Search

IntroductionHematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and chemotherapy are considered potentially curative options for post-remission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the comparative effectiveness of these approaches in favorable- and intermediate-risk AML remains unclear and requires further investigation.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 111 patients diagnosed with de novo favorable- and intermediate-risk AML, categorized according to the ELN 2022 guidelines, were investigated to compare outcomes following autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT), matched sibling donor HSCT (MSD-HSCT), and chemotherapy. Through propensity score matching for disease status before HSCT, 42 cases in first complete remission were selected for each of the auto-HSCT group and the MSD-HSCT group. Additionally, 27 cases in the chemotherapy group, excluding patients with early relapse or death, were included for comparison.ResultsIn the overall population, the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 85.7%, 83.1%, and 70.4% (p = 0.043), while the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 78.6%, 83.2%, and 57.1% (p = 0.002) in the auto-HSCT, MSD-HSCT, and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Notably, both auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT demonstrated significantly improved DFS compared to chemotherapy in patients with favorable-risk AML. Multivariate analysis further revealed that chemotherapy was significantly associated with inferior DFS compared to auto-HSCT (HR=2.82; 95% CI, 1.26–6.32, p=0.012), while DFS was similar between the MSD-HSCT and auto-HSCT groups (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.31–2.09, p=0.645).DiscussionThe findings suggested the advantages of both MSD-HSCT and auto-HSCT over chemotherapy as post-remission therapy for AML patients with favorable and intermediate risk. Further research is needed to support these conclusions.

Abstract The optimal timing and type of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for treating peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remain controversial. This retrospective real-world study investigated the application pattern and outcomes of HSCT in China. The analysis encompassed 408 PTCL patients with a median age of 45.5 years, all of whom received initial adequate therapy at five hospitals. Among patients with nodal PTCL who responded effectively to first-line therapy (the “responders”, n = 127) and subsequently underwent HSCT consolidation (n = 47, 37.0%), 93.6% received auto-HSCT, while 6.4% underwent allo-HSCT. Front-line auto-HSCT showed potential for long-term disease control in nodal PTCL responders. Among non-nodal PTCL responders (n = 80) with HSCT (n = 26, 32.5%), 46.2% underwent allo-HSCT and 53.8% received auto-HSCT. Upfront allo-HSCT provides longer progression-free survival (PFS) for non-nodal PTCL responders, with lower 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (16.7% vs. 56.0%) and comparable non-relapse mortality (NRM) (10.4% vs. 11.0%) compared to auto-HSCT. For patients who achieved remission with second-line salvage regimens, allo-HSCT was the primary choice (82.4%) for non-nodal PTCL, while auto-HSCT was more common (82.4%) in nodal PTCL. Nodal PTCL patients underwent auto-HSCT after ≥ 3 lines of treatment had a higher 3-year CIR (81.0%) compared to those treated in the first (26.0%) or second line (26.0%). Non-nodal PTCL patients underwent allo-HSCT after ≥ 3 lines had a higher 3-year NRM (37.5%) compared to after first (10.4%) or second line treatment (8.5%). These findings highlight distinct HSCT application patterns for PTCL in China, emphasizing the impact of early disease control and upfront consolidative HSCT.

IntroductionCurrently, no study has determined whether platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) before engraftment in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) would impacts clinical outcomes.MethodsWe performed a MDS-specific retrospective analysis to determine whether PTR in one-month post-HSCT in patients with MDS could influence outcomes.Results and discussionAmong the 315 patients enrolled, 110 (34.9 %) had PTR from stem cell infusion to one-month post-HSCT. Baseline characteristics of the PTR and non-PTR groups were similar. We found that patients with PTR had a slower and lower rate of platelet engraftment by day 28, as well as a slower recovery of neutrophils. The median days of neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 14 days (9-23) and 17 days (8-28) in the PTR groups versus 13 days (9-23) and 15 days (7-28) in the non-PTR group (P1041ng/ml (median level) were independent adverse factors of platelet engraftment.

