Search

Background: The MOVIE phase I/II trial (NCT03518606) evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of durvalumab and tremelimumab combined with metronomic oral vinorelbine in patients with advanced tumors. We present the results of the recurrent advanced cervical cancer cohort., Methods: Patients received tremelimumab (intravenously, 75 mg, every four weeks (Q4W); four cycles max) plus durvalumab (intravenously, 1,500 mg, Q4W; 26 cycles max) and metronomic oral vinorelbine (40 mg, every three weeks (3QW)) until disease progression. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1, which was analyzed using a Bayesian approach RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were enrolled and treated in the cervical cancer cohort. The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease was 2 (0-6), with all (100%) and 12 (38.7%) patients pretreated with cisplatin and bevacizumab, respectively. At the data cut-off, the median follow-up duration was 12.8 (Q1-Q3, 6.1-34.6) months. The CBR was 53.1% (95% CI, 36.0% to 69.8%), using a non-informative prior distribution (beta(1, 1)). The overall response rate was 41.9%, five patients achieved a complete response (16.1%), and eight patients (25.8%) had a partial response irrespective of histological subtype or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Of the 31 patients, 28 (90.3%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 13 (41.9%) reported grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (AEs), and 13 (41.9%) reported grade ≥3 chemotherapy-related AEs. The definitive discontinuation rate due to TRAEs was 16.1%., Conclusions: Dual checkpoint blockade of PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 combined with metronomic oral vinorelbine demonstrated meaningful and durable clinical activity in patients with previously treated advanced cervical cancer. Toxicity was significant but manageable., Competing Interests: Competing interests: J-SF reported consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Esai, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Daichi Sankyon and Seagen; honoraria from AstraZeneca, GSK, Esai, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Daichi Sankyon and Seagen; support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca, GSK, Esai, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Daichi Sankyon and Seagen; and participant on advisory board from AstraZeneca, GSK, Esai, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Daichi Sankyon and Seagen outside the submitted work. EB reported consulting fees from Egle Tx; honoraria from Eisai, MSD, Sandoz and Amgen; and support for attending meetings from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Amgen, Sandoz, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche outside the submitted work. EC reported honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Ipsen, BMS, MSD and Janssen; and support for attending meeting from Novartis, AstraZeneca and Janssen outside the submitted work. TDLMR reported grants from MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Seagen; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Clovis oncology, Pfizer, Gilead, Seagen and Sanofi; honoraria from GSK and MSD; support for attending meetings from Pfizer, Gilead and Eisai; and participant on advisory board from MSD outside the submitted work. ES-B reported grants from Merck Serono and AstraZeneca; honoraria from Merck Serono and MSD; support for attending meetings from Merck Serono, MSD and Novartis outside the submitted work. RS reported grants from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from DSK, Eisai and MSD; honoraria from GSK, Pharmaand, MSD, Eisai, Seattle Genetics and Novartis; and support for attending meetings from Eisai, Novartis, GSK and MSD outside the submitted work. PL reported grants from Servier; honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Astellas; supports for attending meetings from Daicho, Ipsen, Astellas, Sanofi, Janssen and Pfizer; and participant on advisory board from Daichi outside the submitted work. OLS reported grants from AstraZeneca and BMS; honoraria from GSK, Pharmaand and MSD; and support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Accord outside the submitted work. AG reported received payments to his institution for grants from Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Gilead and Novartis; received payments to his institution for consulting fees from Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD and Gilead; received payments to his institution for honoraria from Novartis; support for attending meetings from Mylan and Menarini outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with anthracycline sequential paclitaxel is the standard regimen for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), while TNBC with residual positive axillary lymph node after standard NAC indicates poor prognosis. There is no evidence that vinorelbine alone can be used as an adjuvant intensive therapy for such patients at present., Methods: We recruited TNBC patients with clinical stage of T1-4/N1-3/M0, who received NAC with 8 cycles of anthracycline sequential paclitaxel and had residual tumor in axillary lymph node after surgery. The patients were randomly divided into adjuvant intensive treatment group (Group A) and control group (Group B). The patients in group A received vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m 2 on days 1/8 of a 21-day cycle with four planned cycles, while the control group received no therapy. Stratified according to the Miller-Payne system of the primary lesion (G1-2/G3-5). The endpoints included distant disease-free survival (DDFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: A total of 22 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, the 3-year DDFS and RFS rates in the group A were significantly higher than those in group B (90.0% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.022, both) at a median follow-up of 36 months. All patients in the group A completed the scheme in full dose, and no grade 3/4 adverse event occurred., Conclusions: TNBC patients with residual positive axillary lymph nodes after NAC of anthracycline sequential paclitaxel could benefit from adjuvant intensive therapy of vinorelbine with a good safety., Trail Registration: The study was registered on the Clinical Trial registry website ( https://register., Clinicaltrials: gov , NCT03270007) (Registration Date: 08/30/2017)., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Cancer Hospital prior to initiation. Ethical approval date was August 21, 2017. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

It remains unclear whether metronomic chemotherapy is superior to conventional chemotherapy when combined with immune checkpoint blockade. Here we performed a phase 2 clinical trial of metronomic chemotherapy combined with PD-1 blockade to compare the efficacy of combined conventional chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade using Bayesian adaptive randomization and efficacy monitoring. Eligible patients had metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer and had not received more than one prior line of standard chemotherapy. Patients (total n = 97) were randomized to receive (1) metronomic vinorelbine (NVB) monotherapy (n = 11), (2) NVB plus anti-PD-1 toripalimab (n = 7), (3) anti-angiogenic bevacizumab, NVB and toripalimab (n = 27), (4) conventional cisplatin, NVB and toripalimab (n = 26), or (5) metronomic cyclophosphamide, capecitabine, NVB and toripalimab (the VEX cohort) (n = 26). The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. The study met the primary endpoint. The VEX (69.7%) and cisplatin (73.7%) cohorts had the highest DCR. The median PFS of patients in the VEX cohort was the longest, reaching 6.6 months, followed by the bevacizumab (4.0 months) and cisplatin (3.5 months) cohorts. In general, the five regimens were well tolerated, with nausea and neutropenia being the most common adverse events. An exploratory mass cytometry analysis indicated that metronomic VEX chemotherapy reprograms the systemic immune response. Together, the clinical and translational data of this study indicate that metronomic VEX chemotherapy combined with PD-1 blockade can be a treatment option in patients with breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04389073 ., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin in combination with vinorelbine + cisplatin (NPE) for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NPE for advanced NSCLC in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched using a computerized search of the database from the time of creation to May 2023. Two investigators independently extracted literature information and assessed the quality of the included literature. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.0 software., Results: A total of 24 RCTs with 2114 patients with advanced NSCLC were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate in the group received NPE regimen was significantly higher than those in the group without NPE regimen (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.48-1.95, P < .00001). Meanwhile, the clinical benefit rate in the group received NPE regimen was also significantly higher than those in the group without NPE regimen (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.15-1.29, P < .00001). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse event rate between the 2 groups (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.76-1.27, P = .88)., Conclusions: Compared with NP (vinorelbine + cisplatin) regimens for patients with advanced NSCLC, NPE regimens improve the total effective rate and clinical benefit rate of treatment, but there can be no significant difference in adverse effects. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further validate the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: Atezolizumab following platinum chemotherapy and complete pulmonary resection has become the new standard of adjuvant care for patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant therapy and subsequent atezolizumab in patients aged 75 and older have not been established., Methods: Patients with completely resected stage II-III NSCLC aged 75 and older will be prospectively registered in this single-arm phase II study. The enrolled patients will receive cisplatin plus vinorelbine (CDDP + VNR) followed by atezolizumab for up to 12 months. PD-L1 expression in at least 1% of cells will be confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. We plan to enroll 33 patients over 1 year at 25 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint is the completion rate of adjuvant treatment (CDDP + VNR initiation to atezolizumab completion)., Conclusion: The present study represents the first prospective trial of the tolerability of postoperative adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly individuals. The results of this trial might help promote postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy in the future for the elderly., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Matsubara has received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and MSD outside the submitted work. Dr. Yamaguchi reported grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical during the conduct of the study. Dr. Okamoto reported receiving grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical during the conduct of the study; grants from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, and AbbVie; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Chugai Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Apatinib is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. Oral vinorelbine is a semisynthetic chemotherapeutic agent of vinorelbine alkaloids. Apatinib and oral vinorelbine have been proved to be effective in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). At present, several small sample clinical trials have explored the efficacy of apatinib combined with oral vinorelbine in the treatment of mBC., Methods: This retrospective study included 100 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative mBC patients who received low-dose apatinib (250 mg orally per day) plus oral vinorelbine until disease progression or intolerance during February 2017 and March 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were analyzed by SPSS 26.0 software and GraphPad Prism 8 software. Cox proportional hazards regression model for univariate and multivariate was used to identify factors significantly related to PFS and OS., Results: The median follow-up time for this study was 38.1 months. Among 100 patients with HER2-negative mBC, 66 were hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative and 34 were triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The median PFS and OS were 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.2-6.8 months) and 23.0 months (95% CI, 19.9-26.1 months). There were no statistical differences in PFS (p = 0.239) and OS (p = 0.762) between the HR-positive /HER2-negative and TNBC subgroups. The ORR, CBR, and DCR were 21.0%, 58.0%, and 78.0%, respectively. Ninety-five patients (95.0%) experienced varying grades of adverse events (AEs) and 38.0% of patients for Grades 3-4. The most common Grades 3-4 AEs that we observed were neutropenia (30.0%) and leukopenia (25.0%)., Conclusion: Low-dose apatinib combined with oral vinorelbine demonstrates potential efficacy and well tolerated for pretreated HER2-negative mBC., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new combination treatment of vinorelbine and pyrotinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and provide higher level evidence for clinical practice., Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted at three institutions in China. Patients with HER2-positive MBC, who had previously been treated with trastuzumab plus a taxane or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab combined with a chemotherapeutic agent, were enrolled between March 2020 and December 2021. All patients received pyrotinib 400 mg orally once daily plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously or 60-80 mg/m2 orally on day 1 and day 8 of 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, and safety., Results: A total of 39 patients were enrolled. All patients had been pretreated with trastuzumab and 23.1% (n=9) of them had accepted trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. The median follow-up time was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3 to 27.2), and the median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.8). The ORR was 43.6% (95% CI, 27.8% to 60.4%) and the DCR was 84.6% (95% CI, 69.5% to 94.1%). The median PFS of patients with versus without prior pertuzumab treatment was 4.6 and 8.3 months (p=0.017). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (28.2%), neutrophil count decreased (15.4%), white blood cell count decreased (7.7%), vomiting (5.1%), and anemia (2.6%)., Conclusion: Pyrotinib plus vinorelbine showed promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity as second-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive MBC.

