Search

Background: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (nvAF) who experienced a cardioembolic (CE) event despite adequate oral anticoagulation (OAC) are at high risk of recurrence and the combination between percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and long-term OAC may be a valuable option. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and the efficacy of post-LAAC long-term assumption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population., Methods: Consecutive nvAF patients who experienced OAC failure despite adequate OAC therapy and underwent LAAC were retrospectively enrolled from three Italian centers. Patients were divided according to the anticoagulation strategy following LAAC: DOAC group and VKA group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, CE event, and major bleeding, while secondary endpoint was a composite of CE event and major bleeding., Results: Overall, 132 patients (39 % females; mean age 69 ± 11 years), including 73 patients on DOAC and 59 patients on VKA, were enrolled. At a median follow up of 61 ± 23 months, the DOAC group reported lower rate of primary endpoint (HR 0.42, 95 %CI 0.18-0.99, p = 0.038) and lower rate of secondary endpoint (HR 0.28, 95 %CI 0.09-0.89, p = 0.02). No significant differences were detected regarding the type of DOAC assumed. Previous cerebrovascular events, CHA2DS2-VASc, CHADS2, HAS-BLED, and renal dysfunction were predictors of the primary endpoint., Conclusion: Long-term DOAC assumption was associated with higher free from primary and secondary endpoint with respect to VKA in nvAF patients undergoing LAAC for OAC failure., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has emerged as a viable therapy option in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and high surgical risk. Although atrial fibrillation is common among patients undergoing M-TEER, the optimal anticoagulatory treatment after the intervention is unknown., Methods: A single-center retrospective observational analysis was conducted using data from the M-TEER registry at the University Hospital Cologne collected from 2019 untill 2021 including patients undergoing M-TEER between November 2012 and April 2019. Patients with atrial fibrillation receiving consistent anticoagulation following M-TEER were categorized into a direct oral anticoagulant or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) group. The primary end point was a composite of ischemic cerebrovascular and bleeding events. Additionally, overall survival was assessed., Results: Among 613 patients undergoing M-TEER, 206 met the inclusion criteria, with 61 receiving direct oral anticoagulants and 145 receiving VKAs. After a median follow-up of 833 (interquartile range, 355-1271) days, the incidence of the composite primary end point did not differ between direct oral anticoagulant and VKA groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [95% CI, 0.23-1.12]; P =0.07). Similarly, rates of ischemic cerebrovascular events and bleeding events were similar between groups. However, the overall mortality rate was higher in the VKA group (HR, 2.56 [95% CI, 1.54-4.26]; P =0.002). In the multivariable analysis, oral anticoagulation with a VKA was an independent predictor for death (adjusted HR, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.08-5.06]; P =0.03)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that direct oral anticoagulants may offer comparable efficacy and safety to VKAs in preventing thromboembolic events following M-TEER in patients with atrial fibrillation. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these results and establish optimal anticoagulation strategies in this patient population.

Background: Clinical trials of antithrombotic agents typically use separate time-to-event analyses for bleeding and ischemic events, but this framework has limitations. Days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) is an alternative that may provide additional insight. We assessed the utility of DAOH as a clinical trial endpoint among patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention METHODS: AUGUSTUS, a randomized clinical trial, compared apixaban with warfarin and aspirin with placebo in 4614 patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. We used Poisson regression with a robust variance estimate to compare DAOH by treatment group., Results: Mean (SD) DAOH was 168 (31); median (IQR) was 177 (169-180); 75% of patients neither died nor were hospitalized. Mean (SD) DAOH was 169 (28) with apixaban + placebo, 168 (29) with apixaban + aspirin, 168 (33) with warfarin + placebo, and 167 (33) with warfarin + aspirin. There were no significant differences in the rate ratio for DAOH for apixaban vs. warfarin (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01) or aspirin vs. placebo (RR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.01). Compared with warfarin, apixaban increased the proportion of patients who neither died nor were hospitalized during follow-up (76.8 vs. 73.3%; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95)., Conclusion: In this analysis of AUGUSTUS, there was no difference in DAOH by treatment arm. These findings contrast with time-to-event analyses, which showed lower rates of major bleeding and hospitalization with apixaban and placebo. DAOH may not be very a useful measure of effects of antithrombotic therapies in this population., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02415400; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02415400., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Fanaroff: Research grants from the American Heart Association and National Institutes of Health; consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories. Vora: Consulting fees from Medtronic. Mehran: Institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, Bristol Myers Squibb/Sanofi, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, and OrbusNeich; consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Medscape, Siemens Medical Solutions, Roivant Sciences Inc, and Sanofi; consulting (no fees) for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc; institutional consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Spectranetics/Phillips/Volcano Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Watermark Research; Executive committee member for Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb; <1% equity in Claret Medical and Elixir Medical. Granger: Research grants from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Armetheon, AstraZeneca, US Food and Drug Administration, GlaxoSmithKline, The Medicines Company, Medtronic Foundation, Medtronic Inc, Novartis; consulting fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Abbvie, Armetheon, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, The Medicines Company, National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Sirtex, Verseon, Apple, Medscape, LLC, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Rho Pharmaceuticals. Goodman: Research grant support and/or speaker/consulting honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Fenix Group International, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Matrizyme, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/C, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Tenax Therapeutics, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario/University of Toronto, Canadian Heart Research Centre and MD Primer, Canadian VIGOUR Centre, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PERFUSE. Aronson: Employee of Bristol Myers Squibb. Windecker: Institutional research and educational grants from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, CSL Behring, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Polares, Sinomed. Alexander: Research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, CryoLife, CSL Behring, US Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, Sanofi, VoluMetrix; consulting fees from Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Quantum Genomics, Teikoku Pharmaceuticals, VA Cooperative Studies, Zafgen. Lopes: Research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Amgen, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic PLC, Sanofi Aventis; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer AG. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome is still frequently treated with vitamin K antagonists, with a target international normalized ratio of 2-3. Time in therapeutic range of international normalized ratio of ≥ 70% is considered optimal. Time in therapeutic range among antiphospholipid syndrome patients is not well documented and the clinical consequences of poor international normalized ratio control are uncertain. This study aimed to determine the proportion of vitamin K antagonist-treated antiphospholipid syndrome patients achieving time in therapeutic range ≥ 70%, to define the features associated with poor control and to determine its association with thrombotic and bleeding events., Methods: This medical records review included antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, between 2012-2023. The proportion of patients achieving a time in therapeutic range ≥ 70% was determined, and thrombotic and bleeding events were compared between patients with time in therapeutic range ​​≥ 70% vs < 70%., Results: Sixty seven antiphospholipid syndrome patients were studied. It was observed that 29.9% achieved time in therapeutic range ≥ 70% and 9.1% of patients with 3 or more comorbidities achieved time in therapeutic range values ≥ 70% compared with 40% of patients with less than 3 comorbidities. Fewer recurrent arterial and overall thrombotic events occurred with time in therapeutic range ​​≥ 70%., Conclusions: A minority of antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with vitamin K antagonists achieve optimal anticoagulation and are at risk for recurrent thrombotic events, particularly arterial. Presence of multiple comorbidities is associated with poor international normalized ratio control. Careful monitoring of this patient population is warranted., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The use of medicinal plants in Algeria is an ancestral practice that remains relevant today. The population relies on plants to treat various diseases and everyday ailments, which can be dangerous, especially when taking medication [1,2]. The interaction between plants and medication can lead to a modification of the plasma concentrations of the latter, which can impact its therapeutic effectiveness and be responsible for toxicity or therapeutic failure [1,2]. The interaction can also be pharmacodynamic, resulting in the potentiation of the effect or its antagonism. The risk is even higher when the medication has a narrow therapeutic range or presents high inter- or intra-individual variability, such as with vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants., Clinical Case: We report the case of patient B.Z., aged 77, who is suffering from complete atrial fibrillation (ACFA). The patient has been under antivitamin K (AVK) treatment with acenocoumarol for 8 years and has been followed at the central laboratory of Didouche Mourad Hospital since August 2019. The patient has been stable with an INR within the therapeutic target range of 2-3 for 4 years. She is compliant and adheres to the dietary regimen. The dosage of acenocoumarol is alternated between 1/2 tablet and 1/4 tablet. On September 6, 2023, during a routine check-up, the patient's INR was 6.42, and the PT was 17.9%. The recommendation was to stop AVK and perform a control the following day. The interview revealed that the patient had started taking an infusion of oregano (Origanum vulgare), and occasionally verbena, at a rate of one 200 ml cup per day for a week. On September 7, 2023, the INR decreased to 3.80 and the PT to 26.9%, so the recommendation was to resume AVK at a dosage of 1/4 tablet to 1/2 tablet, with discontinuation of the herbal tea intake and an INR check after 72 hours. On the fourth day after resuming the anticoagulant, the INR was 2.5. Despite being informed of the risk of interaction, the patient resumed taking the freshly picked oregano herbal tea from her garden. Given the patient's determination to continue her infusion, the recommendation was made to limit her intake, to prepare much more diluted infusions, and to reduce the dose of acenocoumarol to 1/4 tablet; this allowed the stabilization of the patient's INR. The last check-up was performed on April 7, 2024, with an INR value of 2.3., Results: Oregano, a plant from the Lamiaceae family, is used in herbal