Search

The last decade has seen a profound increase in the development of assessment frameworks for ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions (NBS). This has improved understanding of NBS impact assessment, including processual aspects related to participatory planning and governance. We argue that, although representing a move in the right direction, NBS assessment frameworks would benefit from a broader framing of governance, including the role of government-led laws, policies and regulations along with community-led and collaborative multi-stakeholder initiatives. The consideration of marginalised communities and environmental justice should also be strengthened. To ensure a feasible and comprehensive approach to NBS governance assessment, we carried out a systematic literature review on the topic of urban NBS governance. Using thematic analysis, we developed a framework of five themes encompassing nine governance dimensions, of which some are further broken down into sub-dimensions. To assess the different NBS governance dimensions, we developed a tool in the format of a survey for urban decision-makers and other stakeholders, encompassing nine urban NBS governance indicators corresponding with the identified dimensions. Further to complementing NBS governance assessment approaches in important ways, we were able to highlight knowledge gaps around integrating features of the planning process and community-based or traditional knowledge. Our tool for monitoring urban NBS governance is simple to use and provides cities with a low-cost and comprehensive approach for monitoring and evaluating their readiness for mainstreaming NBS.

Impact assessment is a key step in mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (NBS). Yet, it remains unclear if and how assessment frameworks influence urban planning, design and management. We contend that the potential of current NBS assessment frameworks is not fully exploited due to: (1) limited contextualisation of monitoring and assessment to place-specific contexts and (2) the depoliticisation of co-production. To address this, we present a practical five-step action framework to guide inclusive participation across different stages of monitoring and assessment of urban NBS, including indicator selection. Unlike previous approaches, applying selection criteria at the level of individual indicators, we also use criteria at the aggregate level of the indicator set. We conclude that participatory assessment contributes to mainstreaming urban NBS for sustainable and just cities, provided data is contextualised to local decision-making contexts and the process is designed to amplify marginalised voices.

Suites of concepts and approaches have been launched during recent years to promote urban nature and greener cities. However, it is doubtable whether tinkering within the current economic and political system can provide adequate solutions. Nature-based Solutions can be seen as a new conceptual approach to the human-ecological connection, and as an outcome of an evolutionary development of socio-ecological concepts. In this Communication, we argue for drawing up inspiration by nature as an outset for the development of more sustainable and inclusive cities, balancing anthropocentric and ecocentric values and acknowledging the importance of the social and governance dimensions in a more balanced socio-ecological perspective. We call this approach Nature-based Thinking.

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented many challenges for our legal system. The courts have had to adapt to the unprecedented change in circumstances. One of the most dramatic changes to occur was the introduction of remote court hearings. This report, jointly authored by the Open University and Northumbria University, seeks to explore this transition and the impact it has had on access to justice. The Open University Policy Clinic is part of the Open Justice Centre. Open Justice provides free legal advice and education to members of the public in a variety of legal areas. In 2019, Open Justice established the Policy Clinic to undertake research on behalf of organisations and charities, aiming to influence policy and law reform. The Northumbria Student Law Office was set up in 1981 and offers free legal advice to members of the public on a range of different areas. The Policy Clinic within the Student Law Office was set up in the 2018/2019 academic year with the aim to undertake research influencing policy and law reform. We began our research by gathering data from a sample of 80 Crown Courts and 77 County Courts. In addition to this, we conducted fieldwork in the Court of Protection. This involved all members of the team requesting access as public observers to remote hearings. In total, 25 hearings were attended. There was also a review of existing literature surrounding remote hearings. This report will identify the themes arising from our research that have a direct influence on access to justice. We will discuss the findings from our research alongside the existing data, and comparisons will be made between these two data sets. We believe this report is particularly important as we enter a post-COVID-19 world and questions are being raised as to whether the changes that have occurred during the pandemic should be implemented permanently. The aim of this report is to gain an insight into the effect of the pandemic and to assess the practicality of online courts.

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented many challenges for our legal system. The courts have had to adapt to the unprecedented change in circumstances. One of the most dramatic changes to occur was the introduction of remote court hearings. This report, jointly authored by the Open University and Northumbria University, seeks to explore this transition and the impact it has had on access to justice. The Open University Policy Clinic is part of the Open Justice Centre. Open Justice provides free legal advice and education to members of the public in a variety of legal areas. In 2019, Open Justice established the Policy Clinic to undertake research on behalf of organisations and charities, aiming to influence policy and law reform. The Northumbria Student Law Office was set up in 1981 and offers free legal advice to members of the public on a range of different areas. The Policy Clinic within the Student Law Office was set up in the 2018/2019 academic year with the aim to undertake research influencing policy and law reform. We began our research by gathering data from a sample of 80 Crown Courts and 77 County Courts. In addition to this, we conducted fieldwork in the Court of Protection. This involved all members of the team requesting access as public observers to remote hearings. In total, 25 hearings were attended. There was also a review of existing literature surrounding remote hearings. This report will identify the themes arising from our research that have a direct influence on access to justice. We will discuss the findings from our research alongside the existing data, and comparisons will be made between these two data sets. We believe this report is particularly important as we enter a post-COVID-19 world and questions are being raised as to whether the changes that have occurred during the pandemic should be implemented permanently. The aim of this report is to gain an insight into the effect of the pandemic and to assess the practicality of online courts.