Search

Patients with breast cancer and ipsilateral axillary and internal mammary (IM) lymph node involvement (cN3b) often forgo IM node resection. Therefore, radiation is important for curative therapy. However, prognosis is not well described in the era of modern systemic therapy, and limited data exist to guide optimal locoregional treatment recommendations.We retrospectively reviewed 117 patients with nonmetastatic cN3b breast cancer treated at our institution between 2014 and 2019. Staging included ultrasound evaluation of all regional nodal basins. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, resection of the breast primary, and axillary nodal dissection, followed by adjuvant radiation to the breast/chest wall and regional nodes. Institutional guidelines recommend a 10-Gy boost to radiographically resolved nodes, and a 16-Gy boost to unresolved nodes. Overall survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional RFS, internal mammary RFS, and distant metastasis-free survival were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. A multivariable model for RFS was constructed.Median follow-up for 117 patients was 3.82 years. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years and 56 patients (48%) were receptor group ER+/HER2-. Mastectomy was performed in 96 patients (82%), 38 (32%) had biopsy-confirmed IMC involvement, and 8 (7%) had IM node dissection. The median initial radiation dose was 50 Gy (range, 50-55 Gy) and IMC boost 10 Gy (range, 0-16 Gy). The 5-year overall survival, IM RFS, locoregional RFS, distant metastasis-free survival, and RFS were 74%, 98%, 89%, 68%, and 67%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, a clinical complete response of the IM nodes or ypN0 (pathologic complete response of nodes) status had improved 5-year RFS with hazard ratios of 0.24 (P = .006) and 0.27 (P = .05), respectively. Extranodal extension or lymphovascular invasion were associated with worse 5-year RFS with hazard ratios of 4.13 (P = .001) and 2.25 (P = .04), respectively.Multimodality therapy provides excellent locoregional control of 89% at 5 years for patients with cN3b breast cancer. Adjuvant radiation yields a 5-year IM RFS of 98%. Clinical and pathologic response of IM nodes are independently prognostic for RFS.

Supplementary Table 1

Supplemental figures 1-11

Our understanding is limited concerning the tumor immune microenvironment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), an aggressive form of primary cancer with low rates of pathologic complete response to current neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens. We retrospectively identified pretreatment (N = 86) and matched posttreatment tissue (N = 27) from patients with stage III or de novo stage IV IBC who received NAC followed by a mastectomy. Immune profiling was performed including quantification of lymphoid and myeloid infiltrates by IHC and T-cell repertoire analysis. Thirty-four of 86 cases in this cohort (39.5%) achieved a pathologic complete response. Characterization of the tumor microenvironment revealed that having a lower pretreatment mast cell density was significantly associated with achieving a pathologic complete response to NAC (P = 0.004), with responders also having more stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (P = 0.035), CD8+ T cells (P = 0.047), and CD20+ B cells (P = 0.054). Spatial analysis showed close proximity of mast cells to CD8+ T cells, CD163+ monocytes/macrophages, and tumor cells when pathologic complete response was not achieved. PD-L1 positivity on tumor cells was found in fewer than 2% of cases and on immune cells in 27% of cases, but with no correlation to response. Our results highlight the strong association of mast cell infiltration with poor response to NAC, suggesting a mechanism of treatment resistance and a potential therapeutic target in IBC. Proximity of mast cells to immune and tumor cells may suggest immunosuppressive or tumor-promoting interactions of these mast cells.

Supplementary Data File and Legend PDF file - 113K, Supplementary Data File and legend

Supplementary Tables XLS file - 236K, Supplementary Table 1: Comparison of ER- and ErbB2-status determined using gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry Supplementary Table 2: Validation of the algorithm to identify transcription factor activation Supplementary Table 3: Description of the public nIBC data sets Supplementary Table 4: Molecular data of IBC and nIBC samples Supplementary Table 5: List of 491 probe sets differentially expressed between IBC and nIBC samples in a molecular subtype-independent manner Supplementary Table 6: IPA analysis of the list of 443 unique genes differentially expressed between IBC and nIBC Supplementary Table 7: Networks identified by IPA analysis of the list of 443 unique genes differentially expressed between IBC and nIBC Supplementary Table 8: Uni- and multivariate analyses for DMFS in the public pooled nIBC data set

Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a poorly characterized form of breast cancer. So far, the results of expression profiling in IBC are inconclusive due to various reasons including limited sample size. Here, we present the integration of three Affymetrix expression datasets collected through the World IBC Consortium allowing us to interrogate the molecular profile of IBC using the largest series of IBC samples ever reported.Experimental Design: Affymetrix profiles (HGU133-series) from 137 patients with IBC and 252 patients with non-IBC (nIBC) were analyzed using unsupervised and supervised techniques. Samples were classified according to the molecular subtypes using the PAM50-algorithm. Regression models were used to delineate IBC-specific and molecular subtype-independent changes in gene expression, pathway, and transcription factor activation.Results: Four robust IBC-sample clusters were identified, associated with the different molecular subtypes (P < 0.001), all of which were identified in IBC with a similar prevalence as in nIBC, except for the luminal A subtype (19% vs. 42%; P < 0.001) and the HER2-enriched subtype (22% vs. 9%; P < 0.001). Supervised analysis identified and validated an IBC-specific, molecular subtype-independent 79-gene signature, which held independent prognostic value in a series of 871 nIBCs. Functional analysis revealed attenuated TGF-β signaling in IBC.Conclusion: We show that IBC is transcriptionally heterogeneous and that all molecular subtypes described in nIBC are detectable in IBC, albeit with a different frequency. The molecular profile of IBC, bearing molecular traits of aggressive breast tumor biology, shows attenuation of TGF-β signaling, potentially explaining the metastatic potential of IBC tumor cells in an unexpected manner. Clin Cancer Res; 19(17); 4685–96. ©2013 AACR.

Supplementary Figures PDF file - 529K, Supplementary Figure 1: Application of the Gaussian mixture model to ESR1- and ERBB2-expression data Supplementary Figure 2: Normalization Supplementary Figure 3: Silhouette Analysis Supplementary Figure 4: Silhouette Analysis (P-Values) Supplementary Figure 5: Validation of Limma-corrected IBC/nIBC signature Supplementary Figure 6: Networks overrepresented in IBC Supplementary Figure 7: Networks overrepresented in nIBC Supplementary Figure 8: Prognostic value of the IBC/nIBC signature in nIBC

PDF file, 351K, Silencing endogenous TIG1 in SUM149 IBC cells inhibits cell proliferation (S1); Silencing endogenous TIG1 in KPL-4 IBC cells inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion (S2); TIG1 depletion affects the growth of SUM149 cells in 3-dimensional culture (S3); Heat map of 19 selected candidates from 183 probe sets differentially expressed between SUM149 cells transfected with control siRNA and SUM149 cells transfected with siRNA targeting TIG1 (siTIG1)(S4); Representative images of crystal violet staining of migration and invasion assays for Axl-restored shTIG1-A cells (S5); TIG1 colocalized with Axl in KPL-4 cells (S6); SGI-7079 treatment inhibits the invasion of KPL-4 cells (S7).

PDF file, 107K.

PDF file, 72K, Candidate functional partners of TIG1 selected using DNA microarray analysis.

PDF file, 76K, Relation between TIG1 expression status and clinicopathologic factors of the IBC patient tissues.

PDF file, 80K.

Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and highly aggressive form of breast cancer. Patients with IBC still have worse clinical outcomes compared to patients with non-IBC (40% versus 63% for 5 years overall survival, respectively) despite advances in breast cancer treatment. IBC remains a poorly characterized disease lacking specific therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers. Our group demonstrated that N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) is crucial in promoting tumorigenesis and brain metastasis in mouse models of IBC. Our hypothesis is that NDRG1 is a prognostic marker associated with poor outcome in IBC patients. Methods: 64 IBC patients in a tissue microarray were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining with anti-NDRG1 primary antibody and NDRG1 levels were quantified. Using the median value, 32 patients were grouped as NDRG1-low (≤ median), and 32 as NDRG1-high (>median). Survival data were compared by Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test. Results: The average age of patients was 50 years. Sixty-two percent of patients had estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors, 83% were stage III, 80% high grade, and 67% of these patients received adjuvant radiation. The median follow-up time for the patients studied was 11.7 years, and the median overall survival (OS) time was 3.7 years. On univariate analysis, NDRG1 expression, tumor grade, disease stage, ER status, and adjuvant radiation therapy were associated with OS and disease specific survival (DSS). Patients with NDRG1-low tumors experienced better actuarial 10-year OS (p=0.0129) and DSS (p=0.0074), and showed significant higher 10-year OS and DSS rates than patients with NDRG1-high(OS, 45% vs. 19%, p=0.0278; DSS, 52% vs. 22%, p=0.0139). The median OS and DSS times were shorter for NDRG1-high patients (OS, 2.5 years; DSS, 3.1 years) than for NDRG1-low patients (OS, 5.9 years; DSS, 10.7 years). Multivariable analysis, NDRG1 was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.449, p=0.0274) and DSS (HR=2.727, p=0.0039). ER status, disease stage and adjuvant radiation were also independent predictor for both OS and DSS. Furthermore, we observed that NDRG1-high expressing ER-negative tumors exhibit worse outcome in IBC patients (OS, p=0.0003; DSS, p=0.0003). NDRG1-high expression correlated with worse outcome in patients that received adjuvant radiation treatment (OS, p=0.0088; DSS, p=0.0093), and those with stage III (OS, p=0.0450; DSS, p=0.0239). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that NDRG1 is positively correlated with aggressive tumor characteristics in IBC and that it is an independent prognostic factor for OS and DSS in IBC patients, suggesting that targeting NDRG1 may provide a novel therapeutic strategy to improve outcomes for patients with IBC. Our data further suggests that NDRG1 warrants further investigation in radiation response. Citation Format: Emilly Schlee Villodre, Yun Gong, Xiaoding Hu, Lei Huo, Esther C Yoon, Naoto T Ueno, Wendy A Woodward, Debu Tripathy, Juhee Song, Bisrat G Debeb. NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-13.

Background. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and breast tumor emboli within dermal and breast lymphatic vessels are prognostic for metastatic spread and poor outcomes, and are abundant in Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). IBC is an aggressive breast cancer that presents suddenly with breast swelling and redness due to tumor emboli in lymphatics. Lack of breast-feeding and obesity are IBC risk factors. We sought to demonstrate the combinatorial effects of a high-fat diet and nursing on lymphatic function and compare these to IBC tumor induced changes in lymphatic function. We hypothesize that risk factors for aggressive breast cancer may alter lymphatic function in the normal gland prior to tumor initiation. Methods. Following two rounds of pregnancy in 20 multiparous SCID Beige immunocompromised mice, half of the mice were force weaned while half nursed pups. Prior to forced weaning, half of each of these groups were fed a high fat diet (HFD: 60 Kcal %, N = 10) while the other half received a low-fat diet (LFD: 10 Kcal %, N = 10). Consecutive dynamic near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) lymphatic imaging was performed at 6-7 months (covid interruption) and 14 months after initiating the diet by injecting a near-IR fluorophore into the mammary fatpad and recording lymphatic pulsing over 8 minutes using V++. Matlab and ImageJ were used to quantify pulsing rates on the ventral lymphatics in each animal. Fatpads were subsequently inoculated with SUM149 IBC cells and imaging was repeated 16 months post diet initiation. Lymphatic imaging over time by HFD vs LFD was further studied in nulliparous animals. Tissues were collected for further analyses. ResultsData analysis prior to tumor injection, demonstrated lymphatic pulsing (pulses/4 minutes) increased over time in HFD force weaned (HFFW) and HFD nursing (HFN) animals only (65.5 vs 72.6, P=0.059; 60.1 vs 76.6, P=0.0099, respectively). Comparing HFFW and HFN to matched LFD groups (LFFW and LFN), at 14 weeks HFD was associated with increased pumping after forced weaning (62.3 vs. 72.6, P=0.074), and nursing (62.5 vs 76.6, P=0.0023). There was an increase in pulsing after tumor initiation (16 months after initiation of diet) in all groups (80.1, 84.1, 83.2, 82.4, P > 0.05 all comparisons to initial timepoint). In a separate experiment examining HFD (N=5) vs LFD (N=5) in nulliparous mice, lymphatic contractile activity increased in all animals over. time, average ventral lymphatic contractile frequency for LFD and HFD at week 8,11 and 14 weeks after diet initiation were 5, 8.64, 15.9 pumps/4 mins vs 11.8, 18.5, 28.2 pumps/4 mins, (P = 0.01, 0.05, and 0.0005 respectively). ConclusionsHFD increased lymphatic pulsing rate over time to a significantly greater extent than LFD continuing over 14 months independent of reproductive and nursing status. Tumor initiation prompted further increased pulsing rates beyond that observed after HFD across all groups. The magnitude of the effect of HFD on lymphatic pulsing approached the rate after tumor initiation, while reproductive variables did not impact lymphatic pulsing. Further studies are warranted to demonstrate the relationship if any between lymphatic pumping pre-initiation and LVI after tumor initiation and examine the role of intervention on reducing LVI. Citation Format: Wintana Balema, Janelle Morton, Richard Larson, Fred C Velasquez, Eva Sevick-Muraca, Wendy A Woodward. Risk factor modeled microenvironment effects lymphatics activity and IBC invasiveness and progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-24-06.