tea to treat a wide range of diseases, including joint pain, respiratory conditions, and digestive disorders. Similarly, verbena is also used to combat sleep disorders [2-4]. Origanum and verbena are both plants rich in polyphenols, as well as tannins and flavonoids. These substances are inhibitors of CYP 450, particularly CYP 2C9 and CYP 3A4, which are responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including painkillers, antihypertensives, central nervous system drugs, and anticoagulants such as acenocoumarol. Origanum also exhibits anticoagulant activity due to its high content of carvacrol and thymol [4-6]. These two modes of interaction lead to an increase in the pharmacodynamic effect of acenocoumarol and, therefore, an increased risk of bleeding. This was the case for our patient, who saw her INR increase to more than twice the normal level, coinciding with the intake of oregano and verbena infusions, which normalized after their discontinuation., Conclusion: Oregano is an endemic plant widely used in Algeria, whose anti-inflammatory properties are well established. However, its side effects, toxicity, and risk of interaction when combined with medications are less known. The interaction between oregano and AVK (acenocoumarol) exists and deserves to be recognized and monitored, especially in a population with a traditional culture where the use of plants is common. This practice should be accompanied by national phytovigilance., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background:  The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with polypharmacy., Methods and Results:  Randomized controlled trials or observational studies reporting the data of NOACs versus VKAs among AF patients with polypharmacy were included. The search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases up to November 2022. A total of 12 studies involving 767,544 AF patients were included. For the primary outcomes, the use of NOACs compared with VKAs was significantly associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism in AF patients with moderate polypharmacy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.86]) and severe polypharmacy (HR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.69-0.82]), but there was no significant difference in major bleeding (moderate polypharmacy: HR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.74-1.01]; severe polypharmacy: HR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.79-1.06]) between the two groups. In secondary outcomes, there were no differences in the rates of ischemic stroke, all-cause death, and gastrointestinal bleeding between the NOAC- and VKA- users, but NOAC users had a reduced risk of any bleeding compared with VKA- users. Compared with VKAs, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage was reduced in NOAC- users with moderate polypharmacy but not severe polypharmacy., Conclusion:  In patients with AF and polypharmacy, NOACs showed advantages over VKAs in stroke or systemic embolism and any bleeding, and were comparable to VKAs for major bleeding, ischemic stroke, all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: People undergoing major orthopaedic surgery are at increased risk of postoperative thromboembolic events. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are recommended for thromboprophylaxis in this population. New oral anticoagulants, including direct factor Xa inhibitors, are recommended as alternatives. They may have more advantages than disadvantages compared to LMWHs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs, another type of anticoagulant)., Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of prophylactic anticoagulation with direct factor Xa inhibitors compared with low molecular weight heparins and vitamin K antagonists in people undergoing major orthopaedic surgery for elective total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture surgery., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trial registers to 11 November 2023. We conducted reference checks to identify additional studies., Selection Criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of direct factor Xa inhibitors to LMWHs or VKAs in people undergoing major orthopaedic surgery., Data Collection and Analysis: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major venous thromboembolism (VTE), symptomatic VTE, major bleeding, and serious hepatic and non-hepatic adverse events. We evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies using Cochrane's risk of bias 1 tool. We calculated estimates of treatment effects using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and used GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence., Main Results: We included 53 RCTs (44,371 participants). Participants' average age was 64 years (range: 18 to 93 years). Only one RCT compared a VKA with direct factor Xa inhibitors. All 53 RCTs compared direct factor Xa inhibitors with LMWHs. Twenty-three studies included participants undergoing total hip replacement; 21 studies, total knee replacement; and three studies included people having hip fracture surgery. The studies' average duration was approximately 42 days (range: two to 720 days). Compared to LMWHs, direct factor Xa inhibitors may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.31; I 2 = 0%; 28 studies, 29,698 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Direct factor Xa inhibitors may make little to no difference to major venous thromboembolic events compared to LMWHs, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.71; absolute risk difference: 12 fewer major VTE events per 1000 participants, 95% CI 16 fewer to 7 fewer; I 2 = 48%; 28 studies, 24,574 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to LMWHs, direct factor Xa inhibitors may reduce symptomatic VTE (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.83; I 2 = 0%; 33 studies, 31,670 participants; low-certainty evidence). The absolute benefit of substituting factor Xa inhibitors for LMWHs may be between two and five fewer symptomatic VTE episodes per 1000 patients. In the meta-analysis with all studies pooled, direct factor Xa inhibitors appeared to make little or no difference to major bleeding compared to LMWHs, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.30; I 2 = 15%; 36 studies, 39,778 participants; very low certainty-evidence). • In a subgroup analysis limited to studies comparing rivaroxaban to LMWHs, people given rivaroxaban may have had more major bleeding events (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.98; I 2 = 0%; 17 studies, 17,630 participants; low-certainty evidence). The absolute risk of substituting rivaroxaban for LMWH may be between one and seven more major bleeding events per 1000 patients. • In a subgroup analysis limited to studies comparing direct factor Xa inhibitors other than rivaroxaban to LMWHs, people given these other direct factor Xa inhibitors may have had fewer major bleeding events, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.02; absolute risk difference: 3 fewer major bleeding events per 1000 participants, 95% CI 5 fewer to 0 fewer; I 2 = 0%; 19 studies, 22,148 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Direct factor Xa inhibitors may make little to no difference in serious hepatic adverse events compared to LMWHs, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 3.01, 95% CI 0.12 to 73.93; 2 studies, 3169 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only two studies reported this outcome, with one death in the intervention group due to hepatitis reported in one study, and no events reported in the other study. People given direct factor Xa inhibitors may have a lower risk of serious non-hepatic adverse events than those given LMWHs (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.97; I 2 = 18%; 15 studies, 26,246 participants; low-certainty evidence). The absolute benefit of substituting factor Xa inhibitors for LMWH may be between three and 14 fewer serious non-hepatic adverse events per 1000 patients. Only one study compared a direct factor Xa inhibitor with a VKA. It reported outcome data with imprecise results due to the small number of events. It showed no difference in the effects of the study drugs., Authors' Conclusions: Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may slightly reduce symptomatic VTE events when compared with LMWH. They may make little or no difference to major VTE events, but the evidence is very uncertain. In the evaluation of major bleeding, the evidence suggests rivaroxaban results in a slight increase in major bleeding events compared to LMWHs. The remaining oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may have little to no effect on major bleeding, but the evidence is very uncertain. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may reduce serious non-hepatic adverse events slightly compared to LMWHs. They may have little to no effect on serious hepatic adverse events, but the evidence is very uncertain. Due to the high rates of missing participants and selective outcome reporting, the effect estimates may be biased., (Copyright © 2025 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Risk factors and comorbidities can complicate management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We describe and compare real-world safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in subgroups of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high risk for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, utilizing data from a national quasi-exhaustive French database., Methods: Anticoagulant-naïve adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with ≥1 gastrointestinal bleeding risk factor, initiating anticoagulant treatment January 2016-December 2019, and covered by the French national health data system were eligible. The following subgroups were evaluated: patients age ≥75 years, receiving concomitant medications, HAS-BLED score ≥3, and chronic kidney disease stage 3-4. Outcomes included major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism. Patient characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching., Results: A total of 314,184 patients were identified; characteristics were similar for propensity score-matched subgroups in VKA/DOAC and DOAC/DOAC comparisons. DOACs showed lower risk of major bleeding versus VKAs in all subgroups evaluated (p<0.0001 for all). Apixaban showed lower risk of major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding versus rivaroxaban in all subgroups (p≤0.05 for all) and versus dabigatran in elderly patients, patients with HAS-BLED score ≥3, and those receiving concomitant medications (p<0.05 for all). Stroke/systemic embolism risk was lower with apixaban versus rivaroxaban in elderly patients, those with HAS-BLED ≥3, and those receiving concomitant medications; risks were similar for other comparisons., Conclusions: DOACs were associated with improved safety and effectiveness when compared to VKAs among subgroups of non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Apixaban was associated with lower risks of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and stroke/systemic embolism versus rivaroxaban as well as lower risk of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding bleed and similar risk of stroke/systemic embolism versus dabigatran among several of these patient subgroups., Competing Interests: This was a BMS/Pfizer sponsored study. GYHL reported serving as a consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Anthos outside the submitted work. No fees are received personally. GYHL is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and co-principal investigator of the AFFIRMO project on multimorbidity in AF, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 899871. RB reported serving as a consultant for Alfasigma, Medtronic, Falk, Mayoli and Pfizer. ACM reported serving as a consultant and speaker for Abbott, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and received research grant from BMS/Pfizer. GP, GG, AK and NQ are employees of Certara, who were paid consultants to Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb in connection with the conduct of this study. FD, FS, JC, RS and RM are employees and shareholders of Pfizer. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2025 Lip et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and risks of early versus late initiation of oral anticoagulation (vitamin K antagonists or NOACs) in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation-related ischaemic stroke., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.)