The phase III IMPACT study (UMIN000044738) compared adjuvant gefitinib with cisplatin plus vinorelbine (cis/vin) in completely resected epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was not met, we searched for molecular predictors of adjuvant gefitinib efficacy. Of 234 patients enrolled in the IMPACT study, 202 patients were analyzed for 409 cancer-related gene mutations and tumor mutation burden using resected lung cancer specimens. Frequent somatic mutations included tumor protein p53 (TP53; 58.4%), CUB and Sushi multiple domains 3 (CSMD3; 11.8%), and NOTCH1 (9.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that NOTCH1 co-mutation was a significant poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in the gefitinib group and cAMP response element binding protein (CREBBP) co-mutation for DFS and OS in the cis/vin group. In patients with NOTCH1 co-mutations, gefitinib group had a shorter OS than cis/vin group (Hazard ratio 5.49, 95% CI 1.07-28.00), with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.039). In patients with CREBBP co-mutations, the gefitinib group had a longer DFS than the cis/vin group, with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.058). In completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, NOTCH1 and CREBBP mutations might predict poor outcome in patients treated with gefitinib and cis/vin, respectively., (© 2023 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.)

Introduction: Metastatic breast cancer refractory to anthracycline and taxanes often shows rapid progression. The development of effective and tolerable combination regimens for these patients is needed. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer., Methods: This randomized, open-label, phase II trial was conducted in 17 centers in Korea. Patients with advanced breast cancer who had previously been treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vinorelbine or pemetrexed plus vinorelbine. Randomization was stratified by prior capecitabine treatment and hormone receptor status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, overall survival, safety, and quality of life., Results: Between March 2017 and August 2019, a total of 125 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up duration of 14.1 months, 118 progression events and 88 death events had occurred. Sixty-two patients were assigned to the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm, and 63 were assigned to the vinorelbine arm. Pemetrexed plus vinorelbine significantly prolonged PFS compared to vinorelbine (5.7 vs. 1.5 months, p < 0.001). The combination arm had higher disease control rate (76.8% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001) and a tendency toward longer overall survival (16.8 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.102). Anemia was more frequent in the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm per cycle compared with vinorelbine (7.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia per cycle between the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm and the vinorelbine single arm (14.7% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.066)., Conclusions: This phase II study showed that pemetrexed plus vinorelbine led to a longer PFS than vinorelbine. Adverse events of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine were generally manageable., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest S-A Im received research fund from AstraZeneca, Boryung Pharm, Daewoong Pharm, Eisai, Pfizer, and Roche outside of the current work and have been work as advisory board for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bertis, Eisai, GSK, Hanmi Corp., Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche outside of the current work. Keun Seok Lee has consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Eisai, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Everest Medicine, Bixink, Daiichi Sankyo, and Roche; has received research funding from Novartis; has received research drug supply from Dong-A ST. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The regimen of afatinib and vinorelbine has been used to treat breast or lung cancer cells with some limitations. Aspirin alone or in combination with other agents has shown unique efficacy in the treatment of cancer. We designed a preclinical study to investigate whether the triple therapy of aspirin, afatinib, and vinorelbine could synergistically inhibit the growth of p53 wild-type nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Three NSCLC cells A549, H460, and H1975 were selected to study the effect of triple therapy on cell proliferation and apoptosis. Compared to single agents, triple therapy synergistically inhibited the proliferation of lung cancer cells with combination index <1. Meanwhile, the therapeutic index of triple therapy was superior to that of single agents, indicating a balance between efficacy and safety in the combination of three agents. Mechanistic studies showed that triple therapy significantly induced apoptosis by decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential, increasing reactive oxygen species, and regulating mitochondria-related proteins. Moreover, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) downstream signaling proteins including JNK, AKT, and mTOR were dramatically suppressed and p53 was substantially increased after NSCLC cells were exposed to the triple therapy. We provided evidence that the triple therapy of aspirin, afatinib and vinorelbine synergistically inhibited lung cancer cell growth through inactivation of the EGFR/AKT/mTOR pathway and accumulation of p53, providing a new treatment strategy for patients with p53 wild-type NSCLC., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The JIPANG study is an open-label phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PemP) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP) as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the long follow-up overall survival (OS) data. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either PemP or NP. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point included OS. This analysis was performed using data collected 5 years after the last patient enrollment. Among 804 patients enrolled, 783 patients were eligible (384 for NP and 389 for PemP). The updated median RFS was 37.5 months in the NP arm and 43.4 months in the PemP arm with a hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.14). At a median follow-up of 77.3 months, the OS rates at 3 and 5 years were 84.1% and 75.6% versus 87.0% and 75.0% with a hazard ratio of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.34). This long-term follow-up analysis showed that PemP had similar efficacy to NP in both RFS and OS for this population, with one of the longest OS data compared with the historical data.

Background: This single-arm prospective phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of the dual oral metronomic vinorelbine and capecitabine (mNC) regimen in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in China., Methods: The mNC regimen was administered to the enrolled cases, including oral vinorelbine (VNR) 40 mg three times weekly (on days 1, 3 and 5 every week) and capecitabine (CAP) 500 mg three times a day, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Stratified factors included treatment lines and hormone receptor (HR) status., Results: Between June 2018 and March 2023, 29 patients were enrolled into the study. The median follow-up time was 25.4 months (range, 2.0-53.8). In the entire group, the 1-year PFS rate was 54.1%. ORR, DCR and CBR were 31.0%, 96.6% and 62.1%, respectively. The mPFS was 12.5 months (range, 1.1-28.1). Subgroup analysis revealed that ORRs were 29.4% and 33.3% in first- and ≥second-line chemotherapy, respectively. ORRs were 29.2% (7/24) and 40.0% (2/5) for HR-positive MBC and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), respectively. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were neutropenia (10.3%) and nausea/vomiting (6.9%)., Conclusions: The dual oral mNC regimen showed very good safety features and improved compliance without loss of efficacy in both first- and second-line treatments. The regimen also reached an excellent ORR in the mTNBC subgroup., (© 2023 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Metastasis, rather than the growth of the primary tumor, accounts for approximately 90% of breast cancer patient deaths. Microtentacles (McTNs) formation represents an important mechanism of metastasis. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype with limited targeted therapies. The present study aimed to isolate viable circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and functionally analyze them in response to drug treatment. CTCs from 20 TNBC patients were isolated and maintained in culture for 5 days. Biomarker expression was identified by immunofluorescence staining and VyCap analysis. Vinorelbine-induced apoptosis was evaluated based on the detection of M30-positive cells. Our findings revealed that the CTC absolute number significantly increased using TetherChips analysis compared to the number of CTCs in patients' cytospins ( p = 0.006) providing enough tumor cells for drug evaluation. Vinorelbine treatment (1 h) on live CTCs led to a significant induction of apoptosis ( p = 0.010). It also caused a significant reduction in Detyrosinated α-tubulin (GLU), programmed death ligand (PD-L1)-expressing CTCs ( p < 0.001), and disruption of McTNs. In conclusion, this pilot study offers a useful protocol using TetherChip technology for functional analysis and evaluation of drug efficacy in live CTCs, providing important information for targeting metastatic dissemination at a patient-individualized level.

