Search

Background: GCK gene variants have been reported to be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the Caucasian population. There are no reports exploring this association in the Indian population. Methods: This cross-sectional study included subjects from Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India, over a span of 6 months. Females diagnosed with GDM as per the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria were enrolled. Direct gene sequencing was performed to screen all 10 exons and promoter region of GCK gene. Results: Out of the total 1000 females screened, 154 subjects had any degree of hyperglycemia. GCK gene screening was done and we observed 11 variants in 80.4% (41/51) of the GDM subset and 89.6% (43/48) of the controls. Allele frequencies of observed variants were not different between the control subjects (12.5%) and those diagnosed with GDM (8.4%). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report from north India exploring association of GCK variants with GDM and we do not observe any association of GCK variants with GDM in our study population. CTRI Registration No: CTRI/2017/07/008964 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author comments on a study by VL Rudland et al which demonstrates how the use of the new pregnancy-specific screening criteria (NSC) can provide a cost-effective approach to monogenic diabetes testing and highlights the fact that the knowledge of a patient's glucokinase-MODY status may protect the fetus from harm from intensive glycemic control. He highlights that Southeast Asian and Indian women reportedly have a lower disease prevalence compared to their Anglo-Celtic counterparts.

Introduction: Neuropathy is a comorbid complication of diabetes and Pregabalin and Duloxetine are the two most common drugs used for the treatment of neuropathic pain., Aim: To determine the effectiveness and side effects of Pregabalin and Duloxetine in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain., Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Max Super Speciality Hospital. Patients attending the endocrinology department, above 18 years of age who were prescribed with Pregabalin or Duloxetine were screened and included in this study. The data was collected for all study participants using a specially designed case record form by conducting personal interviews. SF-MPQ, Mc-Gill, NRS and DN-4 questionnaires were used to assess the extent of pain and the side-effects associated with the drugs., Results: Based on the responses from the Numerical Rating Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pregabalin was seen to be less effective compared to Duloxetine. The only side effect observed with Pregabalin was drowsiness, which was observed in 4% cases at 50 mg dose whereas those reported with Duloxetine were drowsiness (22.2% at 20 mg and 33.3% at 30 mg), vomiting (11.1% at 20mg and 30mg), headache (11.1% at 20 mg and 30 mg), and dizziness (0% at 20mg and 11.1% at 30 mg)., Conclusion: Pregabalin has a better safety profile and tolerability compared to Duloxetine but the latter is more effective in treating Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. However, further studies with a larger sample size and longer duration are required to be conducted for finding the effectiveness of these drugs, specifically in the Indian population., (© Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2011.)

Aims/hypothesis: To identify risk factors associated with psychological insulin resistance (PIR) in Indian type 2 diabetes (T2DM) population., Methods: Patients with T2DM, aged 18 years, undergoing treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents and providing written informed consent were considered eligible for the study. Patient's data was collected by face-to-face interaction using 5 validated diabetes questionnaires--Diabetes Attitude Scale, Diabetes Knowledge Test, Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale, Interpersonal Processes of Care Survey-29, and Barriers to Insulin Treatment scale. Demographic variables, categories of patients based on their annual family income, education, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), occupation and type of healthcare setup were correlated with overall scores of validated questionnaires. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson correlation coefficients, analysis of variance, two-group t-test and hierarchical multiple regression., Results: One hundred ninty-eight patients with T2DM were enrolled where 63% were males, 52% had HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol), 32% were in service, 35% had the annual family income between Rs 100,000-500,000, 50% were graduates and 81% were enrolled from private healthcare set ups. Significant high opposition to use insulin was observed in females, patients based at home, patients with insufficient education, and patients visiting government set-ups compared to males, service-class patients, graduates, and patients approaching private set-ups, respectively., Conclusions: In India, major factors contributing to PIR were fear of injection or fear of pain during injection, fear of hypoglycemia, social stigma and lack of education. Effective interpersonal interactions with healthcare providers could help to counteract PIR, especially in patients who are not sufficiently literate highlighting the need of skilled healthcare staffs in Indian public hospitals.