Background: Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) represent an important therapeutic strategy offered by the Brazilian Unified Public Health System to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, predictors of relevant clinical outcomes are understudied in the real world., Objective: To determine the incidence and independent predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with valvular and nonvalvular AF treated with VKA., Methods: This prospective cohort included patients with valvular and nonvalvular AF receiving VKA for ≥ 1 year. The primary outcomes were cardiovascular death, thromboembolic events, and major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, separately and as a composite outcome. The outcomes were independently adjudicated. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant., Results: The study included 1,350 patients, with a mean age of 69.2 (± 11.8) years, 53.6% female, followed up for 17 (15 - 19) months. The annual incidence of thromboembolic events and cardiovascular death was 4.4%, and predictors were prior thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 - 3.67), time in therapeutic range (TTR) < 50% (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.16 - 3.37), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 2.76; 95% CI 4.82 - 1.58). The rate of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 3.24% per year (95% CI 2.47 - 4.14), and predictors were prior bleeding (HR 2.60; 95% CI 1.47 - 4.61) and mechanical prosthesis (HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.15 - 3.15). The composite outcome was 8.7% per year, and predictors were prior bleeding (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.07 - 2.70), TTR < 41% (HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.11 - 2.86), and left atrial diameter > 44 mm (HR 1.97; 95% CI 3.26 - 1.19)., Conclusions: Prior thromboembolism or bleeding, reduced GFR and TTR levels, and enlarged left atrium were predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with AF treated with VKA.

Background: Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) continue to be the principal anticoagulants for both the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. The use of VKA often requires regular monitoring to avoid over-anticoagulation and prevent thromboembolic complications. The aim was to determine the indication for VKA use and factors associated with suboptimal anticoagulation control among patients in northern Tanzania., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that examined the anticoagulation data of patients on long-term VKA from 1 st January 2020 to 31 st December 2022. Eligible participants were those on VKAs for at least 7 days and with at least 3 international normalized ratio (INR) results. The level of anticoagulation control was determined through the calculation of the time-in-therapeutic range (TiTR) using the Rosendaal and the percent of INR in therapeutic range methods., Results: TiTR was found to be 17% using the direct method and 16% using the Rosendaal formula. 102 tests out of 365 were within the target range (28%). Absence of health insurance (aRR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.44, P  = .007), alcohol consumption (aRR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.15-1.62, P  < .001), and prolonged intervals between tests of 14 to 28 days (aRR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.74, P  = .018) showed association with INR being out of range., Conclusion: Patients who achieved target therapeutic anticoagulation control were less than the acceptable 65%. Anticoagulation outcomes were better in patients with frequent INR monitoring and those with health insurance. Alcohol consumption carries a high risk of poor anticoagulation control. Further studies are needed to enforce better INR control., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

The relationship between the concomitant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and elevated prothrombin time-to-international standard ratio (PT-INR) in patients receiving warfarin remains unclear. In the present study, 26 patients treated with ICIs during warfarin therapy were examined for increases in PT-INR within 60 d of ICI administration. Of these patients, 13 developed Grade 2 or higher PT-INR elevations, 5 of which required the immediate administration of vitamin K. The increased risk of bleeding and the impact on the continuation of cancer drug therapy are significant burdens for patients. Immune-related adverse events caused by ICIs have been suggested as one of the reasons for increases in PT-INR, and patients taking warfarin and ICIs need to be managed in consideration of the risk of elevated PT-INR by frequently checking the blood coagulation capacity.

Background: Atrial fibrillation is associated with several comorbidities, particularly cognitive impairment and dementia, especially in older patients. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were used to prevent thromboembolic events. However, data on the real benefit of these drugs on cognitive function decline remains controversial. In this study we evaluated the effect of NOACs compared to VKAs on the absolute and relative decline in cognitive function over time., Methods: Nine hundred and eighty-three older patients with nonvalvular AF were enrolled (76 ± 6 years; 291 on VKAs and 692 on NOACs). The cognitive function was assessed with Mini Mental State examination (MMSE) score. The between-arms difference of cognitive evolution over time was investigated by Linear Mixed Models and group-based trajectory model analyses., Results: In the whole multicenter observational study, after a long follow-up of 7.2 ± 3.4 years, the patients of the NOACs versus VKAs group had lowest absolute reduction of the MMSE score between baseline and follow-up (-0.3 ± 0.03 vs.-1.7 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). After stratification into five subgroups according to trajectories of MMSE score over time, the probability to belong to trajectories with lower decline in cognitive functions was higher in patients on NOACs than in those on VKAs (3.93-13.88 times)., Conclusion: In older patients with atrial fibrillation, the use of NOACs was associated with a smaller decline of cognitive function over time compared to the VKAs, regardless that patients in the NOACs group were older and with a higher burden of comorbidities., (© 2024 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction:  Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is recommended for vitamin K antagonist reversal in patients with major bleeding or in need of surgery. The most important risk associated with the use of 4F-PCC is the occurrence of thromboembolic events (TEEs). In this review, we aim to evaluate the safety profile of a 4F-PCC (Kcentra®/Beriplex® P/N; CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) by reviewing pharmacovigilance data., Methods:  A retrospective analysis of postmarketing pharmacovigilance data of Kcentra®/Beriplex® P/N from February 1996 to April 2022 was performed and complemented by a review of clinical studies published between January 2012 and April 2022., Results:  A total of 2,321,443 standard infusions of Kcentra®/Beriplex® P/N were administered during the evaluation period. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 614 cases (∼1 per 3,781 standard infusions) and 233 of these cases (37.9%) experienced suspected TEEs related to 4F-PCC (∼1 per 9,963 standard infusions); most of these cases had pre-existing or concomitant conditions likely to be significant risk factors for thrombosis. TEE rates were similar when 4F-PCC was used on-label or off-label for direct oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding. Thirty-six cases (5.9%) reported hypersensitivity type reactions (∼1 per 64,485 standard infusions). No confirmed case of viral transmission related to 4F-PCC use was reported. The published literature also revealed a favorable safety profile of 4F-PCC., Conclusion:  Analysis of postmarketing pharmacovigilance safety reports demonstrated that treatment with 4F-PCC was associated with few ADRs and a low rate of TEEs across multiple indications and settings, thus confirming a positive safety profile of 4F-PCC., Competing Interests: T.J.M. is a consultant for CSL Behring, Octapharma, Alexion-Astra Zeneca, and Cellphire. E.L.-L. has received lecture honoraria and advisory fees from Astra Zeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Portola, Norgine, Roche, CSL Behring, Viatris, and Aspen and institutional research support from Bayer AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and CSL Behring. A.V. and D.S.S. are employees of CSL Behring., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Introduction: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently shown potential efficacy for many conditions without the need for regular monitoring. However, their use in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is controversial, with no clear consensus on how they compare to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which have traditionally been used as preferred anticoagulation therapy in these patients., Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase databases were systematically searched up to December 2023 for studies comparing DOACs versus VKAs in KTRs. The main outcomes of interest included venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, graft failure, mortality, and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio 4.1.2 software., Prospero Id: CRD42024498423., Results: Five studies with a total of 959 participants were included. Of these, 433 (45.15 %) participants were treated with DOACs. The mean age of participants was 60.05 years, and 65.9 % were male. The use of DOACs in KTRs was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.35 to 0.90; p = 0.02; I 2  = 0 %) and mortality (RR 0.49; 95 % CI 0.33 to 0.74; p = 0.0006; I 2  = 0 %). No significant differences were found between groups in VTE (RR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.47 to 1.43; p = 0.48; I 2  = 12 %), graft failure (RR 0.43; 95 % CI 0.14 to 1.27; p = 0.13; I 2  = 52 %), and eGFR (MD 3.72 mL/Kg/1.73 m2; 95 % CI -1.58 to 9.03; p = 0.17; I 2  = 0 %). Evidence quality for some outcomes remains low to moderate, limiting the confidence in these conclusions., Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that DOACs represent an effective anticoagulation strategy in KTR, with a significant reduction in major bleeding and mortality relative to VKA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients often present with a higher prevalence of comorbidities, frailty, and malnutrition. We investigated if multimorbidity, frailty and malnutrition were associated with clinical outcomes in patients with AF starting vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy., Methods: Prospective observational cohort study including AF outpatients starting VKAs from July 2016 to June 2018. Multimorbidity was assessed by the number of comorbidities, frailty was evaluated using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and nutritional status was appraised using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT). During 2-years of follow-up, ischemic strokes/transient ischemic attacks (TIA), major bleeds, and all-cause deaths, were recorded., Results: 1050 AF patients (51.4% female; median age 77 years, IQR 70-83) were included. Of these, 912 (86.9%) had multimorbidity (≥2 comorbidities additional to AF), 186 (17.7%) exhibited any frailty degree (CFS ≥ 5), and 76 (7.2%) had moderate-to-severe malnutrition (CONUT ≥ 5). The crude number of comorbidities and the CFS were significantly associated with major bleeds, whereas the CFS and the CONUT score were related to all-cause mortality. After adjustment, any frailty degree was associated with higher risks of major bleeding (aHR 3.04, 95% CI 1.67-5.52) and death (aHR 2.04, 95% CI 1.39-3.01). Moderate-to-severe malnutrition increased risk for ischemic stroke/TIA (aHR 2.25, 95% CI 1.11-4.56) and all-cause mortality (aHR 3.21, 95% CI 