Abstract This study aimed to assess haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) safety and efficacy while exploring strategies for optimising outcomes in patients with hepatitis-associated aplastic anaemia (HAAA). We retrospectively reviewed 35 HAAA patients who underwent HSCT at a large Chinese blood disease hospital between 2008 and 2022. HAAA patients receiving HSCT typically presented with severe (28.6%) and very severe (65.7%) AA. Male patients predominated (68.6%), with a median onset age of 23 years (range, 9–44). Haploidentical donor-HSCT and matched sibling donor-HSCT were in comparable proportions. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 74.0%, with cumulative incidences of grade II–IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 37.1% and 22.4%, respectively. A diagnosis-to-HSCT interval ≥ 75 days, acute GVHD, and post-HSCT liver events (e.g., hepatic GVHD and a three-fold increase in aminotransferase or bilirubin) significantly worsened 5-year OS. In the multivariate models, recipients with sex-matched grafts had better OS, and those with younger male donors had a lower incidence of II–IV aGVHD. Higher HLA matching degree (HLA > = 7/10) was an independent prognostic factor associated with better OS and GFFS. A diagnosis-to-HSCT interval ≥ 75 days was predictive of post-transplant liver events in HAAA patients. In conclusion, HSCT was a safe and effective treatment for HAAA. Early transplantation, careful donor selection and improving post-transplant liver events were crucial to optimise outcomes.

Abstract The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) updated the previous risk classification published in 2017 but the prognostic significance for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unclear. We enrolled 600 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who underwent allo-HSCT to validate ELN-2022 genetic risk system and compared it with ELN-2017. There were 214 (35.67%), 162 (27.0%), and 224 (37.33%) patients in ELN-2022 favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk group respectively and 86 patients (14.33%) experienced a shift in risk stratification compared to ELN-2017. Median and maximum follow-up time were 2.89 (95% CI 2.67 to 3.03) years and 8.78 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 73.8% (95% CI 67.5% to 80.3%), 63.9% (95% CI 56.7% to 72.0%) and 57.6% (95% CI 50.4% to 65.9%) in ELN-2022 favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk group (P

IntroductionRetrospective studies have suggested that Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) provide a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in patients with liver disease. However, it is uncertain whether this finding can be extended to the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) cohort. Therefore, we aim to examine the protective potential of UDCA against SARS-CoV-2 infection in recently received allo-HSCT patients.MethodsDuring the initial Omicron variant wave in China (December 2022 to February 2023), we conducted a prospective observational study involving 91 hospitalized patients who had undergone allo-HSCT within the previous 6 months as part of the National Longitudinal Cohort of Hematological Diseases (NICHE). Throughout hospitalization, we continuously monitored the status of COVID-19 using SARS-CoV-2 PCR kits or SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Tests.ResultsAmong these patients, 67.0% (n = 61) were confirmed to have contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection. For the 52 patients evaluated, 23.1% experienced a severe or critical clinical course. There was no difference in the infection rate or severity of COVID-19 between the UDCA group and the non-UDCA group. We found that only patients transplanted between 3 and 6 months ago demonstrated a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those who received allo-HSCT within 3 months (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.241, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.287-8.814, P = 0.016). But other clinical factors, such as administration of UDCA, showed no difference. Notably, only age ≥38 years old remained as an independent risk factor for a severe clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 3.664, 95% CI: 1.129-13.007, P = 0.035).ConclusionThe effectiveness of UDCA in protecting newly allo-HSCT recipients against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unconfirmed. Presently, the most effective strategy appears to be minimizing exposure to SARS-CoV-2.Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04645199, identifier NCT04645199.

