Search

Infants and toddlers account for a disproportionate percentage of children diagnosed with cancer. These young children and their families benefit when infant and early childhood mental health is recognized as vital and integrated with medical treatment. Such interventions are beneficial for supporting families in coping when cancer is the only stressor, and they become even more essential when cancer is just one in a series of stressors impacting a family, as is often the case. The authors discuss three abridged stories of collaborative, interdisciplinary, family-centered services provided for young children with cancer and their families, elucidating the importance of supporting the whole family and the young child alike in the context of pediatric cancer treatment.

Cancer disrupts the social lives of adolescents and young adults (AYA). Social media may be a resource to engage with social networks, seek entertainment, and receive social support. However, some aspects of social media engagement may be emotionally burdensome and sensitive for AYA to navigate. The aim of this qualitative study was to contextualize the impact of cancer on AYA social media interaction. Eight AYA ages 15–21 years and recently diagnosed with cancer participated in a semi-structured interview. AYA were asked about their social media interactions, engagement habits, and online cancer-related disclosure. Interviews averaged 36 min in length and were de-identified and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Four salient themes emerged from the data: (1) AYA engage in active and passive social media use depending on the platform, (2) AYA social media habits change due to treatment experiences, (3) AYA evaluate and protect their self-image, privacy, and time, and (4) AYA access social support online and interpret its meaning in different ways. AYA reported using social media, but many altered their frequency and type of interaction after diagnosis. Some were comfortable sharing about cancer and continued to interact actively online; others felt protective and vulnerable, transitioning to media consumption, or withdrawing from use. While social media provided space to receive direct and indirect social support, AYA interpreted the meaning of support in complex ways. Social media may serve a variety of socio-emotional needs, but not all AYA will benefit from the same types of social media interaction. This study highlights the importance of talking to AYA with cancer about their social media interactions during treatment to better support their coping and adjustment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Survivors of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are at risk for neurocognitive and social difficulties throughout childhood. This study characterized social cognition (perception and reasoning from social cues) and adjustment in adulthood. Methods: A total of 81 adult survivors of pediatric CNS tumors (51% female; mean [SD] age, 28.0 [5.8] years), were recruited across four groups: (1) no radiation therapy (RT) [n = 21], (2) infratentorial (IT) tumors + focal RT [n = 20], (3) IT tumors + craniospinal irradiation [n = 20], and (4) supratentorial tumors + focal RT [n = 20]. Prevalence of social cognitive and adjustment impairments was compared to test norms. Multivariable models examined clinical and neurocognitive predictors of social cognition and its impact on functional outcomes. Results: Survivors demonstrated elevated risk of severe social cognitive impairments (social perception Morbidity Ratio [95% CI] 5.70 [3.46–9.20]), but self‐reported few social adjustment problems. Survivors of IT tumors treated with craniospinal irradiation performed nearly 1 SD worse than survivors treated without RT on multiple measures of social cognition (e.g., social perception: β = −0.89, p =.004). Impaired executive functioning and nonverbal reasoning were associated with worse social cognitive performance (e.g., social perception: β = −0.75, p <.001; β = –0.84, p <.001, respectively). Better social perception was associated with higher odds of attaining full‐time employment (odds ratio, 1.52 [1.17–1.97]) and at least some college education (odds ratio, 1.39 [1.11–1.74]). Conclusions: Adult survivors of CNS tumors are at elevated risk of severely impaired social cognition, but do not perceive social adjustment difficulties. Better understanding of potential mechanisms underlying social cognitive deficits may inform intervention targets to promote better functional outcomes for at‐risk survivors. Adult survivors of childhood central nervous system tumors are at elevated risk of severely impaired social cognition, but do not perceive social adjustment difficulties. Infratentorial tumor survivors treated with craniospinal radiation demonstrated worse social cognition, which was in turn associated with reduced social attainment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Social and Emotional Assets and Resilience Scale (SEARS) is a promising instrument for prediction of resilience in youth; however, there is limited data to support its use. The purpose of the current study was to examine the factor structure, measurement invariance, internal consistency, and validity of the SEARS-Adolescent Report in youth 8 to 20 years of age. Two hundred and twenty-five childhood cancer survivors (M age = 15.9, SD = 4.2; 51.4% male; 74.5% White) and 122 student controls without history of significant health problems (M age = 14.2, SD = 3.5; 54.1% female; 79.5% White) 8 to 20 years of age completed the SEARS-A. The SEARS-A was found to have an adequate factor structure and model fit (χ2 = 1215.5, p <.001; root mean square error of approximation =.057; comparative fit index =.95; standardized root mean square residual =.06) and demonstrated invariance across domains of age, health status, gender, race, and socioeconomic status (Δ comparative fit index < −0.01). It also demonstrated excellent internal reliability, criterion validity, and current validity when compared with another well-established measure of psychological adjustment. As such, the SEARS-A has potential to be a useful, valid, and psychometrically sound tool for predicting social–emotional adjustment outcomes among at-risk youth 8 to 20 years of age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]