2.14-4.83)., Conclusions: In this real-world prospective cohort of AF taking VKAs, most patients had multiple comorbidities, frailty and malnutrition. Frailty and malnutrition were important risk factors for bleeding, stroke, and mortality in these patients., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: We investigated outcomes in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) according to prior anticoagulation treatment with Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or no anticoagulation., Methods: This is an individual patient data study combining two prospective national stroke registries from Switzerland and Norway (2013-2019). We included all consecutive patients with ICH from both registries. The main outcomes were favourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and mortality at 3 months., Results: Among 11 349 patients with ICH (mean age 73.6 years; 47.6% women), 1491 (13.1%) were taking VKAs and 1205 (10.6%) DOACs (95.2% factor Xa inhibitors). The median percentage of patients on prior anticoagulation was 23.7 (IQR 22.6-25.1) with VKAs decreasing (from 18.3% to 7.6%) and DOACs increasing (from 3.0% to 18.0%) over time. Prior VKA therapy (n=209 (22.3%); adjusted ORs (aOR), 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.84) and prior DOAC therapy (n=184 (25.7%); aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.87) were independently associated with lower odds of favourable outcome compared with patients without anticoagulation (n=2037 (38.8%)). Prior VKA therapy (n=720 (49.4%); aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.08) and prior DOAC therapy (n=460 (39.7%); aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.60) were independently associated with higher odds of mortality compared with patients without anticoagulation (n=2512 (30.2%))., Conclusions: The spectrum of anticoagulation-associated ICH changed over time. Compared with patients without prior anticoagulation, prior VKA treatment and prior DOAC treatment were independently associated with lower odds of favourable outcome and higher odds of mortality at 3 months. Specific reversal agents unavailable during the study period might improve outcomes of DOAC-associated ICH in the future., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MBo: personal fees from AstraZeneca, a company that produces Andexanet alfa (a specific reversal agent for factor Xa-inhibitor-associated ICH, discussed in this study). SW: consultancy fees from Bayer, a company that produces Rivaroxaban (a DOAC discussed in this study). BV: personal fees from Pfizer AG/Bristol-Myers Squibb SA and Bayer AG, producesr of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban, two drugs discussed in this study. DJS: grants from Alexion/AstraZeneca, producer of andexanet alfa discussed in this study. Personal fees from Bayer, producer of Rivaroxaban, discussed in this study. Consultancy fees from VarmX (producer of VarmX, a compound under development for the treatment of FXaI-associated bleeding). All other authors have nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often accompany each other, as they share similar risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms. AF in patients with HF is known to increase hospitalizations and worsen prognosis. A combination of AF and HF translates into high risks of thromboembolic complications, which renders anticoagulants an important aspect of therapy for these patients. Vitamin K antagonists make achieving the target level of anticoagulation challenging due to drug interactions and comorbidities. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred medications owing to a more favorable risk-benefit ratio in this group of patients. At the same time, patients with HF often require a personalized approach when choosing an anticoagulant due to increased risks of thromboembolic complications and bleeding, as well as multiple comorbidities. The article presents the results of sub-analyses of key studies on the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists in patients with HF and AF. It also explores DOACs use in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Background: The ability of bleeding risk scores to predict major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) remains a topic of contention, particularly in nonselected patients in family practice. In addition, the capacity to predict bleeding risk using simple variables has yet to be established., Objectives: The main objective was to confirm that severe anemia was the most predictive factor for the estimation of bleeding risk in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Secondary objectives were to test the capacity of different bleeding scores to detect high-risk patients. Subsequently, the impact of functional decline on bleeding incidence was explored., Methods: The CACAO study was a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients who, due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and/or venous thromboembolism (VTE), had been prescribed an oral anticoagulant by their general practitioner (GP) as a prophylactic measure. Patient characteristics were collected at the time of inclusion by GPs, who then monitored them in accordance with standard practice for one year. MB and CRNMB were the main outcomes for one year. By applying this approach, a total of 13 scores were analyzed., Results: Aaemia was found to be strongly associated with MB (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.2-6.36), with a particularly pronounced association observed in cases of severe anemia (HR: 12.9, 95% CI: 2.76-60.35). Twelve out of 27 MB cases were not identified by at least half of the scores. By contrast, functional decline was identified as a novel factor associated with MB (HR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.13-5.31)., Conclusions: Preexisting anemia is a major prognostic factor associated with the occurrence of bleeding. It seems relevant to suggest that functional decline should be considered by GPs when assessing bleeding risk., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Therapeutic education of the patient (TPE) treated with AVK has improved the safety and efficiency of this treatment by establishing a new doctor-patient relationship. The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a TPE program on adherence in patients treated with AVK., Methods: We conducted a prospective interventional study between January and September 2020, including two groups of patients hospitalized for a first thromboembolic: a G1 group with conventional service support and a G2 group with an ETP program created during this work. Each patient was assessed after three months of adherence to VKA., Results: The two groups had comparable epidemiological and clinical characteristics. After three months, we found a level of adherence in the G2 group., Conclusion: The implementation of an ETP practice in patients treated with AVK allowed a better patient compliance with a better involvement in the management. This practice should be codified through the development of a national FTE repository., Competing Interests: Déclaration de lien d'intérêts Les auteurs déclarent n'avoir aucun lien d'intérêt en relation avec cet article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: The impact of chronic oral anticoagulant (OACs) use on long-term post-discharge outcomes after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalisation remains unclear. Herein, we compared clinical outcomes up to 2-years after COVID-19 hospitalisation between patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct-acting OACs (DOACs) and no OAC therapy., Methods: Data from TriNetX, a global federated health research network, were used. Adult patients on VKAs, DOACs or no OAC therapy at diagnosis of COVID-19 between 20 January 2020 and 31 December 2021, who were hospitalised for COVID-19, were included. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/systemic embolism (SE) and the composite of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH)/gastrointestinal bleeding, at 2 years after COVID-19 hospitalisation., Results: We included 110,834 patients with COVID-19. Following propensity score matching (PSM), we identified a decreased mortality risk in DOAC-treated patients compared to the no OAC cohort (RR .808, 95% CI .751-.870). A higher risk of ischaemic stroke/TIA/SE was observed in VKA users compared to DOAC users (RR 1.100, 95% CI 1.020-1.220) and in VKA users compared to patients not taking OAC (RR 1.400, 95% CI 1.140-1.720). VKA use was associated with a greater risk of ICH/gastrointestinal bleeding than DOAC users (RR 1.198, 95% CI 1.066-1.347), while DOAC users had a lower risk compared to no OAC-treated patients (RR .840, 95% CI .754-.936)., Conclusion: COVID-19 patients taking prior DOACs were associated with lower long-term mortality risk and ICH/gastrointestinal bleeding than patients not taking OAC. Compared to patients on DOACs, VKA users were associated with higher risks of mortality, ischaemic stroke/TIA/SE and ICH/gastrointestinal bleeding., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.)

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation remains a post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complication even in the modern era of early reperfusion. The optimal anticoagulation regimen in this clinical scenario is poorly defined. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the management of LV thrombus after AMI. A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety outcome data regarding the use of DOACs versus VKAs for patients with LV thrombus after AMI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize pooled ORs. Eight studies comprising a total of 605 patients were included. DOACs were associated with an almost twofold higher likelihood of thrombus resolution compared with VKAs (pooled OR 1.95 [1.25 to 3.04], p = 0.003, I 2 = 0%), and decreased the risk of systemic embolism by 70% (pooled OR 0.30 [0.12 to 0.75]; p = 0.01, I 2 = 0%). The use of DOACs was associated with a 54% lower risk of bleeding compared with VKAs (pooled OR 0.46 [0.26 to 0.84], p = 0.01, I 2 = 0%). Overall, patients receiving DOACs had a 63% lower risk of reaching the composite outcome of safety and efficacy compared with patients using VKAs (pooled OR 0.37 [0.23 to 0.60], p <0.0001, I 2 = 0%). In conclusion, DOACs appear to have a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared with VKAs for the management of LV thrombus related to AMI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients on dialysis., Methods: All types of studies published on PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up to 10 September 2023 and comparing outcomes of apixaban vs. VKA in dialysis patients were eligible., Results: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six retrospective studies were included. Apixaban treatment was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.77; I 2  = 50%) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.98, I 2  = 9%) compared to VKA. Meta-analysis also showed that the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.85, I 2  = 16%) and intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.84, I 2  = 0%) was significantly reduced with apixaban. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of ischemic stroke (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.06, 2.69, I 2  = 0%), mortality (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.74, 2.16, I 2  = 94%) and recurrent venous thromboembolism (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.21, I 2  = 0%) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed no difference in bleeding outcomes., Conclusions: Low-quality evidence from a mix of RCTs and retrospective studies shows that apixaban may have better safety and equivalent efficacy as compared to VKA in dialysis patients. Apixaban treatment correlated with significantly reduced risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in observational studies but not in RCTs. The predominance of retrospective data warrants caution in the interpretation of results.