ABSTRACTObjectives To determine the impact of pretransplant measurable residual disease (pre-MRD) and the efficacy of maintenance therapy in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT).Methods We retrospectively analyzed 100 t(8;21) AML patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2013 and 2022. 40 patients received pre-emptive therapy including immunosuppressant adjustment, azacitidine, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) combined with chemotherapy. 23 patients received prophylactic therapy, including azacitidine or chidamide.Results Patients with a positive pre-MRD (pre-MRDpos) had a higher 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (25.90% [95% CI, 13.87%–39.70%] vs 5.00% [95% CI, 0.88%–15.01%]; P = 0.008). Pre-MRDpos patients were less likely to have a superior 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (40.83% [95% CI, 20.80%–80.16%]) if their MRD was still positive at 28 days after transplantation (post-MRD28pos). The 3-year DFS and CIR were 53.17% (95% CI, 38.31% – 73.80%) and 34.87% (95% CI, 18.84% – 51.44%), respectively, for patients receiving pre-emptive interventions after molecular relapse. The 3-year DFS and CIR were 90.00% (95%CI, 77.77% – 100%) and 5.00% (95%CI, 0.31% – 21.10%), respectively, for high-risk patients receiving prophylactic therapy. In most patients, epigenetic-drug-induced adverse events were reversible with dose adjustment or temporary discontinuation.Conclusion Patients with pre-MRDpos and post-MRD28pos were more likely to have higher rates of relapse and inferior DFS, even after receiving pre-emptive interventions. Prophylactic therapy may be a better option for high-risk t(8;21) AML patients; however, this warrants further investigation.

ABSTRACTObjective To investigate the preventive effect of low-dose porcine anti-thymocyte globulin (P-ATG) on graft versus host disease (GVHD) in patients' donors over 40 years old or female donors undergoing HLA-matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT).Methods The clinical data of 30 patients received Low-dose Porcine antithymocyte globulin (P-ATG) as a part of the conditioning regimen (the P-ATG group), while the other 30 patients didn’t receive ATG (the Non-ATG group).Results There was a significant difference in the incidence of aGVHD ([23.3 (10.1–39.7) %] vs [50.0 (30.8–66.5) %], P = 0.028), grade II–IV aGVHD ([16.7 (5.94–32.1) %] vs [40.0 (22.4–57.0) %], P = 0.049) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) ([22.4 (6.03–45.1) %] vs [69.0 (43.4–84.8) %], P = 0.001) between two groups. But there was no significant difference in terms of moderate-severe cGVHD (P = 0.129), 1-year relapse rate (P = 0.742), non-relapse mortality (P = 0.237), or overall survival (P = 0.441).Conclusion The application of low-dose P-ATG in patients/donors over 40 years old or female donors undergoing MSD-HSCT for hematological malignancy can significantly reduce the incidence of aGVHD, grade II–IV aGVHD and cGVHD, doesn’t increase the risk of relapse.

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are major and lethal infectious complications for patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy. Prophylaxis with intravenous and oral suspended itraconazole (200 mg Q12h intravenously × 2 days followed by 5 mg/kg·d orally in twice) or oral suspension of posaconazole (200 mg Q8h) was administered for preventing IFDs. The only 2 episodes of proven IFDs were not included after propensity-score matching (PSM), while the incidence of possible IFDs was 8.2% (9/110) in itraconazole group and 1.8% (2/110) in posaconazole group, respectively (P = .030). In clinical failure analysis, the failure rate of posaconazole group was lower as compared to the itraconazole group (2.7% vs 10.9%, P = .016). Both intravenous-oral itraconazole and posaconazole suspension are effective in preventing IFDs, while posaconazole suspension seems more tolerable.

Objectives Graft failure (GF) is an intractable complication of transplantation, which can severely affect the efficacy of the graft; however, the characteristics, incidence, and risk factors of primary GF have not been well described. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors and outcomes of primary GF to swiftly identify high-risk patients for GF. Methods We performed a case-control study with a case-control ratio of 1:4 with 869 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) between January 2015 and December 2019 at our center. Results Nineteen (2.19%) patients experienced primary poor graft function (PGF), while eleven (1.27%) patients developed primary graft rejection (GR). Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses identified two independent risk factors for primary PGF: splenomegaly [P = 0.030; odds ratio (OR), 3.486; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.139 to 13.109], and donor type [non-matched sibling donor (non-MSD)] (P = 0.018; OR, 4.475; 95% CI, 1.289 to 15.537). However, only donor type (non-MSD) was statistically significant (P = 0.020; OR, 19.432; 95% CI, 1.595 to 236.691) for primary GR. The overall survival was significantly lower in the primary PGF (P = 0.001) and GR group (P = 0.000), respectively, compared to the control group. Conclusion GF can significantly affect the overall survival of patients who underwent allo-HSCT, despite its considerably low incidence. A human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor should be the first choice for patients undergoing allo-HSCT for the prevention of GF. Moreover, splenomegaly is an independent risk factor for PGF, and caution must be exercised while treating such patients.

