of certain HBV-marker-positive patients in clinical trials is possible. There is a great, unmet need for consistent, evidence-based recommendations for best practices pertaining to enrollment, monitoring, and management of HBVr in clinical trial participants receiving IS/IM. The aim of these consensus guidelines is to provide a step-by-step blueprint to safely enroll, monitor and manage the patient with inactive chronic or resolved HBV in IS/IM clinical trials from the time of screening through to the end of post-treatment follow up., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This report introduces a Brighton Collaboration (BC) case definition for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), which has been classified as a priority adverse event of special interest (AESI), as there were possible cases seen following COVID-19 vaccination. The case definition was developed by a group of subject matter and BC process experts to facilitate safety data comparability across pre- and post-licensure clinical trials, as well as pharmacovigilance activities in multiple settings with diverse resources and healthcare access. The usual BC case definition development process was followed in an expedited manner, and took two months to complete, including finalising the manuscript for publication, instead of the usual 1 year development time. It includes a systematic review of the literature and an expert consensus to define levels of diagnostic certainty for AIH, and provides specific guidelines for data collection and analysis. Histology, serological and biochemical tests and exclusion of alternate diagnosis were considered necessary to define the levels of certainty (definitive, probable and possible). AEFI reports of suspected AIH were independently classified by the WG members to test its useability and these classifications were used to finalise the case definition. The document underwent peer review by external AIH experts and a Reference Group of vaccine safety stakeholders in high-, low- and middle-income countries to ensure case definition useability, applicability, and scientific integrity. The expedited process can be replicated for development of other standardised case definitions for priority AESIs for endemics and epidemics. While applicable to cases reported following immunisation, the case definition is independent of lapsed time following vaccination and, as such, can also be used to determine background incidence for vaccinated and unvaccinated control groups in studies of causal association. While use of this case definition is also appropriate for the study of safety of other products including drugs, it is not meant to guide clinical case management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: CM declares participation in advisory boards for Mirum. SK, DNA, HSI, LM, AM, DN, JG, EB and JV declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Effective treatments for patients with primary biliary cholangitis are limited. Seladelpar, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta agonist, has potential benefits., Methods: In this phase 3, 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients who had had an inadequate response to or who had a history of unacceptable side effects with ursodeoxycholic acid to receive oral seladelpar at a dose of 10 mg daily or placebo. The primary end point was a biochemical response, which was defined as an alkaline phosphatase level less than 1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range, with a decrease of 15% or more from baseline, and a normal total bilirubin level at month 12. Key secondary end points were normalization of the alkaline phosphatase level at month 12 and a change in the score on the pruritus numerical rating scale (range, 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]) from baseline to month 6 among patients with a baseline score of at least 4 (indicating moderate-to-severe pruritus)., Results: Of the 193 patients who underwent randomization and treatment, 93.8% received ursodeoxycholic acid as standard-of-care background therapy. A greater percentage of the patients in the seladelpar group than in the placebo group had a biochemical response (61.7% vs. 20.0%; difference, 41.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7 to 53.4, P<0.001). Normalization of the alkaline phosphatase level also occurred in a greater percentage of patients who received seladelpar than of those who received placebo (25.0% vs. 0%; difference, 25.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 18.3 to 33.2, P<0.001). Seladelpar resulted in a greater reduction in the score on the pruritus numerical rating scale than placebo (least-squares mean change from baseline, -3.2 vs. -1.7; least-squares mean difference, -1.5; 95% CI, -2.5 to -0.5, P = 0.005). Adverse events were reported in 86.7% of the patients in the seladelpar group and in 84.6% in the placebo group, and serious adverse events in 7.0% and 6.2%, respectively., Conclusions: In this trial involving patients with primary biliary cholangitis, the percentage of patients who had a biochemical response and alkaline phosphatase normalization was significantly greater with seladelpar than with placebo. Seladelpar also significantly reduced pruritus among patients who had moderate-to-severe pruritus at baseline. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in the two groups. (Funded by CymaBay Therapeutics; RESPONSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04620733; EudraCT number, 2020-004348-27.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis is a rare, chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by the destruction of interlobular bile ducts, leading to cholestasis and liver fibrosis. Whether elafibranor, an oral, dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and δ agonist, may have benefit as a treatment for primary biliary cholangitis is unknown., Methods: In this multinational, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with primary biliary cholangitis who had had an inadequate response to or unacceptable side effects with ursodeoxycholic acid to receive once-daily elafibranor, at a dose of 80 mg, or placebo. The primary end point was a biochemical response (defined as an alkaline phosphatase level of <1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range, with a reduction of ≥15% from baseline, and normal total bilirubin levels) at week 52. Key secondary end points were normalization of the alkaline phosphatase level at week 52 and a change in pruritus intensity from baseline through week 52 and through week 24, as measured on the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable])., Results: A total of 161 patients underwent randomization. A biochemical response (the primary end point) was observed in 51% of the patients (55 of 108) who received elafibranor and in 4% (2 of 53) who received placebo, for a difference of 47 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 57; P<0.001). The alkaline phosphatase level normalized in 15% of the patients in the elafibranor group and in none of the patients in the placebo group at week 52 (difference, 15 percentage points; 95% CI, 6 to 23; P = 0.002). Among patients who had moderate-to-severe pruritus (44 patients in the elafibranor group and 22 in the placebo group), the least-squares mean change from baseline through week 52 on the WI-NRS did not differ significantly between the groups (-1.93 vs. -1.15; difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.99 to 0.42; P = 0.20). Adverse events that occurred more frequently with elafibranor than with placebo included abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting., Conclusions: Treatment with elafibranor resulted in significantly greater improvements in relevant biochemical indicators of cholestasis than placebo. (Funded by GENFIT and Ipsen; ELATIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04526665.