Previous work from our group and others has shown that patients with breast cancer can generate a T cell response against specific human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) epitopes. In addition, preclinical work has shown that this T cell response can be augmented by Ag-directed mAb therapy. This study evaluated the activity and safety of a combination of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination given with mAb and cytotoxic therapy. We performed a phase I/II study using autologous DCs pulsed with two different HER2 peptides given with trastuzumab and vinorelbine to a study cohort of patients with HER2-overexpressing and a second with HER2 nonoverexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Seventeen patients with HER2-overexpressing and seven with nonoverexpressing disease were treated. Treatment was well tolerated, with one patient removed from therapy because of toxicity and no deaths. Forty-six percent of patients had stable disease after therapy, with 4% achieving a partial response and no complete responses. Immune responses were generated in the majority of patients but did not correlate with clinical response. However, in one patient, who has survived >14 y since treatment in the trial, a robust immune response was demonstrated, with 25% of her T cells specific to one of the peptides in the vaccine at the peak of her response. These data suggest that autologous DC vaccination when given with anti-HER2-directed mAb therapy and vinorelbine is safe and can induce immune responses, including significant T cell clonal expansion, in a subset of patients., (Copyright © 2023 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.)

Objective: Endocrine therapy with fulvestrant has shown synergistic antitumor effects with some chemotherapy drugs in vitro . This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant with vinorelbine in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) recurrent or metastatic breast cancer., Methods: Patients were intramuscularly administered fulvestrant 500 mg (day 1 per cycle for 28 days) and oral vinorelbine (60 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and safety., Results: A total of 38 patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer included in the study were followed up for a median time of 25.1 months. The overall median PFS was 9.86 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.2-23.13], and the median PFS of the first-line and the second-line treatment population was 20.73 months (95% CI 9.82 to NR) and 4.27 months (95% CI 3.68 to NR), respectively. Most adverse events reported were of grade 1/2, and none were of grade 4/5., Conclusions: This is the first exploratory study of a fulvestrant and oral vinorelbine regimen in the treatment of HR+/HER2- recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. The combination chemo-endocrine therapy was efficacious, safe, and promising for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer., Competing Interests: No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed., (Copyright © 2023 Cancer Biology & Medicine.)

Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are widely heralded as a drug-screening platform to develop new anti-cancer therapies. Here, we use a drug-repurposing library to screen PDOs of colorectal cancer (CRC) to identify hidden vulnerabilities within therapy-induced phenotypes. Using a microscopy-based screen that accurately scores drug-induced cell killing, we have tested 414 putative anti-cancer drugs for their ability to switch the EGFRi/MEKi-induced cytostatic phenotype toward cytotoxicity. A majority of validated hits (9/37) are microtubule-targeting agents that are commonly used in clinical oncology, such as taxanes and vinca-alkaloids. One of these drugs, vinorelbine, is consistently effective across a panel of >25 different CRC PDOs, independent of RAS mutational status. Unlike vinorelbine alone, its combination with EGFR/MEK inhibition induces apoptosis at all stages of the cell cycle and shows tolerability and effective anti-tumor activity in vivo, setting the basis for a clinical trial to treat patients with metastatic RAS-mutant CRC., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests S.M., C.S.V., J.L.B., and H.J.G.S. are inventors on a patent concerning the combination of MTAs with targeted inhibition of the EGFR-MAPK-signaling pathway. C.S.V., R.O., and S.F.B. are employed by Hubrecht Organoid Technology, which holds the exclusive license to the organoid technology. H.C. is an inventor of several patents related to organoid technology; his full disclosure is given at https://www.uu.nl/staff/JCClevers/., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of second-line metronomic oral vinorelbine-atezolizumab combination for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer., Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase II study performed in patients with advanced NSCLC without activating EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement who progressed after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Combination treatment was atezolizumab (1200 mg IV day 1, every 3 weeks) and oral vinorelbine (40 mg, 3 times by week). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) during the 4-month follow-up from the first dose of treatment. Statistical analysis was based on the exact single-stage Phase II design defined by A'Hern. Based on literature data, the Phase III trial threshold was set at 36 successes in 71 patients., Results: 71 patients were analyzed (median age, 64 years; male, 66.2%; ex-smokers/active smokers, 85.9%; ECOG performance status 0-1, 90.2%; non-squamous NSCLC, 83.1%; PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 4.4%). After a median follow-up of 8.1 months from treatment initiation, 4-month PFS rate was 32% (95% CI, 22-44), i.e. 23 successes out 71 patients. OS rate was 73.2% at 4 months and 24.3% at 24 months. Median PFS and OS were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.0) months and 7.9 (95% CI, 4.8-11.4) months, respectively. Overall response rate and disease control rate at 4 months were 11% (95% CI, 5-21) and 32% (95% CI, 22-44), respectively. No safety signal was evidenced., Conclusion: Metronomic oral vinorelbine-atezolizumab in the second-line setting did not achieve the predefined PFS threshold. No new safety signal was reported for vinorelbine-atezolizumab combination., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of a cisplatin and vinorelbine combination as second- or higher-line palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who were treated with cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks between January 2004 and March 2021. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed; laboratory data were reviewed to determine toxicity. Thirty-two patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated with a combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin. The objective response rate (ORR) was 18.8% and the disease control rate was 75.1%. The median PFS was 4.13 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.8 months). The median OS was 56.9 months (95% CI, 50.5-63.7 months). The ORR (42.9% vs 9.1%; P = .035) was higher in the platinum-sensitive group than in the platinum-resistant group. The median PFS tended to be longer in the platinum-sensitive group (5.3 vs 3.8 months; P = .339) and the median OS was significantly longer in the platinum-sensitive group than in the platinum-resistant group (69.6 vs 24 months; P < .001). All patients developed hematological toxicities, with 56% experiencing grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. Two (6.2%) patients developed febrile neutropenia, but no treatment-related death occurred. This combination therapy may be effective in patients with heavily treated advanced ovarian cancer, particularly in platinum-sensitive patients., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Approximately 80% of desmoid tumors (DTs) show spontaneous regression or disease stabilization during first-line active surveillance. Medical treatment can be considered in cases of disease progression. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of each medical treatment by reviewing only the studies that included progressive disease as the inclusion criterion. We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases to identify published studies for progressive DTs. The disease control rates of the medical treatments, such as low-dose chemotherapy with methotrexate plus vinblastine or vinorelbine, imatinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, nilotinib, anlotinib, doxorubicin-based agents, liposomal doxorubicin, hydroxyurea, and oral vinorelbine for progressive DTs were 71-100%, 78-92%, 67-96%, 84%, 88%, 86%, 89-100%, 90-100%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Low-dose chemotherapy, sorafenib, pazopanib, nilotinib, anlotinib, and liposomal doxorubicin had similar toxicities. Sorafenib and pazopanib were less toxic than imatinib. Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy was associated with the highest toxicity. Hydroxyurea and oral vinorelbine exhibited the lowest toxicity. Stepwise therapy escalation from an initial, less toxic treatment to more toxic agents is recommended for progressive DTs. Sorafenib and pazopanib had limited on-treatment side effects but had the possibility to induce long-term treatment-related side effects. In contrast, low-dose chemotherapy has some on-treatment side effects and is known to have very low long-term toxicity. Thus, for progressive DTs following active surveillance, low-dose chemotherapy is recommended in young patients as long-term side effects are minor, whereas therapies such as sorafenib and pazopanib is recommended for older patients as early side effects are minor., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.)