Purpose BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) mutations confer radiation sensitivity preclinically, but there are limited data regarding breast cancer outcomes after radiation therapy (RT) among patients with documented BRCA1/2 PV mutations versus no PV mutations. Methods and Materials This retrospective cohort study included women with clinical stage I-III breast cancer who received definitive surgery and RT and underwent BRCA1/2 genetic evaluation at the The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-specific death (DSD), toxicities, and second cancers were compared by BRCA1/2 PV status. Results Of the 2213 women who underwent BRCA1/2 testing, 63% self-reported their race as White, 13.6% as Black/African American, 17.6% as Hispanic, and 5.8% as Asian/American Indian/Alaska Native; 124 had BRCA1 and 100 had BRCA2 mutations; and 1394 (63%) received regional nodal RT. The median follow-up time for all patients was 7.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-7.7 years). No differences were found between the groups with and without BRCA1/2 PV mutations in 10-year cumulative incidences of LRR (with mutations: 11.6% [95% CI, 7.0%-17.6%]; without mutations: 6.6% [95% CI, 5.3%-8.0%]; P = .466) and DSD (with mutations: 12.3% [95% CI, 8.0%-17.7%]; without mutations: 13.8% [95% CI, 12.0%-15.8%]; P = .716). On multivariable analysis, BRCA1/2 status was not associated with LRR or DSD, but Black/African American patients (P = .036) and Asians/American Indians/Alaska Native patients (P = .002) were at higher risk of LRR compared with White patients, and Black/African American patients were at higher risk of DSD versus White patients (P = .004). No in-field, nonbreast second cancers were observed in the BRCA1/2 PV group. Rates of acute and late grade ≥3 radiation-related toxicity in the BCRA1/2 PV group were 5.4% (n = 12) and 0.4% (n = 1), respectively. Conclusions Oncologic outcomes in a diverse cohort of patients with breast cancer who had a germline BRCA1/2 PV mutation and were treated with RT were similar to those of patients with no mutation, supporting the use of RT according to standard indications in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 PV mutation.

PURPOSE: There are limited prospective data on predictors of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) plus a boost. We sought to characterize longitudinal PROs and cosmesis in a randomized trial comparing conventionally fractionated (CF) versus hypofractionated (HF) WBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2011 to 2014, women aged ≥40 years with Tis-T2 N0-N1a M0 breast cancer who underwent a lumpectomy with negative margins were randomized to CF-WBI (50 Gray [Gy]/25 fractions plus boost) versus HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fractions plus boost). At baseline (pre-radiation), at 6 months, and yearly thereafter through 5 years, PROs included the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy−Breast (FACTB), and Body Image Scale; cosmesis was reported by the treating physician using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cosmesis values. Multivariable mixed-effects growth curve models evaluated associations of the treatment arm and patient factors with outcomes and tested for relevant interactions with the treatment arm. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients were randomized, completing a total of 14,801 PRO assessments. The median age was 60 years, 37% of patients had a bra cup size ≥D, 44% were obese, and 30% received chemotherapy. Through 5 years, there were no significant differences in PROs or cosmesis by treatment arm. A bra cup size ≥D was associated with worse BCTOS cosmesis (P < .001), BCTOS pain (P = .001), FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (P = .03), FACT-B Emotional Well-being (P = .03), and Body Image Scale (P = .003) scores. Physician-rated cosmesis was worse in patients who were overweight (P = .02) or obese (P < .001). No patient subsets experienced better PROs or cosmesis with CF-WBI. CONCLUSIONS: Both CF-WBI and HF-WBI confer similar longitudinal PROs and physician-rated cosmesis through 5 years of follow-up, with no relevant subsets that fared better with CF-WBI. This evidence supports broad adoption of hypofractionation with boost, including in patients receiving chemotherapy and in a population with a high prevalence of obesity. The associations of large breast size and obesity with adverse outcomes across multiple domains highlight the opportunity to engage at-risk patients in lifestyle intervention strategies, as well as to consider alternative radiation treatment regimens.