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Seladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti-cholestatic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects., Aims: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC., Methods: In an open-label, international, long-term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead-in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years., Results: There were no serious treatment-related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2., Conclusions: Seladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017-003910-16., (© 2023 CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc and The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Hereditary haemochromatosis protein (HFE)-related haemochromatosis, an inherited iron overload disorder caused by insufficient hepcidin production, results in excessive iron absorption and tissue and organ injury, and is treated with first-line therapeutic phlebotomy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rusfertide, a peptidic mimetic of hepcidin, in patients with HFE-related haemochromatosis., Methods: This open-label, multicentre, proof-of-concept phase 2 trial was done across nine academic and community centres in the USA and Canada. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with HFE-related haemochromatosis on a stable therapeutic phlebotomy regimen (maintenance phase) for at least 6 months before screening and who had a phlebotomy frequency of at least 0·25 per month (eg, at least three phlebotomies in 12 months or at least four phlebotomies in 15 months) and less than one phlebotomy per month, with serum ferritin of less than 300 ng/mL and haemoglobin of more than 11·5 g/dL, were eligible. Patients initiated 24 weeks of subcutaneous rusfertide treatment within 7 days of a scheduled phlebotomy at 10 mg once weekly. Rusfertide doses and dosing schedules could be adjusted to maintain serum transferrin iron saturation (TSAT) at less than 40%. During rusfertide treatment, investigators were to consider the need for phlebotomy when the serum ferritin and TSAT values exceeded the patient's individual pre-phlebotomy serum ferritin and TSAT values. No primary endpoint or testing hierarchy was prespecified. Prespecified efficacy endpoints included the change in the frequency of phlebotomies; the proportion of patients achieving phlebotomy independence; change in serum iron, TSAT, serum transferrin, serum ferritin, and liver iron concentration (LIC) as measured by MRI; and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The key efficacy analyses for phlebotomy rate and LIC were conducted by use of paired t tests in the intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who received any study drug and who had pretreatment and at least one post-dose measurement. We included all participants who received at least one dose of rusfertide in the safety analyses. This trial is closed and completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04202965., Findings: Between March 11, 2020, and April 23, 2021, 28 patients were screened and 16 (ten [63%] men and six [38%] women) were enrolled. 16 were included in analyses of phlebotomy endpoints and 14 for the LIC endpoint. 12 (75%) patients completed 24 weeks of treatment. The mean number of phlebotomies was significantly reduced during the 24-week rusfertide treatment (0·06 phlebotomies [95% CI -0·07 to 0·20]) compared with 24 weeks pre-study (2·31 phlebotomies [95% CI 1·77 to 2·85]; p<0·0001). 15 (94%) of 16 patients were phlebotomy-free during the treatment period. Mean LIC in the 14 patients in the intention-to-treat population was 1·4 mg iron per g dry liver weight (95% CI 1·0 to 1·8) at screening and 1·1 mg iron per g dry liver weight (95% CI 0·9 to 1·3) at the end of treatment (p=0·068). Mean TSAT was 45·3% (95% CI 33·2 to 57·3) at screening, 36·7% (24·2 to 49·2) after the pretreatment phlebotomy, 21·8% (15·8 to 27·9) 24 h after the first dose of rusfertide, 40·4% (27·1 to 53·8) at the end of treatment, and 32·6% (25·0 to 40·1) over the treatment duration. Mean serum iron was 24·6 μmol/L (95% CI 18·6 to 30·6), 20·1 μmol/L (14·8 to 25·3), 11·9 μmol/L (9·2 to 14·7), 22·5 μmol/L (15·9 to 29·1), and 19·0 μmol/L (15·3 to 22·6) at these same timepoints, respectively. Mean serum ferritin was 83·3 μg/L (52·2 to 114.4), 65·5 μg/L (32·1 to 98·9), 62·8 μg/L (33·8 to 91·9), 150·0 μg/L (86·6 to 213.3), and 94·3 μg/L (54·9 to 133.6) at these same timepoints, respectively. There were only minor changes in serum transferrin concentration. 12 (75%) patients had at least one TEAE, the most common of which was injection site pain (five [31%] patients). All TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, except for a serious adverse event of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which was considered severe and unrelated to treatment and was pre-existing and diagnosed 21 days after starting rusfertide treatment., Interpretation: Rusfertide prevents iron re-accumulation in the absence of phlebotomies and could be a viable therapeutic option for selected patients with haemochromatosis., Funding: Protagonist Therapeutics., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KVK, KP, JMV, and CF were investigators in the trial and received grants from the study sponsor paid to their institutions to conduct the study. KVK has received royalties from UptoDate; has received consulting fees from CymaBay, Enanta, Genfit, HighTide, Inipharm, Intercept, Ipsen, Madrigal, Mirum, NGM, Pliant, Pfizer, Protagonist, 89bio, and Zydus; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept, and the US Department of Justice; has received payment as a participant on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Medpace, Labcorp, Worldwide Clinical Trials, and CTI; has stock or stock options with Inipharm; and has received equipment material, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Velacur. In addition, his institutions have received grants from Boston, Corcept, CymaBay, Intercept, Ipsen, Janssen, Madrigal, Mirum, Novo Nordisk, NGM, Pfizer, Pliant, Terns, Viking, 89bio, and Zydus. JMV has received payment as a participant on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from the US National Institutes of Health, the US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Fractyl and has stock or stock options in Athenex. NBM, FHV, and