SET-NUP214 fusion gene, also known as TAF-1-CAN and SET-CAN, is observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). SET-NUP214 fusion in T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with chemotherapy resistance, but the prognosis of patients with AML with SET-NUP214 has rarely been reported. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed all patients with acute leukemia including AML and T-ALL patients with SET-NUP214 fusion who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in our center from July 2017 to November 2022. Of the total 11 patients, 5 patients were diagnosed with AML and 6 patients were diagnosed with T-ALL de novo. All patients received myeloablative regimens in CR1, and there were three (60%) AML patients who relapsed post-alloHSCT and three T-ALL (50%) patients who relapsed post-alloHSCT. Only one patient with AML who relapsed post-alloHSCT responded to subsequent chemotherapy plus donor lymphocyte infusion and survived the last follow-up. The estimated 1-year overall survival and 3-year overall survival for all these 11 patients were 69.3% and 38.5%, respectively. The estimated 1-year leukemia-free survival and 3-year leukemia-free survival for all patients were 69.3% and 38.5%, respectively. The research shows a high incidence of relapse for patients with acute leukemia with the SET-NUP214 fusion gene, even after alloHSCT. More clinical trials or research with larger samples are urgently needed for this group of patients.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Method Twenty patients who received auto-HSCT at our center between January 2014 and January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Results Until last follow-up, three patients in the cohort were dead due to relapse. The estimated 1-year and 5-year overall survival were 95.00% ± 4.87% and 83.82% ± 8.58%, respectively. The estimated 5-year RFS and CIR (cumulative incidence of relapse) were 85.00% ± 7.98% and 15.00% ±7.98%, respectively. Conclusion The outcome of auto-HSCT in patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission was excellent and auto-HSCT could be an effective treatment for these patients.

Objective:. To investigate the risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection within 100 days and the relationship between early CMV infection and 1-year relapse for patients with acute leukemia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Methods:. Three hundred fifty-nine patients with acute leukemia who received allo-HSCT at our center between January 2015 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Results:. Of 359 patients, 48.19% (173) patients experienced CMV infection within 100 days posttransplantation. In univariate and multivariate logistic analysis, haploidentical-related donor (HRD) (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 5.542; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.186–9.639), and ratio of CD3+CD8+ cells in lymphocytes

Abstract. Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The incidence is about 7% to 68%, and some patients have to suffer a long period of frequent, urgent, and painful urination, which brings great pain. This study aimed to analyze risk factors of HC and its effect on patient survival. We collected the medical records of 859 patients who underwent HSCT at our hospital between August 2016 and August 2020. Patients with and without HC were matched using propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio based on sex, age, and diagnosis, and logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with HC. We used Kaplan–Meier curves to analyze the survival rates of patients in the HC and non-HC groups. We also analyzed the relationship between BK viral load and the occurrence of HC using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. After propensity score matching, there were 131 patients each in the HC and non-HC groups. In the HC group, 89 patients (67.9%) had mild HC (stage II°) and 43 (32.1%) had severe HC (stage III–IV). The median interval between stem cell transplantation and HC development was 31 (3–244) days. Univariate analysis indicated that donor age, hematopoietic stem cell source, HLA, acute graft-versus-host disease, busulfan, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), total body irradiation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) (urine), and BK polyomavirus (BKV) (urine) were significantly associated with HC. ATG, CMV (urine), and BKV (urine) were independent risk factors for HC based on the multivariate analysis. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference between the HC and non-HC groups (P = .14). The 1- and 2-year survival rates in the HC group were 78.4% and 69.6%, respectively, and the corresponding rates in the non-HC group were 84.4% and 80.7%, respectively. ROC analysis indicated that a urine BKV load of 1 × 107 copies/mL was able to stratify the risk of HC. In conclusion, when the BKV load is >1 × 107, we need to be aware of the potential for the development of HC.