Background: The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy, oral vinorelbine, 50 mg, three times a week for pre-treated, HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients., Methods: In this multicentric phase II study, patients had to have progressed on AI and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between oral vinorelbine (Arm A) and oral vinorelbine with non-steroidal AI (Arm B)., Results: 121 patients were included, 61 patients in Arm A and 60 patients in Arm B. The median age was 68 years. 109 patients had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI. The study had been prematurely stopped following the third death due to febrile neutropenia. Median PFS trend was found to be different with 2.3 months and 3.7 months in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.50-1.06, p value = 0.0929). No statistical difference was shown in OS and better tumor response. 56 serious adverse events corresponding to 25 patients (21%) were reported (respectively, 12 (20%) versus 13 (22%) for arms A and B) (NS)., Conclusion: The addition of AI to oral vinorelbine over oral vinorelbine alone in aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS. Several unexpected serious adverse events were reported. Metronomic oral vinorelbine schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Immune checkpoint (ICP) expression in tumor cells could directly or indirectly affect the results of immunotherapy. ICP ligands on tumor cells usually bind their immune cell receptors to inhibit the activity, resulting in tumor immune escape. Thus, the purpose of this study was to ascertain the impact of various chemotherapeutic drugs on ICP expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines with different pathological subtypes to provide a basis for the development of a superior regimen of chemotherapy combined with ICP blockade. Methods: Several first-line chemotherapy agents (cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and pemetrexed) were selected to treat different NSCLC cell lines (squamous carcinoma H1703, adenocarcinoma A549, and large cell cancer H460) for 72 hours, and then the changes in ICP expression in the tumor cells were observed through flow cytometry. Results: Cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel upregulated the expressions of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death ligand 2 (PD-L2) in A549 and H460 cell lines. Meanwhile, vinorelbine and pemetrexed upregulated PD-L1 and PD-L2 in H1703, A549, and H460 cell lines. Paclitaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and pemetrexed significantly upregulated the expressions of both galectin-9 and high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) in the A549 cell line. Cisplatin and paclitaxel significantly upregulated the expressions of major histocompatibility complex-II (MHC-II), galectin-3, α-synuclein, and fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) in A549 and H460 cell lines. In addition, cisplatin and vinorelbine significantly upregulated the expressions of both CD155 and CD112 in the H460 cell line. Vinorelbine upregulated MHC-I in all three cell lines. Conclusion: Chemotherapy agents have different effects on the expression of ICP ligands in tumor cells with different pathological types, and this may affect the efficacy of combined immunotherapy. These results provide a theoretical basis for further selection and optimization of the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Objectives: Extensive application of anti-HER2 targeted therapy improves significantly the HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) prognosis, however, it is still difficult to treat brain metastasis. In current study, we explored effective approaches via combining pyrotinib to treat brain metastasis in patients with HER2-positive advanced BC based upon clinical data., Materials and Methods: Current study included 61 HER2-positive BC patients with brain metastases (BM) who were treated by pyrotinib-based regimens. The systemic regimens included pyrotinib combined with capecitabine, pyrotinib combined with nab-paclitaxel, and pyrotinib combined with vinorelbine. Patients' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and objective response rate (ORR), as well as drug-related adverse events (AEs) in regard of each combination regimen were analyzed., Results: Pyrotinib-based systemic therapy resulted in 8.6 months median PFS (mPFS) and 18.0 months median OS (mOS) among the BM patients. Regarding different regimens, the combination of pyrotinib with nab-paclitaxel was superior to the combination with capecitabine and vinorelbine with respect to PFS and OS. The central nervous system (CNS) ORR did not showcase significant difference among 3 regimens, however, nab-paclitaxel combined regimen obtained the best peripheral ORR (84.6%) ( p  ≤ .05)., Conclusions: Pyrotinib-based combination therapy is safe for HER2-positive brain metastasis treatment. Compared with vinorelbine or capecitabine, pyrotinib combined with nab-paclitaxel is more effective with less toxicity, which is the preferable regimen for HER2-positive brain metastasis.KEY MESSAGESPresent investigation investigated effective methods through combining pyrotinib to treat brain metastasis with HER2-positive advanced brain cancer. The outcomes verified that pyrotinib-based combination therapy was safe and efficient to treat HER2-positive brain metastasis. Therefore, it is effective to treat brain metastasis applying anti-HER2 targeted therapies although pyrotinib showcases efficiency regarding its treatments for the metastasis.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The randomized, open-label, phase II EVAN study investigated the efficacy (disease-free survival [DFS] and 5-year overall survival [OS]) and safety of erlotinib versus vinorelbine/cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection (R0) for stage III epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutation+ non-small-cell lung cancer. We describe the updated results at the 43-month follow-up. In EVAN, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to erlotinib (n = 51) or vinorelbine/cisplatin (n = 51). The median follow-up was 54.8 and 63.9 months in the erlotinib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. With erlotinib, the respective 5-year DFS by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 48.2% (95% CI, 29.4 to 64.7) and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.6 to 62.9) in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The median OS was 84.2 months with erlotinib versus 61.1 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.151 to 0.670). The 5-year survival rates were 84.8% and 51.1% with erlotinib and chemotherapy, respectively. In whole-exome sequencing analysis, frequent genes with variants co-occurring at baseline were TP53 , MUC16 , FAM104B , KMT5A , and DNAH9 . With erlotinib, a single-nucleotide polymorphism mutation in UBXN11 was associated with significantly worse DFS ( P = .01). To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS improvement with adjuvant erlotinib compared with chemotherapy in R0 stage III EGFR+ non-small-cell lung cancer.

