Search

Background The aim of the International Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Alliance is to create a world where worldwide collaboration brings major breakthroughs for the millions of people living with stroke. A key pillar of this work is to define globally relevant criteria for centers that aspire to deliver excellent clinical rehabilitation and generate exceptional outcomes for patients. Objectives This paper presents consensus work conducted with an international group of expert stroke recovery and rehabilitation researchers, clinicians, and people living with stroke to identify and define criteria and measurable indicators for Centers of Clinical Excellence (CoCE) in stroke recovery and rehabilitation. These were intentionally developed to be ambitious and internationally relevant, regardless of a country’s development or income status, to drive global improvement in stroke services. Methods Criteria and specific measurable indicators for CoCE were collaboratively developed by an international panel of stroke recovery and rehabilitation experts from 10 countries and consumer groups from 5 countries. Results The criteria and associated indicators, ranked in order of importance, focused upon (i) optimal outcome, (ii) research culture, (iii) working collaboratively with people living with stroke, (iv) knowledge exchange, (v) leadership, (vi) education, and (vii) advocacy. Work is currently underway to user-test the criteria and indicators in 14 rehabilitation centers in 10 different countries. Conclusions We anticipate that use of the criteria and indicators could support individual organizations to further develop their services and, more widely, provide a mechanism by which clinical excellence can be articulated and shared to generate global improvements in stroke care.

Introduction Prehypertension is defined as blood pressure that is above the normal range but not high enough to be classed as hypertension. Prehypertension is a warning of development of hypertension as well as a risk for cardiovascular disease, heart attack and stroke. In the UK, non-pharmacological interventions are recommended for prehypertension management, but no reviews have focused on the effectiveness of these types of interventions solely in people with prehypertension. Therefore, the proposed systematic review will assess the clinical- and cost–effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing or maintaining blood pressure in pre-hypertensive people. Methods and analysis This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The databases/ trial registries that will be searched to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and economic evaluations include Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the International HTA Database. Search terms have been identified by the team including an information specialist. Three reviewers will be involved in the study selection process. Risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs, and the Consensus Health Economic Criteria list for economic evaluations. Findings from the included studies will be tabulated and synthesised narratively. Heterogeneity will be assessed through visual inspection of forest plots and the calculation of the Chi2 and I2 statistics, and causes of heterogeneity will be assessed where sufficient data are available. If possible, we plan to investigate differential effects on specific sub-groups and from different types of interventions using meta-regression. Where relevant, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE)

Background: The aim of the International Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Alliance is to create a world where worldwide collaboration brings major breakthroughs for the millions of people living with stroke. A key pillar of this work is to define globally relevant criteria for centers that aspire to deliver excellent clinical rehabilitation and generate exceptional outcomes for patients. Objectives: This paper presents consensus work conducted with an international group of expert stroke recovery and rehabilitation researchers, clinicians, and people living with stroke to identify and define criteria and measurable indicators for Centers of Clinical Excellence (CoCE) in stroke recovery and rehabilitation. These were intentionally developed to be ambitious and internationally relevant, regardless of a country’s development or income status, to drive global improvement in stroke services. Methods: Criteria and specific measurable indicators for CoCE were collaboratively developed by an international panel of stroke recovery and rehabilitation experts from 10 countries and consumer groups from 5 countries. Results: The criteria and associated indicators, ranked in order of importance, focused upon (i) optimal outcome, (ii) research culture, (iii) working collaboratively with people living with stroke, (iv) knowledge exchange, (v) leadership, (vi) education, and (vii) advocacy. Work is currently underway to user-test the criteria and indicators in 14 rehabilitation centers in 10 different countries. Conclusions: We anticipate that use of the criteria and indicators could support individual organizations to further develop their services and, more widely, provide a mechanism by which clinical excellence can be articulated and shared to generate global improvements in stroke care.

