Search

PURPOSE In 2014, the Association of American Medical Colleges defined 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) that all graduating students should be ready to do with indirect supervision upon entering residency and commissioned a 10-school, 5-year pilot to test implementing the Core EPAs framework. In 2019, pilot schools convened trained entrustment groups (TEGs) to review assessment data and render theoretical summative entrustment decisions for class of 2019 graduates. Results were examined to determine the extent to which entrustment decisions could be made and the nature of these decisions. METHOD For each EPA considered (4-13 per student), TEGs recorded an entrustment determination (ready, progressing but not yet ready, evidence against student progressing, could not make a decision); confidence in that determination (none, low, moderate, high); and the number of workplace-based assessments (WBAs) considered (0 - ≥15) per determination. These individual student-level data were de-identified and merged into a multischool database; Chi-squares tested the significance of associations between variables. RESULTS The 2,415 EPA-specific determinations (for 349 students by 4 participating schools) resulted in a decision of ready (n = 997/2,415; 41.3%), progressing but not yet ready (n = 558/2,415; 23.1%), or with evidence against student progression (n = 175/2,415; 7.2%). No decision could be made for the remaining 28.4% (685/2,415), generally for lack of data. Entrustment determinations' distribution varied across EPAs (Chi-square P < .001) and, for 10/13 EPAs, WBAs availability was associated with making (vs. not making) entrustment decisions (each Chi-square P < .05). CONCLUSIONS TEGs were able to make many decisions about readiness for indirect supervision; yet less than half of determinations resulted in a decision of readiness for entrustment to perform this EPA with indirect supervision." More work is needed at the 10 schools to enable authentic summative entrustment in the Core EPAs framework.

ImportanceGaps in readiness for indirect supervision have been identified for essential responsibilities encountered early in residency, presenting risks to patient safety. Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for entering residency have been proposed as a framework to address these gaps and strengthen the transition from medical school to residency.ObjectiveTo assess progress in developing an entrustment process in the Core EPAs framework.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this quality improvement study in the Core EPAs for Entering Residency Pilot, trained faculty made theoretical entrustment determinations and recorded the number of workplace-based assessments (WBAs) available for each determination in 2019 and 2020. Four participating schools attempted entrustment decision-making for all graduating students or a randomly selected subset of students. Deidentified, individual-level data were merged into a multischool database.InterventionsSchools implemented EPA-related curriculum, WBAs, and faculty development; developed systems to compile and display data; and convened groups to make theoretical summative entrustment determinations.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOn an EPA-specific basis, the percentage of students for whom an entrustment determination could be made, the percentage of students ready for indirect supervision, and the volume of WBAs available were recorded.ResultsFour participating schools made 4525 EPA-specific readiness determinations (2296 determinations in 2019 and 2229 determinations in 2020) for 732 graduating students (349 students in 2019 and 383 students in 2020). Across all EPAs, the proportion of determinations of “ready for indirect supervision” increased from 2019 to 2020 (997 determinations [43.4%] vs 1340 determinations [60.1%]; 16.7 percentage point increase; 95% CI, 13.8-19.6 percentage points; P P P Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that there was progress in WBA data collected, the extent to which entrustment determinations could be made, and proportions of entrustment determinations reported as ready for indirect supervision. However, important gaps remained, particularly for a subset of Core EPAs.

The Core EPAs for Entering Residency Pilot project aimed to test the feasibility of implementing 13 entrustable professional activities (EPAs) at 10 U.S. medical schools and to gauge whether the use of the Core EPAs could improve graduates' performance early in residency. In this manuscript, the authors (members of the pilot institutions and Association of American Medical Colleges staff supporting the project evaluation) describe the schools' capacity to collect multimodal evidence about their students' performance in each of the Core EPAs and the ability of faculty committees to use those data to make decisions regarding learners' readiness for entrustment. In reviewing data for each of the Core EPAs, the authors reflected on how each activity performed as an EPA informed by how well it could be assessed and entrusted. For EPAs that did not perform well, the authors examined whether there are underlying practical and/or theoretical issues limiting its utility as a measure of student performance in medical school.

