Search

Summary: Monoclonal immunoglobulin M‐associated type I cryoglobulinaemia is poorly characterised. We screened 534 patients with monoclonal IgM disorders over a 9‐year period and identified 134 patients with IgM type I cryoglobulins. Of these, 76% had Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM), 5% had other non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 19% had IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Clinically relevant IgM‐associated disorders (including cold agglutinin disease [CAD], anti‐MAG antibodies, amyloidosis and Schnitzler syndrome) coexisted in 31%, more frequently in MGUS versus WM/NHL (72% vs. 22%/29%, p < 0.001). The majority of those with cryoglobulins and coexistent CAD/syndrome had the molecular characteristics of a CAD clone (wild‐type MYD88 in 80%). A half of all patients had active manifestations at cryoglobulin detection: vasomotor (22%), cutaneous (16%), peripheral neuropathy (22%) and hyperviscosity (9%). 16/134 required treatment for cryoglobulin‐related symptoms alone at a median of 38 days (range: 6–239) from cryoglobulin detection. At a median follow‐up of 3 years (range: 0–10), 3‐year cryoglobulinaemia‐treatment‐free survival was 77% (95% CI: 68%–84%). Age was the only predictor of overall survival. Predictors of cryoglobulinaemia‐related treatment/death were hyperviscosity (HR: 73.01; 95% CI: 15.62–341.36, p < 0.0001) and cutaneous involvement (HR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.13–7.71, p = 0.028). Type I IgM cryoglobulinaemia is more prevalent than previously described in IgM gammopathy and should be actively sought. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Treatment options for Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) have expanded rapidly in the last decades. However, there is no consensus on a preferred treatment. Therefore, patient preferences become increasingly important in making individualized treatment plans. Still, WM patients' priorities and perspectives regarding their treatment options are unknown. We evaluated treatment preferences of WM patients using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Methods: A mixed‐method approach was utilized for identification and selection of attributes/levels. The DCE questionnaire included five attributes: type of agent (targeted versus chemotherapy); frequency and route of administration; 5‐year progression‐free survival (PFS); adverse events; and risk of secondary malignancies. An orthogonal design and a mixed logit panel data model were used to construct choice tasks and assess patient preferences, respectively. Results: Three hundred thirty WM patients participated in the project. In total, 214 (65%) complete questionnaires were included for data analysis. The 5‐year PFS, followed by risk of secondary malignancies were the most important attributes for making treatment choices. Regarding side effects, patients chose to avoid neuropathy the most compared to nausea/vomiting and extreme fatigue. Patients preferred a fixed‐duration treatment with IV/SC administration at the hospital over a continuous daily oral regimen at home. Conclusion: These are the first systematic data obtained on WM patient preferences for treatment. The results may help discussions with individual patients about their treatment choices. Also, these data can help design clinical trials in WM and inform health‐care decision‐making regarding outcomes that are most relevant to patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that remains incurable. Several effective agents such as monoclonal antibodies (in combination with chemotherapy), Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, and BCL2 inhibitors are (becoming) available for the treatment of relapsed and refractory WM. There is however no consensus on a preferred treatment in the relapsed setting. Choice of therapy in relapsed WM should be individualized by taking several treatment and patients characteristics into account, such as treatment duration, toxicity, age, comorbidities and MYD88L265P and CXCR4 mutational status. Due to better understanding of WM biology and the arrival of novel anti-lymphoma agents, the therapeutic options are increasing. Non-cytotoxic and fixed duration regimens, such as those explored in other indolent NHLs should be the focus of future clinical trials in WM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discrimination between Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) of the bone marrow (BM) can be difficult due to overlap in clinical, histopathologic, and immunophenotypic characteristics. We determined which characteristics can aid in the differential diagnosis of 'gray zone' cases. We compared clinical, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of 222 WM and 65 MZL patients. LASSO regression was employed for variable selection. The most distinguishing clinical features of WM compared to MZL were the presence of the B-symptom weight loss and IgM paraprotein. Histopathological findings were plasmacytoid differentiation, monoclonal plasma cells, and increased mast cells in the BM. Regarding flow cytometry, only CD10 and CD38 were distinguishing markers. Finally, as the expected presence of the MYD88L265P mutation showed to be of great value in the distinction between WM and MZL. Despite the great overlap, WM can often be distinguished from MZL by using a combination of characteristics. These characteristics should be weighed in complex, 'gray zone' cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Contemporary diagnosed WM patients, compared to the general population, continue to experience excess mortality regardless of having survived up to 15 years post‐diagnosis. This gradual increase in excess mortality might result from the incurable nature of this disease characterized by multiple relapses throughout the disease course