Background Stroke nurses are adopting extended roles to improve patient care due to limited numbers of vascular neurologists, however, little is known of this experience. We evaluated the impact of an internationally implemented fellowship education program to equip experienced stroke nurses, nationally and internationally, to undertake extended acute stroke roles. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with the following groups of individuals associated with the NET SMART Advanced Practice fellowship program: 1) Stroke nurse program graduates; 2) currently enrolled stroke nurse fellows; 3) local physician mentors; 4) service managers of program graduates. Interviews took place between February-August 2018 and were analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results Interviews were held with stroke nurses (n=11), mentors (n=4) and a service manager (n=1). Four themes were identified: 1) ‘The learning journey’- describing motivations for undertaking the training and course content; 2) ‘Organizational and professional change’- experiencing professional resistance to the new role, or lack of a suitable role to move into after program completion; 3) ‘What hindered the learning journey?’- small hospitals with low patient volume makes completion challenging; 4) ‘What helped the learning journey?’- a supportive team facilitated completion. Conclusion We found overwhelming skill development and professional growth by nurses, and this was echoed by mentors and managers. However, despite expanding their stroke-specific knowledge and skills, non-U.S.A. nurses faced systemic challenges in implementing their skills including lack of acceptance of extended nurse roles from wider professions.

Background: Suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is a diagnostic challenge yet requires timely diagnosis for secondary stroke prevention. Aims: To understand variability of organisational processes, roles, education, and clinical decision-making in UK TIA services. Methods: Healthcare professionals were surveyed online in 2021 with descriptive data analysis. We conducted interviews (2021-2022) with a purposive sample. Three researchers thematically analysed interview data. Findings: Survey responses were received from 43 TIA services. 70% conducted remote consultations, 28% face-to-face, and 2% mixed. Different physician and roles, skills and experience provided TIA services. All services involved a consultant physician with experience in stroke. Ten interviews confirmed the survey results and highlighted variability regarding: clinical decision-making; service composition; resources; learning opportunities; and mode of consultation. Conclusion: Variability in TIA service workforce and service organisation influenced diagnostic decisions. The possible impact of such variability on clinical outcomes, and approaches to reducing it, require further research.

Introduction Around 40% of adults have pre-hypertension (blood pressure between 120–139/80–89), meaning they are at increased risk of developing hypertension and other cardiovascular disease-related conditions. There are limited studies on the management of pre-hypertension; however, guidance recommends that it should be focused on lifestyle modification rather than on medication. Self-monitoring of blood pressure could allow people to monitor and manage their risk status and may allow individuals to modify lifestyle factors. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability, to both healthcare professionals and people with pre-hypertension, of blood pressure self-monitoring. Methods and analysis A prospective, non-randomised feasibility study, with a mixed-methods approach will be employed. Eligible participants (n=114) will be recruited from general practices, pharmacies and community providers across Lancashire and South Cumbria. Participants will self-monitor their blood pressure at home for 6 months and will complete questionnaires at three timepoints (baseline, 6 and 12 months). Healthcare professionals and participants involved in the study will be invited to take part in follow-up interviews and a focus group. The primary outcomes include the willingness to engage with the concept of pre-hypertension, the acceptability of self-monitoring, and the study processes. Secondary outcomes will inform the design of a potential future trial. A cost-analysis and cost-benefit analysis will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been obtained from London–Fulham NHS Research Ethics Committee, the University of Central Lancashire Health Ethics Review Panel and the HRA. The results of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, feedback to service users and healthcare professionals, and to professional bodies in primary care and pharmacy.

Introduction: Long COVID (LC), the persistent symptoms ≥12 weeks following acute COVID-19, presents major threats to individual and public health across countries, affecting over 1.5 million people in the UK alone. Evidence-based interventions are urgently required and an integrated care pathway approach in pragmatic trials, which include investigations, treatments and rehabilitation for LC, could provide scalable and generalisable solutions at pace. Methods and analysis: This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster-randomised clinical trial of two components of an integrated care pathway (Coverscan™, a multi-organ MRI, and Living with COVID Recovery™, a digitally enabled rehabilitation platform) with a nested, Phase III, open label, platform randomised drug trial in individuals with LC. Cluster randomisation is at level of primary care networks so that integrated care pathway interventions are delivered as “standard of care” in that area. The drug trial randomisation is at individual level and initial arms are rivaroxaban, colchicine, famotidine/loratadine, compared with no drugs, with potential to add in further drug arms. The trial is being carried out in 6–10 LC clinics in the UK and is evaluating the effectiveness of a pathway of care for adults with LC in reducing fatigue and other physical, psychological and functional outcomes at 3 months. The trial also includes an economic evaluation which will be described separately. Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was reviewed by South Central—Berkshire Research Ethics Committee (reference: 21/SC/0416). All participating sites obtained local approvals prior to recruitment. Coverscan™ has UK certification (UKCA 752965). All participants will provide written consent to take part in the trial. The first participant was recruited in July 2022 and interim/final results will be disseminated in 2023, in a plan co-developed with public and patient representatives. The results will be presented at national and international