Summary Background Matricellular proteins comprising matrisome and adhesome are responsible for structure integrity and interactions between cells in the tumour microenvironment of breast cancer. Changes in the gene expression of matrisome and adhesome augment metastasis. Since inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is characterized by high metastatic behaviour. Herein, we compared the gene expression profile of matrisome and adhesome in non-IBC and IBC in fresh tissue and ex vivo patient-derived explants (PDEs) and we also compared the secretory inflammatory mediators of PDEs in non-IBC and IBC to identify secretory cytokines participate in cross-talk between cells via interactions with matrisome and adhisome. Methods Fifty patients (31 non-IBC and 19 IBC) were enrolled in the present study. To test their validation in clinical studies, PDEs were cultured as an ex vivo model. Gene expression and cytokine array were used to identify candidate genes and cytokines contributing to metastasis in the examined fresh tissues and PDEs. Bioinformatics analysis was applied on identified differentially expressed genes using GeneMANIA and Metascape gene annotation and analysis resource to identify pathways involved in IBC metastasis. Results Normal and cancer fresh tissues and PDEs of IBC were characterized by overexpression of CDH1 and MMP14 and downregulation of CTNNA1 and TIMP1 compared with non-IBC. The secretome of IBC cancer PDEs is characterized by significantly high expression of interleukin 6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (CCL2) compared with non-IBC. Conclusion Genes expressed by adhisome and matrisome play a significant role in IBC metastasis and should be considered novel target therapy.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive form of primary breast cancer characterized by rapid onset and high risk of metastasis and poor clinical outcomes. The biological basis for the aggressiveness of IBC is still not well understood and no IBC‐specific targeted therapies exist. In this study, we report that lipocalin 2 (LCN2), a small secreted glycoprotein belonging to the lipocalin superfamily, is expressed at significantly higher levels in IBC vs non‐IBC tumors, independently of molecular subtype. LCN2 levels were also significantly higher in IBC cell lines and in their culture media than in non‐IBC cell lines. High expression was associated with poor‐prognosis features and shorter overall survival in IBC patients. Depletion of LCN2 in IBC cell lines reduced colony formation, migration, and cancer stem cell populations in vitro and inhibited tumor growth, skin invasion, and brain metastasis in mouse models of IBC. Analysis of our proteomics data showed reduced expression of proteins involved in cell cycle and DNA repair in LCN2‐silenced IBC cells. Our findings support that LCN2 promotes IBC tumor aggressiveness and offer a new potential therapeutic target for IBC., In this study, the authors demonstrate that lipocalin 2 (LCN2) is highly upregulated in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), a rare, rapidly‐progressing and aggressive variant of primary breast cancer. Depletion of LCN2 in IBC cell lines reduced colony formation, migration, and cancer stem cell populations in vitro and inhibited tumor growth, skin invasion, and brain metastasis in mouse models of IBC.

