Search

Contains fulltext : 290620.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor and is registered for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The effectiveness of tofacitinib has been evaluated up to 12 months of treatment. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of 24 months of tofacitinib use in UC patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: Patients initiating tofacitinib treatment were included in the ICC Registry, a nationwide, observational registry. Patients were prospectively evaluated for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSFR, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤2) at week 104. Secondary outcomes included biochemical remission (C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤5 mg/L and faecal calprotectin (FC) ≤250 μg/g), safety, and discontinuation rate. RESULTS: We included 110 patients of whom 104 (94.5%) were anti-TNF experienced. After 104 weeks of tofacitinib, 31.8% (34/107) were in CSFR, 23.4% (25/107) in biochemical remission and 18.7% (20/107) in combined clinical and biochemical remission. Of the patients in CSFR at week 52, 76.5% (26/34) remained so after 104 weeks of treatment. Sixty-one patients (55.5%) discontinued tofacitinib after a median duration of 13 weeks (IQR 7-34). The main reasons for discontinuation were non-response (59%), loss of response (14.8%), and adverse events (18%). There were 33.9 possible tofacitinib-related adverse events per 100 patient-years during follow-up. Adverse events most probably related to tofacitinib were skin reactions and headaches. There were 6.4 herpes zoster infections per 100 patient-years. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib was effective in 31.8% of patients after 24 months of treatment. 01 januari 2023

Aims Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets p40, a shared subunit of the cytokines interleukin [IL]-12 and IL-23. It is registered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. We assessed the 2-year effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a real world, prospective cohort of patients with Crohn’s disease [CD]. Methods Patients who started ustekinumab were prospectively enrolled in the nationwide Initiative on Crohn and Colitis [ICC] Registry. At weeks 0, 12, 24, 52 and 104, clinical remission Harvey Bradshaw Index≤ 4 points], biochemical remission (faecal calprotectin ≤ 200 μg/g and/or C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L], perianal fistula remission, extra-intestinal manifestations, ustekinumab dosage and safety outcomes were determined. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 104. Results In total, 252 CD patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Of all included patients, the proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission was 32.3% [81/251], 41.4% [104/251], 39% [97/249] and 34.0% [84/247] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. In patients with combined clinical and biochemical disease activity at baseline [n = 122], the corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 23.8% [29/122], 35.2% [43/122], 40.0% [48/120] and 32.8% [39/119] at weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. The probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment after 52 and 104 weeks in all patients was 64.3% and 54.8%, respectively. The main reason for discontinuing treatment after 52 weeks was loss of response [66.7%]. No new safety issues were observed. Conclusion After 104 weeks of ustekinumab treatment, one-third of CD patients were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Re-induction with intravenous ustekinumab after secondary loss of response in Crohn's disease is a relatively new strategy to regain efficacy. This real-world cohort study aimed to evaluate its effectiveness and safety.METHODS: Crohn's disease patients with loss of response after initial response to ustekinumab and treated with a second intravenous dose of ustekinumab were included. Clinical, biochemical and endoscopic data were collected. Primary outcome was drug survival. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included clinical remission, primary nonresponse and adverse events.RESULTS: In total, 31 Crohn's disease patients were included after re-induction with intravenous ustekinumab. All patients had failed prior biologic therapy, that is 77% were exposed to two or more antitumor necrosis factor agents and 65% were exposed to vedolizumab prior to initiation of ustekinumab treatment. Median treatment duration between initial treatment and re-induction with intravenous ustekinumab was 11.1 months (interquartile range 6.9-19.5). Ustekinumab therapy after a second dose of intravenous ustekinumab was maintained in 74 and 71% of the patients at weeks 20 and 52. Clinical remission rates after re-induction at weeks 8, 20 and 52 were 37, 56 and 45%, respectively. Nonresponse occurred in 16% of the patients. Adverse events were reported in four patients.CONCLUSIONS: Re-induction with intravenous ustekinumab after secondary loss of response results in continuation of ustekinumab treatment for at least 1 year in almost three-quarters of patients and in clinical remission in half of patients after 1 year. Therefore, ustekinumab re-induction may be considered an important rescue treatment option in patients with refractory Crohn's disease.