SG are employees or consultants of Protagonist Therapeutics and have received payments for employment, consulting, or travel, and have stock or stock options in Protagonist Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: ENHANCE was a phase 3 study that evaluated efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ (PPAR) agonist, versus placebo in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)., Approach and Results: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to oral seladelpar 5 mg (n=89), 10 mg (n=89), placebo (n=87) daily (with UDCA, as appropriate). Primary end point was a composite biochemical response [alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 1.67×upper limit of normal (ULN), ≥15% ALP decrease from baseline, and total bilirubin ≤ ULN] at month 12. Key secondary end points were ALP normalization at month 12 and change in pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) at month 6 in patients with baseline score ≥4. Aminotransferases were assessed. ENHANCE was terminated early following an erroneous safety signal in a concurrent, NASH trial. While blinded, primary and secondary efficacy end points were amended to month 3. Significantly more patients receiving seladelpar met the primary end point (seladelpar 5 mg: 57.1%, 10 mg: 78.2%) versus placebo (12.5%) ( p < 0.0001). ALP normalization occurred in 5.4% ( p =0.08) and 27.3% ( p < 0.0001) of patients receiving 5 and 10 mg seladelpar, respectively, versus 0% receiving placebo. Seladelpar 10 mg significantly reduced mean pruritus NRS versus placebo [10 mg: -3.14 ( p =0.02); placebo: -1.55]. Alanine aminotransferase decreased significantly with seladelpar versus placebo [5 mg: 23.4% ( p =0.0008); 10 mg: 16.7% ( p =0.03); placebo: 4%]. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events., Conclusions: Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA who were treated with seladelpar 10 mg had significant improvements in liver biochemistry and pruritus. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The multimodal activities of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists make this class an attractive option to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The safety and efficacy of tropifexor, an FXR agonist, in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, three-part adaptive design, phase 2 study, in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were therefore assessed. In Parts A + B, 198 patients were randomized to receive tropifexor (10-90 μg) or placebo for 12 weeks. In Part C, 152 patients were randomized to receive tropifexor 140 µg, tropifexor 200 µg or placebo (1:1:1) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability to end-of-study, and dose response on alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and hepatic fat fraction (HFF) at week 12. Pruritus was the most common adverse event in all groups, with a higher frequency in the 140- and 200-µg tropifexor groups. Decreases from baseline in ALT and HFF were greater with tropifexor versus placebo at week 12, with a relative decrease in least squares mean from baseline observed with all tropifexor doses for ALT (tropifexor 10-90-μg dose groups ranged from -10.7 to -16.5 U l -1 versus placebo (-7.8 U l -1 ) and tropifexor 140- and 200-μg groups were -18.0 U l -1 and -23.0 U l -1 , respectively, versus placebo (-8.3 U l -1 )) and % HFF (tropifexor 10-90-μg dose groups ranged from -7.48% to -15.04% versus placebo (-6.19%) and tropifexor 140- and 200-μg groups were -19.07% and -39.41%, respectively, versus placebo (-10.77%)). Decreases in ALT and HFF were sustained up to week 48; however, similar trends in AST with tropifexor at week 12 were not observed. As with other FXR agonists, dose-related pruritus was frequently observed. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02855164., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The significance of portal tract histological changes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains unclear. In 2019, CymaBay Therapeutics halted clinical trials of seladelpar (a PPARδ agonist) because initial end-of-treatment liver biopsies of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) showed concerning features of portal inflammation with plasma cells, interface hepatitis and focal bile duct abnormalities. Adjudication concluded that these findings were present in the initial, as well as the subsequent biopsies. Thus, this study's aim was to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of portal inflammation, portal plasma cells, interface hepatitis and features of bile duct damage in liver biopsies of adult patients with NAFLD. The pathology database was searched for cases of NAFLD, including steatosis alone and NASH, from January 2016 to October 2020. Liver biopsies were selected from age and sex matched adult patients with diagnoses of steatosis alone (n=10), NASH fibrosis stage 1 (n=10), stage 2 (n=10), stage 3 (n=10), and stage 4 (n=10). There were 24 males and 26 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 20-79). Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, daily alcohol intake >14 drinks per week, elevation of alkaline phosphatase level, comorbid chronic liver disease, or liver biopsy performed as part of a clinical trial for NASH. Control liver biopsies were selected from age and sex matched persons without significant steatosis and normal liver biochemical tests (n=10). Histological parameters were evaluated in 10 portal tracts or 10 septal areas in each liver biopsy. Portal inflammation and interface hepatitis were graded on a scale of 0-4. Portal plasma cells and bile duct damage were scored from 0-3. Ductular proliferation was assessed by CK7 immunostain and graded from 0-4. NASH biopsies with advanced fibrosis (stage 3 and 4) showed portal inflammatory infiltrates (score 2-3) with readily identifiable plasma cells (score 2), and mild to moderate interface hepatitis (score 2-3). All cases and controls showed focal, mild cholangiocyte changes, characterised by cytoplasmic vacuolation, segmental loss of nuclei, nuclear disarray and apoptosis. NASH patients with advanced fibrosis had frequent and diffuse cholangiocyte changes, along with focal lymphocytic cholangitis and moderate to marked ductular reaction (score 3-4). Histopathological features of advanced NASH frequently include increased portal inflammation with plasma cells, interface hepatitis, cholangiocyte injury and prominent ductular reaction., (Copyright © 2022 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: We examined the efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta agonist, in adults with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) at risk of disease progression (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] ≥1.67xupper limit of normal [ULN]) who were receiving or intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid., Methods: In this 52-week, phase II, dose-ranging, open-label study, patients were randomized (1:1) to seladelpar 5 mg/day (n = 53) or 10 mg/day (n = 55) or assigned to 2 mg/day (n = 11; United Kingdom sites after interim analysis) for 12 weeks. Doses could then be uptitrated to 10 mg/day. The primary efficacy endpoint was ALP change from baseline to Week 8., Results: Mean baseline ALP was 300, 345, and 295 U/L in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Twenty-one percent of patients had cirrhosis, 71% had pruritus. At Week 8, mean ± standard error ALP reductions from baseline were 26 ± 2.8%, 33 ± 2.6%, and 41 ± 1.8% in the 2 mg (n = 11), 5 mg (n = 49), and 10 mg (n = 52) cohorts (all p ≤0.005), respectively. Responses were maintained or improved at Week 52, after dose escalation in 91% and 80% of the 2 mg and 5 mg cohorts, respectively. At Week 52, composite response (ALP <1.67xULN, ≥15% ALP decrease, and normal total bilirubin) rates were 64%, 53%, and 67%, and ALP normalization rates were 9%, 13%, and 33% in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Pruritus visual analog scale score was decreased in the 5 mg and 10 mg cohorts. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, and 4 patients discontinued due to adverse events., Conclusions: Seladelpar demonstrated robust, dose-dependent, clinically significant, and durable improvements in biochemical markers of cholestasis and inflammation in patients with PBC at risk of disease progression. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated and was not associated with any increase in pruritus., Gov Number: NCT02955602 CLINICALTRIALSREGISTER., Eu Number: 2016-002996-91 LAY SUMMARY: Current treatment options for patients living with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are not optimal due to inadequate effectiveness or undesirable side effects. Patients with PBC who took seladelpar, a new treatment being developed for PBC, at increasing doses (2, 5, or 10 mg/day) for 1 year had clinically significant, dose-dependent improvements in key liver tests. Treatment appeared safe and was not associated with any worsening in patient self-reported itch scores., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Christopher Bowlus has received grants from Arena Pharmaceuticals, Cara Therapeutics, Genfit, Genkyotex, and Novartis and grants and personal fees from CymaBay Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and Intercept. Michael Galambos has received consulting and investigator fees from CymaBay Therapeutics. Richard Aspinall owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Gideon M. Hirschfield has received personal fees from CymaBay Therapeutics, Genfit, GlaxoSmithKline, HighTide, Intercept Pharma, Mirum, and Pliant. David E. Jones has received personal fees from Abbott and Falk and personal fees and a grant from Intercept. Stuart C. Gordon has received personal fees and advisory board compensation from CymaBay Therapeutics and research support was paid to his institution by AbbVie, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, CymaBay Therapeutics, DURECT, Eiger, Genfit, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Intercept, Merck, Pliant, Shire, and Viking. Stephen A. Harrison has received personal fees from AgonAB, Altimmune, Boston Pharmaceuticals, B Riley FBR, Canfite Biopharma, Echosens North America, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, GNS Healthcare, Histoindex Pte, Inipharm, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Medpace, Microba Pty, Nutrasource, Piper Sandler & Co, Prometic Pharma Smt, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Sonic Incytes Medical Corporation, and Terns; grants from Cirius Therapeutics, Galmed Research & Development, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, and Pathai; personal fees and grants from Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Civi Biopharma, CymaBay Therapeutics, Enyo Pharma S.A., Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, High Tide, Intercept, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metracrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics B.V., Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics; advisory board compensation from 89Bio, Akero Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Axcella Health, Civi Biopharma, CymaBay Therapeutics, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research & Development, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, High Tide, Histoindex Pte, Indalo Therapeutics, Intercept, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Prometic Pharma Smt, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Sagimet Biosciences, Terns, and Theratechnologies; and owns stock in Akero Therapeutics, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Histoindex Pte, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics B.V., and Pathai. Andreas E. Kremer has received personal fees from AbbVie, Bayer, CymaBay Therapeutics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Escient, Falk, FMC, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Mirum, MSD, Myr, Newbridge, Novartis, and Zambon and personal fees and a grant from Intercept. Marlyn J. Mayo has received consulting and investigator fees from CymaBay Therapeutics. Paul J. Thuluvath has received a grant from CymaBay Therapeutics. Cynthia Levy has received grants from Genkyotex, Gilead, High Tide, Intercept, Novartis, and Zydus and grants and personal fees from Cara Therapeutics, CymaBay Therapeutics, Genfit, and GlaxoSmithKline. Mark Swain has received grants from CymaBay Therapeutics and Genfit and a grant and personal fees from Intercept. Yvonne Dörffel, Guy Neff, David Sheridan, Carmen Stanca, Christoph Berg, and Aparna Goel have nothing to disclose. Mitchell L. Shiffman has received grants from CymaBay Therapeutics, High Tide, and Genfit and grants and personal fees from Intercept. John M. Vierling has received grants from Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, and Intercept; personal fees from Intercept and Novartis; and personal fees and grants from CymaBay Therapeutics. Pol Boudes is a former employee of CymaBay Therapeutics who owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics and holds a patent broadly relevant to this work. Alexandra Steinberg is a former employee of CymaBay Therapeutics who owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Yun-Jung Choi is an employee of and owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics. Charles McWherter is an employee of and owns stock in CymaBay Therapeutics and holds patents broadly relevant to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common cause of progressive hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. Despite the availability of effective direct-acting antivirals, patients often have significant hepatic fibrosis at the time of diagnosis due to delay in diagnosis and comorbidities which promote fibrogenesis. Thus, antifibrotic agents represent an attractive adjunctive therapy. Fuzheng Huayu (FZHY), a traditional Chinese medicine botanical formulation, has been used as an antifibrotic agent in chronic HBV infection. Our aim was to assess FZHY in patients with HCV infection and active viremia., Method: We randomized 118 patients with active viremia from 8 liver centers in the U.S. to receive oral FZHY ( n  = 59) or placebo ( n  = 59) for 48 