Search

Aims To analyze the hospital emergency department (HED) consultations for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in nine Italian hospitals during the 2020 lockdown and postlockdown periods, compared to the equivalent periods in 2019. Methods Characteristics of consultations, patients, and drug prescriptions were analyzed. Joinpoint models were used to identify changes in the weekly trend of consultations. Results During the 2020 lockdown the overall number of HED consultations for schizophrenia decreased by 40.7% and after the lockdown by 12.2% compared with 2019. No difference was found in the proportion of consultations that led to GHPU admissions or compulsory admissions. Suicidality rates did not differ across the two years, with the exception of ideations and plans (+5.9%) during the postlockdown period. We found an increase in benzodiazepine prescriptions in 2020 during the lockdown and postlockdown periods (+10.6% and +20.8%, respectively), and a decrease of prescriptions for short-acting sedative agents in the postlockdown period (–7.9%). An increase in the weekly trend of consultations occurred from March 11 to 17 (week 11) till June 26 to 30 (week 26). As a result, the initial gap in the number of consultations between the 2 years canceled out at the end of June. Conclusions HED consultation rate for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders declined consistent with that of other psychiatric disorders. In the postlockdown period, the growth of suicidal ideation/planning and increase in the prescriptions of anxiolytic-sedating drugs may foreshadow that for some schizophrenia patients the exit from the lockdown period is not liberating, but rather a source of agitation or perturbation.

BACKGROUND: Limited therapeutic options are available for patients with treatment-refractory major depression who do not respond to routinely available therapies. Vagus nerve stimulation showed adjunctive antidepressant effect in chronic treatment resistant depression, even though available studies rarely exceed 2-year follow up. We report a naturalistic 5-year follow up of five patients who received VNS implant for resistant depression (3 patients with major depressive disorder and 2 with bipolar disorder). METHODS: Response was defined as a reduction of the 17-item HDRS total score ≥50% with respect to baseline, remission as a score ≤7. RESULTS: Response and remission rates were both 40% (2/5) after 1 year, and 60% (3/5) at 5 years. Two patients withdrew from the study because of side effects or inefficacy of stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series showed that long-term VNS may be effective in reducing severity of depression in a small but significant minority of patients, although two patients had stimulation terminated because of adverse effects and/or refusal to continue the study.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major public health problem, affecting patients, their close relatives, and the society as a whole. Despite recent developments in psychopharmacotherapy, more than 50% of depressed patients fail to reach complete remission even when adequately treated. Neurostimulation therapies are an open field in research for the treatment of TRD, involving the delivery of physical interventions either through electric current or a magnetic field to target selective or generalized brain regions. In this paper we review evidences for four brain-stimulation therapies, i.e. electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), and we enlighten several new approaches regarding ECT, rTMS and epidural cortical stimulation (EpCS). ECT is the form of neurostimulation with the most extensive evidence, rTMS and VNS have a much smaller evidence base. There is emerging evidence that DBS is effective for otherwise TRD, but this is still an investigational approach. Other approaches are anecdotal reports. ECT and rTMS can be considered as a first-line treatment under specific circumstances. Evidence supporting VNS is less consistent and DBS remains an investigational treatment. Other techniques are promising, but double-blind studies are warranted to evaluate these new approaches to TRD.