Contains fulltext : 238433.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Background: Few data are available on the effects of age and comorbidity on treatment outcomes of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).Aims: To evaluate the association between age and comorbidity with safety and effectiveness outcomes of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in IBD.Methods: IBD patients initiating vedolizumab or ustekinumab in regular care were enrolled prospectively. Comorbidity prevalence was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Association between age and CCI, both continuously assessed, with safety outcomes (any infection, hospitalisation, adverse events) during treatment, and effectiveness outcomes (clinical response and remission, corticosteroid-free remission, clinical remission combined with biochemical remission) after 52 weeks of treatment were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.Results: We included 203 vedolizumab- and 207 ustekinumab-treated IBD patients, mean age 42.2 (SD 16.0) and 41.6 (SD 14.4). Median treatment duration 54.0 (IQR 19.9-104.0) and 48.4 (IQR 24.4-55.1) weeks, median follow-up time 104.0 (IQR 103.1-104.0) and 52.0 weeks (IQR 49.3-100.4). On vedolizumab, CCI associated independently with any infection (OR 1.387, 95% CI 1.022-1.883, P = 0.036) and hospitalisation (OR 1.586, 95% CI 1.127-2.231, P = 0.008). On ustekinumab, CCI associated independently with hospitalisation (OR 1.621, 95% CI 1.034-2.541, P = 0.035). CCI was not associated with effectiveness, and age was not associated with any outcomes.Conclusions: Comorbidity - but not age - is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisations on either treatment, and with any infection on vedolizumab. This underlines the importance of comorbidity assessment and safety monitoring of IBD patients.

Contains fulltext : 225268.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Contains fulltext : 220028.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Prospective data of vedolizumab treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) beyond 1 year of treatment is scarce but needed for clinical decision making. We prospectively enrolled 310 patients with IBD (191 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 119 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)) with a follow-up period of 104 weeks (interquartile range: 103-104) in a nationwide registry. The corticosteroid-free clinical remission rate (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4, Short Clinical Colitis Activity index ≤ 2) at weeks 52 and 104 were 28% and 19% for CD and 27% and 28% for UC, respectively. Fifty-nine percent maintained corticosteroid-free clinical remission between weeks 52 and 104. Vedolizumab with concomitant immunosuppression showed comparable effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab monotherapy (week 104: 21% vs. 23%; P = 0.77), whereas 8 of 13 severe infections occurred in patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression. To conclude, the clinical effect was 19% for CD and 28% for UC after 2 years of follow-up regardless of concomitant immunosuppression.

Contains fulltext : 220044.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Both tioguanine and low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. AIM: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated LDTA in standard care were identified in the prospective ICC Registry. IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated tioguanine were enrolled in three university hospitals. Patients on concomitant biologicals were excluded. The primary outcome was discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes and surgery-, biological- and corticosteroid-free clinical remission (physician global assessment = 0) after 104 weeks. Both multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to correct for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 182 IBD patients treated with tioguanine (n = 94) or LDTA (n = 88) were included with a median follow-up of 104 weeks (IQR 91-104). Of these, 19% (tioguanine: 20%, LDTA: 18%) of patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in terms of discontinuation rate due to adverse events (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15-1.68, P = 0.26), adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44-1.81, P = 0.75), infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40-2.73, P = 0.93), hospitalisations (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.64-6.23, P = 0.23) or clinical remission (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.33-1.68, P = 0.48). All results are comparable with the propensity score matched cohort. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of IBD patients with prior failure to conventional thiopurines due to adverse events discontinued therapy with tioguanine or LDTA due to adverse events. Either therapy may be considered before escalating to biological therapy.

Corticosteroid-free remission is an emerging treatment goal in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In the population-based Inflammatory Bowel Disease South Limburg cohort, we studied temporal changes in corticosteroid use and assessed the corticosteroid-sparing effects of immunomodulators and biologicals in real life.In total, 2,823 newly diagnosed patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were included. Corticosteroid exposure and cumulative days of use were compared between patients diagnosed in 1991-1998 (CD: n=316, UC: n=539), 1999-2005 (CD: n=387, UC: n=527), and 2006-2011 (CD: n=459, UC: n=595). Second, the corticosteroid-sparing effects of immunomodulators and biologicals were assessed.Over time, the corticosteroid exposure rate was stable (54.0% in CD and 31.4% in UC), even as the cumulative corticosteroid use in the first disease year (CD: 83 days (interquartile range (IQR) 35-189), UC: 62 days (IQR 0-137)). On the long-term, a gradual decrease in cumulative corticosteroid use was seen in CD (era '91-'98: 366 days (IQR 107-841), era '06-'11: 120 days (IQR 72-211), P0.01), whereas in UC an initial decrease was observed (era '91-'98: 184 days (IQR 86-443), era '99-'05: 166 days (IQR 74-281), P=0.03), and stabilization thereafter. Immunomodulator and biological users had a lower risk of requiring corticosteroids than matched controls in CD only (33.6% vs. 49.9%, P0.01, and 25.7% vs. 38.2%, P=0.04, respectively).In a real-world setting, more recently diagnosed IBD patients used lower amounts of corticosteroids as of the second year of disease. For CD, a significant association was found with the use of immunomodulators and biologicals. These conclusions support the increasing use of these treatment modalities.