Introduction and Objectives: The optimal chronic antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. Our aim was to compare the incidence of late bleeding events between patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and those on vitamin-K antagonists (VKA)., Methods: This single-center observational study included TAVI patients requiring oral anticoagulation at discharge between 2015 and 2021. The primary endpoint was any clinically significant bleeding event. Secondary endpoints were stroke, heart failure, and all-cause mortality., Results: A total of 702 TAVI procedures were performed, with 297 patients requiring oral anticoagulation at discharge. Among them, 206 (69.4%) received VKA and 91 (30.6%) received DOAC. Baseline clinical, procedural and in-hospital characteristics did not significantly differ between groups, except for better renal function among DOAC patients. The median length of follow-up was 2.8 years. The risk of bleeding events was higher in patients receiving DOACs than in those receiving VKA (HR, 2.27; 95%CI, 1.21-4.26; incidence of 9.7 and 4.2 events per 100 patient-years of follow-up for DOAC and VKA patients, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of stroke (HR, 1.28; 95%CI, 0.4-4.3), heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.46-1.86), or all-cause mortality (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.68-1.55)., Conclusions: In older patients undergoing TAVI and receiving anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation, the use of DOAC was associated with a higher risk of late bleeding events than VKA., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Guidelines for managing left ventricular thrombus remain limited, particularly when incorporating oral anticoagulants into dual antiplatelet therapy for acute myocardial infarction. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in managing left ventricular thrombus among patients with and without recent myocardial infarction., Methods: This retrospective observational study used data from the TriNetX research network. Patients with left ventricular thrombus treated with either DOACs or VKAs between December 1, 2013 and December 1, 2023, were included. Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients with or without recent acute coronary syndrome (<1 month). Risk and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were conducted at 90 days after the indexed event., Results: A total of 39,770 patients were included. DOACs treatment had lower rates of stroke (11.8% vs 13.7%; relative risk [RR] 0.859; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.816-0.905; P < .001), major bleeding (4.8% vs 5.3%; RR 0.902; 95% CI, 0.829-0.982; P = .018), and systemic embolism (3.5% vs 4.2%; RR 0.841; 95% CI, 0.762-0.928; P = .001) compared with VKAs in overall cohort. Within the acute coronary syndrome group (n = 14,302), DOACs had lower stroke (12.3% vs 14.4%, RR 0.860; 95% CI, 0.791-0.935; P < .0001) and systemic embolism (3.1% vs 4%; RR 0.774; 95% CI, 0.651-0.919; P = .003) risks. For non-acute coronary syndrome group (n = 24,162), DOACs had lower stroke (11.4% vs 13.1%; RR 0.868; 95% CI, 0.811-0.929; P < .001) and major bleeding (4.8% vs 5.5%; RR 0.877; 95% CI, 0.787-0.977; P = .017) risks. No significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed across groups., Conclusion: DOACs demonstrated better safety and efficacy outcomes when compared with VKAs in left ventricular thrombus treatment, with or without recent acute coronary syndrome., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation are common among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and these conditions typically require anticoagulation. Traditionally, vitamin K antagonists were used for management, but the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased in KTRs. In the general population, DOACs are recommended over warfarin, but the applicability of these recommendations to KTRs is unclear because of risk-benefit concerns. There is some hesitancy to use DOACs in KTRs because of their dependence on renal clearance for elimination, potential drug-drug interactions, and limited data. To date, studies of DOACs in KTRs have demonstrated that they are efficient in thromboembolic events, major bleeding is rare, and drug-drug interactions appear rare. However, no guidance yet exists about the use of DOACs, reversal of DOAC action, and the pre- and post-kidney transplant management of DOACs in KTRs, and the evidence base is scarce. Thus, decisions on DOAC use in KTRs are based on expert opinion and the resources and experiences of individual transplant centers. This review summarizes 10 published studies on the use of DOACs in 741 KTRs, evaluating the side effects, efficacy, drug-drug interactions, and perioperative management compared with those of 1320 KTRs using vitamin K antagonists. Although current data are limited, DOACs appear to be relatively safe and effective in KTRs, with some studies suggesting lower bleeding rates and better kidney function than with vitamin K antagonists. However, more research with larger patient groups is needed to draw definitive conclusions., Competing Interests: Declarations. Acknowledgement: Both figures were created in Biorender.com. Funding: No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript. Conflicts of interest: Baris Afsar, Rengin Elsurer Afsar, Yasar Caliskan, and Krista L Lentine declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Availability of data and materials: Data sharing is not applicable to this manuscript as no datasets were generated. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Author contribution: Data extraction, writing: BA. Writing: BA, YC: Reviewing and editing: KLL: reviewing, editing, and supervision. REA reviewing' editing and prepeartion of figures. Code availability: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: This observational study compared effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB)., Methods: Anticoagulant-naïve adults with NVAF with ≥1 GIB risk factor, initiating anticoagulant treatment January 2016-December 2019, and covered by the French national health data system were eligible. Outcomes included major bleeding (MB) and stroke/systemic embolism (SE). Patient characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching., Results: A total of 314,184 patients were identified with 162,150 (51.5%) in the apixaban cohort, 88,427 (28.1%) in the rivaroxaban cohort, 16,465 (5.2%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 47,142 (15.0%) in the VKA cohort (mean age 79.0 years, standard deviation 10.5; 51.0% female). A total of 45,124 apixaban-VKAs, 38,737 rivaroxaban-VKAs, 16,415 dabigatran-VKAs, 88,414 apixaban-rivaroxaban, 16,464 apixaban-dabigatran, and 16,459 rivaroxaban-dabigatran pairs were retained after propensity score matching. Apixaban had lower risk of MB versus dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.83) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.66). Apixaban had lower risk of GIB versus dabigatran (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.49-0.59). Risk of GIB was similar with dabigatran versus rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24). Apixaban had lower risk of stroke/SE versus rivaroxaban (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), while risk was similar versus dabigatran (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3). All DOACs had lower risk of MB and stroke/SE versus VKAs (p<0.001 for all)., Conclusions: DOACs had improved safety and effectiveness from bleeding and stroke/SE, respectively, versus VKAs among patients with NVAF at high risk for GIB. Apixaban was associated with lower MB and GIB risk versus other DOACs. For stroke/SE, apixaban was associated with reduced risk versus rivaroxaban and similar risk versus dabigatran., Competing Interests: GYHL reported serving as a consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Anthos outside the submitted work. No fees are received personally. GYHL is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and co-principal investigator of the AFFIRMO project on multimorbidity in AF, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 899871. RB reported serving as a consultant for Alfasigma, Medtronic, Falk, Mayoli and Pfizer. ACM reported serving as a consultant and speaker for Abbott, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and received research grant from BMS/Pfizer. GP, GG, AK and NQ are employees of Certara, who were paid consultants to Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb in connection with the conduct of this study. FD, FS, JC, RS and RM are employees and shareholders of Pfizer. We confirm that this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Lip et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Treatment of isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is still controversial., Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) versus dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy in management of patients with isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 79 patients diagnosed on elective coronary angiography to have either isolated CAE or non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE. Patients were assigned in 1:1 pattern to receive either VKA (warfarin) or DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel). Patients were followed-up for nine-months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative events rate including acute coronary event, target vessel intervention, or cardiac death. Analysis of cumulative events at different time intervals, its individual components, and bleeding were considered secondary endpoints., Results: Cumulative events rate was 33%, with mortality rate of 2.5%. Both treatment groups showed comparable cumulative events during the nine-months follow-up duration. Nevertheless, Kaplan-Meier analysis beyond the first 3-months of follow-up showed significantly higher event-free survival among the VKA-group. Recurrent events (≥2) were significantly higher among the DAPT-group. Both groups showed no major bleeding events. Multivariable cox-regression analysis showed that presence of significant coronary tortuosity, use of DAPT in reference to VKA, and lower percent time in therapeutic range (%TTR) among those receiving VKA were significant independent predictors of clinical adverse events beyond the first 3-months of follow-up., Conclusion: Cumulative adverse events were comparable among both treatment groups for isolated non-obstructive CAE. However, adverse events were significantly more frequent in the DAPT-group beyond the first three months., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified inquiries into the interplay between diabetes and disease severity, and the long-term impact of long-COVID. This study specifically explored the implications of different antithrombotic treatments on COVID-19 patients. It aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in mitigating thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients., Patients and Methods: We conducted a study on 157 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from August 2021 to August 2023. The study evaluated shifts in anticoagulant therapy recommendations, tracking the transition from VKA to DOACs, and analyzed associated health outcomes., Results: A significant shift from VKA to DOACs prescriptions was observed, especially in high-risk patients. Despite the change in antithrombotic treatments, incidences of varices and varices with hemorrhoids increased by 2.6% and 