The explosion of medical information demands a thorough reconsideration of medical education, including what we teach and assess, how we educate, and whom we educate. Physicians of the future will need to be self-aware, self-directed, resource-effective team players who can synthesize and apply summarized information and communicate clearly. Training in metacognition, data science, informatics, and artificial intelligence is needed. Education programs must shift focus from content delivery to providing students explicit scaffolding for future learning, such as the Master Adaptive Learner model. Additionally, educators should leverage informatics to improve the process of education and foster individualized, precision education. Finally, attributes of the successful physician of the future should inform adjustments in recruitment and admissions processes. This paper explores how member schools of the American Medical Association Accelerating Change in Medical Education Consortium adjusted all aspects of educational programming in acknowledgment of the rapid expansion of information.

The Master Adaptive Learner (MAL) theoretical framework describes an integrated approach to learning that combines features of educational theory on self-regulated learning and aspects of quality improvement. In order to develop MAL students, it is important to pay attention to the learning environment.To describe educators' perspectives about theThematic analysis of reports by medical educators who were workshop participants at a national presentation on creating effective learning environment to develop MAL in undergraduate medical education.Three themes educators considered important in the development of the Master Adaptive Learner were Adaptive Educator, Support for Learning, and Institutional Commitment. These findings suggest that in order to support the MAL, an educational setting should provide faculty who can be flexible and adapt to the developing MAL, learning experiences that support active learning, focused on groups as well as developing individual learners. Leaders in the educational setting should demonstrate a commitment to creating a culture to support learning and provide appropriate resources to that end.Learning environments to develop master adaptive learners need to have adaptive educators, teaching, learning, and institutional culture to support challenge and grow Master Adaptive Learners.

One of the main goals of the CoreEPA pilot has been to determine the feasibility of developing a process to make summative entrustment decisions regarding entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Five years into the pilot, we report results of a research study we conducted to explore approaches to the entrustment process undertaken by our ten participating schools. We sought to identify the choices that participating schools made regarding the entrustment process and why these decisions were made. We are sharing these results, highlighting ongoing challenges that were identified with the intent of helping other medical schools that are moving toward EPA-based assessment. We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives of all 10 medical schools in the CoreEPA pilot to understand their choices in designing the entrustment process. Additional information was obtained through follow-up communication to ensure completeness and accuracy of the findings. Several common themes are described. Our results indicate that, while approaches to the entrustment process vary considerably, all schools demonstrated consistent adherence to the guiding principles of the pilot. Several common barriers to the entrustment process emerged, and there was a consensus that more experience is needed with the process before consequential entrustment decisions can be made. The CoreEPA pilot schools continue to address challenges identified in implementing entrustment processes and making entrustment decisions for our students graduating in the Class of 2020. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40670-020-00918-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction: Observations of medical student participation in entrustable professional activities (EPAs) provide insight into the student's ability to synthesize competencies across domains and ef...

Background The master adaptive learner (MAL) uses self-regulated learning skills to develop adaptive, efficient, and accurate skills in practice. Given rapid changes in healthcare, it is essential that medical students develop into MALs. There is a need for an instrument that can capture MAL behaviors and characteristics. The objective of this study was to develop an instrument for measuring the MAL process in medical students and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods As part of curriculum evaluation, 818 students completed previously developed instruments with validity evidence including the Self-Regulated Learning Perception Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Goal Orientation Scale, and Jefferson Scale of Physician Lifelong Learning. The authors performed exploratory factor analysis to examine underlying relationships between items. Items with high factor loadings were retained. Cronbach’s alpha was computed. In parallel, the multi-institutional research team rated the same items to provide content validity evidence of the items to MAL model. Results The original 67 items were reduced to 28 items loading onto four factors: Planning, Learning, Resilience, and Motivation. Each subscale included the following number of items and Cronbach’s alpha: Planning (10 items, alpha = 0.88), Learning (6 items, alpha = 0.81), Resilience (6 items, alpha = 0.89), and Motivation (6 items, alpha = 0.81). The findings from the factor analyses aligned with the research team ratings of linkage to the components of MAL. Conclusion These findings serve as a starting point for future work measuring master adaptive learning to identify and support learners. To fully measure the MAL construct, additional items may need to be developed.

