Search

Objectives Recurrent, severely painful episodes, known as vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) are the hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD) and the primary reason for hospitalization. Opioids have been the gold standard for VOC treatment without significant improvement pain outcomes. To aid analgesia and combat opioid related adverse effects (ORAEs), some SCD clinicians have trialed infusions of sub-anesthetic ketamine along with opioids to treat VOCs. In this retrospective analysis, we compared adult SCD patients who received early vs late adjunctive sub-anesthetic ketamine infusions for VOCs. Methods We identified adult SCD patients (age 18–50 years) who presented to Duke University with a VOC and received sub-anesthetic ketamine infusions from July 2015 to June 2019. We assessed both daily opioid consumption (measured as oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME)) and self-reported 0–10 numeric pain ratings (NPR) at 1, 2, and 3 days after infusion initiation, as well as 1 day after discontinuation. Results A total of 56 patients were identified with a median age of 30 years. Compared to late administration, early infusion of sub-anesthetic ketamine was associated with a 24.5% (P = .0003) and 25.9% (P = .0006) reduction, respectively, in median NPR at 1 day and 2 days after infusion initiation but did not persist at 3 days following initiation of the infusion. A statistically significant reduction in MME was not observed. Conclusions In a nonrandomized study of sickle cell patients with VOCs, early sub-anesthetic ketamine infusion led to greater reduction in subjective pain intensity than late initiation of the infusion. Randomized studies should further explore whether early vs late ketamine infusion improves management of acute SCD pain.

Sickle cell disease is prevalent in large numbers of patients in the United States and has a significant global impact. Its complications span numerous organs and lead to reduced life expectancy. Acute and chronic sickle cell pain is a common cause of patient suffering. The American Society of Hematology published updated guidelines on management of acute and chronic pain from sickle cell disease in 2019. Several of the recommendations are conditional and leave specific decisions to the treating physician. These include conditional recommendations about the use of ketamine for acute pain and the initiation and discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain. Here, 2 hematologists discuss these guidelines and make contrasting recommendations for the management of acute and chronic pain for a patient with sickle cell disease.

Objective This study aimed to quantify the indirect costs of sickle cell disease in the United States. Methods Adult patients from a sickle cell disease clinic at an urban academic healthcare system completed an adapted Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire related to the impact of their disorder on absenteeism, presenteeism, ability to contribute through unpaid work outside of employment, and other aspects of life. Additional data were collected from patient records about each participant’s genotype, total hemoglobin level, and pain level. Results Of the 192 individuals, 187 who completed the survey reported experiencing vaso-occlusive crisis pain events during the last year that negatively affected their productivity at work and in daily roles. Three-fourths of respondents reported impairment in their ability to complete everyday tasks, such as caring for children, running errands, doing housework, shopping for groceries, and volunteer (unpaid) work. Only 30% of respondents reported being employed or self-employed. Of those employed, estimated costs of absenteeism and presenteeism attributable to pain events averaged $15 103 per person annually. Estimated total annual losses in unpaid work productivity averaged $3 145 862 for the study respondents and another $2 870 652 for their caregivers. Conclusions Sickle cell disease affected the work productivity, nonwork productivity, and the daily lives of adults seen with the disorder in an academic medical center.

Ambulatory specialty care operations have been challenged by the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We surveyed sickle cell disease (SCD) specialists to assess the effect of pandemic-associated factors on SCD center ambulatory equipment, operations, personnel, and finances. Thirty-two participants from 27 SCD centers completed our survey. The results showed that telemedicine was frequently adopted, and centers were minimally affected by limited staffing. However, some centers incurred additional cost due to the pandemic. As the long-term consequences of the pandemic become more apparent, vigilant measures are needed to ensure that SCD centers have adequate resources to prevent the exacerbation of existing disparities in access and outcomes for patients with SCD.

Prescription opioid nonadherence, specifically opioid misuse, has contributed to the opioid epidemic and opioid-related mortality in the US. Popular methods to measure and control opioid adherence have limitations, but mobile health, specifically smartphone applications, offers a potentially useful technology for this purpose. We developed, tested, and validated the OpPill application using the Mobile Applications Rating Scale (MARS), a validated tool for assessing the quality of mobile health apps. The MARS contains four scales (range of each scale = 0–4) that rate Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality. It also assesses subjective quality, relevance, and overall application impact. Our application was built to be a mobile monitoring and reporting system intended to enhance opioid adherence by collecting data and providing systematic feedback on pain and opioid use. Patients (n = 28) all had one of various SCD genotypes, were ages 19 to 59 years (mean 36.56), 53.6% were female, and 39.3% had completed some college. Patients rated the OpPill application highly on all four scales: Engagement, 3.93 ± 0.73; Functionality, 4.54 ± 0.66; Aesthetics, 3.92 ± 0.81; Information, 3.91 ± 0.87. The majority of patients found the application to be relevant for their care. A total of 96% reported the information within the app was complete, while 4% estimated the information to be minimal or overwhelming. Patients (91.7%) overwhelmingly reported that the quality of information as it pertained to SCD patients was relevant; only 8.3% found the application to be poorly relevant to SCD. Similarly, patients (91.7%) overwhelmingly rated both the application’s performance and ease of use positively. The large majority of participants (85.7%) found the application to be interesting to use, while 74% found it entertaining. All users found the application’s navigation to be logical and accurate with consistent and intuitive gestural design. We conclude that the OpPill application, specifically targeted to monitor opioid use and pain and opioid behavior in patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain, was feasible and rated by SCD patients as easy-to-use using a validated rating tool.

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a rapid transition to telehealth services. It is unclear how subspecialists managing painful chronic diseases—such as sickle cell disease (SCD), an inherited hemoglobinopathy with significant disparities in access and outcomes—have viewed the transition to telehealth or altered their pain management practices. This study elicits the views of sickle cell providers regarding their transition to telehealth and their opioid prescribing patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design: An anonymous online survey was sent to eligible sickle cell providers.Setting: Comprehensive sickle cell centers and/or clinics across the United States. Participants: Physicians and advanced practice providers providing care to SCD patients.Main outcome measures: Respondents answered questions regarding their (1) views of telehealth compared to in-person encounters and (2) opioid prescribing practices during the early months of the pandemic.Results: Of the 130 eligible participants, 53 respondents from 35 different sickle cell centers completed at least 90 percent of the survey. Respondents reported a significant increase in telehealth encounters for routine and acute appointments (mean difference and standard deviation: 57.6 ± 31.9 percent, p < 0.001 and 24.4 ± 34.1 percent, p < 0.001, respectively) since COVID-19. The overwhelming majority of respondents reported no changes in their opioid prescribing patterns since COVID-19, despite increased telehealth use. Only a minority coprescribed naloxone as a risk mitigation strategy.Conclusion: The rapid uptake of telehealth has not suppressed ambulatory providers’ prescribing of opioids for SCD. Studies assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and telehealth on opioid prescribing practices in other painful chronic diseases are needed to ensure health equity for vulnerable pain patients.

Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) (HU) for sickle cell anaemia (SCA) is underutilised. Case management is an evidence-based health management strategy and in this regard patient navigators (PNs) may provide case management for SCA. We hypothesised that HU-eligible patients exposed to PNs would have improved indicators of starting HU and HU adherence. We randomised 224 HU-eligible SCA adults into the Start Healing in Patients with Hydroxyurea (SHIP-HU) Trial. All patients received care from trained physicians using standardised HU prescribing protocols. Patients in the Experimental arm received case management and education from PNs through multiple contacts. All other patients were regarded as the Control arm and received specialty care alone. Study physicians were blinded to the study arms and did not interact with PNs. At baseline, 6 and 12 months we assessed and compared laboratory parameters and HU adherence indicators. Experimental patients had higher 6-month mean fetal haemoglobin (HbF) levels than controls. But at 12 months, mean HbF was similar, as were white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, total haemoglobin, platelet count and mean corpuscular volume. At 12 months there were fewer experimental patients missing HU doses than controls (mean 1·8 vs. 4·5, P = 0·0098), and more recent HU prescriptions filled than for controls (mean 53·8 vs. 92 days, median 27·5 vs. 62 days, P = 0·0082). Mean HU doses were largely similar. We detected behavioural improvements in HU adherence but no haematological improvements by adding PNs to specialty care.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hemoglobinopathy with potential life-threatening complications that affect millions of people worldwide. Severe and disabling acute pain, referred to as a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), is a fundamental symptom of the disease and the primary driver for acute care visits and hospitalizations. Despite the publication of guidelines for VOC management over the past decade, management of VOCs remains unsatisfactory for patients and providers.Acute SCD pain includes pain secondary to VOCs and other forms of acute pain. Distinguishing VOC from non-VOC pain may be challenging for both patients and clinicians. Further, although opioids have been the gold-standard for VOC pain management for decades, the current highest standard of care for all acute pain is a multimodal approach that is less dependent on opioids, and, instead incorporates analgesics and adjuvants from different mechanistic pathways. In this narrative review, we focus on a multimodal pharmacologic approach for acute SCD pain management and explore the evidence for existing non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts. Moreover, we present an explanatory model of pain, which is not only novel in its application to SCD pain but also captures the multidimensional nature of the SCD pain experience and supports the need for such a multimodal approach. This model also highlights opportunities for new investigative and therapeutic targets - both pharmacological and non-pharmacological.Multimodal pain regimens that are less dependent on opioids are urgently needed to improve acute pain outcomes for individuals with SCD. The proposed explanatory model for SCD pain offers novel opportunities to improve acute pain management for SCD patients.

Sickle cell nephropathy (SCN) is a progressive disease that contributes significant morbidity and mortality in sickle cell disease (SCD), yet it remains poorly understood. Hyperuricemia negatively impacts renal function in the non-sickle cell population but is understudied in SCD. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the first 78 pediatric SCD patients enrolled in a cohort study. The mechanism of development of hyperuricemia (defined, serum uric acid (UA) ≥ 5.5 mg/dL) was characterized as a result of either UA overproduction or inefficient renal excretion by the Simkin index and fractional clearance of urate (FCU) equations. Associations between hyperuricemia and albuminuria or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were determined by linear regression. The prevalence of hyperuricemia in this young population (mean age 11.6 ± 3.77 years) was 34.2%. Only 1 hyperuricemic participant overproduced UA by Simkin index, while 62.5% were inefficient renal excretors of UA (FCU < 4%). Hyperuricemia was associated with a significant decrease in average eGFR, −27 ml/min/1.73m2 below normouricemia (mean eGFR 151.6 ± 40.32), p = 0.0122. Notably, the previously accepted association between decline of eGFR with age is significantly modified by hyperuricemia stratification, where hyperuricemia explains 44% of the variance in eGFR by age (R2 = 0.44, p = 0.0004) and is nonsignificant in normouricemia (R2 = 0.07, p = 0.0775). These findings indicate that hyperuricemia may be associated with early eGFR decline in SCN. This association must be further characterized in prospective cohort studies in SCN, and hyperuricemia must be investigated as a potential therapeutic target for SCN.

Objective: To develop a survey instrument to identify adult sickle cell disease (SCD) patients on chronic opioid therapy who are at-risk for opioid abuse. Design: Prospective survey and interview.Setting: Adult SCD clinic in a large urban teaching facility.Patients/participants: Convenience sampling of adult patients presenting to the sickle cell clinic.Interventions: None.Main outcome: Primary outcome was “at-risk for opioid misuse,” defined as at least 3/8 “yes” answers (a positive composite score) on the Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI) questionnaire. Secondary outcome was DSM-IV criteria for substance abuse using the DSM IV Diagnostic Interview Schedule.Results: Of the 99 patients who completed the POMI, the mean age was 36 years; 58.6 percent were female, 48 percent were hemoglobin SS (47/99), and 26 percent were SC (26/99). Twenty-four percent (24/99) were identified as at-risk for opioid misuse using the POMI. There were no differences in demographic, SCD genotype, or socioeconomic variables for at-risk versus not-at-risk patients.Conclusion: Twenty-four percent of unselected adult SCD patients on opioids were identified as at-risk for opioid misuse using a quick survey. This may represent as much as 2.5-7 times the national misuse rate. This group of patients may benefit from additional diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to help understand and manage their opioid usage.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) pain is often acute-on-chronic, likening it to other chronic acute-on-chronic pain conditions. Pain treatment of SCD was already reported as inadequate prior to the current opioid epidemic, but attitudes underlying treatment were understudied. Understanding these attitudes prior to the current epidemic would be revealing. Therefore in 1997, before the current opioid epidemic, we surveyed physicians' attitudes toward pain management and treatment preferences for acute pain exacerbations in the Emergency Department in SCD versus those of chronic pancreatitis and chronic low back pain, two other acute-on-chronic pain diseases. Thirty-nine residency trainees were surveyed in a level one triage hospital. Resident estimates of the rate of opioid addiction in SCD were higher than estimates in both chronic pancreatitis and chronic low back pain. Most residents relied on their personal clinical experience rather than external sources of data or knowledge as the most important driver when they managed chronic pain. This survey research shows that, predating the current opioid epidemic, there was both a backdrop of opioid-phobia and a bias against treating SCD pain compared to other chronic pain conditions among our sample. Repeating this survey research among current training physicians, along with surveys of other attitudes, would provide useful comparisons.

Objective More effective transitions and transfers of young people with sickle cell disease (SCD) into the adult healthcare setting is a focus of both primary care and specialty care medical organizations. Effective transition and transfer requires six core elements: establishing a policy, tracking progress, administering transition readiness assessments, planning for adult care, transferring to adult care, and integrating into an adult practice. We developed a program using these six core elements. The objective of our report was to assess the development and implementation of this program. Methods We used the six core elements to develop and implement a program at Virginia Commonwealth University for children and adolescents with SCD to transition to adult health care. Results We assessed individuals' differences by age and grade, their independent living skills, their feelings about moving to adult care; tallied and analyzed several assessment scales; and assessed transfer success and patient retention. Conclusions The principles and lessons we learned in developing and implementing this program over 5 years, accompanied by caring, flexible, and dedicated care team members, often can overcome even severe barriers to care transitions.

Introduction: Prescription psychotherapeutic medication misuse is a growing problem in the United States, but no method exists to routinely screen for this in primary care. Our study sought to (1) describe the prevalence of prescription psychotherapeutic medication misuse in primary care and the characteristics of patients who misuse and (2) compare 2 screening instruments modified to identify prescription medication misuse in primary care. Methods: Primary care patients from underserved, urban clinics within a health system completed anonymous computer-directed health screens that included standard questions about prescription medication misuse. They were also administered the 4-item Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, and Eye-opener questionnaire modified to focus on prescription medications (RxCAGE) and a 6-item Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI-e) expanded to include other prescription medications. Results: Of 2,339 respondents, 15.3% were positive for at least 2 items on the RxCAGE and 18.6% were positive for at least 2 items on the POMI-e. Using our computer-directed health screen as a comparison, we found that POMI-e had a higher area under the curve (0.63). A positive POMI-e was associated with being male, white and unemployed, having depression and anxiety, and currently using illicit substances, smoking, and misusing alcohol. Conclusions: Rates of prescription medication misuse were substantial with both RxCAGE and POMI-e showing promise as screening instruments. Future studies are needed to test prescription medication misuse screening tools in broader populations and pilot interventions for those screening positive.

We conducted a multicenter pilot investigation of the safety and feasibility of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in adults with severe sickle cell disease (SCD) (NCT 01565616) using a reduced toxicity preparative regimen of busulfan (13.2 mg/kg), fludarabine (175 mg/m2 ) and thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg) and cyclosporine or tacrolimus and methotrexate for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Twenty-two patients (median age 22 years; range 17-36) were enrolled at eight centers. Seventeen patients received marrow from an HLA-identical sibling donor and five patients received marrow from an 8/8 HLA-allele matched unrelated donor. Before BMT, patients had stroke, acute chest syndrome, recurrent pain events, were receiving regular red blood cell transfusions, or had an elevated tricuspid regurgitant jet (TRJ) velocity, which fulfilled eligibility criteria. Four patients developed grades II-III acute GVHD (18%) and six developed chronic GVHD (27%) that was moderate in two and severe in one patient. One patient died of intracranial hemorrhage and one of GVHD. Nineteen patients had stable donor chimerism, 1-year post-transplant. One patient who developed secondary graft failure survives disease-free after a second BMT. The one-year overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) are 91% (95% CI 68%-98%) and 86% (95% CI, 63%-95%), respectively, and 3-year EFS is 82%. Statistically significant improvements in the pain interference and physical function domains of health-related quality of life were observed. The study satisfied the primary endpoint of 1-year EFS ≥70%. This regimen is being studied in a prospective clinical trial comparing HLA-matched donor BMT with standard of care in adults with severe SCD (NCT02766465).

Background Oxidative stress contributes to the complex pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. Oral therapy with pharmaceutical-grade l-glutamine (USAN, glutamine) has been shown to increa...

Background Even before the US upswing of the current COVID pandemic, the number of sickle cell disease (SCD) patients coming to hospitals and EDs appeared to fall drastically. This happened despite SCD patients having often been heavy utilizers of the ED and hospital for their iconic vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). Though ambulatory SCD clinics quick converted largely to telehealth in order to comply with stay-at-home orders designed to suppress person-to-person transmission, some SCD patients appeared to avoid care, delay care, or refuse doctors' invitations for care. Presumably patients did so out of COVID fears, but this has not been confirmed in the literature. Further, whether these patients had COVID symptoms but stayed at home has not been studied. As part of quality improvement (QI) to conduct COVID surveillance in an adult sickle cell program, we sought to explain and predict SCD health care utilization patterns we were observing, as well as to determine urgent physical and mental health needs of patients who appeared to be avoiding care. Methods Fifteen staff in the Adult Sickle Cell Medical Home at Virginia Commonwealth University, a large urban academic medical center, conducted a telephone survey ("wellness check"was used when we talked to patients) of all known adults with SCD over 19 days in 2020. A staff member confirmed the patient had SCD, asked permission to proceed, then asked about symptoms consistent with COVID-19. At the end of the telephone survey, respondents wer invited to complete an email survey of sickle cell and COVID-19 utilization attitudes (19-33 items, depending on the response pattern, either drawn from the National Health Interview Survey, from the Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement quality of care survey, or drafted by the authors), the Sickle Cell Stress Survey-Adult (SCSS-A, a 10-item previously validated survey), and anxiety and depression (PHQ9 of the PRIME-MD). Results Of 622 adults approached by phone call, 353 responded to the following yes/no screening questions regarding the prior 14 days: fever over 100 F 0/353 (0.00%); cough 3/353(0.01%); difficulty breathing 0/353(0.00%); unexplained shortness of breath 2/353(0.01%); sore throat 2/353 (0.01%); unexplained muscle soreness 2/353(0.01%);contact with anyone who tested positive for COVID-19 2/353(0.01%); testing for COVID 19 6/353(0.02%). For QI purposes, we set a threshold of three or more COVID-associated symptoms or the presence of fever as criteria requiring intense telephone or in-person staff monitoring for the following week. Only three patients met criteria. A total of 219/353 had email surveys sent. Of 63 patients (28.8%) who returned email surveys by June 10, 2020, 35.9% had already managed a "pain attack" at home 4 or more times in the prior 12 months, and 45.5% of these said their bad ER experiences were very or somewhat important in that decision. In the prior 14 days, although 30/64 reported a crisis for at least one day, only 4/64 had visited the Emergency Department for pain. On a 0-10 scale, 21/61 patients endorsed "0" for worry that they would be COVID-infected by going for medical care (weighted mean 3.9), but 18/59 endorsed "10" for worry they were more at risk of COVID because of SCD (weighted mean 6.31), and 22/60 endorsed "10" for worry they would fare worse than others if COVID infected (weighted mean 6.97). Many patients forwent "needed" care (16/62) or delayed "needed" care by at least a day (36/61). Eleven patients met criteria for moderately severe to severe depression on the PHQ-9, and 28/63 somewhat or strongly agreed with the statement "death is always on the back of my mind" on the SCSS-A. Conclusions In adolescents and adults with SCD, many were already reticent to come to the ED for pain, but a significant portion reported delays or avoidance of needed care during the early stages of the US COVID pandemic, and few reported using the ED despite over half reporting at least one crisis day in 14. Patients nonetheless reported very few COVID-associated symptoms. Fears of COVID infection/susceptibility may limit visits for needed sickle cell care among adults. Acknowledgements: Mica Ferlis RN, FNP, Caitlin McManus, RN, FNP, Emily Sushko, RN, FNP, Justin West, RN, Kate Osborne, RN, Stefani Vaughan-Sams, Marla Brannon, BS, Nakeiya Williams, BS Disclosures Smith: GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Consultancy; Emmaeus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire, Inc.: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Health Resources and Services Administration: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Incyte: Other: Investigator; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ironwood: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Imara: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding.

Introduction: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and affects more than 100,000 people in the US. Acute, vaso-occlusive pain crises are the hallmark of the disease and the primary cause of hospitalization. Recurrent, acute pain episodes compound and result in chronic pain for many patients, though the mechanisms of this transition are poorly understood. Although opioids remain the standard of care to treat SCD chronic pain, their myriad adverse side effects (e.g., constipation, respiratory depression, abuse liability, dependence) as well as the fact that SCD chronic pain requires prolonged opioid treatment that results in tolerance, severely limit their therapeutic utility. Thus, a pressing need exists to identify effective non-opioid analgesic strategies to reduce SCD chronic pain. Humanized mouse models of SCD, such as the Berkeley (BERK) model, provide a useful tool to investigate disease pathophysiology and evaluate novel therapeutic strategies. Dorsal Root Ganglion neurons are peripheral sensory neurons essential for pain preclinical investigations. DRG neurons from rodents in neuropathic pain models show hyperexcitability. Inhibitors of the major degradative enzyme of 2-arachidonoylglycerol, monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL), reduce nociceptive behavior in neuropathic and inflammatory preclinical models of pain through cannabinoid receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms. MAGL inhibitors have yet to be tested in BERK mice and we hypothesize that they will ameliorate pain-like behavior and neuronal hyperexcitability. Here we evaluate the effects of MJN110 in a series of pain-related behaviors in BERK mice. Methods: Male and female HbSS-BERK (sickle) and HbAA-BERK (control) mice were used as subjects for these experiments. Pain-like behaviors were assessed using the Von Frey, Hot Plate, and Grip Strength tests. Neuronal hyperexcitability was assessed using whole cell patch clamp electrophysiology of L4-S1 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. For the dose-response experiments, MJN-110 (1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered one hour prior to testing. Data were analyzed as Student's t-test, one- and two-way ANOVAs followed by Tukey or Sidak post-hoc analysis when appropriate (p < 0.05 considered significant). Results: HbSS-BERK mice displayed profound mechanical allodynia, as well as thermal and deep tissues/musculoskeletal hyperalgesia. HbSS-BERK mice possess extremely hyperexcitable DRG neurons. MJN-110 dose-dependently reduced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in HbSS-BERK mice. Importantly, BERK mice given seven days of daily injections of MJN-110 (5 mg/kg) displayed sustained antinociception that did not undergo tolerance. Ongoing studies are aimed to determine whether MJN110 ameliorates the hyperexcitability of DRG neurons. Conclusion: These initial findings, not only validate that BERK mice show hypersensitive responses to mechanical and heat stimuli, but also demonstrate that neurons innervating the distal parts of BERK mice are hyperexcitable. Additionally, MJN110 reduces these hyper-nociceptive behaviors suggesting that MAGL inhibition represents a viable strategy to reduce chronic pain behaviors in the BERK mouse model. Disclosures Gupta: Tautona Group: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; 1910 Genetics: Other: Grantee; Grifols: Other: Grantee; SCDAA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring LLC: Honoraria; NIH: Other: Grantee; University of Minnestoa Foundation: Other: Philanthropic Funding; Southern California Institute for Research and Education Foundation: Other: Philanthropic Funding; Cyclerion: Research Funding; UCI Foundation: Other: Philanthropic Funding. Smith: Emmaus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceuticsl: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novo-Nordisk: Other: DSMB; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Imara: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding.

Vaso-Occlusive Crises (VOCs) in patients with SCD cause acute and chronic morbidity including disabling pain, hospitalizations, missed school and work, end-organ damage, and early mortality. VOC prophylaxis, while beneficial, does not address the disabling pain and morbidity of breakthrough VOC events that still occur. E-selectin upregulation on vascular endothelium leads to leukocyte trapping, activation and aggregation and is a critical driver of acute VOC (Morikis et al, Blood 2017). Rivipansel, a pan-selectin inhibitor with potent activity against E-selectin, prevents interaction between leukocytes and vascular endothelium (Morikis et al, Blood 2017) and increases blood flow by reducing cell-cell aggregates and vascular occlusion in a SCD mouse model (Chang et al, Blood 2010). A phase 2 study of rivipansel in VOC demonstrated shorter hospital stays and reduced opioid use (Telen et al Blood, 2015). The RESET trial (NCT02187003) was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of the efficacy and safety of rivipansel for VOC requiring hospitalization. Three hundred forty-five patients (204 patients ≥18 and 141 patients 6-17 years of age) were randomized to an intravenous rivipansel loading dose, followed by up to 14 additional doses Q 12 hr, or placebo, in addition to standard care. Overall, 320 were treated: 162 with rivipansel, 158 with placebo. Pre-treatment variables were well balanced, including concomitant hydroxyurea use, genotype, chronic opioid use, gender, and country. The primary endpoint was time to readiness for discharge (TTRFD), and key secondary endpoints were time to discharge (TTD), time to discontinuation of IV opioids (TTDIVO), and cumulative IV opioid use (CIVO). Hazard ratios or ratios of medians, and confidence intervals were calculated for each. Both study arms had comparable baseline soluble E-selectin (sE-sel) levels and inflammatory/coagulation biomarkers. Median sE-sel in the rivipansel group decreased by 59% from baseline after a loading dose while increasing by 9% in the placebo group. Although the RESET study did not show statistically significant improvements in outcomes for the total population, additional analysis demonstrated that rivipansel treatment within 26.4 hr of pain onset (earliest quartile of duration of VOC until treatment) reduced median TTRFD by 56.3 hrs (from 122.0 to 65.7 hrs), reduced median TTD by 41.5 hrs (from 112.8 to 71.3 hrs), and reduced median TTDIVO by 50.5 hrs (from 104.0 to 53.5 hrs), compared to placebo. There was also a consistent trend for lower hazard ratios for rivipansel treatment earlier during VOC (up to ~36 hr from onset) for all endpoints (Figure 1). Pediatric subjects (6-17 yrs, n = 141) were 41% of patients treated in the RESET trial (71 in rivipansel arm, 70 in placebo arm). As in the overall population the observed benefit with rivipansel in pediatric subjects depended on duration of VOC prior to treatment. Children 6-17 yrs of age treated with rivipansel within 30 hrs of onset of VOC experienced reduction in median TTRFD by 29.3 hrs (from 94.1 to 64.8 hrs), reduction in median TTD by 23.2 hrs (from 92.8 to 69.6 hrs), and reduction in median TTDIVO by 15.4 hrs (from 68.9 to 53.5 hrs). Early treatment with rivipansel decreased median TTRFD by more than one day and led to more children ready for discharge by 24, 48, and 72 hrs, compared to patients receiving placebo (Table 1). Additionally, pain scale assessments (VAS and Faces scale) showed a substantial reduction in the time to first clinically meaningful reduction in pain (data not shown). Thus, the hazard ratios for the efficacy endpoints favored early rivipansel treatment over placebo in the overall population and the pediatric population (Table 2). Summary: Rivipansel administered early in VOC results in clinically meaningful benefit for adults and children with SCD, shortening IV opioid use and hospital stay. Biomarker data confirm on-target effect, suggesting that the diminishing effect of later rivipansel treatment results from downstream pathophysiology. These findings suggest the utility of early treatment to shorten or interrupt acute VOCs, analogous to thrombolysis for heart attack or stroke. This could change the VOC treatment paradigm from deferral of hospitalization to one of early intervention to reduce length of hospitalization and IV opioid requirement, relieve VOC symptoms, and possibly mitigate end-organ damage from tissue ischemia. Disclosures Dampier: Merck: Research Funding; Hudson Publishing Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CLS Behring: Consultancy, Other: DSMB Chair; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Micelle Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cyclerion: Consultancy, Other: DSMB Chair; Novartis: Research Funding. Telen:GlycoMimetics Inc.: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wun:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Consultancy; Pfizer, Inc.: Other: Steering Committee for clinical study, Research Funding. Smith:Incyte: Other: Investigator; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ironwood: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Imara: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Health Resources and Services Administration: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Shire, Inc.: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Emmaeus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Consultancy. Brown:Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics, Inc,: Research Funding; Imara, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Desai:Pfizer, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GBT, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rockpointe Continuing Medical Education Company: Consultancy. El Rassi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cyclerion: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kanter:Wells Fargo: Honoraria; Medscape: Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Honoraria; NHLBI Sickle Cell Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SCDAA Medical and Research Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AGIOS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BEAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jeffries: Honoraria; GLG: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy; bluebird bio, inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Cowen: Honoraria. Pastore:Pfizer: Honoraria. Rothman:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Readett:Pfizer, Inc.: Current Employment. Lozier:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Magnani:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Thackray:GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Current Employment. Hassell:Pfizer, Inc.: Other: RESET Study Steering Committee; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding.

Background Worldwide, Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is the most common monogenetic disorder. SCD is costly to the American health care system: $460,151 per patient for the 100,000 affected US patients. Biological and behavioral health comorbidities with limited hospital resources contributed to a cost increase in SCD readmissions at the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) from 2012-2016, after a long history of decline. With increasing census, in FY16 the 30-day SCD readmission rate was 33.7%, up from 22.5% in FY14. The average SCD length of stay was 6.7 days, compared with an expected length of 4.2 days. The number of ED visits for SCD patients in FY17 was projected to be double that of FY14. The percent of ED returns in 3 days was projected to be triple that of FY14. Method The VCU Adult SCD Medical Home (ASCMH) was funded and launched to address this issue, based on the success of a pilot that showed cost savings of $333,000 for 5 patients in 12 months. The SCD ASCMH officially began January 1,2018 with a two-year pilot funding period. The ASCMH was structured and designed using quality improvement (QI) principles and consisted of multidisciplinary teams to coordinate inpatient care, emergency care, and ambulatory care respectively. Evaluation compared utilization during CY 2017 (pre-intervention) versus CY 2019 (2 years post intervention). For all patients we compared the average 30-day readmission rate, the average length of stay (ALOS), the average 3-Day ED return rate, the number of ED discharges, the numbers of inpatient days, inpatient discharges, and outpatient visits, the number of patients who used the ED, and total VCU charges. Results Among 541 (2017) and 592 (2019) SCD adults, including 40.6% males and 59.4% females, comparing pre-intervention to intervention, average utilization and VCU charges were either numerically or statistically significantly reduced. Mean 30-day readmission rates were reduced (31.60% vs 20.40%) ALOS was reduced (5.6 days vs 4.3 days), inpatient days were reduced (5313 days vs 3340 days), and total charges were significantly reduced ($15,664,895 vs $13,939,842). Conclusion At VCU, a multi-disciplinary ASCMH that featured intensive case management (CM) reduced annual utilization and cost savings for adult SCD patients. CM program elements that were most effective should be studied in the future and next steps should include a randomized controlled trial that can demonstrate evidence of their efficacy in strengthening and improving utilization Table Disclosures Smith: Emmaeus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Shire, Inc.: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Imara: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Ironwood: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Other: Investigator; Health Resources and Services Administration: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding.

Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience varied salient symptoms that impact their health-related quality of life, which incorporates illness severity, their level of distress and other aspects of impairment, and the impact of the illness on functional status. SCD symptoms may begin at an early age, and their severity varies over time and between patients. Although detection of changes in patients' self-assessed symptoms may be obfuscated by their lifelong symptoms, treating physicians with SCD expertise may be able to detect changes in a patient's status given their experience in treating the diverse symptoms across multiple patients. We evaluated the longitudinal impact of voxelotor (Oxbryta®) in the HOPE study using the single-item Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), a validated clinician-reported outcome analogous to the commonly used Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C), which provides expert clinical impressions that transcend symptom checklists. Methods: In the randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded HOPE study, participants with SCD aged 12 to 65 years were randomized to receive voxelotor (1500 mg or 900 mg dose administered orally, once daily) or placebo. Study participants had a hemoglobin (Hb) level 5.5 to 10.5 g/dL at enrollment and 1 to 10 vaso-occlusive crises in the past 12 months at screening. Clinicians were blinded to treatment assignment and to all central laboratory measures (eg, hematological parameters) throughout the 72-week study period. Clinicians rated the CGI-C at 24 and 72 weeks from baseline. CGI-C ratings used a 7-point scale ("very much improved," "moderately improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "moderately worse," and "very much worse"). CGI-C outcomes were stratified by baseline Hb levels and baseline markers of hemolysis to identify measures predictive of assessment outcomes. Results: Trends of improvement from baseline in overall clinical status with voxelotor 1500 mg, as assessed by CGI-C scores, were observed as early as week 24. At week 72, patients receiving voxelotor 1500 mg were more often rated by the clinician as "very much improved" or "moderately improved" (74%; 39 of 53) compared with those who received placebo (47%; 24 of 51) (P Conclusions: Treatment with voxelotor 1500 mg resulted in improved clinician-reported patient outcomes, as assessed using the CGI-C. Greater proportions of participants were rated "very much improved" or "moderately improved" regardless of baseline Hb levels and baseline markers of hemolysis. The CGI provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes all available information into account, including the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, and behavior, as well as the impact of symptoms on the patient's ability to function. Therefore, a tool that provides a holistic assessment of a patient's well-being may be complementary in capturing changes in a patient's status, considering the substantial interpatient and intrapatient variability in SCD symptomatology. CGI-C assessments are being included in ongoing studies of voxelotor. Disclosures Smith: Emmaeus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire, Inc.: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Health Resources and Services Administration: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Incyte: Other: Investigator; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ironwood: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Imara: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Consultancy. Hankins:American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology: Honoraria; UptoDate: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; MJH Life Sciences: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; LINKS Incorporate Foundation: Research Funding; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Honoraria, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Abboud:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Crispr Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Other: Travel support; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Modus Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Cong:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sorof:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gray:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hoppe:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Telfer:Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Terumo: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Honoraria, Research Funding; ApoPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

OBJECTIVES: Vaso-occlusion is a hallmark feature of sickle cell disease (SCD) that promotes ischemia-reperfusion injury and leads to acute pain episodes, known as vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). VOCs are disabling and frequently impact on the ability of the patient to attend work or school and participate in activities of daily living. VOCs are the primary reason for medical facility visits amongst SCD patients and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The acute pain of a VOC often requires parenteral opioid administration in hospital emergency departments and inpatient units. Patients are also frequently prescribed oral opioids to aid in home management of VOCs. The development of new SCD therapies that have been shown to reduce or prevent VOCs has generated interest in their potential as opioid sparing agents. This study evaluated the effect of crizanlizumab-a humanized monoclonal antibody indicated in the US for reduction of VOCs in SCD-on opioid use for managing VOC related pain. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, subject-level data from the SUSTAIN (NCT01895361) trial were analyzed to determine the number of days of opioid use by patients in both the 5.0 mg/kg crizanlizumab and placebo arms during the 52-week follow-up period. Opioid use captured in case report forms was retrospectively assessed. Due to the common use of "as needed" (PRN) dosing for analgesics, a decision tree was developed in conjunction with clinical advice to guide classification of the opioid as being taken or not taken on a given day based on clinically plausible assumptions. Assumptions considered dose frequency (fixed vs. PRN), route of administration (parenteral vs. oral), and concomitant medications (anti-emetics and anti-histamines). Opioid record start dates, end dates, and dose frequencies were used to determine the number of unique days during the trial that each patient had taken at least one opioid. The annualized days with opioid use was calculated for each patient by dividing their number of unique days on opioids by their duration (days) in the trial. The distribution of annualized days with opioid use was compared between patients from the 5.0 mg/kg crizanlizumab and placebo arms. Mann-Whitney U tests with p-values were used to test differences between arms. A four-step analysis was planned to incorporate an increasing number of assumptions to define whether the opioid had been taken on a given day (see footnote of Table 1). Analyses were performed primarily in the per-protocol (PP) population considering all routes of administration and parenteral use only. Outcomes in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were also assessed. RESULTS: The PP population included 40 patients in the 5.0 mg/kg crizanlizumab arm and 41 patients in the placebo arm. A comparison of the baseline demographics (age, sex, genotype, hydroxyurea use, crisis frequency, and opioid use) showed no statistically significant differences between the two arms. Results of the final step of each analysis are presented as the primary analysis (see Table 1); results of Step 1 were considered a sensitivity analysis (not shown). The median annualized days with opioid use in the PP population was lower in the crizanlizumab arm compared with the placebo arm (absolute reduction: 4.00 days; relative reduction: 57%; p=0.162). The median annualized days with parenteral opioid use was lower in the crizanlizumab arm compared with the placebo arm (absolute reduction: 2.01; relative reduction: 50%; p=0.047). Results in the ITT population (see Table 1) and for sensitivity analyses (not shown) showed similar trends of reduced annualized days with opioid use for patients in the crizanlizumab group compared to the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that crizanlizumab, compared with placebo, may reduce the annual number of days where opioids are used to manage pain from VOCs. Importantly, the benefit was observed for parenteral and oral opioids, demonstrating clinical and patient relevance. These findings are concordant with the tendency for crizanlizumab to reduce the number of VOCs experienced by SCD patients annually; the primary finding of the SUSTAIN trial. The reduction in opioid use with crizanlizumab requires exploration in future studies, but the findings of this study translate into positive clinical and patient-relevant outcomes beyond reducing the frequency of VOCs. Disclosures Smith: Shire: Research Funding; Imara: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Ironwood: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Other: Investigator; Health Resources and Services Administration: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; NHLBI: Research Funding; Shire, Inc.: Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Investigator, Research Funding; Emmaeus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics, Inc.: Consultancy. Ataga:Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Editas Medicine: Honoraria; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Modus Therapeutics: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Saraf:Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Boards, Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer, Global Blood Therapeutics, Novartis: Research Funding. Adisa:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Current Employment. Bailey:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Current Employment. Ramscar:Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment. Bonner:Eversana: Current Employment. Brown:Eversana: Current Employment. Pastor:Eversana: Current Employment.

There is evidence to support the effectiveness of community health workers (CHWs), as they practice in a wide range of health care settings; yet, the perceived value of CHWs suffers from a lack of uniform credentialing and from a dearth of billing and payment structures to recognize their individual work. In turn, credentialing and billing for the work of CHWs is hampered by widely variable regulation, conflicting job titles and position descriptions, and general confusion about CHW identity, sometimes complicated by service boundaries that overlap with those of other health care and social service occupations. This article presents evidence from a rapid review of the CHW literature from 2003 to 2018. It includes clinical trials, meta-analyses, and policy reports summarizing more than 200 CHW interventions intended to improve patient health status or care delivery. The evidence is used to identify CHW roles, responsibilities, behaviors, and competencies. Four categories of CHW practice are developed from the evidence: peer CHW, general CHW, clinical CHW, and health navigator. A framework is proposed to recognize unique CHW roles, promote and further integrate varied levels of CHW function into health care-related organizations, and to inform decisions regarding certification, education, and payment for CHW services in the United States.

For individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), mild to moderate exercise is advised, but self-regulation of these intensities is difficult. To regulate intensity, one SCD recommendation is to stop exercising at the first perception of fatigue. However, perceived effort and affect (how one feels) are perceptual cues that are commonly used to guide exercise intensity. This study (a) examined perceived effort, affect, and fatigue in relation to metabolic state (gas exchange) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with SCD, (b) explored guidelines AYAs use to self-regulate exercise, and (c) compared perceived effort and affect at gas exchange threshold (GET) with healthy counterparts. Twenty-two AYAs with SCD completed an incremental cycle test. Perceived effort, affect, and fatigue were assessed every 2 minutes. A mixed-effects linear model was conducted to model changes in effort, affect, and fatigue across time. Mean scores of effort and affect at GET were compared with published data of healthy counterparts. Participants were queried about self-regulation exercise strategies. Findings indicated that both perceived fatigue and effort at GET was lower than expected. Perceived effort was lower ( p < .0001), and perceived affect was significantly higher ( p = .0009) than healthy counterparts. Interviews revealed that most participants (95%) do not stop exercising until fatigue is moderate to severe, and many (73%) do not stop until symptoms are severe (chest tightness, blurry vision). Nurses should review guidelines for safe exercise with AYAs with SCD. Exercise training may be beneficial to AYAs with SCD for learning how to interpret bodily responses to exercise to improve self-regulation.

The up-regulation of P-selectin in endothelial cells and platelets contributes to the cell-cell interactions that are involved in the pathogenesis of vaso-occlusion and sickle cell-related pain crises. The safety and efficacy of crizanlizumab, an antibody against the adhesion molecule P-selectin, were evaluated in patients with sickle cell disease.In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, we assigned patients to receive low-dose crizanlizumab (2.5 mg per kilogram of body weight), high-dose crizanlizumab (5.0 mg per kilogram), or placebo, administered intravenously 14 times over a period of 52 weeks. Patients who were receiving concomitant hydroxyurea as well as those not receiving hydroxyurea were included in the study. The primary end point was the annual rate of sickle cell-related pain crises with high-dose crizanlizumab versus placebo. The annual rate of days hospitalized, the times to first and second crises, annual rates of uncomplicated crises (defined as crises other than the acute chest syndrome, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, or priapism) and the acute chest syndrome, and patient-reported outcomes were also assessed.A total of 198 patients underwent randomization at 60 sites. The median rate of crises per year was 1.63 with high-dose crizanlizumab versus 2.98 with placebo (indicating a 45.3% lower rate with high-dose crizanlizumab, P=0.01). The median time to the first crisis was significantly longer with high-dose crizanlizumab than with placebo (4.07 vs. 1.38 months, P=0.001), as was the median time to the second crisis (10.32 vs. 5.09 months, P=0.02). The median rate of uncomplicated crises per year was 1.08 with high-dose crizanlizumab, as compared with 2.91 with placebo (indicating a 62.9% lower rate with high-dose crizanlizumab, P=0.02). Adverse events that occurred in 10% or more of the patients in either active-treatment group and at a frequency that was at least twice as high as that in the placebo group were arthralgia, diarrhea, pruritus, vomiting, and chest pain.In patients with sickle cell disease, crizanlizumab therapy resulted in a significantly lower rate of sickle cell-related pain crises than placebo and was associated with a low incidence of adverse events. (Funded by Selexys Pharmaceuticals and others; SUSTAIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01895361 .).

Background. Patients with SCD now usually live well into adulthood. Whereas transitions into adulthood are now often studied, little is published about aging beyond the transition period. We therefore studied age-associated SCD differences in utilization, pain, and psychosocial variables.Methods. Subjects were 232 adults in the Pain in Sickle Cell Epidemiology Study (PiSCES). Data included demographics, comorbidity, and psychosocial measures. SCD-related pain and health care utilization were recorded in diaries. We compared 3 age groups: 16–25 (transition), 26–36 (younger adults), and 37–64 (older adults) years.Results. Compared to the 2 adult groups, the transition group reported fewer physical challenges via comorbidities, somatic complaints, and pain frequency, though pain intensity did not differ on crisis or noncrisis pain days. The transition group utilized opioids less often, made fewer ambulatory visits, and had better quality of life, but these differences disappeared after adjusting for pain and comorbidities. However, the transition group reported more use of behavioral coping strategies.Conclusion. We found fewer biological challenges, visits, and better quality of life, in transition-aged versus older adults with SCD, but more behavioral coping. Further study is required to determine whether age-appropriate health care, behavioral, or other interventions could improve age-specific life challenges of patients with SCD.

Community health workers are increasingly recognized as useful for improving health care and health outcomes for a variety of chronic conditions. Community health workers can provide social support, navigation of health systems and resources, and lay counseling. Social and cultural alignment of community health workers with the population they serve is an important aspect of community health worker intervention. Although community health worker interventions have been shown to improve patient-centered outcomes in underserved communities, these interventions have not been evaluated with sickle cell disease. Evidence from other disease areas suggests that community health worker intervention also would be effective for these patients. Sickle cell disease is complex, with a range of barriers to multifaceted care needs at the individual, family/friend, clinical organization, and community levels. Care delivery is complicated by disparities in health care: access, delivery, services, and cultural mismatches between providers and families. Current practices inadequately address or provide incomplete control of symptoms, especially pain, resulting in decreased quality of life and high medical expense. The authors propose that care and care outcomes for people with sickle cell disease could be improved through community health worker case management, social support, and health system navigation. This report outlines implementation strategies in current use to test community health workers for sickle cell disease management in a variety of settings. National medical and advocacy efforts to develop the community health workforce for sickle cell disease management may enhance the progress and development of “best practices” for this area of community-based care.

Acute pain episodes are the most common complication in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Classically attributed to vaso-occlusion, recent insights suggest that chronic pain may also contribute to the pathogenesis of acute pain episodes, which adds complexity to their diagnosis and management. A taxonomy, or classification system, for acute pain in patients with SCD would aid research efforts and enhance clinical care. To meet this need, the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks public-private partnership with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the American Pain Society, and the American Academy of Pain Medicine formed the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks-American Pain Society-American Academy of Pain Medicine Pain Taxonomy initiative. One of the goals of this initiative was to develop taxonomies for acute pain disorders, including SCD. To accomplish this, a working group of experts in SCD and pain was convened. Based on available literature and expert opinion, the working group used a 5-dimenional structure (diagnostic criteria, common features, modulating factors, impact/functional consequences, and putative mechanisms) to develop an acute pain taxonomy that is specific to SCD. As part of this, a set of 4 diagnostic criteria, with 2 modifiers to account for the influence of chronic pain, are proposed to define the types of acute pain observed in patients with SCD. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a taxonomy for acute pain in patients with SCD. This taxonomy could help to standardize definitions of acute pain in clinical studies of patients with SCD.

Background: Instrumentation with established reliability and validity is not yet routinely utilized to assess readiness for transition from pediatric to adult care for youth and young adults with chronic conditions, including sickle cell disease (SCD). Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a SCD specific readiness for transition assessment tool. Subjects: Fifty-seven youths with SCD, ages 15–21 years, completed the initial version of the Transition Intervention Program – Readiness for Transition (TIP-RFT) assessment; 113 youths/young adults with SCD, ages 14–26 years, at two distinct sites of care completed a refined version of the TIP-RFT. Methods: The TIP-RFT was constructed based on a literature review, provider and patient consensus and assessed domains including knowledge and skills in medical self-care, social support, health benefits and independent living and educational/vocational skills. We used principal components factor analysis to evaluate TIP-RFT responses and assessed differences in TIP-RFT scores in relation to age, gender, sickle cell diagnosis and site of care. Results: The original TIP-RFT, which had demonstrated face validity, was reduced from 56 to 22 items. The revised instrument consisting of four subscales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability and construct validity. Conclusion: Our results support that the TIP-RFT is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of transition readiness for youths with SCD. The TIP-RFT assessment can guide interventions to improve transition readiness and can provide a foundation for future research on other variables that might be associated with transition readiness.

Background: Although opioid prescribing in sickle cell disease (SCD) can be controversial, little is published about patterns of opioid use. Objective: To report on home opioid use among adults with SCD. Design: Cohort study. Participants: Adults with SCD (n = 219) who completed daily pain diaries for up to 6 months and had at least one home pain day. Main measures: Use of long-acting or short-acting opioids, other analgesics, or adjuvants; the proportion of home days, home pain days, and home crisis days with opioid use; these two outcomes according to patient characteristics. Key results: Patients used opioids on 12,311 (78 percent) of 15,778 home pain days. Eighty-five patients (38.8 percent) used long-acting opioids with or without short-acting opioids and 103 (47.0 percent) used only short-acting opioids. Twenty-one (9.6 percent) patients used only non-opioid analgesics and 10 (4.6 percent) used no analgesics. Both pain intensity and pain frequency were higher among opioid users (analysis of variance [ANOVA], p < 0.0001). Opioid users used hydroxyurea more often than nonusers, even when controlling for mean pain on pain days. Among all patients, significant relationships were found between any opioid use and somatic symptom burden, SCD stress, negative coping, and physical and mental quality of life (QOL); the relationship with SCD stress and physical QOL remained when controlled for mean pain. Among opioid users, similar associations were found between frequency of opioid use and some disease-related and psychosocial variables. Conclusions: In this adult SCD sample, opioids were used by the majority of patients. Pain was the overwhelming characteristic associated with use, but disease-related and psychosocial variables were also associated.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of inherited disorders caused by mutations in HBB, which encodes haemoglobin subunit β. The incidence is estimated to be between 300,000 and 400,000 neonates globally each year, the majority in sub-Saharan Africa. Haemoglobin molecules that include mutant sickle β-globin subunits can polymerize; erythrocytes that contain mostly haemoglobin polymers assume a sickled form and are prone to haemolysis. Other pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to the SCD phenotype are vaso-occlusion and activation of the immune system. SCD is characterized by a remarkable phenotypic complexity. Common acute complications are acute pain events, acute chest syndrome and stroke; chronic complications (including chronic kidney disease) can damage all organs. Hydroxycarbamide, blood transfusions and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation can reduce the severity of the disease. Early diagnosis is crucial to improve survival, and universal newborn screening programmes have been implemented in some countries but are challenging in low-income, high-burden settings.

Background Pain diary assessment in sickle cell disease (SCD) may be expensive and impose a high respondent burden. Objective To report whether intermittent assessment could substitute for continuous daily pain assessment in SCD. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Academic and community practices in Virginia. Patients. A total of 125 SCD patients age 16 years or older in the Pain in Sickle Cell Epidemiology Study. Measurements. Using pain measures that summarized all diaries as the gold standard, we tested the statistical equivalence of four alternative strategies that summarized diaries only from the week prior or the month prior to study completion; one week per month; or one day per week (random day). Summary measures included percent pain days, percent crisis days (self-defined), mean pain (0-9 Likert scale) on all days, and mean pain on pain days. Equivalence tests included comparisons of means, regression intercepts, and slopes, as well as measurement of R2. Results Compared with the gold standard, the one-day-per-week and one-week-per-month strategies yielded statistically equivalent means of six summary pain measures, and the week prior and month prior yielded equivalent means as some of the measures. Regression showed statistically equivalent slopes and intercepts to the gold standard using one-day-per-week and one-week-per-month strategies for percent pain days and percent crisis days, but almost no other equivalence. R2 values ranged from 0.64 to 0.989. Conclusions It is possible to simulate five- to six-month daily assessment of pain in SCD. Either one-day-per-week or one-week-per-month assessment yields an equivalent mean and fair regression equivalence.

This placebo-controlled phase II study evaluated the pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of 2,2-dimethylbutyrate (HQK-1001), a fetal globin gene-inducing short-chain fatty acid derivative, administered orally at 15 mg/kg twice daily for 48 weeks in 76 subjects with sickle cell disease (SCD). The median age was 26 years (range: 12-55 years) and 37 subjects (49%) were treated previously with hydroxycarbamide. Sixty subjects (79%) had Hb SS and 16 (21%) had S/β(0) thalassemia. The study was terminated after a planned interim analysis showed no significant increase in fetal hemoglobin (Hb F) and a trend for more pain crises in the HQK-1001 group. For 54 subjects with Week 24 data, the mean absolute increase in Hb F was 0.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1-1.6%) with HQK-1001 and 0.2% (95% CI: -0.7-1.1%) with placebo. Absolute increases in Hb F greater than 3% were noted in 9 of 38 subjects (24%) administered HQK-1001 and 1 of 38 subjects (3%) administered placebo. The mean changes in hemoglobin at Week 24 were comparable between the two groups. The mean annualized rate of pain crises was 3.5 with HQK-1001 and 1.7 with placebo. The most common adverse events in the HQK-1001 group, usually graded as mild or moderate, consisted of nausea, headache, vomiting, abdominal pain, and fatigue. Additional studies of HQK-1001 at this dose and schedule are not recommended in SCD. Intermittent HQK-1001 administration, rather than a daily regimen, may be better tolerated and more effective, as shown previously with arginine butyrate, and warrants further evaluation.

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) comprises a group of genetic blood disorders caused by a single missense mutation (Glu6Val) in the β-globin gene. In early childhood, SCD progresses into a systemic disease resulting in complications that include vaso-occlusion, multi-organ damage, and early death. P-selectin, an adhesion molecule expressed on activated vascular endothelial cells and platelets, contributes to the cell-to-cell and cell-to-endothelium interactions that are involved in the pathogenesis of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) in SCD. Crizanlizumab is an investigational, humanized, anti-P-selectin monoclonal antibody under evaluation for the prevention of VOCs in patients with SCD. In the Phase II SUSTAIN study, crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg significantly reduced the median annual rate of VOCs compared with placebo (P=0.010). The purpose of the randomized, double-blind, Phase III placebo-controlled STAND study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two doses of crizanlizumab (5.0 and 7.5 mg/kg) versus placebo in adolescent and adult patients with SCD and a history of VOCs leading to a healthcare visit. Methods: The STAND study aims to randomize 240 patients with SCD (all SCD genotypes eligible) aged ≥12 years (including at least 48 adolescents), who experienced ≥2 VOCs leading to a healthcare visit in the 12 months prior to screening, and who are not planning to initiate hydroxyurea (HU)/hydroxycarbamide (HC) or erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) or L-glutamine during the trial. Patients who have been taking HU/HC, ESAs or L-glutamine for ≥6 months and plan to continue the same dose at least until they reach 1 year of investigational treatment will be permitted. Exclusion criteria include: history of stem cell transplant; receipt of blood products within 30 days of the first dose; participation in a chronic exchange or transfusion program; and receipt of therapeutic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy within the 10 days prior to the first dose. Patients in the study will be randomized into 1 of 3 treatment arms: crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg, 7.5 mg/kg, or placebo administered intravenously over a period of 30 minutes on week 1 day 1, week 3 day 1, and day 1 of every 4-week cycle thereafter. Primary analysis cut-off date will occur once all patients have reached 1 year of treatment or discontinued within year 1. An open-label extension will offer the possibility to switch treatment (Figure). The primary endpoint is the annualized rate of VOCs leading to a healthcare visit in each treatment group over the first year of treatment. The key secondary endpoint is the annualized rate of all VOCs (leading to a healthcare visit or treated at home) over the first year post randomization. Other objectives include the rate of patients free from VOCs leading to a healthcare visit, time to first and second VOC leading to a healthcare visit, number of days with VOCs leading to a healthcare visit, healthcare resource utilization, SCD-related renal damage, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (P-selectin inhibition), immunogenicity, biomarkers and quality of life. The primary efficacy endpoint will be analyzed based on the data from the full analysis set comprising all randomized patients. A negative binomial regression model with treatment and randomization stratification factors as covariates will be used for analysis, with the logarithm of observation time as offset. The estimates of annualized VOC rates between treatment groups and their 95% confidence intervals will be provided [NCT03814746, EudraCT 2017-001746-10]. Conclusion: This study is designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of crizanlizumab 5 mg/kg and assess the safety and efficacy of a higher dose (7.5 mg/kg) in patients with SCD and history of VOCs. Figure. Disclosures Abboud: GBT: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel support; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CRSPR Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Modus: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Howard:Resonance Health: Other: Travel grant; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant; Imara: Consultancy, Other: Travel grant. Cançado:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Smith:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Espurz:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Weill:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. de Montalembert:bluebird bio, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AddMedica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) often requires hospitalization, but SCD pain may be present prior to admission and persist past discharge, similar to many acute-on-chronic painful conditions. In practice, readiness for discharge during VOC is a judgment and/or negotiation between patients and their caregivers. Subjective pain intensity, rated on a unidimensional continuous or numeric rating scale, communicates neither readiness for discharge, nor patients' multidimensional pain experience. Inpatient multidimensional pain scales that incorporate concepts like physical function may require too much time and/or impose a high, daily respondent burden on uncomfortable SCD respondents. We found no well-established brief daily adult inpatient multidimensional assessment scale for SCD, but found a pediatric daily function SCD scale, as well as scales used in systemic lupus erythematous and fibromyalgia. We therefore developed and validated the functional status-based pain-assessment (FSPA) survey meant to improve evaluation of readiness for discharge during VOC. Methods: FSPA was created using concepts from the above scales, plus input from inpatient management experts familiar with SCD, including physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and bedside nurses. FSPA helps assess the full spectrum of a patient's functional limitations due to pain. FSPA consists of tasks that are recorded using the patient's self-reported ability (5 point Likert scale ranging from "very easy" to "very difficult") to complete activities including sleeping, watching TV, walking around the room, or eating a meal in a chair. FPSA was designed to be on a health literacy grade of one. Patients were asked to complete FSPA daily at approximately the same time of day. Concurrently, they were asked to rate their pain using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). Surveys were administered on a preselected nursing unit from January 2018 to June of 2019. Means (standard deviations) or frequencies were used to summarize data. Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationship between the two continuous variables. Believing readiness for discharge to be a single factor, we performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using structural equation modeling for determining the empirical validity of having a one-factor solution for the FSPA tool. We used item response theory analysis to determine the characteristics of each item using graded response model within a 2-parameter framework. All analyses were performed using Stata 14.0. Results: During the study period, 504 assessments from 86 unique patients over 170 distinct admissions were completed. Of the 86 unique patients, 54% were females with mean age of 31.5 (SD8.0) years. The length of stay was 7.1 (SD6.9) days; minimum 0 days, max 38 days. NRS mean was 6.8 ±1.9 and FSPA mean was 27±8.0. Correlation was moderate and highly significant (Pearson's r = -.4342, p Conclusions: Development and validation of FPSA, while not complete, has yielded a brief assessment tool which may be used daily to improve communication between adult SCD VOC patients and their inpatient clinicians. FPSA may aid the judgment and negotiation of readiness for discharge of these patients, in order to prevent unnecessarily short or long hospital lengths of stay as well as improve patient and provider satisfaction. Future validation could compare FSPA to other longer-term pain and functional assessment tools, determine its ability to predict VOC discharge, and determine whether its use changes VOC discharge behavior. Figure Disclosures Smith: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Background: Case management (CM) and community health workers (CHWs) are two evidence-based health management strategies that can help reduce health risks, reduce readmission rates, and improve patient-provider relationships, all of which may be suboptimal in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD). In Fiscal Year (FY) 2016, the actual average vs. expected average length of stay (ALOS) among SCD adults at Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (VCU), an urban academic medical center, was 6.7 days vs 4.2 days. The 30-day readmission rate was 33.7%. We have previously presented results of a year-long pilot CM and CHW intervention for five of VCU's highest adult SCD utilizers, measured by calendar year (CY) 2015 VCU charges (Sop, et al., Blood 2017). Comparing CYs 2015 and 2016, there were numeric improvements in inpatient discharges, 30-day readmissions, 3-Day Emergency Department (ED) returns, ED discharges, outpatient visits, inpatient days, and total VCU charges. Herein, we show results of an extension of the pilot to evaluate responsivity to change over time: whether these improvements were lost among these same patients in the subsequent year (CY 2017) with diminished CM due to loss of funding, and whether they recurred in CY 2018, when CM was more robust as a result of new, more stable funding. Methods: Using the VCU charge and utilization database, we compared the above utilization variables for the five highest CY 2015 utilizers in CYs 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The five original patients included 2 males and 3 females aged between 25-31 years old. One of the females passed away in 2016. Results: There was a trend toward numerically lower utilization during the two CM and CHW years (2016 and 2018), compared to the two diminished CM years (2015 and 2017). Inpatient discharges, inpatient days, and total charges see-sawed according to the intensity of intervention, going down during the year of the initial intervention, rising during the year after intervention, and going down again with resumption of intervention. However, there were notable exceptions: 30-day re-admissions were the lowest in 2017 a diminished intervention year; 3-day ED returns were flat throughout; ED discharges declined throughout, and; outpatient visits rose throughout. Conclusions: These pilot results must be interpreted with caution, since the sample was very small, and interventions were not standardized or randomized, so that secondary trends could be excluded. We found that, after diminution in 2017 of an initial CM and CHW intervention in 2016, several of the initial 2015-to-2016 improvements in academic medical center utilization for five high-utilizing adult SCD patients deteriorated. Subsequently, these improvements recurred when CM and CHWs were reapplied in 2018. We also found that other utilization improvements were sustained despite diminution or resumption of the intervention. This pilot result lays the groundwork for larger, more rigorous CM and CHW Table Disclosures Smith: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lipato:Novartis: Honoraria.