Search

Psychotherapy for individuals with psychosis is an effective treatment that promotes recovery in various ways. While there is strong quantitative evidence across modalities, less is known from the patient's perspective. There are many varied forms of psychotherapy, and gaining the patient's perspective can improve understanding of salient elements of psychotherapy and increase engagement, ultimately improving recovery rates. The purpose of this review is to identify and integrate data from published studies of patient perspectives of psychotherapy for psychosis to understand essential elements across approaches, differences between approaches, and how psychotherapy impacts recovery. We aimed to understand further: what are the perceptions about individual psychotherapy from the perspective of individuals with psychosis? The current study was a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines of studies that included qualitative interviews with persons with experiences of psychosis who participated in psychotherapy. All three authors participated in the literature search using Pubmed, APA PsycInfo, and Psychiatry Online. We identified N = 33 studies. Studies included cognitive therapies, acceptance and mindfulness approaches, trauma therapies, metacognitive therapy, and music therapy. All studies reported participants' perceived benefit with the therapeutic relationship as especially salient. Participants described diverse aspects of objective (e.g., symptoms, functioning) and subjective (e.g., self-experience or quality of life) recovery improvements, with perceived mechanisms of change, and with music therapy having some unique benefits. Participants also reported challenges and suggestions for improvement. Study findings highlight the salient aspects of psychotherapy identified by patients that may help therapists to individualize and improve approaches to psychotherapy when working with individuals experiencing psychosis. Overall, findings support the potential for integrative psychotherapy approaches for maximal treatment personalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: While recovery from psychosis is possible, recovery is a multidimensional construct driven by various factors. One relevant factor to recovery from psychosis that has often been overlooked in the psychotherapy literature is the importance of facing loss and processing grief in relation to psychosis. Methods: A review of the existing empirical literature on grief associated with psychosis was conducted. Clinicians with significant therapeutic experience working with persons with psychosis reviewed cases to examine the losses the patients had suffered and how they responded to these losses. The clinicians considered essential principles that are relevant when helping patients with psychosis integrate loss and process grief. Results: Persons who have experienced psychosis often experience the loss of role functioning, interpersonal relationships, cognition, and self-concept. However, when these losses are not fully integrated into the person's identity, it can result in either more losses due to denial and metacognitive impairments or increased hopelessness and depression due to internalized stigma. Five elements in psychotherapy of psychosis were identified that can facilitate the integration of loss and processing of grief: understand the personal experience of the psychotic episode, attend to feelings of grief and the primary loss, explore the meaning of psychotic symptoms and identity implications, integrate psychotic vulnerabilities into the sense of self, and foster realistic hope in the face of an uncertain future. Conclusion: Psychotherapy can enable persons with psychosis to make meaning of their losses, process their grief, integrate their psychotic vulnerability into their sense of self, and develop realistic hope. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recovery from serious mental illness (SMI) is a complex process that can be supported by different levels of mental health care, for example, individual psychotherapy. Current individual evidence-based psychotherapy for persons with SMI is often focused on specific objective recovery outcomes, including symptom reduction and functional improvement, and requires a minimum level of insight. Less common but also important are broader, more flexible approaches that allow clients to explore their needs and challenges, without predetermined goals or a certain level of insight. The current article aims to describe (1) the development of metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT), an evidence-based psychotherapy that is focused on self-determination, or self-directed recovery, and (2) how MERIT advances care for persons with SMI by addressing a significant gap in the field for the treatment of people with SMI with limited metacognitive capacity and insight, offering an adaptable approach emphasizing self-directed recovery. MERIT utilizes a metacognitive framework that is guided by flexible key elements and an interpersonal environment. Training MERIT therapists early in their careers may be helpful in providing a holistic view of SMI to promote self-directed recovery in ways that are personalized and meaningful for each person. MERIT training has been completed in multiple countries across different levels of training (e.g., internship and psychology practicum). Professionals such as psychologists and social workers have effectively played a role in MERIT development and dissemination, which ultimately strives to advance psychotherapy for a wide range of individuals with SMI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).