11007 Background: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes and generalizability of a distance learning curriculum on intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), a course developed for radiotherapy clinics across Africa and Latin America (LATAM) at no cost, as measured by a knowledge-based multiple-choice exam, learner self-evaluation, and open-ended feedback. Methods: Following needs identification studies, a curriculum entitled “IMRT 2.0” was created for an audience that included medical physicists, radiation oncologists, radiation therapists, and trainees. Volunteer educators delivered 27 hour-long sessions 1-2 times weekly for four months using video conferencing to African and LATAM programs in English and Spanish, respectively. Recordings and educational materials were shared following each session. Pre- and post-course multiple choice examinations were administered to LATAM participants, and pre- and post-course Likert scale self-evaluation and open-ended feedback were collected for both programs. Paired sample t-tests and chi-squared tests were performed for all available paired quantitative and categorical data, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient, multivariate linear regression, and spline regression models were used to explore impact of course attendance on outcomes. Results: 25 centers across Africa (12 + 1 sister institution in Pakistan) and LATAM (12) were recruited, the majority (92%) of which were recently transitioning or planning to transition to IMRT, yielding a total of 332 enrolled participants. 27 sessions were delivered with a mean of 44 (std dev 22.5) and 85 (std dev 25.4) participants per session for the African and LATAM programs, respectively. Paired pre- and post-course data demonstrated significant improvement in both knowledge (n = 51, p

PURPOSE: Precision medicine is revolutionizing healthcare practices, most notably in oncology. With cancer being the second leading cause of death in the USA, it is important to integrate precision oncology content in undergraduate medical education. METHODS: In 2015, we launched a Clinical Cancer Medicine Integrated Science Course (ISC) for post-clerkship medical students at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (VUSM). In this ISC, students learned cancer biology and clinical oncology concepts through a combination of classroom and patient care activities. Student feedback from mid- and end-of-course surveys and student match data were analyzed and used to develop ongoing course improvements. RESULTS: To date, 72 medical students have taken the Clinical Cancer Medicine ISC. Over 90% of students who completed end-of-course surveys agreed or strongly agreed that this course advanced their foundational science knowledge in clinical cancer medicine, that clinical relevance was provided during non-clinical foundational science learning activities, and that foundational science learning was embedded in course clinical experiences. Students who took this course most commonly matched in Internal Medicine, Pathology, Pediatrics, and Radiation Oncology. VUSM students who matched into Pathology and Radiation Oncology were more likely to take this ISC than students who matched in other specialties. CONCLUSION: The Clinical Cancer Medicine ISC serves as a model for incorporating precision oncology, cancer biology foundational science, and oncology patient care activities in undergraduate medical education. The course prepares students to care for oncology patients in their fields of interests during their future career in medicine.

In 2015, the Association of American Medical Colleges implemented an interinstitutional pilot of 13 core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for entering residency, activities that entering residents should be expected to perform with indirect supervision. The pilot included a concept group on faculty development; this group previously offered a shared mental model focused on the development of faculty who devote their efforts to clinical teaching and assessment for learning and entrustment decision making. In this article, the authors draw from the literature of competency-based education to propose what is needed in overall approaches to faculty development to prepare institutions for undergraduate EPA implementation.Taking a systems-based view that defines the necessary tasks of EPA implementation, the authors move beyond the variably used term "faculty" and enumerate a comprehensive list of institutional stakeholders who can meaningfully support and/or engage in the relationships and organizational processes required for EPA learning and assessment. They consider each group's responsibilities and development needs according to five domains delineated by Steinert: teaching improvement, leadership and management, research-building capacity, academic career building, and organizational change.The authors argue that the EPA framework addresses barriers posed with the use of a competency-based framework. By facilitating the communication required for organizational change, enabling valid assessment with comprehensive yet feasible levels of faculty development, and incorporating all relevant data on student professional behavior into summative assessment decisions, EPAs may offer a clearer path toward the goal of competency-based education.