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by histopathologic changes at the end of therapy. A subset of biopsies was further analyzed using qFibrosis to detect subtle changes in fibrosis in different zones of the hepatic lobules., Results: FZHY was well tolerated and safe. Patients with baseline Ishak fibrosis stages F3 and F4 had better response rates to FZHY than patients with baseline F0-F2 ( p =0.03). qFibrosis zonal analysis showed significant improvement in fibrosis in all zones in patients with regression of the fibrosis stage., Conclusions: FZHY produced antifibrotic effects in patients with baseline Ishak F3 and F4 fibrosis stages. Reduction in fibrosis severity was zonal and correlated with the severity of inflammation. Based on its tolerability, safety, and efficacy, FZHY should be further investigated as a therapy in chronic liver diseases because of its dual anti-inflammatory and antiibrotic properties. Lay Summary . This is the first US-based, multicenter and placebo-controlled clinical trial that shows statistically significant reduction in fibrosis in patients with active HCV using an antifibrotic botanical formula. This has important implications as there is an immediate need for effective antifibrotic agents in treating many chronic diseases including NASH that lead to scarring of the liver. With artificial intelligence-based methodology, qFibrosis, we may provide a more reliable way to assess the FZHY as a therapy in chronic liver diseases because of its dual anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Tarek Hassanein et al.)

To reduce the disparity in access to liver transplant (LT), United Network for Organ Sharing implemented an exception policy in May 2019, which capped hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exception score to the median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) at transplant within the donor service area minus 3 points (MMaT-3) after the 6-mo wait period. We aimed to evaluate how this policy affected HCC waitlist outcomes., Methods: Using United Network for Organ Sharing data, we analyzed waitlist outcomes in HCC patients at the time they received exception points from in the pre-MMaT era (August 15, 2017, to November 15, 2018) and MMaT era (June 1, 2019, to August 30, 2020). Comparisons were made within the HCC group and HCC versus non-HCC (at time of listing) groups in the pre-MMaT and MMaT eras and regions were grouped as low, medium, and high MELD based on MMaT., Results: HCC group: LT probability within HCC patients decreased by 20% (subhazard ratio [sHR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.85) between the eras and decreased by 41% in low MELD regions (sHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.66). Waitlist dropout was unchanged. Matched HCC versus non-HCC groups: HCC patients had 80% higher LT probability (sHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.71-1.99) than non-HCC patients in the pre-MMaT era; which decreased to a 14% higher LT probability in MMaT era. In low and medium regions, HCC patients had over twofold higher LT probability in the pre-MMaT era, which decreased to a ~20% higher probability (sHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23) in the MMaT era. After implementation of the acuity circle policy, HCC patients had lower LT probability (sHR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94) than non-HCC patients., Conclusions: The geographic disparity between HCC and non-HCC patients has improved with the MMaT-3 policy. Despite lower LT probability for HCC patients, waitlist dropout was not adversely impacted., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background & Aims: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been well characterised and codified through the development of diagnostic criteria. These criteria have been adapted and simplified and are widely used in clinical practice. However, there is a need to update and precisely define the criteria for both treatment response and treatment., Methods: A systematic review was performed and a modified Delphi consensus process was used to identify and redefine the response criteria in autoimmune hepatitis., Results: The consensus process initiated by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group proposes that the term 'complete biochemical response' defined as 'normalization of serum transaminases and IgG below the upper limit of normal' be adopted to include a time point at 6 months after initiation of treatment. An insufficient response by 6 months was a failure to meet the above definition. Non-response was defined as '<50% decrease of serum transaminases within 4 weeks after initiation of treatment'. Remission is defined as liver histology with a Hepatitis Activity Index <4/18. Intolerance to treatment was agreed to stand for 'any adverse event possibly related to treatment leading to potential drug discontinuation'., Conclusions: These definitions provide a simple and reproducible framework to define treatment response and non-response, irrespective of the therapeutic intervention. A consensus on endpoints is urgently required to set a global standard for the reporting of study results and to enable inter-study comparisons. Future prospective database studies are needed to validate these endpoints., Lay Summary: Consensus among international experts on response criteria and endpoints in autoimmune hepatitis is lacking. A consensus on endpoints is urgently required to set a global standard for the reporting of study results and to enable the comparison of results between clinical trials. Therefore, the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) herein presents a statement on 5 agreed response criteria and endpoints: complete biochemical response, insufficient response, non-response, remission, and intolerance to treatment, which can be used to guide future reporting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest All authors report no potential conflicts that are relevant to the manuscript. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The screening for undiagnosed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (SUNN) study was a population-based screening study that aimed to provide proof of concept to encourage community-level screening and detection for this non-communicable disease. Current screening guidelines do not recommend the routine screening of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) for asymptomatic populations, so providers are not encouraged to actively seek disease, even in high-risk patients. This study sought to determine whether a self-selecting cohort of asymptomatic individuals would have scores based on vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) significantly correlated to risk factors to suggest that routine screening for high-risk patients should be recommended. The study recruited 1,070 self-selected participants in Houston and Galveston County, Texas, 940 of which were included in final analysis. A pre-screening survey was used to determine eligibility. VCTE-based scores analyzed steatosis and fibrosis levels. Fifty-seven percent of the study population demonstrated