Willem H. Schreuder, Astrid Lipplaa, Arjen H.G. Cleven, Henk van den Berg, Peter H. Bisschop, Renate T. de Jongh, Max J.H. Witjes, Peter A.W.H. Kessler, Matthias A.W. Merkx, Esther Edelenbos, Cornelis Klop, Ruud Schreurs, Anneke M. Westermann, Jacqueline M. Tromp, Henriette Levenga, Hans Gelderblom, Jan de Lange, MUMC+: MA Mondzorg Kaak Aangezicht Chirurgie (3), RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Other Research, CCA - Cancer biology and immunology, Endocrinology, AMS - Ageing & Vitality, AMS - Musculoskeletal Health, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Graduate School, AMS - Rehabilitation & Development, Oncology, CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam, AMS - Tissue Function & Regeneration, Basic and Translational Research and Imaging Methodology Development in Groningen (BRIDGE), Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS), Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Maxillofacial Surgery (AMC), Maxillofacial Surgery (VUmc), Oral Kinesiology, Maxillofacial Surgery (AMC + VUmc), Internal medicine, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, and Pediatrics
Contains fulltext : 288341.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: In all giant-cell-rich lesions (GCRL) occurring in bone, a common underlying excessive RANKL expression is held responsible for the osteolytic activity. Apart from giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), systematic outcome analysis of RANKL inhibition in other GCRL is unavailable. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a 1-year denosumab protocol in giant cell lesions of the jaw (GCLJ). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted compromising patients treated with a 1-year protocol of monthly subcutaneously administered 120 mg denosumab. Objective tumour response based on histology and imaging was used to calculate objective tumour response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression. Type, severity and frequency of adverse events were recorded in a standardised way to assess safety. RESULTS: Twenty patients, predominantly female (90%), were included. Fifty-five per cent of lesions were located in the mandible; most classified as aggressive lesions (90%). Thirty-five per cent (7/20) of cases were either recurrent after prior treatment or progressive, while on other drug treatment. Objective tumour response rate was 100% after 12 months of treatment. Median PFS was 50.4 months (95% CI 38.0-62.8) with a cumulative PFS rate of 22.6% (95% CI 1.8-43.4) at 5 years follow-up. Median time to progression was 38.4 months (95% CI 26.0-50.8). Treatment was well tolerated, and none of the patients had to interrupt therapy for toxicity. CONCLUSION: High-dose denosumab is effective and safe in achieving a complete response in GCLJ within 12 months. The high long-term relapse rate after treatment cessation is the main obstacle for denosumab to become standard treatment for GCLJ.