Because change is ubiquitous in healthcare, clinicians must constantly make adaptations to their practice to provide the highest quality care to patients. In a previous article, Cutrer et al. described a metacognitive approach to learning based on self-regulation, which facilitates the development of the Master Adaptive Learner (MAL). The MAL process helps individuals to cultivate and demonstrate adaptive expertise, allowing them to investigate new concepts (learn) and create new solutions (innovate). An individual's ability to learn in this manner is driven by several internal characteristics and is also impacted by numerous aspects of their context. In this article, the authors examine the important internal and contextual factors that can impede or foster Master Adaptive Learning.

This study aims to design, implement, and launch courses that integrate foundational science learning and clinical application in a post-clerkship undergraduate medical school curriculum. In academic year 2015–2016 (AY15–16), as part of a comprehensive curricular revision, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (VUSM) formally implemented “Integrated Science Courses” (ISCs) that combined rigorous training in the foundational sciences with meaningful clinical experiences. These courses integrated foundational sciences that could be leveraged in the clinical environment, utilized a variety of instructional modalities, and included quantitative and qualitative (competency-based milestones) student assessments. Each ISC underwent a rigorous quality-improvement process that required input on foundational science content, student experience, and student performance assessment. Eleven ISCs were delivered to 173 students in AY15–16, with some students taking more than one ISC. Immediately after completing each course, 93% (n = 222) of ISC enrollees completed a course evaluation. Students (91%; n = 201) “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that foundational science learning informed and enriched the clinical experiences. Furthermore, 94% (n = 209) of students thought that the clinical experiences informed and enriched the foundational science learning. Ninety-four percent of the students anticipated using the foundational science knowledge acquired in future clinical training and practice. The teaching of foundational sciences in the clinical workplace in the post-clerkship medical curriculum is challenging and resource intensive, yet feasible. Additional experience with the model will inform the mix of courses as well as the breadth and depth of foundational science instruction that is necessary to foster scientifically based clinical reasoning skills in each student.

Change is ubiquitous in health care, making continuous adaptation necessary for clinicians to provide the best possible care to their patients. The authors propose that developing the capabilities of a Master Adaptive Learner will provide future physicians with strategies for learning in the health care environment and for managing change more effectively. The concept of a Master Adaptive Learner describes a metacognitive approach to learning based on self-regulation that can foster the development and use of adaptive expertise in practice. The authors describe a conceptual literature-based model for a Master Adaptive Learner that provides a shared language to facilitate exploration and conversation about both successes and struggles during the learning process.

Purpose: Many US medical schools have adopted learning communities to provide a framework for advising and teaching functions. Faculty who participate in learning communities often have additional educator roles. Defining potential conflicts of interest (COIs) among these roles is an important consideration for schools with existing learning communities and those looking to develop them, both for transparency with students and also to comply with regulatory requirements. Methods: A survey was sent to the institutional contact for each of the 42 Learning Communities Institute (LCI) member medical schools to assess faculty opinions about what roles potentially conflict. The survey asked the role of learning community faculty in summative and formative assessment of students and whether schools had existing policies around COIs in medical education. Results: In all, 35 (85%) LCI representatives responded; 30 (86%) respondents agreed or strongly agreed that learning community faculty should be permitted to evaluate their students for formative purposes, while 19 (54%) strongly agreed or agreed that learning community faculty should be permitted to evaluate their students in a way that contributes to a grade; 31 (89%) reported awareness of the accreditation standard ensuring “that medical students can obtain academic counseling from individuals who have no role in making assessment or promotion decisions about them,” but only 10 (29%) had a school policy about COIs in education. There was a wide range of responses about what roles potentially conflict with being a learning community faculty. Conclusion: The potential for COIs between learning community faculty and other educator roles concerns faculty at schools with learning communities, but most schools have not formally addressed these concerns.

