Search

With the increasing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in education, concerns about inherent biases in these models have gained prominence. We evaluate LLMs for bias in the personalized educational setting, specifically focusing on the models' roles as "teachers". We reveal significant biases in how models generate and select educational content tailored to different demographic groups, including race, ethnicity, sex, gender, disability status, income, and national origin. We introduce and apply two bias score metrics--Mean Absolute Bias (MAB) and Maximum Difference Bias (MDB)--to analyze 9 open and closed state-of-the-art LLMs. Our experiments, which utilize over 17,000 educational explanations across multiple difficulty levels and topics, uncover that models perpetuate both typical and inverted harmful stereotypes., Comment: 46 Pages, 55 Figures, dataset release pending publication

As AI advances in text generation, human trust in AI generated content remains constrained by biases that go beyond concerns of accuracy. This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. Through three experiments involving text rephrasing, news article summarization, and persuasive writing, we investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content. While the raters could not differentiate the two types of texts in the blind test, they overwhelmingly favored content labeled as "Human Generated," over those labeled "AI Generated," by a preference score of over 30%. We observed the same pattern even when the labels were deliberately swapped. This human bias against AI has broader societal and cognitive implications, as it undervalues AI performance. This study highlights the limitations of human judgment in interacting with AI and offers a foundation for improving human-AI collaboration, especially in creative fields., Comment: 9 pages, 2 figures

The success of generative models has reached a unique threshold where their outputs are indistinguishable from real data, leading to the inevitable contamination of future data collection pipelines with synthetic data. While their potential to generate infinite samples initially offers promise for reducing data collection costs and addressing challenges in data-scarce fields, the severe degradation in performance has been observed when iterative loops of training and generation occur -- known as ``model collapse.'' This paper explores a practical scenario in which a pretrained text-to-image diffusion model is finetuned using synthetic images generated from a previous iteration, a process we refer to as the ``Chain of Diffusion.'' We first demonstrate the significant degradation in image quality caused by this iterative process and identify the key factor driving this decline through rigorous empirical investigations. Drawing an analogy between the Chain of Diffusion and biological evolution, we then introduce a novel theoretical analysis based on quantitative trait modeling. Our theoretical analysis aligns with empirical observations of the generated images in the Chain of Diffusion. Finally, we propose Reusable Diffusion Finetuning (ReDiFine), a simple yet effective strategy inspired by genetic mutations. ReDiFine mitigates model collapse without requiring any hyperparameter tuning, making it a plug-and-play solution for reusable image generation., Comment: 29 pages, version 2 with new analysis

As the number of accepted papers at AI and ML conferences reaches into the thousands, it has become unclear how researchers access and read research publications. In this paper, we investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research, particularly the citation counts of papers they share. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023, alongside controls precisely matched by 9 key covariates. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers, with median citation counts 2-3 times higher than those of the control group. Additionally, the study delves into the geographic, gender, and institutional diversity of highlighted authors. Given these findings, we advocate for a responsible approach to curation, encouraging influencers to uphold the journalistic standard that includes showcasing diverse research topics, authors, and institutions., Comment: 15 Pages, 22 Figures, ICML 2024

QR decomposition is an essential operation for solving linear equations and obtaining least-squares solutions. In high-performance computing systems, large-scale parallel QR decomposition often faces node faults. We address this issue by proposing a fault-tolerant algorithm that incorporates `coded computing' into the parallel Gram-Schmidt method, commonly used for QR decomposition. Coded computing introduces error-correcting codes into computational processes to enhance resilience against intermediate failures. While traditional coding strategies cannot preserve the orthogonality of $Q$, recent work has proven a post-orthogonalization condition that allows low-cost restoration of the degraded orthogonality. In this paper, we construct a checksum-generator matrix for multiple-node failures that satisfies the post-orthogonalization condition and prove that our code satisfies the maximum-distance separable (MDS) property with high probability. Furthermore, we consider in-node checksum storage setting where checksums are stored in original nodes. We obtain the minimal number of checksums required to be resilient to any $f$ failures under the in-node checksum storage, and also propose an in-node systematic MDS coding strategy that achieves the lower bound. Extensive experiments validate our theories and showcase the negligible overhead of our coded computing framework for fault-tolerant QR decomposition.