Chemotherapy for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients on hemodialysis (HD) is an extremely challenging situation because pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of most chemotherapeutics are lacking for the HD patient, and the small amount of evidence available comes mostly from case reports and small case series. In this review, we provide recommendations based on treatment experience of cHL patients on HD in the literature. HD patients undergoing chemotherapy are at risk of overdose and toxicities because many drugs are significantly eliminated by the kidneys, and at the same time, are at risk of undertreatment because many drugs are removed by HD. Therefore, dose modifications and timing of drug administration in relation to HD sessions must be carefully planned according to the distinct traits of each chemotherapeutic. We carried out an exhaustive literature review of reports of actual administrations of chemotherapeutics to cHL on HD, and also extrapolated data from reports of the same chemotherapeutics that were administered to HD patients with malignancies other than cHL. We summarized the information found in the literature, and provide practical and balanced recommendations concerning dose modifications and optimal timing of drug administration in relation to HD sessions for each chemotherapeutic. Chemotherapy regimens and individual chemotherapeutics studied in this review include ABVD (doxorubicin + bleomycin + vinblastine + dacarbazine), BEACOPP (bleomycin + etoposide + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + vincristine + procarbazine + prednisolone), MOPP (mechlorethamine + vincristine + procarbazine + prednisolone), gemcitabine, vinorelbine, brentuximab vedotin, and PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab)., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) is a phase II single-arm trial evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in adults with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) unresectable or metastatic breast cancer (u/mBC) who have received two or more prior anti-HER2 therapies., Objectives: Objectives were to explore approaches for estimating long-term overall survival (OS) with T-DXd from immature data (June 2020 data-cut; median follow-up 20.5 months), and compare predicted long-term outcomes with UK-recommended non-targeted therapies eribulin, capecitabine, and vinorelbine., Methods: Two methods were used to model T-DXd long-term OS: (1) applying a hazard ratio (HR) to the OS curve for another HER2 targeted therapy (third-line trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1]) with longer trial follow-up; and (2) extrapolating T-DXd OS data directly. Comparator OS was based on direct extrapolation of published data (comparison with vinorelbine OS was not possible). Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using a previously published model of utility., Results: Both extrapolation methods demonstrated longer mean/median OS with T-DXd versus eribulin, and capecitabine (44.7/32.9 months [applying an HR to the T-DM1 OS curve]; 47.7/29.9 months [using direct extrapolation]; vs 11.3/9.2, and 17.8/13.6 months, respectively), translating to 2.3, 2.3, 0.6, and 0.9 discounted QALYs., Conclusion: Alternative methods produced consistent results, showing T-DXd is associated with substantial gains in OS and QALYs versus eribulin, and capecitabine. Modelled median OS results were similar to a later data-cut (median of 29.1 months, March 2021 data-cut). The modelling approach in which an HR was applied to the T-DM1 OS curve informed a submission to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer is treated with sequential single-agent chemotherapy with poor outcomes. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate with an SN-38 payload targeting trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2, an epithelial antigen expressed in breast cancer., Methods: In this global, randomized, phase III study, SG was compared with physician's choice chemotherapy (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine) in endocrine-resistant, chemotherapy-treated HR+/HER2- locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic breast cancer. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review., Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive SG (n = 272) or chemotherapy (n = 271). The median age was 56 years, 95% had visceral metastases, and 99% had a prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, with three median lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Primary end point was met with a 34% reduction in risk of progression or death (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.83; P = .0003]). The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 7.0) with SG and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 4.4) with chemotherapy; the PFS at 6 and 12 months was 46% (95% CI, 39 to 53) v 30% (95% CI, 24 to 37) and 21% (95% CI, 15 to 28) v 7% (95% CI, 3 to 14), respectively. Median overall survival (first planned interim analysis) was not yet mature (hazard ratio, 0.84; P = .14). Key grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (SG v chemotherapy) were neutropenia (51% v 38%) and diarrhea (9% v 1%)., Conclusion: SG demonstrated statistically significant PFS benefit over chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated, endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and limited treatment options., Competing Interests: Hope S. RugoHonoraria: Puma Biotechnology, Mylan, Samsung Bioepis, Chugai Pharma, Blueprint Medicines, Napo PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: OBI Pharma (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Merck (Inst), Odonate Therapeutics (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Sermonix Pharmaceuticals (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Ayala Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), MacroGenics (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Polyphor (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/summary Aditya BardiaConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis (Inst), Genentech, Pfizer, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, BioTheranostics, Merck, Radius Health (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Innocrin Pharma (Inst), Sanofi, Puma Biotechnology, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Foundation Medicine, Philips HealthcareResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Merck (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Radius Health (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/523675 Frederik MarméHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Celgene, Genomic Health, PharmaMar, Amgen, MSD Oncology, Immunomedics (Inst), Settle Genetics, Myriad Genetics, Pierre Fabre, GlaxoSmithKline, AGENDIA, Lilly, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca (Inst), Tesaro, Pfizer, Roche (Inst), Genomic Health, CureVac, Amgen, Vaccibody (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst), Novartis (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), Vaccibody (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca Javier CortesStock and Other Ownership Interests: MedSIR, Nektar, Leuko (I)Honoraria: Novartis, Eisai, Celgene, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Daiichi SankyoConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Cellestia Biotech, AstraZeneca, Roche, Settle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, ERYTECH Pharma, Polyphor, Athenex, Lilly, Servier, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, Leuko, Clovis Oncology, Bioasis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma, HiberCell, BioInvent, GEMoaB, Gilead Sciences, Menarini, Zymeworks, Reveal GenomicsResearch Funding: ARIAD (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Baxalta (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Guardant Health (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), Queen Mary University of London (Inst), Roche (Inst), Piqur (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Pharmaceuticals Combinations of A Pi3k Inhibitor and a Microtubule Destabilizing Agent. Javier Cortes Castan, Alejandro Piris Gimenez, Violeta Srra Elizalde. WO 2014/199294 A, Her2 as a predictor of response to dual HER2 blockade in the absence of cytotoxic therapy, Aleix Prat, Antonio Llombart, Javier Cortes, US 2019/0338368 A1Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences Peter SchmidEmployment: Roche (I)Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, Eisai, CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche (I), AstraZeneca, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, Novartis, Eisai, Celgene, Puma BiotechnologyResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), OncoGenex (Inst), Genetech (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Roche (Inst), Medivation Delphine LoiratHonoraria: MSD, Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca, LillyConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Immunomedics, Gilead Sciences, 4D Pharma, LillyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences Olivier TrédanConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Eisai Europe, Sandoz-Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Pierre Fabre, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bayer (Inst),Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology Eva CiruelosConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer Komal L. JhaveriConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Jounce Therapeutics, Synthon, IntelliSphere, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, AbbVie, Lilly, Blueprint Medicines, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Biotheranostics, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company, Taiho Oncology, Sanofi, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Novartis (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Debiopharm Group (Inst), ADC Therapeutics (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Novita Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Zymeworks (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), VelosBio/Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Taiho Pharmaceutical, Jounce Therapeutics, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, IntelliSphere, Lilly, Gilead Sciences Rosemary DelaneyEmployment: Gilead SciencesStock and Other Ownership Interests: Immunomedics (I), Gilead Sciences Olivia FuEmployment: Gilead SciencesStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences Lanjia LinEmployment: Gilead SciencesStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences Wendy VerretEmployment: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences Sara M. TolaneyThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Nektar, NanoString Technologies, AstraZeneca, Puma Biotechnology, Genentech, Eisai, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Paxman, Seattle Genetics, Odonate Therapeutics, G1 Therapeutics, OncoPep, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Samsung Bioepis, CytomX Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Athenex, Immunomedics/Gilead, Mersana, Certara Inc, 4D Pharma, Ellipses Pharma, OncoSec, Chugai Pharma, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, OncXerna Therapeutics, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Zymeworks, Zentalis, BluePrint Medicines, Reveal GenomicsResearch Funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Merck (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Eisai (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), NanoString Technologies (Inst), Cyclacel (Inst), Nektar (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), Odonate Therapeutics (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Settle Genetics (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Introduction: An increasing body of evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies suggests that metronomic oral vinorelbine (VNR) is a promising treatment option for elderly and unfit advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this multicenter study was to present real-world data about the experience in treatment of NSCLC with metronomic VNR in Portugal., Material and Methods: Retrospective data from NSCLC patients not eligible for conventional chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors who received oral metronomic VNR irrespective of treatment line and dose was retrieved from 19 Portuguese Oncology Centers between 2016 and 2018., Results: A total of 293 patients were included, with a median of 76 (39 - 94) years; 71% were ≥70 years old. Patients had a median of 3 comorbidities and predominantly (61%) ECOG PS 2. Most (42%) received metronomic oral VNR as first-line treatment. Overall response rate was 18%, with 42 (18%) partial and no (0%) complete responses. A total of 54% of patients experienced stable disease and 28% of patients, disease progression. Disease control rate was 72%. Patients were a median of 4 (1 - 40) months on treatment. Treatment discontinuation was observed in 90%, mostly (67%) due to disease progression, followed by death (16%). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were only reported in 5% of patients. Female gender (HR 0.601, 95% CI 0.434 - 0.832; p = 0.002) and ECOG PS 1 (HR 0.625, 95% CI [0.443 - 0.881]; p = 0.007) were significantly associated with a lower risk of metronomic oral VNR discontinuation. Overall, 21% of patients experienced G3/4 toxicity., Conclusion: The present real-world results agree with what has been previously reported by other international Centers and support the concept that metronomic scheduling is a relevant and safe approach to treat advanced NSCLC patients., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To explore the effects of cyclophosphamide combined with vinorelbine in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and anteroposterior changes in MRI., Methods: The clinical data of 90 patients with advanced SCLC admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the control group and the study group according to the order of admission, with 45 cases in each group. The control group received the routine treatment, while the study group was treated with cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine to compare the indexes of imaging data and clinical indicators between the two groups before and after treatment., Results: There was no significant difference in the indexes of imaging data between the two groups before treatment ( P > 0.05), and the indexes of imaging data in the study group were visibly lower than those in the control group after treatment ( P < 0.001). The DCR in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group after treatment ( P < 0.05), while the QLQ-C30 scores and serum indices of the study group after treatment were significantly lower than those of the control group ( P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Patients with advanced SCLC were treated with cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine, which can effectively improve the quality of life and reduce the expression of inflammatory factors. This treatment model has a higher application value, and the treatment value is also reflected compared with the routine treatment. At the same time, the permeability parameters obtained by MRI can predict the therapeutic effects of cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine, and further studies are helpful to establish a better solution for patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Zhichun Li and Liliang Ren.)