It is critical for health professionals to continue to learn and this must be supported by health professions education (HPE). Adaptive expert clinicians are not only expert in their work but have the additional capacity to learn and improve in their practices. The authors review a selective aspect of learning to become an adaptive expert: the capacity to optimally balance routine approaches that maximize efficiency with innovative ones where energy and resources are used to customize actions for novel or difficult situations. Optimal transfer of learning, and hence the design of instruction, differs depending on whether the goal is efficient or innovative practice. However, the task is necessarily further complicated when the aspiration is an adaptive expert practitioner who can fluidly balance innovation with efficiency as the situation requires. Using HPE examples at both the individual and organizational level, the authors explore the instructional implications of learning to shift from efficient to innovative expert functioning, and back. They argue that the efficiency-innovation tension is likely to endure deep into the future and therefore warrants important consideration in HPE.

Problem The transition into medical school represents a time of profound professional development for medical students. Many medical schools manage this transition with brief orientations followed by abrupt moves into the anatomy laboratory. Recognizing that early introduction of key humanistic concepts could have a lasting impact on students' attitudes, faculty at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine created the Foundations of the Profession (FoP) course to frame medicine as a moral practice. Approach The FoP course, offered annually since 2012, occurs during the first week of medical school. Using coronary artery disease with a chief complaint of angina as a core example, teams of students create variations of five hypothetical patients and walk them through potential care episodes. This allows students to compare the impact of many factors on a provider's ability to uphold fundamental professional obligations. Students engage in readings, lectures, small-group discussions, clinic visits, and research on insurance plans. Faculty engage with students in small groups and establish a safe environment for discussion of challenging moral dilemmas. Outcomes From 2013 to 2016, 356 (97%) of the 368 first-year medical students who took the course submitted summative course evaluations. Of the respondents, 349 (98%) indicated they believed the course contributed to their professional development and supported their learning. Next steps Future iterations of this course may include increased exposure to key educational faculty to solidify the formation of a moral scaffold on which to build subsequent knowledge.

PURPOSE: To design, implement, and launch courses that integrate foundational science learning and clinical application in a post-clerkship undergraduate medical school curriculum. METHOD: In Academic Year (AY) 15–16, as part of a comprehensive curricular revision, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (VUSM) formally implemented “Integrated Science Courses” (ISCs) that combined rigorous training in the foundational sciences with meaningful clinical experiences. These courses integrated foundational sciences that could be leveraged in the clinical environment, utilized a variety of instructional modalities, and included quantitative and qualitative (competency-based milestones) student assessments. Each ISC underwent a rigorous quality improvement process that required input on foundational science content, student experience, and student performance assessment. RESULTS: Eleven ISCs were delivered to 173 students in AY15–16, with some students taking more than one ISC. Immediately after completing each course, 93% (n=222) of ISC enrollees completed a course evaluation. Students (91%; n=201) ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ that foundational science learning informed and enriched the clinical experiences. Furthermore, 94% (n=209) of students thought that the clinical experiences informed and enriched the foundational science learning. Ninety-four percent of the students anticipated using the foundational science knowledge acquired in future clinical training and practice. CONCLUSION: The teaching of foundational sciences in the clinical workplace in the post-clerkship medical curriculum is challenging and resource-intensive, yet feasible. Additional experience with the model will inform the mix of courses as well as the breadth and depth of foundational science instruction that is necessary to foster scientifically-based clinical reasoning skills in each student.

As future physicians, nearly all medical students will be required to provide face-to-face feedback. Moreover, receiving high quality feedback from multiple perspectives is particularly valuable during the pre-clerkship training period. To address these needs, we developed a straightforward, easy to implement exercise that affords students the opportunity to practice giving and receiving feedback with peers. We describe how this exercise has been tailored to fit within the case-based learning small groups of our first-year curriculum and how to enhance the activity by weaving the basic principles of quality feedback into preparation sessions. This exercise has been valued greatly by students.

