Search

This study critically examines the suitability of using a single drop height to assess the reaction strength index in trained and active participants, a key component of athletic performance. Using a cross-sectional design, 377 trained (n = 163) and active (n = 214) participants aged 14–18 years performing drop jumps from 4 different heights (24, 32, 40, and 48 cm) were studied. The primary aim was to explore the individual differences in reaction strength index at these heights and to assess whether a single height can reliably represent stretch-shortening cycle capabilities. While the repeated measures analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences, the Bland–Altmann analysis revealed significant individual discrepancies between the performance of the drop heights, resulting in a mean absolute error of 32.1 and a mean absolute percentage error of 20.6%. These results strongly suggest that a single drop height is not sufficient to determine performance in the stretch-shortening cycle. This has important practical implications as it can lead to underestimates of performance trends. The study advocates the inclusion of a range of drop heights in routine testing to accurately measure reactive power and thus improve the effectiveness of individualized training programs for young athletes/active youth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Isokinetic dynamometry is a common tool for evaluating muscle function and is used across various disciplines. Technical advancements have shifted focus towards multi-joint exercises such as the leg press, offering insights into practical human movement dynamics. However, previous reproducibility studies have focused predominantly on single-joint exercises, warranting investigations into the reliability of multi-joint exercises. This study aimed to assess the reproducibility of peak force (PF) during multi-joint leg press exercises using the IsoMed 2000 dynamometer. Methods: Thirty physically active subjects (mean: stature 179.4 cm; body mass 76.0 kg; age 30.6 years) participated in three testing sessions. Each session consisted of isometric and isokinetic leg press exercises. Knee angles for isometric exercises included 100° and 140°; velocities for isokinetic exercise included 30 mm/s and 600 mm/s. The first session served as the familiarization session. Statistical analysis included paired sample t-tests, Cohen's d effect sizes, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard errors of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman calculations, including corresponding plots. Results: Descriptive data revealed consistent PF across sessions, with a significant between-sessions difference observed only for isometric (100°) leg extension in the right leg (p < 0.001; d = 0.13). ICC calculations showed high relative reproducibility (ICC > 0.911), with SEM ranging from 37.6 to 294.7 N (SEM% 2.3–6.3%, respectively). Bland-Altman plots depicted minimal intersession disparities (-141.8–68.3 N, respectively − 3.02–1.26%), supporting high reliability. Conclusions: This study highlights the reliability of assessing peak force during isometric and isokinetic leg press exercises using the IsoMed 2000 after a single familiarization session. These findings support its utility in muscular performance evaluation, urging practitioners to incorporate familiarization trials for accurate assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Striking velocity is a key performance indicator in striking-based combat sports, such as boxing, Karate, and Taekwondo. This study aims to develop a low-cost, accelerometer-based system to measure kick and punch velocities in combat athletes. Utilizing a low-cost mobile phone in conjunction with the PhyPhox app, acceleration data was collected and analyzed using a custom algorithm. This involved strike segmentation and numerical integration to determine velocity. The system demonstrated moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 3 , 1 = 0.746 to 0.786 , standard error of measurement (SEM) = 0.488 to 0.921 m/s), comparable to commercially available systems. Biological and technical variations, as well as test standardization issues, were acknowledged as factors influencing reliability. Despite a relatively low sampling frequency, the hardware and software showed potential for reliable measurement. The study highlights the importance of considering within-subject variability, hardware limitations, and the impact of noise in software algorithms. Average strike velocities exhibited higher reliability than peak velocities, making them a practical choice for performance tracking, although they may underestimate true peak performance. Future research should validate the system against gold-standard methods and determine the optimal sampling frequency to enhance measurement accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the concordance of isokinetic bilateral strength differences of the knee extensors in single- and multi-joint movement tasks. One hundred and nineteen male athletes performed isokinetic legpresses at 0.1 m/s and 0.7 m/s as well as isokinetic knee extensions at 60°/s and 180°/s. Bilateral differences and directed bilateral differences (sign indicating the direction of the difference) were calculated for all measurements. Bland-Altman-Plots were plotted to investigate if the different conditions detect bilateral differences of the same magnitude. Additionally, concordance correlations for the directed bilateral differences of the different tests were calculated to investigate magnitude and direction. The results indicate poor to fair concordance between the bilateral differences in the legpress conditions as well as between single- and multi-joint tasks. The single-joint knee extensions displayed a moderate level of agreement. Bilateral strength differences in isokinetic movement tasks are dependent on movement velocity and the nature of the task (single- or multi-joint movement) in the lower extremities. Both the value and the direction of the strength differences show no clear pattern across the investigated measurements and cannot be used interchangeably. Therefore, to assess interlimb strength balance, multiple different tests should be performed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: While maximum strength diagnostics are applied in several sports and rehabilitative settings, dynamic strength capacity has been determined via the one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing for decades. Because the literature concerned several limitations, such as injury risk and limited practical