Search

Background: Prematurity and the presence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) increase the risk for the occurrence of amblyogenic risk factors in childhood and adolescence., Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate ocular morbidities and the ophthalmological care of former preterm and full-term persons in adulthood., Material and Methods: The Gutenberg prematurity eye study (GPES) is a retrospective cohort study with a prospective ophthalmological examination of individuals formerly born preterm and full term between 1969 and 2002 (now aged 18-52 years). All participants underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination and were asked about the frequency of ophthalmological care. Participants were grouped into those with normal gestational age (GA) ≥ 37 weeks (control group), preterm individuals without ROP and GA 33-36 weeks (group 2), GA 29-32 weeks (group 3), GA ≤ 28 weeks (group 4), and those with ROP without treatment (group 5) and with ROP with treatment (group 6). All participants were asked if they had an ophthalmological examination within the last 12 months., Results: In total, data from 140 term and 310 preterm adults were included in the present study. Strabismus was present in 2.1 % (3/140), 6.6 % (9/137), 17.4 % (16/92), 11.1 % (2/18), 27.1 % (13/48) and 60 % (9/15) in groups 1-6, respectively. The proportion of subjects with an ophthalmological examination within the last 12 months was highest in the groups of extremely preterm persons with and without ROP compared with the control group. Overall, 33.3 % (1/3) of the term and 57.1 % (28/49) of the preterm subjects with strabismus and 0 % (0/3) of the term and 46.9 % (15/32) of the preterm individuals with amblyopia had an ophthalmological examination within the past 12 months., Discussion: Extremely preterm adults with and without postnatal ROP showed the highest rate of eye diseases as well as the highest rate of ophthalmological check-ups within the last 12 months. This suggests that extremely preterm adults particularly with the occurrence of postnatal ROP perceive more frequent ophthalmological check-ups throughout their lives., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ophthalmologic care in childhood and adolescence of infants born preterm and full-term from the retrospective point of view of their parents., Methodology: The Gutenberg Prematurity Eye Study (GPES) is a retrospective cohort study with a prospective ophthalmologic examination of persons born preterm and full-term between 1969 and 2002 (now aged 18 to 52 years), and asks their parents about the ophthalmologic care received by their children in childhood and adolescence from their retrospective perspective. Participants and their parents were grouped into those with normal gestational age (GA) ≥ 37 (control group), preterm born infants without retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and gestational age (GA) 33 - 36 (group 2), GA 29 - 32 (group 3), GA ≤ 28 weeks (group 4), and those with ROP without treatment (group 5) and with ROP with treatment (group 6). Parents of participants were interviewed about the ophthalmic care received by their children., Results: In total, data from 57 full-term and 131 preterm infants and their parents were included in the present study. The parents of the participants reported that ophthalmologic examination had taken place until 6 years of age in the respective groups 1 to 6 in 22/57 (38.6%), 33/58 (56.9%), 22/38 (57.9%), 3/6 (50%), 19/21 (90.5%), and 7/8 (87.5%). Overall, between 83% and 100% of parents in the different groups reported that ophthalmologic care had been adequate. A change of ophthalmologist due to dissatisfaction with treatment was reported by a total of 4/57 (7%), 9/58 (15.5%), 8/38 (21.1%), 1/6 (16.7%), 1/21 (4.8%) and 2/8 (25%) in the respective groups., Discussion: The present study demonstrates adequate satisfaction and good treatment regarding ophthalmologic care of former preterm children from the parents' perspective. Especially parents of children with ROP rated the treatment positively., Competing Interests: Norbert Pfeiffer erhält finanzielle Unterstützung und Zuschüsse von Novartis, Ivantis, Santen, Thea, Boehringer Ingelheim Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Alcon und Sanoculis. Alexander K. Schuster erhält Forschungsunterstützung von Allergan, Bayer, Heidelberg Engineering, PlusOptix und Norvartis. Die Autoren erklären, dass sie keinen Interessenkonflikt haben./Norbert Pfeiffer receives financial support and grants from Novartis, Ivantis, Santen, Thea, Boehringer Ingelheim Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Alcon, and Sanoculis. Alexander K. Schuster receives research support from Allergan, Bayer, Heidelberg Engineering, PlusOptix, and Norvartis. The authors hereby declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)