IntroductionSince allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered one of the curative treatments for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), hematological relapse following allo-HSCT remained a crucial concern for patients’ survival. MethodsWe retrospectively compared patients who received venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (VEN+HMA, n=23) or intensive chemotherapy (IC, n=42) for hematological relapse of myeloid malignancies after allo-HSCT. HMA selection included decitabine (n=2) and azacitidine (n=21), and combined donor lymphocyte infusion was administered to 21 and 42 patients in VEN+HMA and IC groups, respectively. ResultsMedian age of all patients was 39 (16-64) years old. Overall response rates, including complete response (CR), CR with incomplete recovery of normal neutrophil or platelet counts (CRi) and partial response (PR), were not significantly different between VEN+HMA and IC groups (60.1% versus 64.3%, P=0.785). CR/CRi rate was 52.2% in VEN+HMA and 59.5% in IC group (P=0.567). The rate of relapse after response was 66.7% in VEN+HMA group and 40.7% in IC group (P=0.176). Median overall survival was 209.0 (95%CI 130.9-287.1) days for VEN+HMA group versus 211.0 (95%CI 28.7-393.3) days for IC group (P=0.491). The incidence of lung infection (17.4% versus 50.0%, P=0.010), thrombocytopenia (73.9% versus 95.2%, P=0.035) and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) (50.0% versus 13.0%, P=0.003) was significantly higher in IC group. DiscussionIn conclusion, VEN+HMA is not inferior to IC regimen in terms of improving response and survival, and is associated with a lower incidence of adverse events and aGvHD. However, further research is required to enhance long-term survival.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-ALG (porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin) and R-ATG (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) in the conditioning regime for patients with acquired aplastic anemia who underwent HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (halpo-HSCT). Methods A total of 91 patients with acquired aplastic anemia who received haplo-HSCT at our center between January 2014 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight patients were in the P-ALG group while sixty-three patients were in the R-ATG group. Results The median time was 11 versus 13 days (P = 0.294) for myeloid engraftment and 12.5 versus 15 days (P = 0.465) for platelet engraftment in the P-ALG and R-ATG groups, respectively. There were no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (74.83% ± 8.24% vs 72.29% ± 6.26%, P = 0.830), GVHD-free, failure-free survival (71.05% ± 8.65% vs 62.71% ± 6.22%, P = 0.662), failure-free survival (74.83% ± 8.24% vs 66.09% ± 5.84%, P = 0.647) and transplantation-related mortality (25.17% ± 8.24% vs 26.29% ± 6.22%, P = 0.708) between the two groups. The incidence of aGVHD (acute graft versus host disease) (65.39% ± 9.33% vs 62.71% ± 6.30%, P = 0.653), II–IV aGVHD (38.46% ± 9.54% vs 35.64% ± 6.24%, P = 0.695), III–IV aGVHD (19.23% ± 7.73% vs 10.53% ± 4.07%, P = 0.291), cGVHD (chronic graft versus host disease) (22.22% ± 12.25% vs 22.31% ± 6.30%, P = 0.915), and moderate to severe cGVHD (5.56% ± 5.40% vs 9.28% ± 4.46%, P = 0.993) were not significantly different. Similar outcomes were observed between the P-ALG and R-ATG groups for severe bacterial infection (17.9% vs 25.4%, P = 0.431), invasive fungal diseases (3.6% vs 9.5%, P = 0.577) and graft rejection (0% vs 9.5%, P = 0.218). However, the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and Epstein-Barr virus infection was significantly lower in the P-ALG group (46.4% vs 71.4%, P = 0.022; 3.6% vs 25.4%, P = 0.014). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of P-ALG were similar with R-ATG in the setting of haplo-HSCT for patients with acquired aplastic anemia patients. P-ALG could be an alternative for R-ATG.

ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the characteristics of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) and non-ETP ALL patients and the outcomes of these patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).MethodA total of 57 patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma receiving allo-HSCT at our center between January 2016 and March 2022 were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed as ETP-ALL/LBL (28/57, 49.12%) in the cohort.ResultsThe baseline characteristic was not significantly different between the two groups. The median time for myeloid engraftment was 14 days (ranged from 11 to 21) versus 14 days (ranged from 10 to 20) (P = 0.067) and 18 days (ranged from 12 to 27) versus 15.5 days (ranged from 12 to 72) (P = 0.183) for platelet engraftment in the ETP-ALL/LBL and non-ETP ALL groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (54.74% ± 10.33% vs. 64.20% ± 10.30%, P = 0.786), relapse-free survival (56.22% ± 10.11% vs. 57.17% ± 12.71%, P = 0.841), cumulative incidence of relapse (30.14% ± 9.85% vs. 22.79% ± 8.24%, P = 0.774), and non-relapse mortality (19.52% ± 8.99% vs. 25.95% ± 14.44%, P = 0.967) between the two groups. The incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) (P = 0.922), II–IV aGVHD (P = 0.940), III–IV aGVHD (P = 0.664), cytomegalovirus infection (P = 0.862), Epstein–Barr virus infection (P = 0.610), and severe bacterial infection (P = 0.145) was also similar.ConclusionThe prognosis of patients with ETP-ALL/LBL was similar to non-ETP ALL patients when they received allo-HSCT.

Cardiac involvement in hematological malignancies is uncommon, with only a few cases reported to date, and it often leads to a poor prognosis. Here, we report a case of a 42-year-old woman with a history of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma/acute lymphoblastic leukemia in whom cardiac mass and myocardial infiltration were detected. Prior to this presentation, massive pericardial effusion had occurred 6 months after CAR T-cell therapy, which was improved via ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis. We observed elevated cytokine levels and increased copy number of CAR DNA in both pericardial effusion and serum. Upon detecting cardiac mass and myocardial infiltration, the patient was administered tocilizumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody against IL-6 receptor), which controlled the serum cytokine levels, and reduced intensity chemotherapy, including vindesine, cyclophosphamide, and prednisolone. However, the patient finally died of multiple organ failure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the development of a cardiac mass and occurrence of myocardial infiltration after allo-HSCT and CAR T-cell therapy. This report may provide supporting data for the early diagnosis and immediate treatment of patients with cardiac involvement.

Abstract Objectives Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, demonstrates efficacy for treating steroid‐resistant acute graft‐versus‐host disease (SR‐aGVHD) following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). Myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have a protective effect on aGVHD via suppressing T cell function. However, the precise features and mechanism of JAK inhibitor‐mediated immune modulation on MDSCs subsets remain poorly understood. Methods A total of 74 SR‐aGVHD patients treated with allo‐HSCT and ruxolitinib were enrolled in the present study. The alterations of MDSC and regulatory T cell (Treg) populations were monitored during ruxolitinib treatment in responders and nonresponders. A mouse model of aGVHD was used to evaluate the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs and related signalling pathways in response to ruxolitinib administration in vivo and in vitro. Results Patients with SR‐aGVHD who received ruxolitinib treatment achieved satisfactory outcomes. Elevation proportions of MDSCs before treatment, especially polymorphonuclear‐MDSCs (PMN‐MDSCs) were better to reflect the response to ruxolitinib than those in Tregs. In the mouse model of aGVHD, the administration of ruxolitinib resulted in the expansion and functional enhancement of PMN‐MDSCs and the effects could be partially reversed by an anti‐Gr‐1 antibody in vivo. Ruxolitinib treatment significantly elevated the suppressive function of PMN‐MDSCs through reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by Nox2 upregulation as well as bypassing the activated MAPK/NF‐κB signalling pathway. Additionally, ex vivo experiments demonstrated that ruxolitinib prevented the differentiation of mature myeloid cells and promoted the accumulation of MDSCs by inhibiting STAT5. Conclusions Ruxolitinib enhances PMN‐MDSCs functions through JAK/STAT and ROS‐MAPK/NF‐κB signalling pathways. Monitoring frequencies and functions of MDSCs can help evaluate treatment responses to ruxolitinib.

