Background Dengue is a major public health problem in Thailand, but data are often focused on certain dengue-endemic areas. Methods: To better understand dengue epidemiology and clinical characteristics in Thailand, a fever surveillance study was conducted among patients aged 1–55 years, who presented with non-localized febrile illness at Bang Phae Community Hospital in Ratchaburi province, Thailand from October 2011 to September 2016. Results Among 951 febrile episodes, 130 were dengue-confirmed. Individuals aged 10–14 years were mostly affected, followed by those 15–19 years-of-age, with about 15% of dengue-confirmed cases from adults 25 years and older. There were annual peaks of dengue occurrence between June-November. Most prevalent serotype in circulation was DENV-2 in 2012, DENV-3 in 2014, and DENV-4 & -3 in 2015. Among dengue cases, 65% were accurately detected using the dengue NS1 RDT. Detection rate was similar between secondary and primary dengue cases where 66% of secondary vs. 60% of primary dengue cases had positive results on the NS1 RDT. Among dengue cases, 66% were clinically diagnosed with suspected dengue or DHF, prior to lab confirmation. Dengue was positively associated with rash, headache, hematemesis and alterations to consciousness, when compared to non-dengue. Dengue patients were 10.6 times more likely to be hospitalized, compared to non-dengue cases. Among dengue cases, 95 were secondary and 35 were primary infections. There were 8 suspected DHF cases and all were identified to be secondary dengue. Secondary dengue cases were 3.5 times more likely to be hospitalized compared to primary dengue cases. Although the majority of our dengue-positive patients were secondary dengue cases, with few patients showing manifestations of DHF, our dengue cases were mostly mild disease. Even among children < 10 years-of-age, 61% had secondary infection and the rate of secondary infection increased with age. Conclusion While the majority of dengue-confirmed cases were children, almost three-quarters of dengue-confirmed cases in this study were secondary dengue. Our study results consistent with previous data from the country confirm the hyperendemic transmission of DENV in Thailand, even in the non-epidemic years. With various interventions becoming available for dengue prevention and control, including dengue vaccines, decision-making on future implementation strategies should be based on such burden of disease data., Author summary Dengue is a well-known public health problem in Thailand. To identify epidemiologic and clinical patterns of dengue in Thailand, we studied 951 febrile patients with fever, aged 1–55 years, who attended Bang Phae district hospital in Ratchaburi province, Thailand. Patients were tested with a rapid test for dengue, and further tests were carried out on paired blood samples taken 10–21 days apart. Overall, 14% of the febrile episodes identified between October 2011 and September 2016 were dengue-confirmed. Teenagers were mostly affected with only few adults. Dengue peaks occurred between June-November, but there was no large epidemic during the study period. DENV type 2 was the main serotype in circulation in 2012, DENV type 3 in 2014, and DENV types 4 and 3 in 2015. Dengue cases were 11 times more likely to be hospitalized than non-dengue cases. Dengue patients were more likely to present with rash, headache, hematemesis and alterations to consciousness, compared to non-dengue. Two thirds of the dengue cases were clinically diagnosed with suspected dengue or DHF, even without lab confirmation. Secondary dengue cases were about three times more common than primary cases. Even among children < 10 years-of-age, 61% of the patients were of secondary infection. Among dengue cases, 65% were accurately detected using the dengue RDT. This was not different between secondary and primary dengue cases. All 8 patients clinically diagnosed with DHF were secondary dengue cases. Although most of our dengue-positive patients were secondary dengue cases, we only observed few patients showing DHF. Thus, we concluded that our dengue cases were mostly of mild dengue illness. Our study results support the previous data confirming the high burden of dengue in Thailand and such information would help to make decisions on future implementation of various tools for dengue prevention and control.