Search

Background: Ex situ heart perfusion (ESHP) has been used to optimize donor organs before heart transplantation. However, cardiac function often deteriorates with the development of myocardial edema. The use of dialysis during ESHP could assist in cardiac preservation. Methods: Male Yorkshire pig hearts were subjected to ESHP for 8 hours with or without dialysis. Hearts were supported during nonworking mode and working mode, and pressure-volume loops and coronary vasomotor function were evaluated. Finally, tissue biopsies were assessed for mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Results: Adding dialysis to ESHP significantly enhanced cardiac function, with improved preload recruitable stroke work at 4 hours (64.09 ± 20.13 vs 35.08 ± 13.52, p = 0.010) and 8 hours (64.31 ± 9.08 vs 23.30 ± 19.25, p = 0.0002), maximal elastance at 8 hours (24.67 ± 10.75 vs 10.62 ± 8.471, p = 0.0477), and end diastolic pressure volume relationship at 8 hours (644.7 ± 566.68 vs 86.63 ± 72.05, p = 0.0187). Coronary vasomotor function improved in the dialysis group in endothelium dependent (LogIC50 −7.39 ± 0.25 vs −2.22 ± 0.76, p

Objective: During surgical aortic valve replacement, prosthesis–patient mismatch is avoided by implanting the largest possible valve, which sometimes requires annular enlargement (ARE). The effects of ARE on mortality remain controversial. We reviewed data from a multinational clinical trial evaluating a novel pericardial bioprosthesis to determine the influence of ARE 5 years postimplant. Methods: Patients with aortic valve disease requiring surgical aortic valve replacement were prospectively enrolled at 25 centers in North America and 13 centers in Europe. Standardized follow-up was prescribed, including serial echocardiography assessed by a core lab. A composite 30-day end point of major morbidity or mortality was defined as death, reoperation for any cause, stroke, deep sternal wound infection, and acute kidney injury. Results: Among 602 patients with detailed intraoperative data, 90 (15%) underwent ARE with similar rates in North America (17%) and Europe (12%; P = .11). Implanted valve size was similar in both groups (P = .18). The prevalence of moderate or severe prosthesis–patient mismatch at 12 months and at 5 years was comparable between groups, as was the average indexed effective orifice area (P = .3). Five-year survival (ARE, 91% vs no ARE, 89%) and freedom from 30-day major morbidity and mortality (ARE, 87% vs no ARE, 89%) were also similar. Conclusions: In this analysis of a prospective, observational clinical trial, we observed that the performance of an aortic root enlargement procedure did not increase morbidity or mortality at 30 days. We found that survival at 5 years was similar between groups, suggesting that the performance of an ARE procedure restored survival to that observed in patients who did not require an ARE.

Background: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used increasingly to support patients who are in cardiogenic shock. Due to the risk of complications, prediction models may aid in identifying patients who would benefit most from VA-ECMO. One such model is the Survival After Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (SAVE) score. Therefore, we wanted to validate the utility of the SAVE score in a contemporary cohort of adult patients. Methods: Retrospective data were extracted from electronic health records of 120 patients with cardiogenic shock supported with VA-ECMO between 2011 and 2018. The SAVE score was calculated for each patient to predict survival to hospital discharge. We assessed the SAVE score calibration by comparing predicted vs observed survival at discharge. We assessed discrimination with the area under the receiver operating curve using logistic regression. Results: A total of 45% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Survivors had a significantly higher mean SAVE score (–9.3 ± 4.1 in survivors vs –13.1 ± 4.4, respectively; P = 0.001). SAVE score discrimination was adequate (c = 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.86; P < 0.001). SAVE score calibration was limited, as observed survival rates for risk classes II-V were higher in our cohort (II: 67% vs 58%; III: 78% vs 42%; IV: 61% vs 30%; and V: 29% vs 18%). Conclusions: The SAVE score underestimates survival in a contemporary North American cohort of adult patients with cardiogenic shock. Its inaccurate performance could lead to denying ECMO support to patients deemed to be too high risk. Further studies are needed to validate additional predictive models for patients requiring VA-ECMO. Résumé: Contexte: L’oxygénation extracorporelle veino-artérielle (ECMO-VA) est de plus en plus utilisée comme assistance pour les patients qui sont en choc cardiogène. En raison du risque de complications, des modèles de prédiction peuvent aider à déterminer quels patients bénéficieraient le plus d’une ECMO-VA. Le score SAVE (Survival After Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) est un modèle de ce genre. Par conséquent, nous voulions valider l’utilité du score SAVE dans une cohorte contemporaine de patients adultes. Méthodologie: Des données rétrospectives ont été extraites de dossiers médicaux électroniques de 120 patients atteints d’un choc cardiogène ayant reçu une ECMO-VA entre 2011 et 2018. Le score SAVE a été calculé pour chaque patient afin de prédire la survie au congé de l’hôpital. Nous avons évalué la calibration du score SAVE en comparant la survie prédite au moment du congé et la survie observée. Nous avons évalué la discrimination par l’aire sous la courbe opérationnelle chez le receveur en faisant appel à la régression logistique. Résultats: Au total, 45 % des patients ont survécu au congé de l’hôpital. Les survivants affichaient un score SAVE moyen considérablement plus élevé (–9,3 ± 4,1 chez les survivants vs –13,1 ± 4,4; p = 0,001). La discrimination par le score SAVE était adéquate (c = 0,77; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 0,69 à 0,86; p < 0,001). La calibration du score SAVE était limitée, car les taux pour les classes de risque II à V étaient plus élevés dans notre cohorte (II : 67 % vs 58 %; III : 78 % vs 42 %; IV : 61 % vs 30 %; et V : 29 % vs 18 %). Conclusions: Le score SAVE sous-estime la survie dans une cohorte nord-américaine contemporaine de patients adultes atteints d’un choc cardiogène. L’inexactitude de ses résultats pourrait faire en sorte qu’une assistance par ECMO serait refusée à des patients jugés comme présentant un risque élevé. D’autres études sont nécessaires pour valider d’autres modèles de prédiction pour les patients ayant besoin d’une ECMO-VA.

Patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy due to Fabry disease are often deemed ineligible for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support due to the risk of suction events with a small LV cavity. We describe the first case series of LVAD support for Fabry disease. LVAD therapy can improve survival, quality of life, and provide clinical stability to start enzyme replacement therapy. Precautions at the time of surgery include rapid treatment of fever to avoid Fabry crises, involvement of a multidisciplinary team, and early initiation of rehabilitation. We describe LVAD support for both bridging and destination therapy. Résumé: Les patients qui ont une cardiomyopathie restrictive due à la maladie de Fabry sont souvent considérés non admissibles aux dispositifs d’assistance ventriculaire gauche (DAVG) en raison du risque de succion lié à la petite cavité VG. Nous décrivons la première série de cas liée aux DAVG en présence de la maladie de Fabry. La thérapie par DAVG peut contribuer à l’amélioration de la survie, de la qualité de vie et offrir une stabilité clinique pour débuter l’enzymothérapie de substitution. Parmi les précautions à prendre au moment de l’intervention chirurgicale figurent le traitement rapide de la fièvre pour éviter les crises de Fabry, la participation de l’équipe multidisciplinaire et la mise en place précoce de la réadaptation. Nous décrivons l’utilisation du DAVG à titre de pont jusqu’à la transplantation et à titre de thérapie définitive.