Search

Your search keyword '"Vitali G.C."' showing total 18 results
Start Over Author "Vitali G.C."
18 results on '"Vitali G.C."'

1. European multicenter propensity score match study of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for splenic flexure carcinomas: Results from the Splenic Flexure Cancer (SFC) Study Group

Author

Beghdadi, N., de’Angelis, N., Brunetti, F., Bianchi, G., Pham, J., Genova, P., Sobhani, I., Martínez-Pérez, A., Gómez, S.A., Torres, M.T., Payá, C., Gonzálvez, P., Winter, D.C., Stakelum, A., Zaborowski, A., Landi, F., Sueiras-Gil, A., Hevia, R., Vitali, G.C., Assalino, M., Ris, F., Le Roy, B., Pezet, D., Abdallah, M., Coccolini, F., Ansaloni, L., Celentano, V., Kraft, M., Solis, A., Espin, E., Denet, C., Fuks, D., Birindelli, A., and Di Saverio, S.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Résection par cœlioscopie versus laparotomie des carcinomes de l’angle colique gauche : une étude multicentrique européenne avec appariement selon le score de propension

Author

Beghdadi, N., Martínez-Pérez, A., Winter, D.C., Landi, F., Vitali, G.C., Le Roy, B., Pezet, D., Coccolini, F., Celentano, V., Stakelum, A., Assalino, M., Solis, A., Denet, C., Di Saverio, S., Brunetti, F., Ris, F., Fuks, D., Espin, E., de’Angelis, N., Bianchi, G., Pham, J., Genova, P., Sobhani, I., Gómez, S.A., Torres, M.T., Payá, C., Gonzálvez, P., Zaborowski, A., Sueiras-Gil, A., Hevia, R., Abdallah, M., Ansaloni, L., Kraft, M., and Birindelli, A.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for centrally located single hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: A propensity score-matching analysis

Author

Ferraro, V., primary, Memeo, R., additional, Cherqui, D., additional, Adam, R., additional, Aldrihetti, L., additional, Briceño-Delgado, J.R., additional, Di Benedetto, F., additional, Pessaux, P., additional, Piardi, T., additional, Vitali, G.C., additional, and De’angelis, N., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy

Author

De'Angelis, N., Catena, F., Memeo, R., Coccolini, F., Martínez-Pérez, A., Romeo, O.M., Simone, B. De, Saverio, S. Di, Brustia, R., Rhaiem, R., Piardi, T., Conticchio, M., Marchegiani, F., Beghdadi, N., Abu-Zidan, F.M., Alikhanov, R., Allard, M.A., Allievi, N., Amaddeo, G., Ansaloni, L., Andersson, R., Andolfi, E., Azfar, M., Bala, M., Benkabbou, A., Ben-Ishay, O., Bianchi, G., Biffl, W.L., Brunetti, F., Carra, M.C., Casanova, D., Celentano, V., Ceresoli, M., Chiara, O., Cimbanassi, S., Bini, R., Coimbra, R., de'Angelis, G. Luigi, Decembrino, F., Palma, A., Reuver, P.R. de, Domingo, C., Cotsoglou, C., Ferrero, A., Fraga, G.P., Gaiani, F., Gheza, F., Gurrado, A., Harrison, E., Henriquez, A., Hofmeyr, S., Iadarola, R., Kashuk, J.L., Kianmanesh, R., Kirkpatrick, A.W., Kluger, Y., Landi, F., Langella, S., Lapointe, R., Roy, B., Luciani, A., Machado, F., Maggi, U., Maier, R.V., Mefire, A.C., Hiramatsu, K., Ordoñez, C., Patrizi, F., Planells, M., Peitzman, A.B., Pekolj, J., Perdigao, F., Pereira, B.M., Pessaux, P., Pisano, M., Puyana, J.C., Rizoli, S., Portigliotti, L., Romito, R., Sakakushev, B., Sanei, B., Scatton, O., Serradilla-Martin, M., Schneck, A.S., Sissoko, M.L., Sobhani, I., Broek, R.P. Ten, Testini, M., Valinas, R., Veloudis, G., Vitali, G.C., Weber, D., Zorcolo, L., Giuliante, F., Gavriilidis, P., Fuks, D., Sommacale, D., De'Angelis, N., Catena, F., Memeo, R., Coccolini, F., Martínez-Pérez, A., Romeo, O.M., Simone, B. De, Saverio, S. Di, Brustia, R., Rhaiem, R., Piardi, T., Conticchio, M., Marchegiani, F., Beghdadi, N., Abu-Zidan, F.M., Alikhanov, R., Allard, M.A., Allievi, N., Amaddeo, G., Ansaloni, L., Andersson, R., Andolfi, E., Azfar, M., Bala, M., Benkabbou, A., Ben-Ishay, O., Bianchi, G., Biffl, W.L., Brunetti, F., Carra, M.C., Casanova, D., Celentano, V., Ceresoli, M., Chiara, O., Cimbanassi, S., Bini, R., Coimbra, R., de'Angelis, G. Luigi, Decembrino, F., Palma, A., Reuver, P.R. de, Domingo, C., Cotsoglou, C., Ferrero, A., Fraga, G.P., Gaiani, F., Gheza, F., Gurrado, A., Harrison, E., Henriquez, A., Hofmeyr, S., Iadarola, R., Kashuk, J.L., Kianmanesh, R., Kirkpatrick, A.W., Kluger, Y., Landi, F., Langella, S., Lapointe, R., Roy, B., Luciani, A., Machado, F., Maggi, U., Maier, R.V., Mefire, A.C., Hiramatsu, K., Ordoñez, C., Patrizi, F., Planells, M., Peitzman, A.B., Pekolj, J., Perdigao, F., Pereira, B.M., Pessaux, P., Pisano, M., Puyana, J.C., Rizoli, S., Portigliotti, L., Romito, R., Sakakushev, B., Sanei, B., Scatton, O., Serradilla-Martin, M., Schneck, A.S., Sissoko, M.L., Sobhani, I., Broek, R.P. Ten, Testini, M., Valinas, R., Veloudis, G., Vitali, G.C., Weber, D., Zorcolo, L., Giuliante, F., Gavriilidis, P., Fuks, D., and Sommacale, D.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 238974.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4-1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.