applicability in large populations (e.g., athletic training groups), the strength prediction via the velocity profile has received increasing attention recently. Referring to relative reliability coefficients and inappropriate interpretation of agreement statistics, several previous recommendations neglected systematic and random measurement bias. Methods: This article explored the random measurement error arising from repeated testing (repeatability) and the agreement between two common sensors (vMaxPro and TENDO) within one repetition, using minimal velocity thresholds as well as the velocity = 0 m/s method. Furthermore, agreement analyses were applied to the estimated and measured 1RM in 25 young elite male soccer athletes. Results: The results reported repeatability values with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.66-0.80, which was accompanied by mean absolute (percentage) errors (MAE and MAPE) of up to 0.04-0.22 m/s and =7.5%. Agreement between the two sensors within one repetition showed a systematic lower velocity for the vMaxPro device than the Tendo, with ICCs ranging from 0.28 to 0.88, which were accompanied by an MAE/MAPE of =0.13 m/s (11%). Almost all estimations systematically over/underestimated the measured 1RM, with a random scattering between 4.12% and 71.6%, depending on the velocity threshold used. Discussion: In agreement with most actual reviews, the presented results call for caution when using velocity profiles to estimate strength. Further approaches must be explored to minimize especially the random scattering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soccer is a complex sports discipline that requires players to engage in diverse high-intensity and multidirectional activities. The optimization of strength and conditioning programs requires a comprehensive understanding of the physical attributes influencing player performance. While previous research has demonstrated the influence of knee and hip extensor muscles on the performance in sprints and other explosive movements, this study aimed to establish the relationship between plantar flexor muscle strength and high-intensity actions. Back squat (BS) and calf raise (CR) one-repetition maxima as well as linear sprint (5-, 10-, 30 m) and drop jump performance from different heights (15, 30, 45 and 60 cm) were measured in 45 elite youth players (age: 16.62 ± 1.1 years). Results showed significant negative correlations between BS strength and sprint times (r = −0.60 to −0.61), confirming the importance of lower limb extensor muscle strength in short-distance sprints. While no significant correlations were found with sprint performances, CR strength was significantly associated with drop jump test results from 45 and 60 cm drop height (r = 0.36 to 0.46). These findings demonstrate that isolated CR strength positively influences the performance in actions involving rapid stretch-shortening cycles, which suggests that current strength and conditioning programs for youth soccer players should be extended to also include exercises specifically targeting the plantar flexor muscles. While this cross-sectional study provides novel insights into the complex interplay between muscle strength and soccer-specific performance, its findings need to be corroborated in longitudinal studies directly testing the impact of plantar flexor strength training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive validity of critical power (CP) and the work above CP (W′) on cycling performance (mean power during a 20-min time trial; TT20). Methods: On 3 separate days, 10 male cyclists completed a TT20 and 3 CP and W′ prediction trials of 1, 4, and 10 min and 2, 7, and 12 min in field conditions. CP and W′ were modeled across combinations of these prediction trials with the hyperbolic, linear work/time, and linear power inverse-time (INV) models. The agreement and the uncertainty between the predicted and actual TT20 were assessed with 95% limits of agreement and a probabilistic approach, respectively. Results: Differences between the predicted and actual TT20 were "trivial" for most of the models if the 1-min trial was not included. Including the 1-min trial in the INV and linear work/time models "possibly" to "very likely" overestimated TT20. The INV model provided the smallest total error (ie, best individual fit; 6%) for all cyclists (305 [33] W; 19.6 [3.6] kJ). TT20 predicted from the best individual fit-derived CP, and W′ was strongly correlated with actual TT20 (317 [33] W; r =.975; P <.001). The bias and 95% limits of agreement were 4 (7) W (−11 to 19 W). Conclusions: Field-derived CP and W′ accurately predicted cycling performance in the field. The INV model was most accurate to predict TT20 (1.3% [2.4%]). Adding a 1-min-prediction trial resulted in large total errors, so it should not be included in the models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Animal studies show that long-lasting stretching training can lead to significant hypertrophy and increases in maximal strength. Accordingly, previous human studies found significant improvements in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), flexibility, and muscle thickness (MTh) using constant angle long-lasting stretching. It was hypothesized that long-lasting stretching with high intensity will lead to sufficient mechanical tension to induce muscle hypertrophy and maximal strength gains. This study examined muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore, 45 well-trained subjects (f: 17, m: 28, age: 27.7 ± 3.0 years, height: 180.8 ± 4.9 cm, mass: 80.467.2 kg) were assigned to an intervention group (IG) that stretched the plantar flexors 6 x 10 minutes per day for 6 weeks or a control group (CG). Data analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA. There was a significant Time x Group interaction in MVC (p < 0.001-0.019, η² = 0.158-0.223), flexibility (p < 0.001, η² = 0.338-0.446), MTh (p = 0.002-0.013, η² = 0.125-0.172), and MCSA(p = 0.003-0.014, η² =0.143-0.197). Post hoc analysis showed significant increases inMVC(d = 0.64-0.76), flexibility (d = 0.85-1.12), MTh (d = 0.53-0.6), and MCSA (d = 0.16-0.3) in IG compared with CG, thus confirming previous results in well-trained subjects. Furthermore, this study improved the quality for the morphological examination by investigating both heads of the gastrocnemius with MRI and sonography. Because stretching can be used passively, an application in rehabilitation settings seems plausible, especially if no commonly used alternatives such as strength training are applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]