Search

Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of systemic inflammation, has been shown to correlate with worse outcomes in patients undergoing vascular surgery. Limited data exists on the association of NLR and outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity vascular surgery. We sought to investigate whether preoperative NLR correlates with outcomes in patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization procedures.We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent open lower extremity revascularization procedures from January 2011 to January 2017 (N = 535). Preoperative NLR was calculated within 6 months of surgery. Primary outcomes were major adverse limb event (MALE) or death. The maximally-ranked statistic method was used to determine the NLR cut-off point. Kaplan-Meier analyses of death and MALE and NLR were used to compare the groups by NLR cut-off point. We conducted a multivariate analysis of the association between NLR and mortality using Cox proportional hazard models, including confounding variables such as age, smoking status, and diabetes. P-values0.05 were considered statistically significant.Two hundred and fifty four patients undergoing surgery from January 2011 to January 2013 were analyzed. The median NLR was 3.6 interquartile range [IQR 2.5-6.7]. The analysis showed a negative correlation between elevated NLR and mortality (P 0.001), but not MALE (P = 0.8). Controlling for multiple comorbidities including gender, age, smoking, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and infection, the NLR cut-off point was a significant independent predictor of mortality (P 0.0001), but not MALE (P = 0.551). Elevated NLR was also correlated with statistically and clinically significant longer hospital stays (6.5 [IQR 3.0-12.8] days vs. 4.0 [IQR 2.0-8.0] days, P = 0.027).This study suggests that NLR is an independent predictor of mortality and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularizations. Going forward, we plan to expand this study to include more patients and to compare NLR to other risk assessment tools.

Tibial revascularization is often performed in the setting of critical limb ischemia and tissue loss requiring close patient monitoring in the early post-operative period for worsening gangrene and/or ischemia. Multiple studies have shown loss to follow-up is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes in several vascular procedures. Therefore, we evaluated the risk factors relating to loss to follow up against outcomes in patients undergoing tibial endovascular procedures with the hypothesis that poor post-operative visit compliance is associated with decreased amputation-free survival rates.We performed a single-institution retrospective chart review of patients who underwent therapeutic endovascular tibial revascularization between 2014-2018. Patient follow-up and outcomes of death or major amputation (trans-tibial/trans-femoral) were followed up to 36-months post-operatively. Patients who had undergone previous infra-geniculate interventions or reached mortality/major amputation within 30-days post-operatively were excluded from analysis.We identified 89 patients who met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of attendance at less than1 month, 1-6 months, 6-15 months and 15-36 months post-operatively were 60%, 64%, 60 and 40% respectively. 16% of patients had complete loss to follow-up. Patients without tissue loss (≤ Rutherford 4) were less likely to attend early1 month and 1-6 month follow-up intervals. Notably, absenteeism from the first immediate post-operative visit was a significant risk factor for further absenteeism at 1-6 months (51% vs. 26%; P = 0.01) and at greater than 6-month follow-up (48% vs. 31%; P = 0.05). Compared to the cohort of all patients, failure to follow-up within 1 month was associated with a decrease in attendance from 64% to 26% at 1-6 months and 63-31% at more than 6 months. Missing the first post-operative visit was also associated with decreased amputation-free survival (P = 0.04).Absenteeism from the first post-operative visit is associated with worse amputation-free survival and a significant risk factor for further absenteeism from post-operative care. Given these results, ensuring close immediate post-operative follow up is essential to improving outcomes in patients undergoing tibial revascularization.