To explore the design, implementation, and efficacy of a faculty development program in a cohort of early career junior faculty.Interested junior faculty members were divided into interdisciplinary small groups led by senior faculty facilitators. The groups met monthly for 1.5 hours to review a modular curriculum from 2011 to 2013. Using a survey at two time points (September 2011 and 2013) and an interim program evaluation, the authors collected data on participants' demographics, faculty interconnectedness, and self-reported knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSA) in the domains of professional development and scholarship, including the ability to write career goals and align activities with those goals.A total of 104 junior faculty participated in the program. They demonstrated changes in self-reported KSA in the domains of professional development (P = .013, P = .001) and scholarship (P = .038, P = .015) with an increase in ability to write career goals (P.001), ability to align activities with those goals (P.001), and number of and amount of time spent pursuing activities related to those goals (P = .022). These changes were more significant among female faculty and were not affected by academic rank or time since last training. Interconnectedness among faculty increased during the period of study-the number of nodes and ties between nodes within the network increased.This facilitated peer mentoring program for junior faculty was effective in improving the KSA necessary to promote early career advancement and peer networking, especially for women.

The imbalance resulting from an increasing number of medical school graduates combined with a relatively stable number of residency spots is creating a challenge for U.S. medical students attempting to secure postgraduate residency training. This trend increases the stakes for medical students in their applications to residency training programs and places much higher importance on performing effectively during residency interviews. With little to no formal training in interviewing skills, U.S. medical school graduates may be ill prepared to face challenges presented during both formal and informal residency interviews. In order to better prepare fourth-year medical students at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, faculty mentors constructed and implemented a comprehensive residency interview practice performance initiative entitled “Mock Interviews”. The mentors enlisted available faculty from within the learning communities to conduct these interviews and provide immediate feedback to students in advance of their actual residency interviews. Collected data show that this program has been progressively well received and quite successful in helping students achieve an increased level of perceived preparedness in their residency interviews. Requiring minimal cost and little infrastructure, and utilizing available resources within most medical schools, this program appears to serve as a logical next step in the training of medical students for securing postgraduate residency spots.

In 2014, the Association of American Medical Colleges identified 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (Core EPAs), which are activities that entering residents might be expected to perform without direct supervision. This work included the creation of an interinstitutional concept group focused on faculty development efforts, as the processes and tools for teaching and assessing entrustability in undergraduate medical education (UME) are still evolving. In this article, the authors describe a conceptual framework for entrustment that they developed to better prepare all educators involved in entrustment decision making in UME. This framework applies to faculty with limited or longitudinal contact with medical students and to those who contribute to entrustment development or render summative entrustment decisions.The authors describe a shared mental model for entrustment that they developed, based on a critical synthesis of the EPA literature, to serve as a guide for UME faculty development efforts. This model includes four dimensions for Core EPA faculty development: (1) observation skills in authentic settings (workplace-based assessments), (2) coaching and feedback skills, (3) self-assessment and reflection skills, and (4) peer guidance skills developed through a community of practice. These dimensions form a conceptual foundation for meaningful faculty participation in entrustment decision making.The authors also differentiate between the UME learning environment and the graduate medical education learning environment to highlight distinct challenges and opportunities for faculty development in UME settings. They conclude with recommendations and research questions for future Core EPA faculty development efforts.

