Search

Der Bericht gibt die Ergebnisse einer Befragung von 40 Einzelhändlern in Sachsen wieder. Er zeigt deren Bedarf an bio- und regionalen Lebensmitteln. Adressaten sind direktvermarktende Landwirte, Lebensmittelhersteller sowie deren Berater und Organisationen. Redaktionsschluss: 31.07.2022

Das Experimentierfeld EXPRESS erprobt digitale Lösungen für den Wein- und Obstbau. Über vielfältige Transferansätze werden den Landwirtinnen und Landwirten dabei konkrete Unterschiede und Möglichkeiten dieser Technologien aufgezeigt.

Open AccessArticle How Are Urban Green Spaces and Residential Development Related? A Synopsis of Multi-Perspective Analyses for Leipzig, Germany by Nina Schwarz 1,2,*, Annegret Haase 3, Dagmar Haase 2,4, Nadja Kabisch 3,4, Sigrun Kabisch 3, Veronika Liebelt 2,5,6, Dieter Rink 3, Michael W. Strohbach 7, Juliane Welz 8and Manuel Wolff 3,4 1 Department Urban and Regional Planning and Geo-Information Management (PGM), Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands 2 Department Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 3 Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 4 Department of Geography, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany 5 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Biodiversity Economics, Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 6 Department of Economics, Leipzig University, 04109 Leipzig, Germany 7 Landscape Ecology and Environmental Systems Analysis, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany 8 Fraunhofer Center for International Management and Knowledge Economy IMW, 04109 Leipzig, Germany * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Academic Editor: Thomas Panagopoulos Land2021,10(6), 630;https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060630 Received: 24 March 2021/Revised: 7 June 2021/Accepted: 9 June 2021/Published: 12 June 2021 (This article belongs to the Special IssueNature-based solutions (NBS) in Cities and Their Interaction with Urban Land, Ecosystems, Built Environment and People: Debating Societal Implications) Download PDF Browse Figures Citation Export Abstract The relationship between urban green spaces (UGS) and residential development is complex: UGS have positive and negative immediate impacts on residents’ well-being, residential location choice, housing, and land markets. Property owners and real estate agents might consider how prospective clients perceive UGS and act accordingly, while urban planners influence UGS location and management as well as aim at steering the built environment. Typically, studies focus on one of these perspectives at a time. Here, we provide a synopsis of results from studies, taking different perspectives for a single case study: Leipzig, Germany. We summarise and discuss the findings of eight studies on UGS and residential development. In detail, these studies focus on spatial pattern analysis, hedonic pricing analysis, mixed-methods studies on experts’ perspectives, surveys, and choice experiments exploring residents’ perceptions of UGS. We reflect on the feasibility of deriving a synthesis out of these independent studies and to what extent context matters. We conclude that both triangulating of data and methods, as well as long-term and context-sensitive studies are needed to explain the interlinkages between UGS and residential development and their context dependency.

[Foreword ...] The present report contains the results of the initial working steps of the CLAVE project which is a) the theoretical combination of fragmentation and vulnerability, and b) the development of a methodology for assessing socio-environmental fragmentation and residential vulnerability in order to enhance the overall knowledge of urban vulnerability. This is seen as the primary prerequisite for the subsequent elaboration and implementation of local adaptation measures. The different methodological steps and in-depth analyses to be undertaken are described by using selected municipalities within the MAS. Chapter 2 focuses on describing the underlying problem of linking the theoretical approaches of fragmentation and vulnerability from a general point of view. Existing approaches presented by other authors are discussed, in order to link as well as distinguish the work presented here with/from others. Chapter 3 shows how the concepts of fragmentation and vulnerability are interlinked from the project’s point of view. Chapter 4 describes the theoretical background of climate change adaptation and adaptive capacity in order to allow a better understanding of both the CLAVE project approach and its application. The case study, the MAS, is described and illustrated in Chapter 5 by providing a general overview of the city together with existing findings with regard to fragmentation and vulnerability. This chapter thereby explains the context in which the approach is to be applied. Chapter 6 presents the project’s methodological framework with its three-stage approach as an integrated assessment of urban vulnerability to climate change. Options for validating the approach are likewise discussed. Chapter 7 summarizes the main conclusions and provides an outlook by describing success stories and lessons learned for validating the theoretical approach. The development of strategies to deal with future climate change in these and other regions worldwide is discussed.

This discussion paper presents a methodological approach to sustainability indicators and scenarios that evolved within the framework of the interdisciplinary and application-oriented Risk Habitat Megacity research initiative on sustainable urban development in Santiago de Chile. The aim of this discussion paper is to support regional and local planning authorities and political decision-makers in the area of housing and other urban policy fields. It will be shown how the approach was contextualized in order to contribute to the ongoing debate on methodological approaches to social sustainability and to the policy-related understanding of socio-spatial differentiation trends and their implications for social inclusion.