Search

An Interagency Panel Session organized by the NASA Human Research Program (HRP) Space Radiation Program Element (SRPE) was held during the NASA HRP Investigator's Workshop (IWS) in Galveston, Texas on 26 January 2017 to identify complementary research areas that will advance the testing and development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) in support of radioprotection and radiation mitigation on the ground and in space. There were several areas of common interest identified among the various participating agencies. This report provides a summary of the topics discussed by each agency along with potential areas of intersection for mutual collaboration opportunities. Common goals included repurposing of pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals for use as radioprotectors and/or mitigators, low-dose/chronic exposure paradigms, late effects post-radiation exposure, mixed-field exposures of gamma-neutron, performance decrements, and methods to determine individual exposure levels.

Radiation Biodosimetry is a continually developing clinical diagnostic field, which focuses on biological markers that proportionally change in relationship to the amount of ionizing radiation absorbed. Examples of host marker response include changes in white cell count, specific proteins in circulation, RNAs in white blood cells, or chromosome fidelity in affected lymphocytes. Measurements of radiation biomarkers correlate with the approximate radiation dose absorbed and indirectly provide an assessment of the likelihood of developing acute radiation syndrome. The aim of this review is to summarize four biodosimetry programs that are in advanced development, later pipeline stages with funding from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), an agency under the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). With BARDA financial support, biodosimetry diagnostic assays in development will inform patient management, improve health and psychosocial outcomes, and save lives after a nuclear disaster. These tests include an SRI International developed rapid on-site screening test requiring only a finger stick of blood to triage those who have received little or no radiation from those who have received clinically significant levels of radiation and need further immediate patient management. In addition, multiple laboratory-based, high-throughput quantitative tests, currently under development by MRIGlobal, DxTerity, and ASELL, will more accurately define dose levels and possibly predict cellular and organ-damage and other longer-term effects of radiation. In the future, when clinical and analytical validation of these assays is complete, the data is reviewed by the FDA, and agency use status is obtained, rapid triage and laboratory-based biodosimetry test results will enable emergency medical teams to do the most good for the largest number of people after a nuclear blast.

Following a mass-casualty nuclear disaster, effective medical triage has the potential to save tens of thousands of lives. In order to best use the available scarce resources, there is an urgent need for biodosimetry tools to determine an individual's radiation dose. Initial triage for radiation exposure will include location during the incident, symptoms, and physical examination. Stepwise triage will include point of care assessment of less than or greater than 2 Gy, followed by secondary assessment, possibly with high throughput screening, to further define an individual's dose. Given the multisystem nature of radiation injury, it is unlikely that any single biodosimetry assay can be used as a standalone tool to meet the surge in capacity with the timeliness and accuracy needed. As part of the national preparedness and planning for a nuclear or radiological incident, the authors reviewed the primary literature to determine the capabilities and limitations of a number of biodosimetry assays currently available or under development for use in the initial and secondary triage of patients. Understanding the requirements from a response standpoint and the capability and logistics for the various assays will help inform future biodosimetry technology development and acquisition. Factors considered include: type of sample required, dose detection limit, time interval when the assay is feasible biologically, time for sample preparation and analysis, ease of use, logistical requirements, potential throughput, point-of-care capability, and the ability to support patient diagnosis and treatment within a therapeutically relevant time point.

The objective of this work was to assess the performance of the newly developed Health-Related Productivity Questionniare-Diary (HRPQ-D). Patients completed the HRPQ-D daily for 1-week periods during weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 of a clinical trial for infectious mononucleosis. Productivity data were collected on a daily basis in terms of absenteeism, presenteeism, and combined lost productivity for three work venues (work outside home, housework, and classes/homework). These were then correlated with patient symptom scores. Symptom scores were positively correlated with lost work hours because of absenteeism and combined lost productivity scores. However, negative correlations were observed between symptom scores and the lost work hours due to presenteeism. The HRPQ-D demonstrated good construct validity, making it a useful tool for determining productivity levels across different work venues within clinical trial or survey research applications.

The safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of atevirdine (ATV), a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, were studied in a phase I/II clinical trial (ACTG 187) of patients with CD4 counts < or =500/mm3. In all, 34 HIV-1-infected patients were randomized to receive ATV for 12 weeks in doses chosen to achieve one of three serum trough levels: 5 to 13 microM, 14 to 22 microM, or 23 to 31 microM. Rash was the most common adverse event, with a grade 3 or 4 rash occurring in 4 patients. No significant change from baseline in HIV-1 plasma RNA mean copy number was detected at week 4 (+0.09 log10 copies/ml; p = .30). However, some evidence indicated moderate antiviral activity at week 4, based on median changes in CD4 count (+23/mm3; p = .05), and viral peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) titer (-0.68 log10) copies/ml; p = .03). In addition, 2 of 4 patients with detectable baseline serum p24 antigen showed declines of >50%. HIV-1 resistance to ATV was detected in 41% of patients and was most commonly associated with RT mutations K103N and Y181C. In contrast, the Y181C mutation was not detected in ATV-resistant isolates obtained from patients enrolled in ACTG 199, a study of ATV given in combination with zidovudine. Under the conditions of this study, ATV failed to demonstrate significant antiretroviral activity. However, transient in vivo activity might have been obscured by rapid development of resistance coupled with inadequate sampling at early time points following initiation of ATV therapy.

A quantitative human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA polymerase chain reaction assay has been validated analytically and clinically in > 13,000 samples. The assay is highly reproducible with intra- and inter-assay precision of 16% and 19%, respectively. In 1,542 of 1,548 subjects with CD4+ counts of 0-500 cells per mm3, viral RNA levels were quantifiable and ranged from approximately 3,000-52,200,000 copies per milliliter. Median plasma HIV-1 RNA values were inversely proportional to CD4+ counts from 0-400 cells per mm3. When patients were off antiretroviral therapies for approximately 14 days prior to the initial baseline RNA PCR evaluation, the mean variance between the two baseline values was 23% (0.1 log). Of these patients, 95% had a sufficient plasma viral load to quantitate a 10-fold (1 log) diminution in viral load caused by antiviral therapy. In contrast, only 20% and 45% of these subjects had sufficient p24 and ICD p24 levels to detect a 50% diminution in circulating virus. The high precision and reproducibility of this quantitative RNA PCR assay provide an enhanced means of evaluating therapeutic drug regimens for HIV-1.

An immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for active renin in human plasma was analytically and clinically validated. Analytical validation established 1) precision, 2) recovery, 3) linearity, 4) cross-reactivity, 5) sample stability, and 6) the validity and specificity of the 125I-labeled anti-renin monoclonal in the Diagnostics Pasteur immunoradiometric renin kit. Clinical validation included 1) establishing normal reference range for renin, 2) comparing plasma renin activity (PRA) results to immunoreactive renin levels in subjects on Upjohn research protocols, and 3) comparing the renin responsiveness of sodium replete subjects to that of sodium deplete subjects prior to, during, and after infusion with Upjohn renin inhibitory peptide, ditekiren. This study was undertaken to demonstrate the research validity of an assay tool for the differentiation of enzymatically active renin from inactive renin or a form of prorenin.

Plasma samples from more than 300 inbred chickens were screened by using an immunofixation technique with antibody against the fourth component of complement (C4) from humans. Precipitation patterns of plasma from adult male and sexually immature birds, either male or female, were identical. Plasma from egg-laying hens demonstrated a distinctly different precipitation pattern compared with plasma of other birds, with one additional band appearing 14 to 9 days before production of the first egg. The banding pattern could not be induced in males by progesterone injection and remained unchanged in molted female birds.