Search

Protein tyrosine kinases, especially receptor tyrosine kinases, have dominated the cancer therapeutics sphere as proteins that can be inhibited to selectively target cancer. However, protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are also an emerging target. Though historically known as negative regulators of the oncogenic tyrosine kinases, PTPs are now known to be both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic. This review will highlight key protein tyrosine phosphatases that have been thoroughly investigated in various cancers. Furthermore, the different mechanisms underlying pro-cancerous and anti-cancerous PTPs will also be explored.

Compositional oscillations of the gut microbiome are essential for normal peripheral circadian rhythms, both of which are disrupted in diet-induced obesity (DIO). Although time-restricted feeding (TRF) maintains circadian synchrony and protects against DIO, its impact on the dynamics of the cecal gut microbiome is modest. Thus, other regions of the gut, particularly the ileum, the nexus for incretin and bile acid signaling, may play an important role in entraining peripheral circadian rhythms. We demonstrate the effect of diet and feeding rhythms on the ileal microbiome composition and transcriptome in mice. The dynamic rhythms of ileal microbiome composition and transcriptome are dampened in DIO. TRF partially restores diurnal rhythms of the ileal microbiome and transcriptome, increases GLP-1 release, and alters the ileal bile acid pool and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) signaling, which could explain how TRF exerts its metabolic benefits. Finally, we provide a web resource for exploration of ileal microbiome and transcriptome circadian data.

Immunotherapy is a highly emerging form of breast cancer therapy that enables clinicians to target cancers with specific receptor expression profiles. Two popular immunotherapeutic approaches involve chimeric antigen receptor-T cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAb). Briefly mentioned in this review as well is the mRNA vaccine technology recently popularized by the COVID-19 vaccine. These forms of immunotherapy can highly select for the tumor target of interest to generate specific tumor lysis. Along with improvements in CAR-T, bispecific antibody engineering, and therapeutic administration, much research has been done on novel molecular targets that can especially be useful for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) immunotherapy. Combining emerging immunotherapeutics with tumor marker discovery sets the stage for highly targeted immunotherapy to be the future of cancer treatments. This review highlights the principles of CAR-T and BsAb therapy, improvements in CAR and BsAb engineering, and recently identified human breast cancer markers in the context of in vitro or in vivo CAR-T or BsAb treatment.

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the deadliest infectious diseases worldwide and its current treatments have been complicated with the emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB) strains. Therefore, the discovery of new antitubercular agents is in need to overcome this problem. In our efforts to discover novel candidates for the treatment of tuberculosis, we describe in this work in vitro activityagainstM. smegmatis for a series of aminated benzo-fused heterocycles, particularly, dibenzothiophene to explore the structure-activity relationship of 2-aminodibenzothiophene 3aa. From these studies, three compounds 5-aminobenzothiophene 3ia, 6-aminobenzothiophene 3ma (MIC: 0.78 µg/mL) and 5-aminobenzofuran 3ja (MIC: 1.56 µg/mL) were identified as potent inhibitors of M. smegmatis with low cytotoxicity. These results suggested the significance of these compounds 3ia, 3ja and 3ma for the future development of candidate agents to treat tuberculosis.

Chemical inhibitors of the checkpoint kinases have shown promise in the treatment of cancer, yet their clinical utility may be limited by a lack of molecular biomarkers to identify specific patients most likely to respond to therapy. To this end, we screened 112 known tumor suppressor genes for synthetic lethal interactions with inhibitors of the CHEK1 and CHEK2 checkpoint kinases. We identified eight interactions, including the Replication Factor C (RFC)-related protein RAD17. Clonogenic assays in RAD17 knockdown cell lines identified a substantial shift in sensitivity to checkpoint kinase inhibition (3.5-fold) as compared to RAD17 wild-type. Additional evidence for this interaction was found in a large-scale functional shRNA screen of over 100 genotyped cancer cell lines, in which CHEK1/2 mutant cell lines were unexpectedly sensitive to RAD17 knockdown. This interaction was widely conserved, as we found that RAD17 interacts strongly with checkpoint kinases in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the setting of RAD17 knockdown, CHEK1/2 inhibition was found to be synergistic with inhibition of WEE1, another pharmacologically relevant checkpoint kinase. Accumulation of the DNA damage marker γH2AX following chemical inhibition or transient knockdown of CHEK1, CHEK2 or WEE1 was magnified by knockdown of RAD17. Taken together, our data suggest that CHEK1 or WEE1 inhibitors are likely to have greater clinical efficacy in tumors with RAD17 loss-of-function.

An emerging therapeutic strategy for cancer is to induce selective lethality in a tumor by exploiting interactions between its driving mutations and specific drug targets. Here we use a multi-species approach to develop a resource of synthetic lethal interactions relevant to cancer therapy. First, we screen in yeast ∼169,000 potential interactions among orthologs of human tumor suppressor genes (TSG) and genes encoding drug targets across multiple genotoxic environments. Guided by the strongest signal, we evaluate thousands of TSG-drug combinations in HeLa cells, resulting in networks of conserved synthetic lethal interactions. Analysis of these networks reveals that interaction stability across environments and shared gene function increase the likelihood of observing an interaction in human cancer cells. Using these rules, we prioritize ∼10(5) human TSG-drug combinations for future follow-up. We validate interactions based on cell and/or patient survival, including topoisomerases with RAD17 and checkpoint kinases with BLM.

Synthetic lethal interactions are a type of genetic interaction in which the simultaneous loss of function of two genes in combination results in cell death. Recently, there has been much interest in the discovery of drugs that are selectively toxic to cancer cells by targeting proteins that form synthetic lethal interactions with tumor specific mutations. He we have identified that RAD17 loss of function is synthetically lethal with AZD7762, an inhibitor of Chk1 and Chk2, and with MK-1775, an inhibitor of Wee1. HeLa or LN428 glioblastoma cells were selectively responsive to AZD7762 or MK-1775 following shRNA-mediated depletion of RAD17. Cells with dual knockdown of CHEK1 and CHEK2 or knockdown of WEE1 were also sensitized to RAD17 knockdown. At baseline, cells with RAD17 knockdown had greater expression of the DNA damage marker H2AX, an effect that was magnified by either chemical inhibition or siRNA-mediated knockdown of CHEK1/2 or WEE1. Accumulation of H2AX was observed primarily in S and G2 phases, RAD17 loss did not have a significant effect on cell cycle progression. The combination of AZD7762 and MK-1775 resulted in synergistic toxicity in RAD17 knockdown but not control cells. Collectively, these results demonstrate that RAD17 loss of function sensitizes cells to inhibition of S and G2/M checkpoint kinases, resulting in greater accumulation of DNA damage and ultimately cell death. We suggest that AZD7762 and MK-1775 may have greater clinical efficacy in tumors with RAD17 mutation or deletion. Citation Format: John Paul Shen, Rohith Srivas, Ana Bojorquez-Gomez, Katherine Licon, Vignesh Sivaganesh, Jia L. Xu, Huwate Yeerna, Andrew Gross, Jian Feng Li, Robert Sobol, Trey Ideker. RAD17 loss of function is synthetically lethal with the checkpoint kinase inhibitors AZD7762 or MK-1775. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 129. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-129