The development in an extremely short time of an efficacious and safe vaccine against the pandemi A/H1N1 virus was a challenge that involved the entire scientific community.To assess the immunological and clinical efficacy of the new H1N1v monovalent influenza vaccine (Focetria Novartis Vaccines, Siena, Italy) in a group of health care workers (HCWs).A total of 148 volunteer HCWs were enrolled between Mid-Novembre 2009 and December 2009. After measuring antibody titers, a single intramuscular dose of 7.5 microg of Focetria monovalent vaccine against A/H1N1/2009 influenza virus with MF59C.1 adjuvant was administered.Antibody titers (median value) before and after a single dose of vaccine, measured by means of standard beam-agglutination inhibition test (HAI), increased from 32 to 256 (p0.001). After vaccination, 79.7% of the subjects showed antibody seroconversion, and in 97.3% seroprotection was achieved. The ratio between the geometric means of antibody titers (GMTR) was 6.69. For the 3 subjects who reported symptoms of ILI (Influenza-like illness), a regular nasal-pharyngeal swab sample was taken to identify the virus type by RT-PCR, the laboratory results of tests performed on these samples were negative for pandemic A/H1N1/2009 virus. During the entire follow-up period of 6 months no severe adverse events occurred.The vaccine against pandemic A/H1N1/2009 virus provided protection against the virus and not only contributed to a significant immunization (according to EMEA criteria), but kept all 148 subjects under study free from A/H1N1/2009 influenza illness.

Background Patients with bipolar disorder may be at greater risk for overweight and obesity than individuals in the general population. This risk may be due to the illness itself, to mediating factors (diet, life style) and/or to medications used to treat the disorder. This investigation explores the association between body weight and bipolar illness in drug-naive patients. Methods Weight and height were retrospectively obtained from 76 clinical charts of drug-naive patients with bipolar disorder (DSM-IV-TR). A reference group for comparison was then selected from another psychiatric population (65 patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder) and investigated with the same methodology to estimate their BMI. A second focus was to examine the differences in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between overweight and non-overweight bipolar patients. Results A total of 40.8% of the patients with bipolar disorder met criteria for obesity or overweight with significant difference in comparison with obsessive–compulsive patients (10.8%). The highest proportions of depression at index episode were in the overweight group (83.3%) with significant difference with the non-overweight patients (58.1%). Limitations Retrospective study. Weight measurement not in euthymic period. Conclusions Overweight is significantly more prevalent in drug-naive patients with bipolar disorder than in another drug-naive psychiatric patients (OCD). In agreement with previous studies, the number of patients experiencing a depressive episode was significantly higher in the overweight than in the non-overweight group. These results suggest that the prevalence of overweight in bipolar patients is also influenced by the illness itself or mediating factors such as diet and life style than by pharmacologic treatment.

Introduction Although a significant amount of evidence indicates the efficacy of some antidepressants in treating psychogenic pain and somatoform disorder, very few studies have investigated their possible therapeutic action in burning mouth syndrome (BMS). The purpose of this 8-week, single-blind study was to provide preliminary data on the efficacy and tolerability of amisulpride and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) paroxetine and sertraline for patients with BMS. Method Seventy-six patients with BMS (diagnosed according to the criteria in the literature and integrating the Diagnostic Interview Schedule-Revised for a complete psychiatric assessment), with no possible local or systemic causes and without concurrent major depression, were randomly assigned to receive amisulpride (50 mg/day), paroxetine (20 mg/day), or sertraline (50 mg/day). Efficacy assessments included a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain intensity, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), and the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Results All 3 treatment regimens resulted in a significant improvement from baseline in burning mouth symptoms at week 8 as demonstrated by the quantitative (mean reduction in VAS, HAM-D, and HAM-A scores) and qualitative (percentage of responders) analyses. Amisulpride showed a shorter response latency than the SSRIs. No serious adverse events were reported, and the incidence of side effects did not differ among the 3 groups. None of the patients who received amisulpride withdrew from the trial, whereas withdrawal from the trial occurred within the first week of treatment in 11.5% of patients (N = 3) treated with paroxetine and in 21.7% of patients (N = 5) treated with sertraline. Conclusion The data suggest that amisulpride and SSRIs may be effective treatments for BMS; they are equally effective and equally well tolerated in the short-term treatment of BMS. Amisulpride is associated with better compliance within the first week of treatment and with a shorter response latency in comparison with SSRIs. This finding may indicate that amisulpride is especially useful at the beginning of drug therapy of BMS. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed to further document the efficacy of amisulpride and SSRIs in the treatment of BMS.