Aim: This qualitative study explores with health professionals the provision of, and challenges for, post-discharge stroke care, focussing on eating, drinking and psychological support across India. Design: Qualitative semi-structured interviews. Setting: Seven geographically diverse hospitals taking part in a Global Health Research Programme on Improving Stroke Care in India Participants: A purposive sample of healthcare professionals with current experience of working with stroke patients. Results: Interviews with 66 healthcare professionals (23 nurses (14 staff nurses; 7 senior nurse officers; 1 Intensive Care Unit nurse; 1 palliative care nurse)); 16 doctors (10 neurologists; 6 physicians); 10 physiotherapists; 5 speech and language therapists; 4 occupational therapists; 4 dieticians; 2 psychiatrists; and 2 social workers) resulted in three main themes: Integrated inpatient discharge care planning processes; Post-discharge patient and caregiver role and challenges; Patient and caregiver engagement post-discharge. Conclusions: Discharge planning was integrated and customised, although resources were limited in some sites. Task-shifting compensated for a lack of specialists but was limited by staff education and training. Caregivers faced challenges in accessing and providing post-discharge care. Post-discharge care was mainly hospital-based, supported by tele-services, especially for rural populations. Further research is needed to understand post-discharge care provision and the needs of stroke survivors and their caregivers.

Introduction: Overweight and obesity are growing public health problems worldwide. Both diet and physical activity have been the primary interventions for weight reduction over the past decade. With increasing rates of overweight and obesity, it is evident that a primary focus on diet and exercise has not resulted in sustained obesity reduction within the global population. There is now a case to explore other weight management strategies, focusing on psychological factors that may underpin overweight and obesity. Psychological therapy interventions are gaining recognition for their effectiveness in addressing underlying emotional factors and promoting weight loss. However, there is a dearth of literature that has mapped the types of psychological interventions and the characteristics of these interventions as a means of achieving weight reduction and sustained weight reduction in adults with overweight or obesity. Methods and analysis: The review will combine the methodology outlined by Arksey and O’Malley with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of six databases will be searched using a comprehensive search strategy. Intervention studies will be included if participants are 18 years and over, classified as overweight or obese (≥BMI 25kg/m2), and have received a psychological therapy intervention. The review will exclude studies that are not available in English, not full text, none peer reviewed or combine a lifestyle and/or pharmacological intervention with a psychological intervention. Data will be synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required to conduct this scoping review. The findings will be disseminated through journal publication(s), social media, and a lay summary for key stakeholders.

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) affects over half of people with stroke. It is unclear which methods are accurate in assessing presence and type of UI to inform clinical management. Diagnosis of UI based on inaccurate methods may lead to unnecessary interventions. The aims of this systematic review were to identify, for adults with stroke, clinically accurate methods to determine the presence of UI and type of UI. Method: We searched seven electronic databases and additional conference proceedings. To be included, studies had to be primary research comparing two or more methods, or use a reference test. Results: We identified 3846 studies with eight eligible for inclusion. We identified 11 assessment methods within the eight studies. Only five studies had sufficient comparator data for synthesis. Due to heterogeneity of data, results on the following methods were narratively synthesised: Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score (CLSS), clinical history and physical examination, Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index, International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICiQ-SF) and urodynamic studies (UDS). Most studies were small and of low to medium quality. All reported differences in sensitivity, and none compared the same assessment methods. Conclusion: Current evidence is insufficient to support recommendations on the most accurate UI assessment for adults with stroke. Further research is needed.