A significant portion of diagnostic errors arises through cognitive errors resulting from inadequate knowledge, faulty data gathering, and/or faulty verification. Experts estimate that 75% of diagnostic failures can be attributed to clinician diagnostic thinking failure. The cognitive processes that underlie diagnostic thinking of clinicians are complex and intriguing, and it is imperative that clinicians acquire explicit appreciation and application of different cognitive approaches to make decisions better. A dual-process model that unifies many theories of decision-making has emerged as a promising template for understanding how clinicians think and judge efficiently in a diagnostic reasoning process. The identification and implementation of strategies for decreasing or preventing such diagnostic errors has become a growing area of interest and research. Suggested strategies to decrease diagnostic error incidence include increasing clinician's clinical expertise and avoiding inherent cognitive errors to make decisions better. Implementing Interventions focused solely on avoiding errors may work effectively for patient safety issues such as medication errors. Addressing cognitive errors, however, requires equal effort on expanding the individual clinician's expertise. Providing cognitive support to clinicians for robust diagnostic decision-making serves as the final strategic target for decreasing diagnostic errors. Clinical guidelines and algorithms offer another method for streamlining decision-making and decreasing likelihood of cognitive diagnostic errors. Addressing cognitive processing errors is undeniably the most challenging task in reducing diagnostic errors. While many suggested approaches exist, they are mostly based on theories and sciences in cognitive psychology, decision-making, and education. The proposed interventions are primarily suggestions and very few of them have been tested in the actual practice settings. Collaborative research effort is required to effectively address cognitive processing errors. Researchers in various areas, including patient safety/quality improvement, decision-making, and problem solving, must work together to make medical diagnosis more reliable.

Few educational opportunities exist in paediatric cardiac critical care units (PCCUs). We introduced a new educational activity in the PCCU in the form of of patient-specific summaries (TPSS). Our objective was to study the role of TPSS in the provision of a positive learning experience to the multidisciplinary clinical team of PCCUs and in improving patient-related clinical outcomes in the PCCU.Prospective educational intervention with simultaneous clinical assessment was undertaken in PCCU in an academic children's hospital. TPSS was developed utilizing the case presentation format for upcoming week's surgical cases and delivered once every week to each PCCU clinical team member. Role of TPSS to provide clinical education was assessed using five-point Likert-style scale responses in an anonymous survey 1 year after TPSS provision. Paediatric cardiac surgery patients admitted to the PCCU were evaluated for postoperative outcomes for TPSS provision period of 1 year and compared with a preintervention period of 1 year.TPSS was delivered to 259 clinical team members including faculty, fellows, residents, nurse practitioners, nurses, respiratory therapists and others from the Divisions of Anesthesia, Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Critical Care, and Pediatrics working in the PCCU. Two hundred and twenty-four (86%) members responded to the survey and assessed the role of TPSS in providing clinical education to be excellent based on mean Likert-style scores of 4.32 ± 0.71 in survey responses. Seven hundred patients were studied for the two time periods and there were no differences in patient demographics, complexity of cardiac defect and surgical details. The length of mechanical ventilation for the TPSS period (57.08 ± 141.44 h) was significantly less when compared with preintervention period (117.39 ± 433.81 h) (P0.001) with no differences in length of PCICU stay, hospital stay and mortality for the two time periods.Provision of TPSS in a paediatric cardiac surgery unit is perceived to be beneficial in providing clinical education to multidisciplinary clinical teams and may be associated with improved clinical outcome.

Introduction A vital element of health care practice is evidence-based medicine, the explicit and judicious use of current, best-available evidence in making decisions about the individualized care of patients. With the use of evidence-based medicine continually increasing in clinical practice, medical schools are charged with ensuring graduates are prepared to appropriately access, appraise, and utilize clinical evidence, highlighting the need for a corresponding assessment tool. However, assessing evidence-based practice remains a challenging endeavor for medical educators. Few assessment tools capture students' ability to apply information resources in order to answer a targeted question during a medical encounter. Methods We describe a triple-jump assessment design where students access evidence, appraise information at hand, and apply it to formulate a treatment plan during an observed structured clinical encounter (OSCE). Results One hundred and five clerkship students participated in one of two OSCE scenarios. Data from this exercise underwent descriptive statistical analysis, including mean performance scores and confidence scores, and showed that accuracy and confidence in providing evidence-based care improved after the search and appraisal period. Discussion The addition of a modified triple-jump assessment to the end of the OSCE experience not only creates a more authentic experience but also allows for assessment and development of student metacognitive skills within the domain of knowledge gap assessment. The ease of integrating this assessment into the structure of an already-developed OSCE allows for different types of assessment to be achieved without writing entirely new OSCE cases, but rather by modifying existing scenarios.

