Search

BackgroundSoft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are heterogeneous and aggressive tumors, with high metastatic risk. The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) 20-gene signature is a signature of cytotoxic immune response. We hypothesized that ICR might improve the prognostic assessment of early-stage STS.MethodsWe retrospectively applied ICR to 1455 non-metastatic STS and searched for correlations between ICR classes and clinicopathological and biological variables, including metastasis-free survival (MFS).ResultsThirty-four per cent of tumors were classified as ICR1, 27% ICR2, 24% ICR3, and 15% ICR4. These classes were associated with patients’ age, pathological type, and tumor depth, and an enrichment from ICR1 to ICR4 of quantitative/qualitative scores of immune response. ICR1 class was associated with a 59% increased risk of metastatic relapse when compared with ICR2-4 class. In multivariate analysis, ICR classification remained associated with MFS, as well as pathological type and Complexity Index in Sarcomas (CINSARC) classification, suggesting independent prognostic value. A prognostic clinicogenomic model, including the three variables, was built in a learning set (n=339) and validated in an independent set (n=339), showing greater prognostic precision than each variable alone or in doublet. Finally, connectivity mapping analysis identified drug classes potentially able to reverse the expression profile of poor-prognosis tumors, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies.ConclusionICR signature is independently associated with postoperative MFS in early-stage STS, independently from other prognostic features, including CINSARC. We built a robust prognostic clinicogenomic model integrating ICR, CINSARC, and pathological type, and suggested differential vulnerability of each prognostic group to different systemic therapies.

Objectives The role of 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-Choline PET/CT) in different clinical situations remains controversial and current practices are very heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to evaluate the “real-world” practice of 18F-Choline PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer and its potential impacts on therapeutic strategy. Methods and materials This is a retrospective multicenter observational study including 265 consecutive men who underwent 18F-Choline PET/CT for prostate cancer between November 2014 and November 2015. Primary outcome was impact on therapeutic strategy. Secondary outcomes were sensitivity of the 18F-Choline PET/CT and predictive factors associated with positive scans. Statistical analyses comprised Student's t test for continuous variables or chi-squared test for qualitative variables. Results Median PSA level at the time of PET/CT was 4.19 ng/ml. The decision to perform PET/CT was made after multidisciplinary discussion in 29.8% of cases; most were prescribed by urologists (50.2% of cases). Three main indications were concerned: biochemical recurrence after local treatment (61.1%), initial staging (26.0%), or at the time of progression to castration-resistance (12.9%). Upon biochemical recurrence, 18F-Choline PET/CT allowed identification of ≥1 site(s) with a sensitivity of 80.9%. In multivariate analysis, predictive factors associated with 18F-Choline PET/CT sensitivity were serum PSA level and local treatment type in cases of biochemical recurrence, and PSA doubling time and Gleason score in case of initial staging. 18F-Choline PET/CT results allowed restaging and change in therapeutic strategy in 58.1% of all combined indications. Conclusions Indications of 18F-Choline PET/CT were varied. The detection rate of metastatic lesions was suitable, especially when PSA rate was >1 ng/mL. In most cases, 18F-Choline PET/CT led to a change in therapeutic strategy, particularly in the setting of biochemical recurrence.

e16527 Background: Gastric cancer (GC) occurs in 50% of case after 70 years old (y/o). Radical surgery or perioperative treatments have to be balanced with safety management in those potential frail patients. Methods: We perfomed a retrospective review of our single institution database to address the outcome of patient (pts) > 70y/o who underwent radical surgery for GC with or without neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment. Results: From 2005 to 2019, 60 eligible patients (pts) have undergone radical surgery for resectable GC. Median age at diagnosis was 74.2y/o [70.3-92.8] and 82% were male. Initial echoendoscopy staged 12% of T1/T2 tumor versus 70% of T3/T4, whereas 60% were found with lymph node spreading (N+). 80% of pts were given neoadjuvant treatment: chemoradiation (58%), chemotherapy (45%) or radiation alone (1%). 1/4 pt received perioperative chemotherapy. Only one patient had post-operative radiation with FOLFOX and none had adjuvant radiation alone. Surgery procedure was total (27%) or sub-total (5%) gastrectomy, polar-oesogastrectomy with thoracotomy (18%) or without thoracotomy (50%). Post-operative mortality within 3 months was 5% (n = 3) including 2 pts in the first 30 days. For the global cohort, median overall survival (mOS) was 44.75 months and median progression free survival (mPFS) was 21.2 months. Patients who frontly underwent radical surgery (n = 15, 25%) had small disease with 13% pT0 and 60% of pT1 on final pathology. Only 27% had pT2/T3 but all had vascular and/or peri-nervous emboli. Two of them (13%) were pN+. The mOS was 60 months and mPFS 60 months in this cohort and 33% of pts end/was lost of follow up. Only one metastatic relapse was identifies and no local relapse. Six pts died (40%): 2 in the 30-days post surgery (13%), 3 (30%) from other cause than GC and 1 (7.5%) because of GC distant relapse. The cohort treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 45, 75%) was given platinum and anthracycline-based regimen in 73% and 16% of cases, respectively. 1% received fluoropyrimidine +/- irinotecan. 53% associated radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant treatment completion, 47% of downstaging (including 18% of pCR), 33% of stable stage and 15.5% of upstaging was observed and 40% of initial usN+ was pN0. After perioperative treatment, mOS was 31 months and mPFS was 18.9 months. Overall 44% experienced local and/or distant relapse. Conclusions: Age above 70y/o should not systematically exclude patient from neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment and radical surgery, which is feasible in selected population displaying long term result in focal and distant disease control.

The role ofThis is a retrospective multicenter observational study including 265 consecutive men who underwentMedian PSA level at the time of PET/CT was 4.19 ng/ml. The decision to perform PET/CT was made after multidisciplinary discussion in 29.8% of cases; most were prescribed by urologists (50.2% of cases). Three main indications were concerned: biochemical recurrence after local treatment (61.1%), initial staging (26.0%), or at the time of progression to castration-resistance (12.9%). Upon biochemical recurrence,Indications of