steatosis without fibrosis, suggesting NAFLD, while 16% demonstrated both steatosis and fibrosis, suggesting NASH. Statistically significant risk factors included factors related to metabolic syndrome, race, and age, while statistically significant protective factors included consumption of certain foods and exercise. The findings of this study suggest that high-risk individuals should be screened for NAFLD even in the absence of symptoms and that community-based screenings are an effective tool, particularly in the absence of proactive guidelines for providers., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: WE, GAW, MLH, and HEC are employees of FLF, which reports program support and educational grants from Allergan, Amazon, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Clinical Care Options, Continuum Clinical, Echosens, Eskridge Family Trust, Fibronostics, First Line Creative, Gilead Sciences, Global Engage, Google, Health Business Solutions, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Meetrix, Merck & Co., Inc. NetNoggin, Prosciento, Pfizer, Terns Pharmaceuticals and various private and philanthropic individual donors. JMV reports relevant research and grant support from Allergan, Alnylam, 89Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, CymaBay, Exalenz, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Hanmi, Immuron, Intercept, Madrigal, Merck, Mochida, Molecular Stethoscope, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Pliant, Sagimet, Tobira Therapeutics, and Zydus; advisor or consultant fees from Allergan, Blade Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Conatus, CymaBay, Exalenz, Fractyl, Intercept, Novartis; and is on the Data Safety and Management Boards for NIH NIDDK Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) and Fractyl. WG reports grant support from AbbVie and Gilead Sciences. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Autoimmune liver disease (AILD) spans a spectrum of chronic disorders affecting the liver parenchyma and biliary system. Three main categories of AILD are autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). This review condenses the presentation and discussions of the Single Topic Conference (STC) on AILD that was held in Ottawa, Ontario, in November 2019. We cover generalities regarding disease presentation and clinical diagnosis; mechanistic themes; treatment paradigms; clinical trials, including approaches and challenges to new therapies; and looking beyond traditional disease boundaries. Although these diseases are considered autoimmune, the etiology and role of environmental triggers are poorly understood. AILDs are progressive and chronic conditions that affect survival and quality of life. Advances have been made in PBC treatment because second-line treatments are now available (obeticholic acid, bezafibrate); however, a significant proportion still present suboptimal response. AIH treatment has remained unchanged for several decades, and data suggest that fewer than 50% of patients achieve a complete response and as many as 80% develop treatment-related side effects. B-cell depletion therapy to treat AIH is in an early stage of development and has shown promising results. An effective treatment for PSC is urgently needed. Liver transplant remains the best option for patients who develop decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma within specific criteria, but recurrent AILD might occur. Continued efforts are warranted to develop networks for AILD aimed at assessing geo-epidemiological, clinical, and biochemical differences to capture the new treatment era in Canada., Competing Interests: The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Introduction: The disparity between the number of individuals on the wait list and available liver allografts creates the need for a system that maximizes donor liver utilization and predicts graft failure., Research Question: This study aimed to determine the relationship between donor Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), liver discard, and graft failure., Design: Through multivariate analysis from 53 966 deceased liver donors, we adjusted for donor clinical and demographic characteristics and compared donor GGT with allograft discard. We compared donor GGT ranges with graft failure and analyzed data from 47 269 liver recipients., Results: After adjusting for other factors, donor GGT was significantly associated with liver discard, with GGT over 200 U/L being most significant (OR 2.74, CI 2.51-2.99). Donor GGT under 20 U/L was also found to be a protective factor for post-transplant graft failure (HR 0.91, CI 0.83 - 1.00)., Conclusion: Going forward, GGT should be included among other characteristics associated with allograft discard considered during the procurement process.

Background & Aims: Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score are used as endpoints in trials of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We aimed to quantify inter- and intra-individual variation in levels of ALP and the ELF score over time, and evaluated their association with fibrosis progression., Methods: We analyzed data from 234 patients with large-duct PSC enrolled in a 2-year, phase 2b placebo-controlled trial of simtuzumab. Participants were assessed by laboratory tests every 4 weeks, and liver biopsies collected at time of screening, week 48, and week 96., Results: Serum levels of ALP and ELF scores did not differ significantly between simtuzumab and placebo groups, so the data were pooled. Median per-patient variations in ALP between clinic visits were approximately 12% over 12 weeks, 20% over 48 weeks, and 20% over 96 weeks. Reductions, unrelated to study intervention, of more than 40% in ALP were observed in 10.9% of patients with baseline activity greater than 2-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN) and 12.5% of patients with more than 3-fold the ULN at 1 year. At 2 years, reductions of more than 40% in ALP were observed in 15.8% of patients with baseline activity greater than 2-fold the ULN and 17.9% of patients with more than 3-fold the ULN. Among the 209 patients with Ishak fibrosis stage 0-4 at baseline, serum ALP activity did not associate with development of cirrhosis or with a 2-point increase in fibrosis stage at 2 years. In contrast, the median per-patient variation in ELF scores between clinic visits was approximately 3% over 12 weeks, 4% over 48 weeks, and 4% over 96 weeks. Elevated ELF scores at baseline and at weeks 12, 24 and 48, each associated with development of cirrhosis at 2 years (odds ratio >2.75; P < .01 for all timepoints). ELF scores at baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 48, also associated with a 2-point increase in fibrosis stage at 2 years (odds ratios all greater than 2; P < .01 for all timepoints)., Conclusions: In an analysis of data from patients with large-duct PSC enrolled in a prospective trial, we found large interindividual and intraindividual variations in serum ALP activity. Serum ALP activity did not associate with disease progression over a 2-year period. Variations in ELF score were smaller, and scores