Introduction The development of junior faculty drives the success of an academic institutional department through furthering individual career success. Mentorship is central in this early development and results in improved job satisfaction as well as job retention in academic medicine. A recent survey of junior faculty revealed that less than 50% felt adequately mentored. Additionally, faculty on the clinician-educator track were less likely to have a mentor than colleagues on the physician-scientist track. Since 2000, numerous publications have documented faculty development programs, many of which place mentorship in a central role. Faculty development programs have focused on delivering the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for success, including professional development and scholarship. Methods This guide provides an overview of the design and implementation process of the Vanderbilt Department of Pediatrics Hazinski Society for Faculty Development, as well as a reference for the specific curricula used in the program. We describe the steps of design, recruitment of both junior faculty participants and senior faculty facilitators, and the process of obtaining support from both departmental and division-specific leadership. A description is provided for the flow of a typical session, as well as access to all curricular documents used within the program. This guide should serve as a ready reference for users planning to implement a similar program at their own institutions. Results Participants in the program reported a significant change in knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the areas of professional development and scholarship. These advances were associated with a reported increase in the skill/ability to create career goals as well as to align current activities with desired goals. Discussion The program described here was created in a grassroots design through a needs assessment via small groups of junior faculty, as well as junior faculty playing a central role in the programmatic development through the organizing committee. Hence, the curriculum design (as well as the peer network established through the small groups) has led to significant changes.

Learning communities, which are an emerging trend in medical education, create a foundation for professional and academic development through the establishment of longitudinal relationships between students and faculty. In this article, the authors describe the robust learning community system at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, which encompasses wellness, career planning, professional development, and academics.The Vanderbilt Advisory Colleges Program introduced in 2006 initially focused on two goals: promoting wellness and providing career advising. In the 2011-2012 academic year, the focus of the colleges expanded to incorporate an enhanced level of personal career advising and an academic component. In the four-year College Colloquium course, faculty selected as college mentors teach the medical humanities and lead sessions dedicated to student professional development in the areas of leadership, research, and service-learning. This academic and professional development program builds on the existing strengths of the colleges and has transformed the colleges into learning communities.The authors reflect on lessons learned and discuss future plans. They report that internal data and data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Medical School Graduation Questionnaire support consistently high and increasing satisfaction among Vanderbilt medical students, across the metrics of personal counseling, faculty mentoring, and career planning.

* Abbreviations: HSP — : Henoch-Schonlein Purpura RLQ — : right lower quadrant As part of the ongoing Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics series on skills and strategies used by great clinical teachers,1–6 this article focuses on practical knowledge and skills for teaching clinical reasoning. Building on SNAPPS and One Minute Preceptor models,6 we will address the clinical assessment portion of oral and written presentations that represents the culmination of the clinical reasoning process. Using the concepts of problem representation,7 semantic qualifiers,8 and illness scripts7,9,10 defined below, we will outline how you can guide your students’ clinical reasoning development. A problem representation is “the one-liner” at the end of a presentation that synthesizes the entire patient story (history details, physical findings, and investigations) into 1 “big picture” statement.7 To create a problem representation, physicians restructure pertinent patient details into abstract terms called semantic qualifiers. Semantic qualifiers are abstractions in medical rather than lay terminology and generally exist in divergent pairs, such as acute versus chronic and severe versus mild (Table 1, step 2).8 Here is an example of a problem representation, with the semantic qualifiers in italics: A previously well, 2-year-old unimmunized girl presents with an acute history of respiratory distress. She is febrile , looks unwell , and is drooling. View this table: TABLE 1 Teaching Steps for Clinical Reasoning Novice clinicians can be taught to generate problem representations by using semantic qualifiers. First, have your students write out a 1- to 2-sentence problem representation (summary of patient information) based on either a written … Address correspondence to Joseph Gigante, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 8232 Doctor’s Office Tower, Nashville, TN 37232-9225. E-mail: joseph.gigante{at}vanderbilt.edu