Background: Data are currently insufficient to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after surgical resection for stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients aged ≥ 75 years. In this study we evaluated efficacy and safety profile of ACT in this population., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients ≥ 75 years who underwent curative surgical resection for stage II-III NSCLC from 2010 to 2018 with an indication to ACT according to current guidelines. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to avoid cofounding biases., Results: Thirty of 140 patients (21%) received ACT. Most patients (n = 24, 80%) received carboplatin in combination with vinorelbine, while 5 patients (17%) received cisplatin plus vinorelbine and one patient (3%) carboplatin plus gemcitabine. The occurrence of adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 8 (27%) cases, while 19 (63%) patients completed 4 chemotherapy cycles. Common reported adverse events with ACT were anemia (n = 20, 67%), neutropenia (n = 18, 60%), thrombocytopenia (n = 9, 30%), renal impairment (n = 4, 13%) and transaminase elevation (n = 4, 13%). No toxic deaths occurred. The median follow-up was 67 months (IQR: 53-87). ACT was associated with a significant benefit in both relapse-free survival (median 36 vs. 18.5 months, p = 0.049) and overall survival (median not reached [NR] vs. 33.5 months, p = 0.023) in a propensity score-matched analysis which controlled for cofounders., Conclusion: ACT confers a survival benefit after curative resection of stage II-III NSCLC in selected patients aged 75 years or older with a manageable toxicity profile., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different platinum adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early-stage resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Design: Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials., Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus Google Scholar were searched through 12 March 2021., Eligibility Criteria: Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the postoperative platinum chemotherapy regimen with the observation-controlled group or comparing two platinum chemotherapy regimens head-to-head were included., Data Extraction and Synthesis: The primary outcome was the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens including relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), 2-year, 3-year, 5-year RFS rate and OS rate. The secondary outcome was the rate of grade 3-4 toxicity assessments. Cochrane Handbook (V.5) was used for the risk of bias assessment. Analyses were performed using R software V.4.3.1., Results: 20 RCTs with a sample size of 5483 were enrolled in meta-analysis. The chemotherapy group had a significant RFS and OS advantage compared with the observation group (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.81, p<0.0001; HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.88, p<0.0001, respectively). Compared with the observation arm, only the 'cisplatin&#95;vinorelbine' regimen had a significant RFS and OS advantage (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.87; HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.87, respectively) while the remaining chemotherapy regimens had no significant difference of efficacy compared with the observation group. In terms of the safety of adjuvant chemotherapy, the incidence of haematological toxicities and nausea/vomiting was not significantly higher in the 'cisplatin&#95;vinorelbine' arm than in other chemotherapy group., Conclusion: This study summarised the adjuvant cytotoxicity chemotherapy regimens for patients with early-stage resected NSCLC. Our analysis may provide some guiding significance for the clinicians when determining the optimal chemotherapy regimen., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Effective reinduction regimens are needed for children with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as outcomes remain poor. Therapeutic options are limited in this heavily pretreated patient population, many of whom have reached lifetime recommended doses of anthracycline chemotherapy. The development of effective non-anthracycline-based salvage regimens is crucial to these patients who are at significant risk of life-threatening cardiotoxicity. We previously reported results of a phase 2 trial of a clofarabine-based regimen with topotecan, vinorelbine, and thiotepa (TVTC) in patients with relapsed acute leukemias. Here we report on an expanded bicenter cohort of 33 patients, <25 years of age, with relapsed/refractory AML treated with up to 2 cycles of the TVTC reinduction regimen from 2007 to 2018. The overall response rate, defined as complete remission or complete remission with partial recovery of platelet count, was 71.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.9-91.6) for those patients in first relapse (n = 14) and 47.4% (95% CI, 24.4-71.1) for patients in second or greater relapse or with refractory disease. Responses were seen across multiple high-risk cytogenetic and molecular subtypes, with 84% of responders successfully bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The 5-year overall survival for patients in first relapse was 46.2% (95% CI, 19.1-73.3) and 50.0% (95% CI, 26.9-73.1) for patients who responded to TVTC. For pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed/refractory AML, TVTC reinduction compares favorably with currently used salvage regimens and warrants further exploration., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: Resistance to HER2 (ErbB2)-targeted therapy may be mediated by other members of the ErbB family. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the irreversible ErbB family blocker, afatinib, alone as first-line therapy in the advanced setting and in combination with vinorelbine or paclitaxel for those who progressed on afatinib monotherapy, in female patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed or progressed on prior HER2-targeted therapy in the early disease setting., Methods: In this phase II, single-arm, two-part study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01271725), patients in part A received afatinib 40 mg/day in 21-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). Patients with progressive disease could then receive afatinib plus weekly vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 or paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 until disease progression or intolerable AEs (part B). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1)., Results: Eighty-seven patients were enrolled and 74 were treated in part A (median age: 51 years [range 27-76]; 31 [42%] estrogen receptor-positive, 26 [35%] progesterone receptor-positive). Of these, 39 (53%) patients went on to receive afatinib plus vinorelbine (13 patients) or paclitaxel (26 patients) in part B. Thirteen (18%) and 12 (31%) patients achieved an objective response in parts A and B, respectively. The most common treatment-related AEs with afatinib monotherapy (any/grade ≥ 3) were diarrhea (68%/8%) and rash (49%/4%). Combination therapy was generally well tolerated, with no additive toxicity observed., Conclusion: Afatinib treatment, alone or in combination with vinorelbine or paclitaxel, was associated with objective responses in ≥ 18% of patients with metastatic breast cancer for whom prior HER2-targeted therapy has failed. Treatment-related AEs were generally manageable, with few grade ≥ 3 AEs reported., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01271725, registered 1 July 2011., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

We aimed to explore the epidemiological characteristics and changes of lung cancer and the clinical medication in England from 2001 to 2019. We searched related research using search engine systems such as MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO. Lung cancer is a serious disease and the prognosis is usually very poor. The overall mortality rate of lung cancer decreased year by year in England from 2001 to 2019, but men, the elderly, and people exposed to polluted air are still more likely to be infected with lung cancer or die as a result, the prevalence and mortality rate of lung cancer in the north of England is significantly higher than that in the south, and the gap is increasing year by year. Lung cancer has changeable risk factors such as quitting smoking and improving air quality, which can effectively reduce the related risk. Paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine are the main drugs for the treatment of lung cancer in England and the treatment of these drugs is beneficial to the survival and quality of life of patients. Men and the elderly are at high risk of lung cancer, which means that lung cancer has obvious gender inequality and age inequality. At the same time, based on the statistical data of lung cancer risk in different regions, it can be concluded that lung cancer also has strong geographical and economic inequality. Changing risk factors and using drugs can effectively reduce the risk of lung cancer and provide effective treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Baokun Zhang and Ying Yang.)