Background Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare breast malignancy with poor outcomes compared with non-IBC. Age-related differences in tumor biology, treatment, and clinical outcomes have been described in non-IBC. This study evaluated age-related differences in IBC. Methods From an institutional prospective database, patients with an IBC diagnosed from 2010 to 2019 were identified. Age was categorized as 40 years or younger, 41 to 64 years, and 65 years or older. Demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment received were compared. Recurrence and survival outcomes were analyzed using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Of 523 IBC patients, 113 (21.6%) were age 40 years or younger, and 72 (13.8%) were age 65 years or older. The groups did not differ statistically by race/ethnicity, N stage, clinical stage, or tumor subtype. The younger patients included a higher proportion of Hispanic and Asian patients, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and clinical N2/N3. Trimodality therapy was received by 92% of the stage 3 patients, with no difference in pathologic complete response (pCR) by age (23.3% vs 28.6%; p = 0.46). During a median follow-up period of 40 months, 17% of the patients experienced locoregional recurrence and 42.8% had distant metastasis. No difference in 3-year recurrence-free survival (57.9% vs 42.6% vs 54%; p = 0.42, log rank) or overall survival (OS) (75.6% vs 77.1% vs 64.4%; p = 0.31, log rank) by age was observed, and no difference in OS by age in de novo stage 4 disease was observed. In the multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with TNBC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-3.05) and no pCR (HR, 4.45; 95% CI, 2.16-9.18). Conclusion No significant differences were observed in demographics, treatment patterns, or clinical outcomes for IBC patients age 40 years or younger compared with those age 65 years or older treated by a specialized multidisciplinary team. These findings do not support age-related treatment de-escalation in IBC.

Nearly one-third of patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) present with de novo stage IV disease. There are limited data on frequency and clinical outcomes of contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) in IBC with no consensus diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Frequency of synchronous CAM was calculated in unilateral IBC patients at a single center (10/2004–6/2019). Clinicopathologic variables, diagnostic evaluation, treatment received, and overall survival (OS) were assessed and compared. Of 588 unilateral IBC patients, 49 (8.3%) had synchronous CAM. Of these, 32 (65.3%) also presented with metastatic disease at another distant site. CAM was not associated with age, tumor laterality, breast cancer subtype, grade, or cN stage (p > 0.05). The sensitivity/specificity to detect CAM was as follows: mammography (18.2%/99.2%), ultrasound (92.3%/95.5%), PET (90.1/99.1%), and MRI (76.0%/98.6%). Following systemic therapy, 22 patients had contralateral axillary surgery, and 18 received adjuvant contralateral nodal radiation. On multivariable analysis including tumor receptor subtypes, patients with stage IV-isolated CAM has statistically similar survival to stage III patients (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.70–2.69, p = 0.36). Patients with Stage IV non-CAM (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.66–2.85, p < 0.001) and stage IV-CAM plus other distant metastasis (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.59–4.16, p < 0.001) had higher risk of death (reference: stage III disease). CAM in IBC was diagnosed in 8.3% of patients at presentation and was best identified by ultrasound and PET. We recommend routine contralateral axillary ultrasound as part of staging for all IBC patients. Diagnosis of CAM is a key first step toward much-needed prospective clinical trials evaluating management and outcomes of CAM in IBC.

Background Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has a highly invasive and metastatic phenotype. However, little is known about its genetic drivers. To address this, we report the largest cohort of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of IBC cases. Methods We performed WGS of 20 IBC samples and paired normal blood DNA to identify genomic alterations. For comparison, we used 23 matched non-IBC samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA). We also validated our findings using WGS data from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium. We examined a wide selection of genomic features to search for differences between IBC and conventional breast cancer. These include (i) somatic and germline single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), in both coding and non-coding regions; (ii) the mutational signature and the clonal architecture derived from these SNVs; (iii) copy number and structural variants (CNVs and SVs); and (iv) non-human sequence in the tumors (i.e., exogenous sequences of bacterial origin). Results Overall, IBC has similar genomic characteristics to non-IBC, including specific alterations, overall mutational load and signature, and tumor heterogeneity. In particular, we observed similar mutation frequencies between IBC and non-IBC, for each gene and most cancer-related pathways. Moreover, we found no exogenous sequences of infectious agents specific to IBC samples. Even though we could not find any strongly statistically distinguishing genomic features between the two groups, we did find some suggestive differences in IBC: (i) The MAST2 gene was more frequently mutated (20% IBC vs. 0% non-IBC). (ii) The TGF β pathway was more frequently disrupted by germline SNVs (50% vs. 13%). (iii) Different copy number profiles were observed in several genomic regions harboring cancer genes. (iv) Complex SVs were more frequent. (v) The clonal architecture was simpler, suggesting more homogenous tumor-evolutionary lineages. Conclusions Whole-genome sequencing of IBC manifests a similar genomic architecture to non-IBC. We found no unique genomic alterations shared in just IBCs; however, subtle genomic differences were observed including germline alterations in TGFβ pathway genes and somatic mutations in the MAST2 kinase that could represent potential therapeutic targets.