3.2%, respectively. Long-COVID was also linked to higher occurrences of diabetes and gastrointestinal diseases. Joint diseases rose by 14%, indicating persistent inflammation. Cardiomyopathies increased by 3.9%, predominantly in high-risk groups, and psychoanxiety disorders surged by 39.5%, highlighting the need for further research. DOAC usage was more common in older age groups, with a 10.2% increase in recommendations among high-risk patients (p<0.05)., Conclusion: The study underscores the evolving landscape of antithrombotic therapy in managing COVID-19 complications. Despite the increased use of DOACs, the rise in various health conditions suggests the necessity for personalized treatment strategies tailored to patient risk profiles., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: In the AUGUSTUS trial (An Open-Label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs Aspirin Placebo in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), the combination of dual antiplatelet therapy plus oral anticoagulation increased the risk of bleeding without reducing ischemic events compared with a P2Y12 inhibitor plus oral anticoagulation among patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention. However, AUGUSTUS enrolled patients up to 14 days after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention, and there may be a benefit to dual antiplatelet therapy plus oral anticoagulation early after an ischemic event., Methods: In this secondary analysis of AUGUSTUS, we divided patients into groups based on whether they were enrolled <6 days (early) or ≥6 days (later) after their index acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention, and tested the interaction between time from the index event to enrollment and randomized treatment (apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist and aspirin versus placebo) on 30-day and 6-month clinical outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Among 4605 patients enrolled in AUGUSTUS with data available on time from the index event to enrollment, the median time from the index event to enrollment was 6 (range, 0-14) days. There were no significant interactions between time from the index event and aspirin versus placebo on clinical outcomes at 30 days or 6 months, though patients with time from the index event <6 days had a nominally significant reduction in death or ischemic events at 30 days with aspirin (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.30-0.99]), whereas patients with time from the index event ≥6 days did not (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.54-1.43]; interaction P =0.23). There were no significant interactions between time from the index event and apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist on clinical outcomes., Conclusions: Among patients with atrial fibrillation with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there was no difference in the relative benefit of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist or aspirin versus placebo when patients were enrolled early versus later after their index event., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02415400., Competing Interests: Dr Fanaroff: research grants from the American Heart Association, National Institutes of Health, and Cardiovascular Systems Inc; and consulting fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals and Abbott Laboratories. Dr Granger: research grants from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Armetheon, AstraZeneca, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), GlaxoSmithKline, The Medicines Company, Medtronic Foundation, Medtronic, Inc, and Novartis; consulting fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Abbvie, Armetheon, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, The Medicines Company, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Novartis, Sirtex, Verseon, Apple, Medscape, LLC, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, and Rho Pharmaceuticals. Dr Goodman: research grant support and speaker/consulting honoraria from Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, CYTE, Ltd, Daiichi-Sankyo/American Regent, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, HLS Therapeutics, JAMP Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/C, Pendopharm/Pharmascience, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Tolmar Pharmaceuticals, and Valeo Pharma; salary support/honoraria from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario/University of Toronto (Polo) Chair, Canadian Heart Failure Society, Canadian Heart Research Centre and MD Primer, Canadian Virtual Coordinating Centre for Global Collaborative Cardiovascular Research, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Centre for Clinical Research, Duke Clinical Research Institute, New York University Clinical Coordinating Centre, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group (Brigham Health). Dr Aronson: employee of Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Windecker: research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse, Inc, Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, MedAlliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; advisory board member and steering/executive group member of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave, with payments to the institution but no personal payments; steering/executive committee group member of several investigator-initiated trials funded by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Mehran: institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, Bristol Myers Squibb/Sanofi, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, and OrbusNeich; consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Medscape, Siemens Medical Solutions, Roivant Sciences, Inc, and Sanofi; consulting (no fees) to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc; institutional consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Spectranetics/Phillips/Volcano Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Watermark Research; executive committee member for Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb; <1% equity in Claret Medical and Elixir Medical. Dr Alexander: research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, CryoLife, CSL Behring, US FDA, NIH, Sanofi, and VoluMetrix; consulting fees from Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Quantum Genomics, Teikoku Pharmaceuticals, VA Cooperative Studies, and Zafgen. Dr Lopes: research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Amgen, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic PLC, and Sanofi Aventis; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer AG. The other authors report no conflicts.

Objectives: The optimal management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with oral anticoagulation (OA) is challenging. Our study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcome of AIS in patients with OA for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on NVAF patients with AIS on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) admitted to our Stroke Unit from 2017 to 2022. Ninety-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 90-day, and 12-month stroke recurrences were recorded., Results: A total of 169 patients (53.2% female, mean age 82.8±6.7 y), 117 (69.2%) on DOAC, and 52 on VKA (30.8%), were enrolled. Mean age, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mRS ≥4 were significantly higher in VKA patients. 63.4% of VKA patients had subtherapeutic INR, whereas 47.1% of DOAC patients were on low-dose (14.2% off-label). Large vessel occlusion and embolic etiology were more frequent in VKA patients (34.6% vs. 26.4%, P =0.358; 92.3% vs. 74.3%, P =0.007, respectively), whereas lacunar strokes were more frequent in DOAC patients (19.8% vs. 12.2%, P =0.366). Among patients on VKA before AIS 86.4% were switched to DOAC, whereas a DOAC-to-VKA and a DOAC-to-DOAC switch were done in 25.4% and 11.7%, respectively. Stroke recurrence occurred in 6.4% of patients at 90 days and 10.7% at 12 months. Anticoagulant switching was not associated with stroke recurrences., Conclusions: In our study, nonembolic etiology was more frequent in DOAC patients and anticoagulant switching did not reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. Prospective multicentric studies are warranted., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Oral anticoagulation self-control programs have demonstrated efficiency and cost-effectiveness over recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a training intervention focused on patients with antivitamin K anticoagulants included in a self-care program. For this, we made a quasi-experimental study, pretest and post-test, using a validated questionnaire with 2 measures, before and after an educational intervention about oral anticoagulation focused on patients that will initiate the self-control program in consultation. To check the patient's adherence and coagulation level, we evaluated the Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, both before and after the intervention. One hundred fifty patients were included since the start of the self-monitoring program in our center in 2016. The mean age was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] = 17.24). The distribution by gender was 76 women and 69 men (52.4%-47.6%). The mean score for the first test was 14.61 (SD = 3.26) and the mean score for the second test was 17.01 (SD = 2.14) (P <.001). We also measured Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, a parameter that indicates stabilization in international normalized ratio determinations and quality of the anticoagulation management. Values before and after interventions were also statistically significant (67.46 vs 70.53, P <.001). Patients' knowledge improved after the training session, with statistical significance. Despite intentional sampling, the population was homogeneous. Scoring data dispersion in the second test was significantly lower than in the first one. Time on therapeutic rank values was better after the training. We intend to adapt its content to the rest of anticoagulated patients to enhance and improve their follow-up., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: Oral anticoagulant drugs reduce the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists, gold standard therapy for decades, have been deposed by the direct oral anticoagulants that exhibit superior safety profiles. However, hemorrhagic complications remain a major concern to anticoagulation., Areas Covered: We searched available data in the literature to review the current knowledge on the safety profiles of available anticoagulants., Expert Opinion: Despite a relevant leap forward with the introduction of DOACs, safety concerns persist in some fields of the current pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In-depth knowledge of the safety profile of available anticoagulants and dealing with safety issues in patient subgroups is of utmost importance. Bleeding risk scores should not be dichotomously used to decide anticoagulation treatment but rather to promote shared decision, identify and correct modifiable risk factors, and set monitoring frequency. Additional issues that wait to be investigated in order to improve the safety of therapy include circulating levels of direct oral anticoagulants and anticoagulation in patient sub-groups: very elderly, frail, those with advanced kidney or liver disease, and so on. Safety may be improved from the in-depth knowledge of safety concerns and therapeutic options.

Objective: Vitamin K (VK) is commonly prescribed for pediatric sepsis-induced coagulopathy without trial-derived evidence to support its use for this indication. The purpose of this study was to characterize national prescribing trends for VK in this population. Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System registry including children 0 to 17 years of age hospitalized for sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit from January 2016 through December 2022. The primary outcome was overall, annual, and center-specific VK prescribing rates. Descriptive data included demographics, length of stay, and rates of VK deficiency, hepatic insufficiency, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and mortality. VK prescribing trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression. Descriptive statistics employed included Wilcoxon rank-sum, student's t , and chi-square tests. Results: Of the 31 221 encounters studied, 4539 (14.6%) were prescribed VK (median center-specific rate: 14.2%; interquartile range [IQR]: 8.8-21%) with a linear annual trend decreasing from 17.3% in 2016 to 13.3% in 2022 (-0.6%/year, r 2  = .661). Those prescribed VK had greater rates of hepatic dysfunction (20.5% vs 3.1%), RBC transfusion (26.5% vs 11.2%), VTE (12.5% vs 4.6%), mortality (17.1% vs 4.4%), and median length of stay (16 [IQR: 8-33] vs 8 [4-15] days) (all P  < .001). VK deficiency was diagnosed in 0.2% of encounters. Conclusions: In this multicenter retrospective cohort, VK prescribing was common among critically ill children diagnosed with sepsis. Phased trials are needed to demonstrate clinical efficacy and safety for VK in this population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) are considered the first-line anticoagulants for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS), particularly with triple positivity or arterial events. However, thrombotic recurrence remains high despite anticoagulation and other clinical issues may arise. Long-term parenteral anticoagulants may therefore be considered, however little is known about the viability of fondaparinux in this setting., Materials and Methods: We describe the efficacy and safety of long-term fondaparinux for TAPS (>3-months duration) treated at a single centre in the UK. Clinical features and the outcomes of recurrence and bleeding were reviewed using electronic patient records., Results: 46 patients were identified with history of either venous or arterial TAPS and a total 175 patient-years using fondaparinux (median duration 2.7 years/patient (IQR 1.4-4.8)). 43 (93%) had VKA as first-line anticoagulation with a median duration of 6.5 years (IQR 4.0 - 9.8). All patients received fondaparinux as second-to fourth-line anticoagulation.Thrombosis recurrence occurred in 1 (1%) patient (0.6 events/100-patient years). Major, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) or minor bleeding occurred in 2 (7%), 5 (10.9%) and 8 (17.4%) patients respectively. Major/CRNM bleeding rates were 1.1 and 2.9 events/100-patient-years. Age >65years was associated with bleeding ( p = .047) and concurrent antiplatelets were associated with major/CRNM bleeding ( p = .011). Logistic regression showed increasing age was associated with bleeding (OR = 1.097, p = .009)., Conclusions: We suggest that fondaparinux may be used for TAPS when VKA is not appropriate. Thrombotic recurrence was infrequent, and the number of major bleeding events appeared comparable to conventional therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device has decreased thromboembolic events and minimized the risk of pump thrombosis. However, bleeding complications due to combined antithrombotic therapy with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin remain high. Only limited data on the safety of VKA monotherapy in HM3 patients are available. A systematic search on the main databases was performed. Observational data and randomized trials were eligible for this analysis. As primary endpoint, we analyzed hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAE). As secondary endpoints, we investigated the individual components of the primary endpoint. The analysis was carried out using the odds ratio (OR) as outcome measure. A random-effects model was fitted to the data. Five manuscripts fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These trials included 785 patients (381 on VKA monotherapy, 404 on VKA and aspirin). VKA monotherapy significantly reduced HRAE (OR: 0.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02-0.59], p = 0.01, I2 = 87%). The reduction was driven by a decrease in bleeding complications (OR: 0.12 [95% CI: 0.02-0.62], p = 0.01, I2 = 86%) without increasing the rates of thromboembolic events (OR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.26-1.81], p = 0.45, I = 0%). Vitamin K antagonist monotherapy is associated with a significant reduction of bleeding events without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications in HM3 patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure: T.S. received consulting/advisory fees from Medtronic Inc., Abbott Inc., BiVACOR, Berlin Heart, and CorWave; and received grant support from Medtronic Inc., Abbott Inc., Berlin Heart, and CorWave. D.W. is a proctor for Abbott Inc. and received consulting/advisory fees from Abbott Inc. and Xenios/Fresenius Medical Care. D.Z. is a proctor for and received speaker/consulting fees from Medtronic Inc., Abbott Inc., Berlin Heart, Edwards, Abiomed, and grant support from Medtronic Inc. and Abbott Inc. T.G. received speaker/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi- Sankyo, Novartis, and Pfizer, and grant support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic and Abbott. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first-line anticoagulants for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, patients with severe inherited thrombophilias represent a group in whom the efficiency and safety of DOACs is poorly studied. In this communication, we focus on the utility of DOACs in the secondary prevention of VTE in patients with severe thrombophilia. Current evidence is based only on cohort or single-center studies, and poor data are available on compliance of the patients in the studies. Analysis of the studies suggested that full-dose DOACs and vitamin K antagonists have a similar efficacy and bleeding risk in the secondary prevention of VTE in patients with thrombophilia, with a low hazard ratio for recurrent VTE calculated from cohort studies for DOAC vs warfarin, ranging from 0.3 to 0.75. We wish to highlight that treatment failure is greater in those with severe forms of protein S deficiency (below 20%) and possibly in antithrombin deficiency type II heparin-binding site homozygous Budapest 3. In summary, the current approach to using DOACs in patients with severe thrombophilia is dependent on clinical judgment and experience. Limited evidence suggests that for those with severe thrombophilias, full-dose DOACs have similar utility as vitamin K antagonists. We recommend caution in using low-dose DOACs due to lack of evidence. Ideally, large randomized multicenter studies are required to develop a reliable treatment algorithm., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests There are no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. All rights reserved.)

The use of oral anticoagulants in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents distinct therapeutic challenges and benefits. In PAH, the benefits of oral anticoagulation are uncertain, with studies yielding mixed results on their efficacy and safety. Conversely, oral anticoagulants are a cornerstone in the treatment of CTEPH, where their use is consistently recommended to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. The choice between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a significant clinical question, as each type presents advantages and potential drawbacks. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concomitant PAH and CTEPH treatments complicate anticoagulant management, necessitating careful consideration of individual patient regimens. This review examines the current evidence on oral anticoagulant use in PAH and CTEPH and discusses the implications of DDIs within a context of multi-drug treatments, including targeted drugs in PAH., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of coadministering statins with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on the risk of major bleeding events in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE)., Design: Observational cohort analysis based on a multicentre international registry., Setting: Data were extracted from the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbolica Registry, which involves 205 centres across 27 countries., Participants: A total of 73 659 patients diagnosed with VTE were classified based on their anticoagulant therapy (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and concurrent use of statins., Methods: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounding variables to assess the risk of major bleeding events stratified by the type of anticoagulant use and statin use., Results: From October 2013 to February 2023, 73 659 patients were recruited: 2573 were statin users on DOACs, 14 090 were statin users on LMWH or VKA therapy, 10 088 were non-statin users on DOACs and 46 908 were non-statin users on LMWH or VKA therapy. Statin users were 10 years older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, renal failure or prior artery disease. During anticoagulation (median, 187 days), 1917 patients (2.6%) suffered major bleeding. Rates of major bleeding per 100 patient-years were 2.33 (95% CI 1.72 to 3.09), 3.75 (95% CI 3.43 to 4.10), 1.39 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.69) and 3.10 (95% CI 2.93 to 3.27), respectively. On multivariable analysis, patients treated with DOACs had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared with those on LMWH or VKA therapy (adjusted HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.74). The adjusted HR in statin users versus non-users was 1.03 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.14), while in statin users on DOACs versus the rest of patients, it was 1.18 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.76)., Conclusions: In patients with VTE receiving statins, long-term anticoagulation with DOACs was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding, regardless of the statin use. These findings support the safety profile of DOACs over VKAs or LMWH in the management of VTE in patients requiring statins., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The optimal approach for anticoagulation in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a subject of debate. A meta-analysis using updated evidence to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves to address this controversy., Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up until March 2023. The search aimed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy and safety outcomes of both direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes of interest were major bleeding and all-cause mortality., Results: Our study demonstrated that despite the difference was not significant, the hazard of all-cause mortality was 2.5% higher in the DOAC group (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.88, 1.19], p-value = .75). Similarly, the hazard of stroke (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = [0.87, 1.32], p-value = .71) and major bleeding (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = [0.89, 1.38], p-value = .36) were found to be respectively 3.2 and 10.7% higher in the DOAC group, although the difference was not significant. However, the hazard of intracranial hemorrhage was found to be 28.8 lower in the DOAC treatment group (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = [0.39, 1.31], p-value = .27), which again was not statistically significant., Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that in patients undergoing bioprosthetic valve surgery and presenting with AF afterward, DOAC and VKA are similar regarding life-threatening and all-cause mortality outcomes, including major bleeding, stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves must be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) due to an increased risk of valve thrombosis and systemic embolism., Objectives: To assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on VKA treatment control in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves., Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using the Clalit Health Services database. The cohort included patients who underwent either aortic or mitral valve replacement using a prosthetic mechanical valve. The primary outcomes included the overall time in therapeutic range (TTR) and the percent of patients with a TTR < 50% during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to preceding year., Results: The cohort included 2381 patients. The percentage of patients who had at least two international normalized ratio (INR) tests during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly lower compared to the year preceding the pandemic (81% and 87%, respectively, P < 0.001). In both years, the percentage of patients without any documented INR test was high (31.5% in the first COVID-19 pandemic year and 28.9% in the preceding year, P < 0.001). TTR was significantly lower during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year (68.1% ± 26 and 69.4% ± 24, P = 0.03). A TTR > 50% was demonstrated in 78% and 81% during the pandemic and the preceding year, P = 0.009., Conclusions: We noted overall poor VKA control in patients with mechanical heart valves. During the COVID-19 pandemic, VKA control became even worse as reflected by significantly lower TTR and INR tests rates.