determined at multiple timepoints associated with fibrosis progression and development of cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2021 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is designated as type 1 or 2 (AIH-1/2) on the basis of serum autoantibody (Ab) profiles. In children, AIH may present as acute or chronic liver failure or cirrhotic AIH (ALF/CLF/CAIH) with or without overlap sclerosing cholangitis (SC). The aim of this study was to compare demographics, presentation, and outcomes between groups in children., Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review of children with AIH who met standard diagnostic criteria with histologic confirmation at Texas Children's Hospital was performed, with de novo AIH after liver transplant (LT) excluded. Patients were identified and divided into AIH-1, AIH-2, ALF, CAIH, AIH-SC, and LT and compared using chi-square analysis, Student t-test, and Mood median test., Results: Among 91 children with AIH, 72 (79.1%) had AIH-1, 19 (20.9%) had AIH-2, 13 (14.3%) had ALF, 25 (27.5%) had CAIH, and 14 (15.4%) had AIH-SC. Both AIH-1/2 had female and Hispanic predominance (72.2/89.5%, 40.3/57.9%). AIH-2 presented at younger mean age in years than AIH-1 (6.8, 12.1, P < 0.05). Both AIH-1/2 had low rates of remission after 1 year of IS (25.4, 35.7%) and most recent (30.6, 54.5%) follow-up. Twenty-two (24.2) patients received LT: 16 had AIH-1 (72.7%), 6 had AIH-2 (27.3%), 9 (40.9%) had ALF, and 13 (59.1%) had CAIH. One-year patient and graft survivals were 100%., Conclusions: The epidemiology and clinical presentation of AIH-1 and -2 had a few subtle differences. AIH-1 was associated with more complications after LT. More data are needed to better characterize the 2 as separate disease entities., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: I.G.R., J.A.G., and T.M. report no conflicts of interest. J.M.V. reports the following conflicts of interest: Scientific Advisor for Novartis, PI on Research Grants from Novartis, Co-author of Immunosuppression for Orthotopic Liver Transplanation on Up-To-Date., (Copyright © 2020 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Direct-acting antiviral treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are generally safe; however, understanding the safety profile of each regimen is essential for their continued use. Safety data were pooled from 12 clinical trials of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) that enrolled adult participants with HCV infection. Pooled analyses are presented for participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving EBR/GZR plus ribavirin (RBV) for 16-18 weeks. Safety data are also presented for participants with comorbidities receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks in individual clinical trials (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5, inherited blood disorders [IBLD] or receiving opioid agonist therapy [OAT]). Among 1743 participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks, 1068 (61.3%) reported ≥1 adverse event (AE) and 491 had AEs (28.2%) considered drug-related. The most frequent AEs were headache (10.6%), fatigue (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (5.8%), nausea (5.1%) and diarrhoea (5.0%). Serious AEs were reported by 37 participants (2.1%), and 12 (0.7%) discontinued treatment due to an AE. In populations with CKD 4/5 or IBLD or receiving OAT, safety was similar in participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12 weeks and those receiving placebo. Some AEs occurred at higher frequencies in participants receiving RBV compared with those receiving EBR/GZR alone: fatigue (32.7% vs 8.7%); headache (21.6% vs 10.6%); and nausea (15.8% vs 5.1%). Safety was similar in participants with and those without cirrhosis. Grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were reported in 0.7% participants. EBR/GZR is a safe treatment option for individuals with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or GT4 infections, even those with challenging comorbidities such as CKD or IBLD and those receiving OAT., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Reports on the long-term outcomes and immunosuppressive regimens of multiorgan transplant patients are limited. Here, we describe a patient with cystic fibrosis complicated by multiorgan failure who was successfully treated with combined liver lung transplant and delayed kidney transplant, resulting in excellent outcomes. Delayed kidney transplant was done to reduce the operative stress of a single procedure, giving time for adequate resuscitation and weaning from vasopressors. Our patient's postoperative course was complicated by post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, which was successfully treated with rituximab and reduced dosages of immunosuppression., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant efficacy in patients with various malignancies, however, they are associated with a wide range of immune-related toxicities affecting many organs, including the liver. Immune-mediated liver injury caused by checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI) is a distinctive form of drug induced liver injury (DILI), that differs from most DILI types in presumed underlying mechanism, incidence, and response to therapeutic interventions. Despite increased awareness of ILICI and other immune-related adverse effects of ICIs reflected by recent guidelines for their management in post marketing clinical practice, there is lack of uniform best practices to address ILICI risk during drug development. As efforts to develop safer and more effective ICIs for additional indications grow, and as combination therapies including ICIs are increasingly investigated, there is a growing need for consistent practices for ILICI in drug development. This publication summarizes current best practices to optimize the monitoring, diagnosis, assessment, and management of suspected ILICI in clinical trials using ICI as a single agent and in combination with other ICIs or other oncological agents. It is one of several publications developed by the IQ DILI Initiative in collaboration with DILI experts from academia and regulatory agencies. Recommended best practices are outlined pertaining to hepatic inclusion and exclusion criteria, monitoring of liver tests, ILICI detection, approach to a suspected ILICI signal, causality assessment, hepatic discontinuation rules and additional medical treatment., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Investigating outcomes after marginal allograft transplant is essential in determining appropriate and more aggressive use of these allografts., Objective: To determine the time trends in the outcomes of marginal liver allografts as defined by 6 different sets of criteria., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case-control, multicenter study, 75 050 patients who received a liver transplant between March 1, 2002, and September 30, 2016, were retrospectively analyzed to last known follow-up (n = 55 395) or death (n = 19 655) using the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. The study period was divided into three 5-year eras: 2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to examine the allograft after transplant with marginal allografts, which were defined as 90th percentile Donor Risk Index allografts (calculated over the entire study period), donor after circulatory death allografts, national share allografts, old age (donors >70 years) allografts, fatty liver allografts, and 90th percentile Discard Risk Index allografts. Statistical analysis was performed from August to December 2019., Main Outcomes and Measures: Allograft failure after transplant as defined by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database., Results: Among the 75 050 patients (44 394 men; mean [SD] age, 54.3 [9.9] years) in the study, Donor Risk Index, patient Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores, and balance of risk scores significantly increased over time. