Search

Background: As a teaching method, feedback is an integral part of medical education. However, there is a lack of a uniform theoretical basis or generally recognized guidelines for its specific design. Against this background, the aim of this article is to discuss conceptual considerations and empirical findings regarding feedback using various practical examples.Procedure and conceptual considerations: Building on the results of a workshop of the Committee for Communicative and Social Competences of the Society for Medical Education (GMA), this article first explains central conceptual considerations and empirical results on the topic of feedback. A particular focus is on various variables that influence the effect of feedback. This includes the feedback source, the frequency of feedback, starting points of feedback, the connection between feedback and reflection as well as the motivation and meta-cognitive skills of the feedback recipient.Practical examples: The implementation of feedback in practice is illustrated using eight examples from the field of medical and dental education. They stem from various settings and the focus is on formative oral feedback. It will become evident that the focus is more on the givers of feedback than the recipients of feedback. Instructions for recipients of feedback on how to reflect on it is still the exception.Discussion: Many of the relevant aspects for the effect of feedback described in the literature are already taken into account in the practical examples discussed. In conclusion, seven recommendations are made for implementing feedback in practice.

Copyright of GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung is the property of German Medical Science Publishing House gGmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Psychosocial care of cancer patients is an important aspect throughout the entire course of oncological treatment. Since 2015, psychosocial screening has been implemented in the outpatient clinics of the Skin Cancer Center in Freiburg. We present here a post hoc analysis in the context of a quality management program., Question: Acceptance, psychosocial distress and desire for counseling were evaluated. Exploratively, we investigated which patient and disease characteristics are related to increased subjective distress., Materials and Methods: In a full survey from 06/2015 to 12/2015, we evaluated acceptance, psychosocial distress by distress thermometer (DT), and desire for counseling., Results: Of 753 patients, 345 (45.8%) participated in psychosocial screening and data from 310 (174 men, 136 women; 89.7% melanoma patients, mean time since initial diagnosis 4.7 ± 3.9 years) could be analyzed. The mean burden on the DT was 2.97 ± 2.83 (median 2, range 0-10). High distress (DT ≥ 5) was reported by 84 patients (28.8%). Thirty-four patients (11%) indicated a desire for counseling, and 23 patients took up the counseling offer. The patient group with high distress was younger, more often under ongoing or recently completed systemic therapy, and had more often a desire for counseling., Conclusion: In addition to assessing psychosocial distress with validated screening instruments, the survey of the subjective desire for care represents an important parameter for the identification of patients in need of care. Young patients and patients with ongoing systemic therapy should be the focus of attention., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: The aim of the study is to look at the specific contribution of outpatient cancer counselling centers (OCCC) from the perspective of both the person seeking advice and the referring health care professionals., Methods: Qualitative design by means of guideline-based face-to-face interviews with cancer patients/relatives and individual telephone interviews with referring health care professionals., Results: A total of 43 persons seeking advice and 30 referring health care professionals were interviewed. With regard to the contents of counselling, psycho-oncological support and help for self-help in combination with social-legal information about additional support services are perceived as central features. In the group of referring physicians, however, there seems to be some uncertainty about what OCCCs (can) provide., Conclusion: On the one hand, the results point to a specific core of the services offered by OCCCs, and on the other hand to ambiguous perceptions on the part of the respondents. They may contribute to further sharpening the profile of OCCC and to clarifying their place in the health care system., Competing Interests: Susanne Singer erhielt Vortrags- bzw. Juryhonorare von Pfizer, Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim und BMS, alle außerhalb der hier vorgestellten Studie. Andreas Ihrig, Evelyn Flohr-Schmitt, Markus Besseler, Gudrun Bruns, Norbert Gelse und Alexander Wünsch sind selbst Mitarbeiter/innen einer Krebsberatungsstelle. Alle anderen Autor/innen (Margret Xyländer, Oliver Bayer, Melanie Schranz, Thorsten Meyer) geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The aim of the present survey was to describe and evaluate experiences of German psychosocial cancer counselling centers with user surveys as a quality management measure., Methods: Representatives of various psychosocial cancer counselling centers were asked to prepare an experience report on user surveys. Nine field reports were presented and discussed in summary by the working group "Cancer Counselling Centers" of the Working Group Psychooncology of the German Cancer Society (PSO). Special attention was paid to the short questionnaire KBS-N (Cancer Counselling Centre Questionnaire) recommended by the working group., Results: All psychosocial cancer counselling centers reported positive experiences with user surveys, which, however, represent an effort in terms of personnel and logistics. In addition to the KBS-N, more detailed questionnaires were also used. The surveys were conducted either continuously or on a random basis over a limited period of time. Those seeking advice were usually asked at a defined time directly after the initial interviews or after the end of the counselling sequence. The response rate was higher (85-95%) when the questionnaire was handed out personally after the initial consultation than for postal delivery and return (47-89%). All counselling centers reported positive feedback on the counselling services provided. Isolated points of criticism were related in particular to organizational framework conditions., Conclusion: After weighing up the costs and benefits, an active follow-up survey of those seeking advice using the short questionnaire KBS-N appears to be a practicable quality assurance measure, at least over a limited period of time. More detailed user surveys require more effort and are therefore more suitable for use in research that go beyond quality assurance., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Outpatient Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disability The psychiatric morbidity risk for people with intellectual disability is considerably increased. Psychotherapy is considered as one possible treatment. Among experts the caresituation is described as substantial insufficient. This study investigated the perspective of psychotherapists for children and adolescents in the German state North Rhine-Westphalia regarding the care situation of outpatient psychotherapy for children and adolescents with intellectual disability. The participants received a questionnaire (a) about the care situation, (b) how they consider their training to treat these patients and (c) the possibility for free answers. In this cross-section study 185 licensed psychotherapists for children and adolescents filled out a semi-standardized online-questionnaire. The data were analyzed descriptively; free answers were categorized according to Mayring. Additionally, group differences were tested. (a) The psychotherapeutic supply situation for children and adolescents with intellectual disability was rated as insufficient. Clients with learning disability or minor intellectual disability are mainly treated. This group of people benefits from psychotherapy. (b) The training for treating these clients was rated as inadequate. (c) Qualitative analysis refers that request for psychotherapy is seen as difficult; cognitive orientated treatments need modification. The psychotherapeutic care situation for children and adolescents with intellectual disability appears insufficient. This topic should be part of the training curriculum for psychotherapists.