Published
2021

6. Comparaison de la survie entre la résection chirurgicale et l’ablation par radiofréquence pour le carcinome hépatocellulaire selon les critères de Milan chez les patients âgés : une étude multicentrique Européenne

Author

Conticchio, M., primary, Felli, E., additional, Vitali, G.C., additional, Dè Angelis, N., additional, Piardi, T., additional, Adam, R., additional, Pessaux, P., additional, Aldrighetti, L., additional, and Memeo, R., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Hémicolectomie droite élargie, hémicolectomie gauche ou colectomie gauche segmentaire pour un cancer de l’angle colique gauche : étude multicentrique européenne avec appariement selon de la score de propension

Author

De’angelis, N., primary, Beghdadi, N., additional, Martinez-Perez, A., additional, Winter, D.C., additional, Landi, F., additional, Vitali, G.C., additional, Le Roy, B., additional, Brunetti, F., additional, Celentano, V., additional, Di Saverio, S., additional, Denet, C., additional, Fuks, D., additional, and Espin, E., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Résection par cœlioscopie versus laparotomie des carcinomes de l’angle colique gauche : une étude multicentrique européenne avec appariement selon le score de propension

Author

Beghdadi, N., Martínez-Pérez, A., Winter, D.C., Landi, F., Vitali, G.C., Le Roy, B., Pezet, D., Coccolini, F., Celentano, V., Stakelum, A., Assalino, M., Solis, A., Denet, C., Di Saverio, S., Brunetti, F., Ris, F., Fuks, D., Espin, E., de’Angelis, N., Bianchi, G., Pham, J., Genova, P., Sobhani, I., Gómez, S.A., Torres, M.T., Payá, C., Gonzálvez, P., Zaborowski, A., Sueiras-Gil, A., Hevia, R., Abdallah, M., Ansaloni, L., Kraft, M., and Birindelli, A.

Abstract

•Les carcinomes de l’angle colique gauche (CACG) représentent moins de 10 % des cancers colorectaux et ils ont été exclus des essais cliniques randomisés comparant la cœlioscopie à la laparotomie.•Cette étude européenne multicentrique est basée sur la plus large cohorte de patients atteints d’un CACG traité par résection chirurgicale curative en chirurgie élective.•Les résultats montrent que la cœlioscopie est associée à des avantages opératoires (moindres pertes sanguines) et postopératoires (réhabilitation du patient plus rapide) par rapport à la laparotomie.•Les bénéfices de l’approche cœlioscopique sont observés indépendamment de la procédure de résection réalisée (colectomie droite élargie, colectomie gauche ou résection angulaire gauche).•Les taux de survie globale et sans récidive à 5 ans des patients opérés par cœlioscopie sont comparables à ceux observés chez les patients opérés par laparotomie.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Cœlioscopie versus ablation par radiofréquence pour le traitement du carcinome hépatocellulaire unique≤3cm chez les patients âgés : une analyse d’appariement des scores de propension

Author

Conticchio, M., Gelli, M., Vitali, G.C., Dè Angelis, N., Laurent, A., Adam, R., Pessaux, P., Aldrighetti, L., and Memeo, R.