with limited efficacious treatment options in the released/refractory setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: It is unclear how treatment advances impacted the population‐level survival of patients with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (LPL/WM). Therefore, we assessed trends in first‐line therapy and relative survival (RS) among patients with LPL/WM diagnosed in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018 (N = 6232; median age, 70 years; 61% males) using data from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were grouped into three age groups (<65, 66–75 and >75 years) and four calendar periods. Overall, treatment with anti‐neoplastic agents within 1 year post‐diagnosis gradually decreased over time, following a broader application of an initial watch‐and‐wait approach. Approximately 40% of patients received anti‐neoplastic therapy during 2011–2018. Furthermore, use of chemotherapy alone decreased over time, following an increased application of chemoimmunotherapy. Detailed data among 1596 patients diagnosed during 2014–2018 revealed that dexamethasone‐rituximab‐cyclophosphamide was the most frequently applied regimen; its use increased from 14% to 39% between 2014 and 2018. The 5‐year RS increased significantly over time, particularly since the introduction of rituximab in the early–mid 2000s. The 5‐year RS during 1989–1995 was 75%, 65%, and 46% across the age groups compared to 93%, 85%, and 79% during 2011–2018. However, the survival improvement was less pronounced after 2011. Collectively, the impressive survival improvement may be accounted for by broader application of rituximab‐containing therapy. The lack of survival improvement in the post‐rituximab era warrants studies across multiple lines of therapy to further improve survival in LPL/WM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented on a case study of a 73-year-old Caucasian patient who had a waxing and waning course of intravascular large cell lymphoma (IVL).

Introduction: During the last decades, the pathogenesis of cold agglutinin disease (CAD) has been well elucidated and shown to be complex. Several documented or investigational therapies have been made available. This development has resulted in major therapeutic advances, but also in challenges in choice of therapy., Areas Covered: In this review, we address each step in pathogenesis: bone marrow clonal lymphoproliferation, composition and effects of monoclonal cold agglutinin, non-complement mediated erythrocyte agglutination, complement-dependent hemolysis, and other effects of complement activation. We also discuss the heterogeneous clinical features and their relation to specific steps in pathogenesis, in particular with respect to the impact of complement involvement. CAD can be classified into three clinical phenotypes with consequences for established treatments as well as development of new therapies. Some promising future treatment approaches - beyond chemoimmunotherapy and complement inhibition - are reviewed., Expert Opinion: The patient's individual clinical profile regarding complement involvement and hemolytic versus non-hemolytic features is important for the choice of treatment. Further development of treatment approaches is encouraged, and some candidate drugs are promising irrespective of clinical phenotype. Patients with CAD requiring therapy should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials.

Background: Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune haemolytic anaemia mediated by the classical complement pathway (CP). Sutimlimab selectively targets complement C1s inhibiting classical CP activation. In CADENZA Part A (26-weeks), a placebo-controlled study in patients without recent transfusion history, sutimlimab reduced haemolysis, anaemia, and fatigue, and was generally well tolerated., Methods: The CADENZA study (NCT03347422) started in March 2018 (Part A) and completed in December 2021 (Part B). All patients in Part B were eligible to receive sutimlimab for up to 1 year after the last patient completed Part A. Efficacy and safety was assessed throughout Part B, until the last on-treatment visit with available assessment (LV), and after a 9-week washout., Findings: In total, 32/39 patients completed Part B; median treatment duration: 99 weeks. Similar sustained improvements in haemolysis, anaemia, and quality of life were observed in patients switching to sutimlimab and those continuing sutimlimab. Mean LV values for the combined group (ie, placebo-to-sutimlimab group and sutimlimab-to-sutimlimab group) improved from baseline for haemoglobin (≥11.0 g/dL on-treatment vs 9.3 g/dL at baseline), bilirubin (≤20.0 μmol/L on-treatment vs 35.0 μmol/L at baseline), and FACIT-Fatigue scores. Following a 9-week washout, inhibition of CP activity was reversed, and haemolytic markers approached baseline levels. Overall, sutimlimab was generally well tolerated throughout the study. No patients developed systemic lupus erythematosus or meningococcal infections. During the 9-week washout, most adverse events could be attributed to recurrence of underlying CAD., Interpretation: The CADENZA Part B results support the sustained efficacy and safety of sutimlimab for treatment of CAD; however, upon discontinuation disease activity reoccurs., Funding: Sanofi., Competing Interests: AR has received consultancy fees from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Bioverativ, a Sanofi company, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; honoraria from Alexion, Amgen, Apellis, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Sobi, and advisory board fees from Alexion, Amgen, Apellis, Bioverativ, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Sobi. SB has received research support from Mundipharma; lecture honoraria from Apellis, Bioverativ (a Sanofi