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of gefitinib as an adjuvant therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation., Patients and Methods: IMPACT (WJOG6410L; University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000006252), a randomized, open-label, phase III study, included patients with completely resected pathologic stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) during September 2011 to December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 mg once daily) for 24 months or cisplatin (80 mg/m 2 on day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8; cis/vin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS)., Results: Overall, 234 patients were randomly assigned. Among 232 eligible patients (116 each; excluding two who withdrew consent), the median DFS was 35.9 and 25.1 months in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier curves crossed around 4 years after surgery with no statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank P = .63; hazard ratio by stratified Cox proportional hazards model = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.28). Overall survival (OS) was also not different (stratified log-rank P = .89; hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.65), with the 5-year OS rates being 78.0% and 74.6% in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0 and three patients in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively., Conclusion: Although adjuvant gefitinib appeared to prevent early relapse, it did not prolong DFS or OS. However, similar DFS and OS may justify adjuvant gefitinib in the selected patient subsets, especially those deemed ineligible for platinum-doublet adjuvant therapy; however, this was not a noninferiority trial., Competing Interests: Hirohito TadaHonoraria: Chugai Pharma Tetsuya MitsudomiHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Lilly, Novartis, MSD K.K., Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Guardant Health, Ethicon, Thermofisher Scientific Biomarkers, Merck KGaA, Janssen Oncology, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD Oncology, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Thermo Fisher ScientificResearch Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Sanofi/Aventis (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), MSD K.K. (Inst), Kyowa Hakko Kirin (Inst) Toshihiro MisumiSpeakers' Bureau: Chugai Pharma, AstraZeneca Kenji SugioHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Chugai PharmaResearch Funding: Covidien Japan, Lilly Japan Masahiro TsuboiHonoraria: AstraZeneca Japan, Chugai Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, MSD K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, MedtronicResearch Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Merck (Inst) Isamu OkamotoHonoraria: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, MSD Oncology, Chugai Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Lilly JapanConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, Chugai Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, PfizerResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), MSD Oncology (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Chugai/Roche (Inst) Shunichi SugawaraHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD K.K., Yakult Honsha, Kyowa Kirin Shinji AtagiHonoraria: Chugai Pharma, MSD K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly Japan, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck, Novartis, Thermo Fisher ScientificResearch Funding: MSD K.K. (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Lilly Japan (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb Japan (Inst), Roche (Inst), Merck (Inst) Toshiaki TakahashiHonoraria: AstraZeneca KK, Chugai Pharma, Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD K.K., Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Yakult HonshaResearch Funding: AstraZeneca KK (Inst), Lilly Japan (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), MSD K.K. (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst) Hidetoshi HayashiHonoraria: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb Japan, Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca Japan, Chugai Pharma, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Merck SeronoConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharma, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Shanghai HaiHe Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB JapanResearch Funding: Ono Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, AbbVie (Inst), AC Medical (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Lilly Japan (Inst), EPS Associates Co, Ltd (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Japan Clinical Research Operations (Inst), Kyowa Hakko Kirin (Inst), Merck Serono (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Otsuka (Inst), Parexel (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), PPD-SNBL (Inst), Quintiles Inc (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Yakult Honsha (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Sysmex Morihito OkadaSpeakers' Bureau: Taiho Pharmaceutical, Johnson & Johnson, Covidien, Lilly, Chugai Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, CSL BehringResearch Funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Nippon Kayaku (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Covidien (Inst), Johnson & Johnson (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Yakult Honsha (Inst), Lilly Japan (Inst), Nihon Medi-Physics (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Mochida Pharmaceutical Co Ltd. (Inst), Shionogi (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Kyowa Hakko Kirin (Inst) Hiroshige YoshiokaHonoraria: Lilly, Chugai Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD K.K., Novartis, Kyowa Kirin Co, Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo, Nippon Kayaku, Delta-Fly Pharma, PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Delta-Fly Pharma Kazuhisa TakahashiSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca Ichiro YoshinoHonoraria: Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Chugai Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Shionogi, Astra Zeneca, Intuitive Surgical, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Covidien/MedtronicConsulting or Advisory Role: Astra Zeneca, Intuitive Surgical, Covidien/MedtronicResearch Funding: Chugai Pharma (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Shionogi (Inst) Kazuhiko NakagawaHonoraria: AstraZeneca KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, CareNet, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Yodosha, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc, Kyorin, Takeda, Medical Review Co, Ltd, MSD K.K., AbbVie, Merck, Roche Diagnostics, Bayer Yakuhin, Nippon Kayaku, Amgen, Kyowa Kirin Co, Ltd, Medical Mobile Communications Co, Ltd, 3H Clinical Trial, Astellas Pharma, Yomiuri Telecasting Corporation, Medicus Shuppan, publishers Co, Ltd, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co, Inc, Nichi-iko, Nanzando Co, Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co, LtdConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharma, TakedaResearch Funding: Chugai Pharma (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Parexel International Corp. (Inst), A2 Healthcare (Inst), Novartis (Inst), IQvia (Inst), SymBio Pharmaceuticals (Inst), AstraZeneca KK (Inst), Kissei Pharmaceutical (Inst), EPS Holdings (Inst), Bayer Yakuhin (Inst), MSD K.K. (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Otsuka (Inst), Syneos Health (Inst), EPS International (Inst), PRA Health Sciences (Inst), PPD-SNBL (Inst), Covance (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline K.K. (Inst), Sysmex (Inst), Mochida Pharmaceutical Co Ltd. (Inst), Japan Clinical Research Operations (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Medical Research Support (Inst), ICON (Inst), CMIC (Inst), Kyowa Kirin Co, Ltd (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The mutation status of tumor tissue DNA (n = 389) of resected stage II-III non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (Ns-NSCLC) was analyzed using targeted deep sequencing as an exploratory biomarker study (JIPANG-TR) for the JIPANG study, a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed/cisplatin (Pem/Cis) vs vinorelbine/cisplatin (Vnr/Cis). The TP53 mutation, common EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion and L858R), and KRAS mutations were frequently detected. The frequency of the EGFR mutation was significant among female patients. Patients with an EGFR mutation-positive status had a significantly shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) time (24 mo vs not reached) (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22-2.21; P = .0011 for EGFR mutation status). Multivariable analysis identified both the pathological stage and EGFR mutation status as independent prognostic factors for RFS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.30-2.44; P = .0003 for disease stage; and HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.16; P = .0050 for EGFR mutation status). This study demonstrated that the EGFR mutation has either a poor prognostic or predictive impact on a poor response to postoperative chemotherapy with platinum doublet chemotherapy for stage II-III Ns-NSCLC patients. This result supports a role for mandatory molecular diagnosis of early-stage Ns-NSCLC for precision oncology and signifies the importance of adjuvant for the 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor rather than platinum-based chemotherapy. This study is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000012237)., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Metronomic chemotherapy is a treatment option for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who require prolonged disease control without cumulative toxicity. Data available on the efficacy and tolerability of prolonged usage of metronomic therapy are limited. We analyzed patients with MBC, enrolled in a clinical trial, who obtained a prolonged clinical benefit for a duration of at least 12 months with vinorelbine 30 or 40 mg orally three times a week, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily and capecitabine 500 mg three times a day (VEX regimen). The patients were treated at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan. We identified 67 MBC patients. The median age before starting the VEX regimen was 53 years. There were 59 patients (88%) who had hormone-receptors positive and HER2 negative BC. We had 37 patients who received VEX as the first-line treatment for MBC, while 30 patients were pretreated. The objective response rate was 49% (95% CI, 37-62). The median duration of VEX treatment after the first year was 14 months (min-max range 0.3-81.3 months). The progression-free survival at 3 years was 25.4% (95% CI, 15.7-36.2) and at 4 years was 18.5% (95% CI, 10.1-28.8 time 0 corresponds to 1 year after starting VEX). A total of 25 patients required a dose reduction, 7% of patients experienced G3 hand and foot syndrome. Metronomic VEX regimen can induce prolonged clinical benefit in MBC. On the basis of this long-term safety evaluation, there is no evidence of specific cumulative or delayed toxicities with metronomic chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed treatments improve outcomes for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Current identification of patients with HER2-positive disease relies on tumor tissue testing, which can be inaccurate because of tumor heterogeneity or tumor evolution. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are often present in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that HER2 assessment of CTCs in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer could identify a subset of patients with HER2-positive CTCs who could benefit from HER2-directed treatments., Methods: This was a single-arm, two-stage, phase II trial. Patients with HER2-negative progressive MBC with HER2-positive CTC (defined as HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization), ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for MBC, and no prior vinorelbine received trastuzumab in combination with vinorelbine on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate., Results: From January 2013 to June 2014, we prospectively screened CTCs from patients with HER2-negative MBC. CTCs were detected in 201 of 311 patients (65%). The median number of CTCs was 10 (interquartile range, 3-57). Sixty-nine of 311 patients (22%) had HER2+ CTCs, with a median of three HER2+ CTCs (range 1-21). Twenty patients with HER2+ CTCs were treated on study. At data cutoff (January 13, 2017), no patients remained on study therapy. The objective response rate was 5% (95% CI, 0.1 to 24.9), with one of 20 patients experiencing a partial response. The clinical benefit rate was 20.0% (1 partial response and 3 stable diseases > 24 weeks, 95% CI, 5.7% to 43.7%). The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months., Conclusion: CTC analysis of patients with HER2-negative MBC identifies a subset with HER2-amplified CTCs. However, clinical activity of an HER2-directed regimen in this population was low. The functional significance of HER2-positive CTCs remains uncertain., Competing Interests: Heather A. ParsonsConsulting or Advisory Role: Foundation MedicineResearch Funding: Puma Biotechnology (paid to institution) William T. BarryEmployment: Rho Gerburg M. WulfStock and Other Ownership Interests: Selecta BiosciencesResearch Funding: Merck, GlaxoSmithKlinePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Pin1 as a marker for abnormal cell growth Patent number: 8129131 Steven J. IsakoffConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, OncoPep, Puma Biotechnology, Seattle Genetics, NovartisResearch Funding: Genentech, PharmaMar, AbbVie, OncoPep, Merck, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Outcomes4Me Ian E. KropEmployment: AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Freeline TherapeuticsLeadership: AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Freeline TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Freeline Therapeutics, VertexHonoraria: Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, CelltrionConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Macrogenics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Context Therapeutics, Novartis, Merck, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Genentech, Pfizer, MacrogenicsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Objectives: Microtubule inhibitors (MTIs) are widely used as anti-cancer drugs for various types of tumors. Vinorelbine, an MTI, is utilized in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, especially for lung adenocarcinoma. However, no molecular markers are able to identify patients for whom MTIs would be effective. In this study, we attempted to identify practical markers to predict the efficacy of MTI-based adjuvant chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: We explored a novel combination of molecular marker candidates, based on gene expression network analysis constructed using an omics panel of 26 lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. We then applied the obtained classification method to predict the efficacy of MTI treatment in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was conducted using surgical specimens from 24 Japanese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated postoperatively with vinorelbine., Results: We identified four modules within the network with module activities that were significantly associated with sensitivity to MTIs. Two modules were associated with high sensitivity to MTIs: genes with low differentiation or transdifferentiation of lung adenocarcinomas. On the other hand, MTI-low sensitivity modules were enriched in common epithelial genes and markers of well-differentiated lung adenocarcinomas. We also classified lung adenocarcinoma cases using the module activities associated with MTI efficacy and stratify the cases with MTI resistance., Conclusion: We demonstrate that the constructed classification method is useful for identifying patients with MTI resistance which results in a high risk of cancer relapse., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of a taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard of care for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. The combination of vinorelbine with trastuzumab and pertuzumab showed anti-tumor activity in a phase 2 trial., Patients and Methods: The databases of two tertiary medical centers were retrospectively searched for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who underwent first-line treatment in 2013-2019 with a taxane or vinorelbine in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Groups were compared for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile., Results: The study included 87 patients in the taxane group and 65 in the vinorelbine group. Overall median PFS was significantly longer in the taxane group [HR 0.56 (0.36-0.88), P = 0.01], but on multivariate analysis the difference was not statistically significant [HR 0.68 (0.4-1.1, P = 0.11)]. PFS was comparable in both groups of patients with recurrent disease [HR 0.94 (0.5-1.79), P = 0.85]. However, in patients with de novo metastatic disease, the difference in favor of the taxane group was pronounced [HR 0.4 (0.2-0.78), P = 0.007] and maintained significance on multivariate analysis [HR 0.46 (0.2-0.97, P = 0.04)]. There was no statistical significant difference in OS in the whole cohort [HR 0.69 (0.39-1.23)] or the subgroups., Conclusions: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer had similar survival with first-line treatment of taxane or vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. When the analysis was adjusted for prognostic factors, there was no PFS benefit for taxanes except in the subgroup with de novo disease.