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that 90th percentile Donor Risk Index allograft survival increased across the study period (2002-2006: hazard ratio, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.34-1.49]; 2007-2011: hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.17-1.34]; 2012-2016: hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.98-1.24]). Secondary definitions of marginal allografts (donor after circulatory death, national share, old age donors, fatty liver, and 90th percentile Discard Risk Index) showed similar improvements in allograft survival., Conclusions and Relevance: The study's findings encourage the aggressive use of liver allografts and may indicate a need for a redefinition of allograft marginality in liver transplantation.

Background: Independent studies provide evidence that low volume pediatric solid organ transplant centers have inferior outcomes compared to high volume pediatric centers. The study assessed whether patients treated at low volume pediatric centers have access to higher volume pediatric centers, which offer potentially better outcomes., Methods: We analyzed center specific data on 467 pediatric solid organ transplant centers in the U.S using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from 2002 to 2014. The proximities of low volume pediatric centers to high volume pediatric centers were determined using Maptive, a tool based on Google Maps., Results: Most low volume pediatric transplant centers focused on transplantation of adults (84% heart, 83% liver, and 93% kidney programs). A majority of low volume pediatric centers (77% for heart, 53% for lung, 68% for liver and 90% for kidney) were within 150 miles of high volume centers. Among all children listed for transplantation, 30.7% were listed in low volume pediatric centers. Most low volume pediatric centers are adult focused and near high volume pediatric centers., Conclusion: We need greater scrutiny of outcomes, particularly waitlist outcomes, of low volume pediatric solid organ transplant centers located close to high volume pediatric solid organ transplant centers., Type of Study and Level of Evidence: Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Given the critical shortage of donor livers, marginal liver allografts have potential to increase donor supply. We investigate trends and long-term outcomes of liver transplant using national share allografts transplanted after rejection at the local and regional levels. We studied a cohort of 75 050 candidates listed in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for liver transplantation between 2002 and 2016. We compared patients receiving national share and regional/local share allografts from 2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016, performing multivariate Cox regression for graft survival. Recipient and center-level covariates that were not significant (P < .05) were removed. Graft survival of national share allografts improved over time. National share allografts had a 26% increased risk for graft failure in 2002-2006 but no impact on graft survival in 2007-2011 and 2012-2016. The cold ischemia time (CIT) of national share allografts decreased from 10.4 to 8.0 hours. We demonstrate that CIT had significant impact on graft survival using national share allografts (CIT <6 hours: hazard ratio 0.75 and CIT >12 hours: hazard ratio 1.25). Despite a trend toward sicker recipients and poorer quality allografts, graft survival outcomes using national share allografts have improved to benchmark levels. Reduction in cold ischemia time is a possible explanation., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To assess the ability of signature metabolites alone, or in combination with the model for end-stage liver disease-Na (MELD-Na) score to predict mortality in patients with cirrhosis caused by primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis., Materials & Methods: Plasma metabolites were detected using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in 39 patients with cirrhosis caused by primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis. Mortality was predicted using Cox proportional hazards regression and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analyses., Results: The top five metabolites with significantly greater accuracy than the MELD-Na score (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.7591) to predict 1-year mortality were myo-inositol (AUROC = 0.9537), N-acetylputrescine (AUROC = 0.9018), trans-aconitate (AUROC = 0.8880), erythronate (AUROC = 0.8345) and N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine (AUROC = 0.8055). Several combined MELD-Na-metabolite models increased the accuracy of predicted 1-year mortality substantially (AUROC increased from 0.7591 up to 0.9392)., Conclusion: Plasma metabolites have the potential to enhance the accuracy of mortality predictions, minimize underestimates of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and low MELD-Na scores, and promote equitable allocation of donor livers., Competing Interests: Financial & competing interests disclosure AL Mindikoglu was supported by 2017 Roderick D MacDonald Research Award/Baylor St Luke's Medical Center (award number 17RDM005). This project was also supported in part by NIH Public Health Service grant P30DK056338, which funds the Texas Medical Center Digestive Diseases Center and its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases or the NIH. JP Arab and VH Shah were supported by NIH/NIDDK P30DK084567 which funds Mayo Center for Cell Signaling in Gastroenterology and the contents of this project are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases or the NIH. C Coarfa was partially supported by Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) awards RP170295 and RP170005, and by the NIH/NIDDK award R01DK111522 and the contents of this project are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases or the NIH. AR Opekun was partially supported by an unrestricted institutional grant from DR and GP Laws. The laboratory of N Putluri receives grant funding from Agilent Technologies to develop mass spectrometry-based biomarkers in cancer (grant number: 0300016016). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript., (© 2019 The authors.)