company), Janssen-Cilag, Momenta Pharmaceuticals and True North Therapeutics; and consultancy and advisory board honoraria from Apellis, Bioverativ, and Momenta Pharmaceuticals. WB has received research support from Alexion; honoraria from Agios, Alexion, Apellis, Biocryst, Incyte, Janssen, Momenta, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi; and advisory board fees from Alexion, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Sobi. SD reports speaker fees and research funding from Janssen, BeiGene and Sanofi. BJ has received reimbursement for travel costs related to scientific advice and scientific presentations from Sanofi. MM has received research support for clinical studies from Roche; received fees from Amgen and GlaxoSmithKline for their participation in scientific advisory boards. ICW has received consultancy fees from Alexion, Apellis, Novartis, and Biocryst; and honoraria from Alexion. MY has no disclosures. JN is a member of the advisory board for Chugai Pharmaceuticals and Alexion Pharmaceuticals and has received research funding and honorarium from Alexion Pharmaceuticals. JMIV has received honoraria from Sanofi, Amgen, and BMS; research support from Beigene and AbbVie/Genmab, and advisory board fees from Sanofi and Janssen; all of these are institutional. JC received research funding from Cerus, Kawasumi Laboratories and Sanofi; he also received speaker or advisory fees from Cerus, Fresenius Kabi, Grifols, MacoPharma, Pharm-Olam, Sanofi and Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies. CMB has received research support from Alexion, Argenx, Electra, Novartis, and Sanofi; honoraria from Alexion, Argenx, and Sanofi; and advisory board fees from Argenx, Novartis, and Sanofi. DJ, FS, ML, MS, MW, NW, RY, SS are Sanofi employees and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Abstract: Cold agglutinin disease is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia characterized by complement pathway-mediated hemolysis. Riliprubart (SAR445088, BIVV020), a second-generation classical complement inhibitor, is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits only the activated form of C1s. This Phase 1b study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and effect on hemolysis of riliprubart in adult patients with cold agglutinin disease. On day 1, 12 patients received a single IV dose of either 30 mg/kg (n = 6) or 15 mg/kg (n = 6) of riliprubart and were subsequently followed for 15 weeks. Riliprubart was generally well tolerated; there were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events, or treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death or permanent study discontinuation. There were no reports of serious infections, encapsulated bacterial infections including meningococcal infections, hypersensitivity, or thromboembolic events. Rapid improvements in hemoglobin (day 5) and bilirubin (day 1) were observed in both treatment cohorts. Mean hemoglobin levels were maintained at >11.0 g/dL from day 29 and mean levels of bilirubin were normalized by day 29; both responses were maintained throughout the study. Improvements in clinical markers closely correlated with a sustained reduction in the 50% hemolytic complement (CH50) throughout the study. Mean C4 levels, an in vivo marker of treatment activity, increased 1 week after treatment with either dose of riliprubart and were sustained throughout the study. In conclusion, a single IV dose of riliprubart was well tolerated, and led to rapid classical complement inhibition, control of hemolysis, and improvement in anemia, all of which were sustained over 15 weeks. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04269551., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Bing-Neel syndrome is a rare manifestation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), which is caused by infiltration of the malignant lymphoplasmacytic cells in the central nervous system. Patients can present with a diverse range of neurologic symptoms, and differentiation with other comorbidities seen in WM, such as immunoglobulin M-related polyneuropathy, can be challenging. Both the rarity of this disorder and the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation often cause a significant diagnostic delay with the risk of permanent neurologic damage. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Bing-Neel syndrome., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of a serotype-specific urinary antigen detection multiplex assay for identification of 13 pneumococcal serotypes (1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F and 23F) in urine of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Adult patients with clinical suspicion of community-acquired pneumonia were included. In addition to standard diagnostic procedures, a urine sample was collected to perform the urinary antigen detection test. Demographic, clinical, radiological and microbiological data were collected. Among 1095 community-acquired pneumonia patients Streptococcus pneumoniae was identified as causative pathogen in 257 (23%), when using conventional diagnostic methods and in 357 (33%) when urinary antigen detection was added. Of the 49 bacteraemic episodes caused by one of the 13 serotypes covered by the urinary antigen detection, 48 were detected by the urinary antigen detection, indicating a sensitivity of 98%. Of the 77 community-acquired pneumonia episodes with a "non-urinary antigen detection" causative pathogen, none had a positive urinary antigen detection result, indicating a specificity of 100%. Addition of the urinary antigen detection test to conventional diagnostic methods increased the prevalence of S. pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia by 39%. Using bacteraemic episodes as reference sensitivity and specificity of the urinary antigen detection was 98% and 100%, respectively.