Objective: To develop a pirarubicin (THP) and vinorelbine (VRL) codelivery nano-micellar system (T+V-CS micelles) of pirarubicin (THP) and vinorelbine (VRL) by using chondroitin sulfate-cholesterol polymers (CS-Chol) and DSPE-mPEG 2000 and to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the codelivery nano-micelles in breast cancer treatment., Methods: T+V-CS micelles were prepared by ultrasonic-dialysis method, and the physicochemical characterization were evaluated using multiple technological means. The anti-tumor efficacy of T+V-CS micelles in vitro was evaluated by MTT assay and cell cycle arrest analysis. Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of T+V-CS micelles in vivo was carried out on xenograft 4T1 murine breast cancer bearing BALB/c mice model., Results: T+V-CS micelles displayed a nearly spherical shape when observed through transmission electron microscope. The particle size and polydispersity indexes (PDI) of T+V-CS micelles was (155.5±4.5) nm and 0.170±0.003 respectively, while the Zeta potential was (-23.0±0.9) mV. Meanwhile, T+V-CS micelles demonstrated high encapsulation efficiency of (81.87±2.56)% for THP and (87.54±2.82)% for VRL and a high overall drug loading efficiency of (10.20±1.20)%. In vitro and in vivo studies of the therapeutic efficacy of breast cancer showed that T+V-CS micelles had synergistic anti-tumor effect and induced increased G 2 /M cell cycle arrest in 4T1 cells, which could significantly inhibit tumor growth and prolong survival compared with the therapeutic efficacy of micelles loaded with a single kind of drug or free drug solutions., Conclusion: The study showed that T+V-CS micelles had excellent anti-tumor effect, offering a reference to the clinical treatment of breast cancer., (Copyright© by Editorial Board of Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences).)

Purpose: We conducted a single-arm prospective phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral metronomic vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab (mNH) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients., Methods: HER2-positive MBC patients received oral vinorelbine 40 mg thrice a week and trastuzumab (loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD for ≥ 24 weeks). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), tolerability, and overall survival (OS)., Results: Twenty patients with HER2-positive MBC were enrolled, with a median of 1 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Median age was 61.5 years (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 48.6-63.1). Visceral involvements presented in 14 patients (70.0%). ORR was 20.0%, and CBR was 75% with 4 PR (20.0%) and 11 SD (55.0%). The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 7.4 months (95% CI 3.2-11.5) and 45.8 months (95%CI: not reached), respectively. The mPFS was 17.7 months (95%CI not reached) and 5.8 months (95%CI 5.6-5.9) in mNH as first-line and ≥ second-line therapy (log rank p = 0.03), respectively. The most common grade 1 adverse events (AEs) included nausea (15%), leukopenia (15%), ALT/AST elevation (15%), diarrhea (10%), and peripheral neuropathy (10%). Grade 2 adverse events included leukopenia (5%) and neutropenia (10%). No grade 3/4 AEs were observed., Conclusions: Oral metronomic vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab is a well-tolerated and effective anti-tumor regimen for HER2-positive MBC.

Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive tumour with dismal prognosis arising in the pleura and associated with asbestos exposure. Its incidence is on the rise worldwide. In selected patients with early-stage MPM, a maximal surgical cytoreduction in combination with additional antitumour treatment may be considered in selected patients assessed by a multidisciplinary tumor board. In patients with unresectable or advanced MPM, chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed is the standard of care. Currently, no standard salvage therapy has been approved yet, but second-line chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine is commonly used. Novel therapeutic approaches based on dual immunotherapy or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy demonstrated promising survival benefit and will probably be incorporated in the future.

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (mVNR) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients unfit for platinum-based combination chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study in treatment-naive patients with TNM stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Patients received mVNR at a fixed dose of 50 mg × 3 or standard schedule 60-80 mg/m 2 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS; NCI-CTC v4). Main secondary objectives were safety, disease control rate (DCR) without grade 4 toxicity (G4DCR), DCR, PFS, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL)., Results: A total of 167 patients were included, 83 and 84 patients in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. The median G4PFS was 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-4.3] and 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-2.9), hazard ration (HR) = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.88), P = 0.0068 in favor of metronomic arm; G4DCR was 45.8% and 26.8% in the mVNR and standard arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the mVNR arm (25.3% versus 54.4%) mainly owing to a reduction in all grades (15.7% versus 51.9%) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (10.8% versus 42%). PFS was 4.3 (95% CI: 3.3-5.1) and 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-5.2) in mVNR and standard arms, respectively. No difference in median OS was observed. QoL was comparable between arms., Conclusions: Metronomic oral vinorelbine significantly prolonged median G4PFS in advanced NSCLC patients unfit for platinum combinations as first-line treatment. It was associated with a clear reduction in toxicity and may be considered as an important option in this challenging population., Competing Interests: Disclosure AC has disclosed expert testimony (Pierre Fabre), travel accommodations/expenses (Roche, Pierre Fabre). A Morabito has disclosed speaker's bureau (Pfizer, BMS, Boehringer, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca). FG has disclosed advisory boards/consultations (Eli Lilly, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, BMS, MSD, Novartis); honoraria: seminar/talks to industry (Eli Lilly, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Celgene, BMS, MSD); research funding (AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD). RR has disclosed consulting/advisory (Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim). G-LC has disclosed consulting/advisory (Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astellas). JB-B reports grants and personal fees from Roche-Genentech, grants from Pfizer, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Novartis and grants from Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. PL is an employee of Pierre Fabre Médicament. CTTM is an employee of Pierre Fabre Médicament. SG, biostatistician, is an employee of Pierre Fabre Médicament (IRPF). DK has disclosed consultancy and advisory board: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, BMS, MSD. T-EC reports consulting/advisory, personal fees from Astellas Pharma, Janssen, BMS, Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, A-D Pharm, Lilly, AstraZeneca and Novartis; non-financial support from Pfizer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Servier, Ipsen, Amgen, Adpharm, AstraZeneca, Roche, BMS, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and Astellas Pharma. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an aggressive tumor with high mortality and poor prognosis. In this study, we designed a liposome encapsulating polymeric micelles (PMs) loaded with vinorelbine (NVB) and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (cisplatin or CDDP) for the treatment of NSCLC., Materials and Methods: Sodium poly(α-l-glutamic acid)-graft-methoxy-polyethylene glycol (PLG-G-PEG 5K ) was used to prepare NVB-loaded NVB-PMs and CDDP-loaded CDDP-PMs that were co-encapsulated into liposomes by a reverse evaporation method, yielding NVB and CDDP co-delivery liposomes (CoNP-lips) composed of egg phosphatidyl lipid-80/cholesterol/DPPG/DSPE-mPEG 2000 at a molar ratio of 52:32:14:2. The CoNP-lips were characterized in terms of particle size, zeta potential, drug content, encapsulation efficiency, and structural properties. Drug release by the CoNP-lips as well as their stability and cytotoxicity was evaluated in vitro, and their antitumor efficacy was assessed in a mouse xenograft model of Lewis lung carcinoma cell-derived tumors., Results: CoNP-lips had a spherical shape with uniform size distribution; the average particle size was 162.97±9.06 nm, and the average zeta potential was -13.02±0.22 mV. In vitro cytotoxicity analysis and the combination index demonstrated that the CoNP-lips achieved a synergistic cytotoxic effect at an NVB:CDDP weight ratio of 2:1 in an NSCLC cell line. There was sustained release of both drugs from CoNP-lips. The pharmacokinetic analysis showed that CoNP-lips had a higher plasma half-life than NP solution, with 6.52- and 8.03-fold larger areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of NVB and CDDP. CoNP-lips showed antitumor efficacy in tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice and drug accumulation in tumors via the enhanced permeability and retention effect., Conclusion: CoNP-lips are a promising formulation for targeted therapy in NSCLC., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2021 Wang et al.)

Purpose: ADJUVANT-CTONG1104 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01405079), a randomized phase III trial, showed that adjuvant gefitinib treatment significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VP) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutation-positive resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) results., Methods: From September 2011 to April 2014, 222 patients from 27 sites were randomly assigned 1:1 to adjuvant gefitinib (n = 111) or VP (n = 111). Patients with resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) NSCLC and EGFR -activating mutation were enrolled, receiving gefitinib for 24 months or VP every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was DFS (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Secondary end points included OS, 3-, 5-year (y) DFS rates, and 5-year OS rate. Post hoc analysis was conducted for subsequent therapy data., Results: Median follow-up was 80.0 months. Median OS (ITT) was 75.5 and 62.8 months with gefitinib and VP, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.36; P = .674); respective 5-year OS rates were 53.2% and 51.2% ( P = .784). Subsequent therapy was administered upon progression in 68.4% and 73.6% of patients receiving gefitinib and VP, respectively. Subsequent targeted therapy contributed most to OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.38) compared with no subsequent therapy. Updated 3y DFS rates were 39.6% and 32. 5% with gefitinib and VP ( P = .316) and 5y DFS rates were 22. 6% and 23.2% ( P = .928), respectively., Conclusion: Adjuvant therapy with gefitinib in patients with early-stage NSCLC and EGFR mutation demonstrated improved DFS over standard of care chemotherapy. Although this DFS advantage did not translate to a significant OS difference, OS with adjuvant gefitinib was one of the longest observed in this patient group compared with historic data.