Fear of progression (FoP) is an appropriate, rational response to the real threat of cancer and its treatments. However, patients experiencing elevated, dysfunctional levels of FoP often feel severely distressed and are in need of treatment. We previously conducted a (partly-)randomized controlled study with cancer patients undergoing in-patient rehabilitation and showed that a brief, four-session cognitive-behavioral group therapy significantly reduced dysfunctional FoP. In this report, we describe the adaption of the cognitive-behavioral group therapy program for use with cancer out-patients. This group therapy program was conducted in the psycho-oncological out-patient department of a large university hospital. It comprises 6 group sessions lasting 90 min each. Because of the larger number of sessions there is more room for the use of exposure-based techniques. Imaginal exposure is used to confront the patient's cancer-related fears and worries. Patients are asked to vividly recount their worries and to think of what would be the worst that can happen (worst-case scenario exercise). In addition, interventions that focus the patient's ressources are applied. The completion of 3 group therapies in the pilot phase supported the feasibility of the program. Pre-post evaluation (n=10) revealed a significant decline of FoP (Fear of Progression Questionnaire, FoP-Q) from M=12,0 (SD=2,0) to M=10,3 (SD=1,7), p=0.029. This represents a large effect (Cohen's d=0.9). Three out of 14 participants (21%) quit treatment after 2 sessions. In sum, the results and our experiences show that this out-patient group therapy program is feasible and probably effective. However, it also shows that some patients regard confronting their cancer-related fears and worries as too stressful. High ambivalence with regard to exposure seems to increase the risk for premature termination. Thus, cancer patients should be thoroughly educated before starting exposure-based treatment of dysfunctional FoP., Competing Interests: Interessenkonflikt: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)