Background: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is indicated for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal but is associated with thrombotic events (TE). In 2018, the institution revised 4F-PCC dosing for VKA reversal from INR and weight-based dosing to a fixed-dose of 1500 units. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare hemostatic efficacy and TE rate of fixed-dose 4PCC to weight-based dosing. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study of adult patients who received 4F-PCC for VKA reversal from January 2014 through May 2016 (INR and weight-based dosing) or April through October 2018 (fixed-dosing). The primary endpoint was hemostatic efficacy, defined by achieving an INR of ≤1.4, or an INR of ≤1.7 with evidence of hemostasis. The key secondary endpoint was TE within 14 days of 4F-PCC administration. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared for nominal data and Mann-Whitney U for ordinal and continuous data. Results: The study included 163 patients who received weight-based dosing and 45 who received fixed-dose 4F-PCC. Hemostatic efficacy was 76.9% of patients in the weight-based group and 77.4% of patients in the fixed-dose group ( P = .229). TE occurred in 13.5% of the weight-based vs 6.7% of the fixed-dose group ( P = .181). Conclusion: This study found no difference in hemostatic efficacy with fixed-dose 4F-PCC for VKA reversal compared to INR and weight-based dosing. The occurrence of TE was reduced by 50% with the 4F-PCC fixed-dose strategy; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting IinterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic strategies by age in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention in AUGUSTUS., Methods: Patients were stratified into 3 age groups: <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years. Outcomes of interest were major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, major bleeding, death or rehospitalization, and ischemic events. Treatment effects of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin vs. placebo were assessed across age groups using Cox models., Results: Of 4614 patients, 1267 (27.5%) were <65, 1802 (39.0%) were 65-74, and 1545 (33.5%) were ≥75 years. Apixaban was associated with lower rates of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding than VKA (<65: HR 0.69 [0.47-1.00]; 65-74: HR 0.57 [0.43-0.75]; ≥75: HR 0.81 [0.63-1.04]). Death or hospitalization occurred less often with apixaban, regardless of age. No differences were observed in rates of ischemic events between apixaban and VKA according to age. Aspirin was associated with higher rates of bleeding than placebo (<65: HR 1.67 [1.15-2.43]; 65-74: HR 2.32 [1.73-3.10]; ≥75: HR 1.69 [1.31-2.19]). Rates of death or rehospitalization and ischemic events were similar among patients receiving aspirin or placebo across age groups., Conclusions: Apixaban was associated with greater absolute reduction in bleeding than VKA in older age groups, reflecting their higher hemorrhagic risk. Aspirin increased bleeding in all age groups vs. placebo. Our findings support the use of apixaban plus a purinergic receptor P2Y 12 (P2Y 12 ) inhibitor without aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent acute coronary syndrome/percutaneous coronary intervention, regardless of age., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The transition to or from direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is common in clinical practice., Areas Covered: A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and UpToDate up to March 2024 for conditions and approaches for transitioning from one agent to the other. No randomized clinical trials were retrieved except for two studies regarding switching to DOAC in well-conducted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy. A narrative review was conducted addressing the conditions for switching from one agent to the other, such as thromboembolic events and major bleeding during anticoagulation, development or worsening of kidney or liver failure, initiation of interfering drugs, adverse events such as allergic reactions, frailty, patients' preferences, and affordability. During transitions from one anticoagulant to the other, the risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications should be minimized. The current approaches for such transitions are derived from those employed in clinical trials evaluating DOAC and from product information., Expert Opinion: Many uncertainties remain regarding those circumstances requiring a change in anticoagulant strategies, as they lack evidence-based guidance. It can be envisaged that the problem of switching to and from DOAC will need additional studies especially addressing the conditions and the best approach to such transitions.

Abstract: A 76-year-old male patient, who underwent a post-aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve in 2006, was on oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, maintaining a stable therapeutic level of anticoagulation until 2022. He had a new diagnosis of ulcerative colitis in 2022, following which he was started on mesalamine. He had been having a supratherapeutic level of anticoagulation, as evidenced by an international normalized ratio (INR) of 12 to 14 on multiple occasions since 2022, leading to gastrointestinal bleeding, necessitating multiple packed red cell transfusions. He presented to us in August 2024 with severe anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding. The evaluation revealed severe depletion of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors. In this report, we discuss the possible drug-drug interactions between mesalamine and vitamin K antagonists, which went unrecognized leading to life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding., (Copyright © 2024 Journal of Postgraduate Medicine.)

Background: Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer-acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials., Methods: Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation-naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding., Results: Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching-cohort (PSM-cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM-cohort, 5-year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un-weighted and three different weighted Fine-Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort., Conclusions: In this large real-world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs., (© 2024 BARMER Institut für Gesundheitssystemforschung and The Author(s). Journal of Internal Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Publication of The Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Background: Guidelines on myocardial infarction (MI) recommend antithrombotic and anticoagulatory treatment at time of diagnosis. MI with ST segment elevation (STEMI) is mostly a certain diagnosis. Acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) has diagnostic uncertainty and remains a working diagnosis in the prehospital setting., Objective: Assessment of prehospital loading with aspirin and heparin depending on ACS subtype and pretreatment with oral anticoagulants., Methods: The PRELOAD survey was a nationwide German study. STEMI/NSTE-ACS scenarios were designed and varied in pretreatment: I) no pretreatment, II) new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), III) vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Loading strategy was assessed and included: a) aspirin (ASA), b) unfractionated heparin (UFH), c) ASA + UFH, d) no loading., Results: A total of 708 emergency physicians were included. In NSTE-ACS without pretreatment, 79% chose loading (p < 0.001). ASA + UFH (71.4%) was the preferred option. In corresponding STEMI scenario, 100% chose loading and 98.6% preferred ASA + UFH (p < 0.001). In NSTE-ACS with NOAC pretreatment, 69.8% favored loading (p < 0.001); in VKA pretreatment the corresponding rate was 72.3% (p < 0.001). In each scenario, ASA was the preferred option. In STEMI with NOAC pretreatment, 97.5% chose loading (p < 0.001); analogous rate was 96.8% in STEMI with VKA pretreatment (p < 0.001). ASA was the preferred option again., Conclusions: Prehospital loading was the preferred treatment strategy despite the diagnostic uncertainty in NSTE-ACS and guidelines recommending loading at time of diagnosis. Pretreatment with oral anticoagulants resulted in a strategy shift to loading with only aspirin. In STEMI patients, this indicates potential undertreatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The impact of NOACs on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness and safety of NOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with CTEPH. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for relevant studies, encompassing data from inception until November 2023. The data were pooled using a fixed-effects model if the I2 value was less than 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was employed. Overall, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight observational studies involving 4556 patients with CTEPH were included. Patients receiving NOACs exhibited a significantly lower incidence of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.76) and major bleeding (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92) compared to those with VKAs. There were no significant differences in the rate of VTE recurrence (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.72-1.59), total bleeding (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60-1.01), and minor bleeding (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.73-1.69) between the two studied groups. Similar results were found in the subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.This meta-analysis provided evidence that NOACs could be superior to VKAs for the treatment of CTEPH. NOACs might be safe and a convenient alternative to VKAs for thromboprophylaxis in patients with CTEPH., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To describe characteristics of published research on the safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for pregnant patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), including their methodological characteristics and knowledge gaps., Methods: This study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews protocol system. Studies were primarily identified through searching electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Study characteristics and outcomes were reported and described using customized charting tables., Results: Of 1528 publications, 17 remained in the final analysis. These reported up to 190 VKA-treated aPL-positive pregnancies diagnosed as antiphospholipid syndrome (APS); pregnancy cases were likely overlapping in some publications. In the 17 reports, there were 723 individuals in comparison groups, including healthy pretreatment pregnancies and women with APS treated with standard therapies without VKA. However, only 4 (23.5%) of the 17 publications stated a study objective focusing on VKA use, of which only one was a full-length article. In addition, information on VKA doses, disease diagnostic criteria, and the long-term outcomes of offspring were largely absent., Conclusion: The current evidence is insufficient to assess VKA efficacy and safety profiles in aPL-positive pregnant patients. Studies with a defined focus on VKA use in this population are lacking, and reporting of key information is not consistent. The relative lack of knowledge of VKA use in pregnant women with APS is concerning, and efficacy and safety questions remain., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Purpose: The efficacy of factor Xa inhibitors in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is unknown., Methods/results: The objective of this article was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the INVICTUS trial, an open-label randomized controlled study that compared vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to rivaroxaban in patients with AF and RHD while also considering the existing evidence from literature in this particular area of research., Conclusion: The findings of the INVICTUS trial indicated that rivaroxaban was found to be inferior in efficacy to VKA. However, it is important to note that the primary outcome of the trial was driven by sudden death and death caused by mechanical pump failure. As a result, it is necessary to approach the data from this study with caution, and it would be inappropriate to draw parallel conclusions for other causes of valvular AF. Particularly, the perplexing issue of how rivaroxaban could have contributed to both pump failure and sudden cardiac death requires further explanation. Additional data regarding changes in heart failure medication and ventricular function would be essential for proper interpretation., (© 2023. The Author(s).)