Background Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets p40, a shared subunit of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23. It is registered for the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis. We assessed the two-year efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in a real world, prospective cohort of CD patients. Methods CD patients who started ustekinumab in regular care were prospectively enrolled in the nationwide Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Registry. At week 0, 12, 24, 52 and 104, clinical remission (HBI ≤ 4 points), biochemical remission (fecal calprotectin (FC) ≤200 μg/g and/or CRP ≤5 mg/L), peri-anal fistula remission, extra-intestinal manifestations, ustekinumab dosage and safety outcomes were determined. Patients starting therapy less than two years ago were excluded for the current evaluation. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 104. Results In total, 252 CD patient with at least two years of follow up were included. Of all included patients, the proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 12, 24, 52 and 104 was 32.3% (81/251), 41.4% (104/251), 39% (97/249) and 34.0% (84/247), respectively. Of the 97 patients in corticosteroid free clinical remission at week 52, 58 (59.8%) were still in corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 104. In patients with combined clinical and biochemical disease activity at baseline (n=122), the corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 23.8% (29/122), 35.2% (43/122), 40.0% (48/120) and 32.8% (39/119) at week 12, 24, 52 and 104, respectively. The probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment after 52 and 104 weeks was 64.3% and 54.8%, respectively. There were no predictive factors associated with corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 104 on univariate and multivariate analysis. Most common adverse events were headache, skin reaction and musculoskeletal complaints. Two patients stopped ustekinumab due to an infection after 8 and 30 weeks of treatment (mild fever syndrome and moderate upper airway infection, respectively). The main reason for discontinuing treatment after 52 weeks was loss of response (66.7%). Conclusion Ustekinumab was effective and relatively safe in our real world, prospective cohort of CD patients. After 104 weeks of ustekinumab treatment, one third of patients were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission.

Contains fulltext : 225270.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Background and Aims Ustekinumab is approved for the treatment of Crohn’s disease [CD]. Systematically registered prospective real-world data are scarce. We therefore aimed to study the effectiveness, safety and usage of ustekinumab for CD in everyday practice. Methods We prospectively enrolled CD patients initiating ustekinumab in regular care between December 2016 and January 2019. Clinical (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI]), biochemical (C-reactive protein [CRP] and faecal calprotectin [FCP]), extra-intestinal manifestations and, peri-anal fistula activity, ustekinumab dosage, concomitant medication use, and adverse events were documented at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 52. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission. Results In total, 221 CD patients were included (98.6% anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] and 46.6% vedolizumab exposed) with a median follow-up of 52.0 weeks [interquartile range 49.3–58.4]. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates at weeks 24 and 52 were 38.2% and 37.1%, respectively. An initial dosing schedule of 8 weeks, compared to 12 weeks, correlated with a lower discontinuation rate [20.0% vs 42.6%, p = 0.01], but comparable corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 52 (46.3% [q8w] vs 34.6% [q12w], p = 0.20). There was no clinical benefit of combination therapy after 52 weeks when compared to ustekinumab monotherapy [combi 40.6% vs mono 36.0%, p = 0.64]. At baseline, 28 patients had active peri-anal fistula, of whom 35.7% showed complete clinical resolution after 24 weeks. During follow-up we encountered six severe infections [3.5 per 100 patient-years], with all patients being on concomitant immunosuppressant therapies. Ustekinumab treatment discontinuation was observed in 75 [33.9%] patients mainly due to lack of response. Conclusion Ustekinumab is a relatively safe and effective treatment option for CD patients with prior failure of anti-TNF and anti-integrin therapies.

Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective agent for induction and maintenance of response and remission in Crohn’s disease (CD). In addition to randomised controlled trials, an abundance of real-world evidence is available as well, suggesting that a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to UST therapy. To date, there is very little evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation strategy to manage primary or secondary non-response to ustekinumab. Methods This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Clinical Committee of ECCO. We included active (HBI≥5; CDAI ≥220) CD patients that received a standard-dose IV induction and at least one SC UST dose of 90 mg. Patients with ostomy were excluded. All patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to q4/6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of intravenous and subcutaneous escalation. The primary aim of the study was a clinical response (defined as Δ HBI≥3 or Δ CDAI ≥ 70 points) at week 16 after dose escalation. Clinical remission was defined as HBI Results Of 140 patients, 83 (59.3%) were females, median age at treatment onset 36 (26–50) years, median duration of disease 9 (5–18) years from 21 centres in 13 countries (12 Europe, 1 Canada) were included. The patients were dose-escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 (20–45) weeks. Thirty-four (24,3%) were previously escalated from q12 to q8 maintenance regimen. Eighty-nine (63.5%) of the patients were escalated from q8 to q4 regimen, 20 (14.3%) – from q8 to q6, 15 (10.7%) received intravenous reinduction and 16 (11.4%) – a combination of intravenous reinduction and subcutaneous dose interval shortening. At week 16 from escalation, 83 (59.3%) responded to treatment, of them 21 (15%) were in clinical remission. Thirty-three (23.6%) of the patients were on systemic corticosteroids upon escalation; 7/33 (21.2%) achieved corticosteroid-free remission at week 16. One hundred and nine patients (77.8%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 75/150 (53.6%) of the patients (median duration of follow-up: 35 (32–54) weeks) from dose escalation. At the last follow-up, 53/75 (70.7%) continued to respond to treatment, including 42 (56%) in clinical remission; 25/75 (33%) discontinued treatment at last follow-up. Conclusion This large multicentre retrospective study demonstrates that intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage may be effective in up to 60% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients that are non-responsive to q8 ustekinumab maintenance dosing.

Background Tofacitinib is a janus kinase 1 and 3 inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world evidence is needed to evaluate the effectiveness, usage and safety in daily practice. Methods UC patients in whom tofacitinib was started in 15 hospitals (8 academic, 7 non-academic) participated in the ICC Registry: a Dutch prospective, observational registry. Visits were planned at baseline, Week 12, and 24. Patients with both clinical (Short Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) >2) and objective disease activity (endoscopy (Mayo >0), C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/l or faecal calprotectin (FCP) >250 µg/g) were included. In this study, corticosteroid-free clinical remission (SCCAI ≤2), biochemical remission (FCP ≤250 µg/g), combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission, predictors of remission, safety outcomes, dose optimisation, and effect on lipids were determined at Week 24. Only patients from centres with routine endoscopic follow-up (regardless of symptoms) were analysed to determine endoscopic remission (Mayo = 0) at Week 12. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. Results In total, 111 UC patients (95% anti-TNF, 60% vedolizumab, 4% ustekinumab exposed) were followed for a median of 24 weeks (IQR 12–26). All patients had both active clinical and objective disease (SCCAI 8 (IQR 5–11), FCP 1800µg/g (IQR 633–2682)). Corticosteroid-free clinical, biochemical, and combined corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission rate at week 24 was 29%, 25%, and 19%, respectively. Endoscopic remission was achieved in 21% of patients (n = 33) at Week 12. Prior vedolizumab exposure was associated with a lower remission rate at week 24 (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11–0.94) in multivariable analysis. In total, 36 patients (88 per 100 patient-years) experienced tofacitinib-related adverse events (most common: cutaneous lesions and headache) of which 6 patients (18 per 100 patient-years) discontinued treatment. No thromboembolic events were reported. We observed 4 cases of herpes zoster re-activation but no severe infections (requiring hospitalisation). During follow-up 14 hospitalisations and 5 (4.5%) colectomies were performed. Cholesterol, HDL, and LDL increased between baseline and week 12 (18% (95% CI 9–26, n = 35), 18% (95% CI 8–28, n = 35) and 27% (95% CI 14–39, n = 35), respectively). At week 24, 33% of patients used 10 mg twice daily. Conclusion Tofacitinib is an effective treatment for UC after anti-TNF and/or vedolizumab failure. We did observe a relatively high rate of adverse events in this refractory UC cohort.