Abstract

Le but de notre travail était d’évaluer les résultats chez les patients âgés (>70 ans) avec un carcinome hépatocellulaire (CHC) unique inférieur à 3cm traite avec une résection cœlioscopique (RES) ou ablation par radiofréquence (RFA).

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Extended right colectomy, left colectomy, or segmental left colectomy for splenic flexure carcinomas: a European multicenter propensity score matching analysis

Author

De'Angelis, N., Martinez-Perez, A., Winter, D. C., Landi, F., Vitali, G. C., Le Roy, B., Coccolini, F., Brunetti, F., Celentano, V., Di Saverio, S., Ris, F., Fuks, D., Espin, E., Bianchi, G., Pham, J., Genova, P., Sobhani, I., Gomez, S. A., Torres, M. T., Paya, C., Gonzalvez, P., Stakelum, A., Zaborowski, A., Sueiras-Gil, A., Hevia, R., Assalino, M., Pezet, D., Abdallah, M., Ansaloni, L., Birindelli, A., Denet, C., Solis, A., Kraft, M., Chirurgie digestive et hépatobiliaire, CHU Estaing [Clermont-Ferrand], CHU Clermont-Ferrand-CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Henri Mondor, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University NHS Trust, CHU Amiens-Picardie, de'Angelis N., Martinez-Perez A., Winter D.C., Landi F., Vitali G.C., Le Roy B., Coccolini F., Brunetti F., Celentano V., Di Saverio S., Ris F., Fuks D., Espin E., Bianchi G., Pham J., Genova P., Sobhani I., Gomez S.A., Torres M.T., Paya C., Gonzalvez P., Stakelum A., Zaborowski A., Sueiras-Gil A., Hevia R., Assalino M., Pezet D., Abdallah M., Ansaloni L., Birindelli A., Denet C., Solis A., and Kraft M.

Subjects
Male, Extended right colectomy, 0302 clinical medicine, Postoperative Complications, Colectomy, ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS, Splenic fexure carcinoma, Aged, 80 and over, ddc:617, Middle Aged, 3. Good health, Treatment Outcome, Elective Surgical Procedures, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Colonic Neoplasms, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, Female, Left colectomy, Colon, Transverse, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Operative Time, Segmental left colectomy, Disease-Free Survival, Resection, 03 medical and health sciences, Postoperative complications, Propensity score matching, Splenic flexure carcinoma, Internal medicine, medicine, Carcinoma, Humans, Propensity Score, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Splenic flexure, business.industry, [SDV.BBM.BM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology/Molecular biology, Hepatology, Length of Stay, medicine.disease, [SDV.MP.BAC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Microbiology and Parasitology/Bacteriology, Surgery, Postoperative complication, Laparoscopy, Lymph Nodes, business, Abdominal surgery
Abstract

Background: The surgical resection of the splenic flexure carcinoma (SFC)is challenging and the optimal surgical procedure for SFCs remains a matter of debate. The present study aimed to compare in a multicenter European sample of patients the short- and long-term outcomes of extended right (ERC) vs. left (LC) vs. segmental left colectomy (SLC) for SFCs. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed the surgical and oncological outcomes of SFC patients undergoing elective curative intent surgery between 2000 and 2018. Descriptive and exploratory analyses were first conducted on the whole sample. Outcomes of the different procedures (ERC vs. LC vs. SLC) were then compared using propensity score matching for multilevel treatment. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier method. Results: From a total of 399 SFC patients, 143 (35.8%) underwent ERC, 131 (32.8%) underwent LC, and 125 (31.4%) underwent SLC. Overall, 297 (74.4%) were laparoscopic procedures. An increase in operative time, time to flatus, time to regular diet, and hospital stay was observed with the progressive extension of SFC resection. ERC was associated with significantly increased risk of postoperative ileus compared to both LC and SLC. A significantly greater number of lymph nodes were retrieved by ERC, but the objective of at least 12 retrieved lymph nodes was achieved in 85% of patients, without procedure-related differences. No differences were observed in OS or DFS between ERC, LC, and SLC. Conclusion: The present study supports the resection of SFCs by colon-sparing surgical techniques, such as SLC.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results