Whether infections before transplantation impair the survival of patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to compare survival between patients with SAA who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with infection (n=66) and patients without infection (n=189) from one medical center. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except that more patients in the infection group were diagnosed with VSAA (59.09% vs. 30.69%, P

We compared the efficacy and safety of porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin (pALG) (n=140) and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) (n=86) in patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from matched sibling donors (MSD) in two transplantation centers in China ranging from 2005 to 2020. The groups had similar baseline characteristics except for a higher number of infused mononuclear cells (P

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 387 consecutive patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen from matched sibling donors (MSD) (n = 108) or haploidentical donors (HID) (n = 91) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 188) from 2014 to 2020 at our hospital. Compared with HID-HSCT, MSD-HSCT had a lower incidence of graft failure (1% vs. 7%, p = 0.062), grade II–IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) (16% vs. 35%, p = 0.001), and mild to severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (8% vs. 23%, p = 0.007), but an equivalent incidence of grade III–IV aGvHD (8% vs. 12%, p = 0.237) and moderate to severe cGvHD (3% vs. 9%, p = 0.076). HSCT had superior blood count recovery at 3, 6, and 12 months compared with IST (p < 0.001). The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) of the MSD, HID, and IST groups were 86%, 72%, and 79% (p = 0.02), respectively; accordingly, the failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 85%, 68%, and 56%, respectively (p < 0.001). For patients aged ≤40 years, the OS rate was still significantly superior for MSD-HSCT receipients compared to HID-HSCT receipients (89% vs. 76%, p = 0.024) while the HID-HSCT recipients showed similar OS (76% vs. 78%, p = 0.166) but superior FFS (p = 0.047) when follow-up was longer than 14.5 months in contrast to IST. In a multivariate analysis, HID-HSCT and a conditioning regimen that included busulfan were adversely related to OS among patients who received allografts. In conclusion, MSD-HSCT was the frontline choice for patients with severe AA aged ≤40 years, while HID-HSCT was as effective as IST for patients without an MSD.

Secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) is a life-threatening complication that may affect up to 20% of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), we retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who received continuous rhTPO for the treatment of SFPR. Overall response and complete response were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients and 10 (34.5%) patients, at a median time of 21.5 days (range, 3-41 days) and 39.5 days (range, 7-53 days) after initiation of rhTPO treatment, respectively. Among the responders, the probability of keeping overall response and complete response at 1 year after response was 77.3% and 80.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher CD34 + cells (≥3 × 10 6 /kg) infused during HSCT (HR: 7.22, 95% CI: 1.53-34.04, P = 0.01) and decreased ferritin after rhTPO treatment (HR: 6.16, 95% CI: 1.18-32.15, P = 0.03) were indicated to associate with complete response to rhTPO. Importantly, rhTPO was well tolerated in all patients without side effects urging withdrawal and clinical intervention. The results of this study suggest that rhTPO may be a safe and effective treatment for SFPR.

Objectives: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common but lethal complication of chemotherapy in hematological malignance. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic risk factors for antibiotic treatment outcome in PN patients, and provide the optimal choice for the initial empirical antibiotic treatment. Methods: 227 consecutive FN hematologic malignancies from four hospitals in Northeast China were enrolled. The outcome of antibiotic therapy was investigated until 14 days after the onset of FN. The factors affecting antibiotic therapy outcome were evaluated using Univariate analysis and Multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Among all patients, 27 patients did not achieve favorable outcome either clinically or bacteriologically. It was shown that the risk factors for poor FN therapy outcome were associated with prolonged duration of neutropenia over 9 days during FN (P=0.019), slow neutrophil recovery (P=0.039), respiratory infection (P=0.005), and that initial monotherapy with drugs recommended by the guidelines indicated better outcome (P=0.009). Additionally, patients with multi-bacterial infection, as well as further ANC decrease after fever, had a poor prognosis. Conclusions: Our results indicate that early application of antibiotics and prevention of respiratory infection as well as good clinical care are able to improve clinical outcomes from empirical antibiotic treatment in FN patients with hematological malignances.