1. Clinical outcomes with biodegradable versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
- Author
-
Araujo GN, Machado GP, Moura M, Silveira AD, Bergoli LC, Fuchs FC, Wainstein RV, Goncalves SC, Lemos PA, Quadros AS, and Wainstein MV
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Aged, Time Factors, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Polymers chemistry, Retrospective Studies, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction therapy, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction mortality, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnostic imaging, Drug-Eluting Stents, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention instrumentation, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention mortality, Registries, Absorbable Implants, Prosthesis Design
- Abstract
Background: Coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) built with either durable (DP) or biodegradable (BP) polymeric coatings have been largely tested and are extensively available for routine use. However, their comparative performance remains an open question, particularly in more complex subsets of patients., Aims: We evaluated the outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) using DP-DES versus BP-DES in a large multicenter real-world registry., Methods: The population comprised patients with STEMI treated with pPCI within 12 h of symptoms onset. Those treated with more than one DES who received different polymer types were excluded. The final cohort for analysis was selected after propensity score matching (PSM), computed to generate similar groups of DP DES versus BP DES. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of total death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization at 2 years., Results: From January 2017 to April 2022, a total of 1527 STEMI patients underwent pPCI with a single DES type (587 DP-DES; 940 BP-DES). After PSM, 836 patients (418 patients in the DP-DES and 418 patients in the BP-DES groups), comprised the final study population. Both study groups had a similar baseline profile. Patients treated with BP-DES group had similar rates of MACE (15.3 % vs. 19.4 %, HR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.50-0.94, p = 0.022). Rates of target lesion revascularization was lower in BP DES group (0.7 % vs. 3.8 %, HR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.05-0.51, p = 0.006)., Conclusion: In a cohort of STEMI patients submitted to pPCI, BP and DP DES had similar rates of the primary outcome. Patients treated with BP DES, however, had a decreased incidence of TLR at after 2-year follow-up., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared they do not have anything to disclose regarding conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF