Search

As a hypersonic aerodynamic configuration that can break through the lift-drag ratio barrier, waverider configuration is an important candidate for wide-speed reusable aircraft. Therefore. It has become a hot research topic that improving the low speed performance of the waverider vehicle and realizing wide-speed flight. Due to the idea of designing the flow field first and then constructing the shape of the waverider vehicle, the basic flow field will affect its performance. This paper analyzes and compares the calculation methods of the basic flow field, and then introduces the design methods of the combined, variable Mach number and vorticity lift wide-speed waverider vehicle, compares the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Finally, some suggestions for the future development of wide-speed waverider vehicle are put forward from two perspectives of basic flow field and design methods.

Purpose: We compared the adaptive responses to supramaximal high-intensity interval training (HIIT) individualized according to anaerobic speed reserve (ASR), the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (VIFT), and velocity associated with maximum oxygen uptake (MAS) to determine which approach facilitates more identical adaptations across athletes with different profiles. Methods: Thirty national-level basketball players (age = 28.4 [5] y; body mass = 88.9 [6.3] kg; height = 190 [4.8] cm) were randomly assigned to 3 training groups performing 2 sets of 4, 6, 8, 6, 8, and 10-minute runs (from first to sixth week, respectively), consisting of 15-second running at Δ%20ASR (MAS + 0.2 × ASR), 95%VIFT, and 120%MAS, with 15 seconds recovery between efforts and a 3-minute relief between sets. Results: All 3 interval interventions significantly (P <.05) enhanced maximum oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 max), oxygen pulse ( V ˙ O 2 / HR), first and second ventilatory threshold (VT1 and VT2), cardiac output ( Q ˙ max ), stroke volume, peak and average power output, testosterone levels, and testosterone-to-cortisol ratio following the training period. Different values of interindividual variability (coefficient of variation) for the percentage changes of the measured variables were observed in response to HIITASR, HIITvIFT, and HIITMAS for V ˙ O 2 max (8.7%, 18.8%, 34.6%, respectively), V ˙ O 2 / HR (9.5%, 15.0%, 28.6%), VT1 (9.6%, 19.6%, 34.6%), VT2 (21.8%, 32.4%, 56.7%), Q ˙ max (8.2%, 16.9%, 28.8%), stroke volume (7.9%, 15.2%, 23.5%), peak power output (20%, 22%, 37.3%), average power output (21.1%, 21.3%, 32.5%), testosterone (52.9%, 61.6%, 59.9%), and testosterone-to-cortisol ratio (55.1%, 59.5%, 57.8%). Conclusions: Supramaximal HIIT performed at Δ%20ASR resulted in more uniform physiological adaptations than HIIT interventions prescribed using VIFT or MAS. Although hormonal changes do not follow this approach, all the approaches induced an anabolic effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]