The wide breadth of vascular surgery (VS) training enables vascular surgeons to assist in nonvascular operations and rapidly respond to urgent and emergent needs for intervention. This study aims to evaluate VS secondary operative assistance and intraoperative consultations METHODS: Retrospective review of all operative interventions with a vascular surgeon as secondary surgeon between January 1, 2011 and January 31, 2020 at a single institution. Any cases with VS as primary service were excluded. Patient demographics, operative variables, and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated.Four hundred thirty-seven patients requiring interventions necessitating VS assistance were identified, this included elective, urgent, and emergent operative cases. One hundred thirty-one cases were urgent or emergent and 306 were elective. The median age was 58.0 years (IQR: 40-68.0). Most patients were male (237, 54.2%), White (298, 68.2%), and average BMI was 29.2 +/- 8.5 with ASA ≥4 (143, 32.7%). One hundred seventy (38.9%) cases involved intraoperative consultations, whereas, 267 (61.1%) provided advance notice of need for secondary assistance. The most common services requesting consultations were spine surgery (both orthopedic and neurosurgery) (83, 19%), cardiothoracic surgery (82, 18.8%), and surgical oncology (42, 9.6%). Vascular interventions included revascularization (108, 4.7%), hemorrhage control (94, 21.5%), and exposure (131, 30%). In-hospital mortality was 12.1%.With the armamentarium of open, endovascular, and hybrid interventions, vascular surgeons are prepared to respond and intervene in nonvascular cases in the event of unexpected vascular compromise, iatrogenic injury, or challenging exposure, as well as assist in planned elective operations. This study reinforces the role of VS in an institution's ability to offer safe and prompt surgical care.

Objective It is often unclear which patients presenting with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) are likely to survive after surgery. The Harborview Medical Center (HMC), Dutch Aneurysm Score (DAS), and Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) risk scores have been recent attempts at predicting mortality in this setting. We compared the prognostic value of these scoring systems for patients at our institution with rAAA. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who received surgery at our institution for rAAA between January 1, 2011, and November 27, 2019. The χ2, Fisher's exact, and t-tests were used to screen preoperative variables against in-hospital mortality. HMC, DAS, and VSGNE scores were calculated for each patient and tested against in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess performance of each scoring system. Results Sixty-four patients were identified during the study period. Fifteen patients were excluded because 4 patients chose comfort care and an additional 11 patients were missing key variables. The final cohort for analysis included 49 patients who underwent surgery, including 33 patients receiving endovascular repair and 16 patients receiving open repair. The in-hospital mortality was 37% (24% for endovascular repair vs 63% for open repair). Individual variables associated with in-hospital mortality were lowest preoperative systolic blood pressure (P = .036), creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dL (P = .020), first recorded intraoperative pH (P = .007), and use of suprarenal aortic control (P = .025), and preoperative cardiac arrest approached significance (P = .051). Plots of the HMC and VSGNE scores vs in-hospital mortality rate produced linear relationships (R2 = 0.97 and R2 = 0.93, respectively), in which a higher score was associated with a greater likelihood of mortality. On logistic regression analysis using HMC score components, creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dL produced a significant association with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-131.7). Similar analysis using VSGNE components produced a significant association between suprarenal aortic control and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.2-25.5). receiver operating characteristic curves produced an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60-0.88), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.87), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51-0.83) for the HMC, VSGNE, and DAS, respectively. Conclusions The HMC, VSGNE, and DAS scores performed similarly and adequately predicted in-hospital mortality after rAAA. The HMC score holds the added benefit of using preoperative variables, setting it apart as a valid prognostic indicator in the preoperative setting.

AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy, although a successful treatment modality for arterial thrombus removal and recanalization, has been shown to have increased rates of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with other methods of treatment for acute limb ischemia. The postinterventional course of AKI can differ markedly from patient to patient, but typically resolves relatively quickly. Herein, we present a case of AKI secondary to AngioJet intervention that demonstrates an exceedingly prolonged but ultimately recoverable course with conservative management and without the need for renal replacement therapy.

Background The aim of this study is to assess the incidence, clinical manifestations, management, and prognosis of graft infection after bypass surgery with prosthetic conduit for infectious femoral artery pseudoaneurysms (IFAPs) in patients with a history of intravenous drug use (IVDU). Methods A single-center retrospective chart review of IVDU presenting with graft infections after previously being treated with extra-anatomic prosthetic conduit bypass surgery for IFAPs between 2009 and 2019 was performed. Relevant clinical data and patient demographics were collected and analyzed. All patients underwent procedures consisting of graft removal with analysis of operative details and complications. Results Of all 122 patients who underwent IFAP resection with extra-anatomic prosthetic bypass, the incidence of graft infection was 38.5% (47 patients, 48 grafts) with an average age of 35.7 ± 7.3 years. The average interval between bypass surgery and infectious symptoms was 9.2 ± 2.5 months and average time from bypass to graft removal was 13.6 ± 3.4 months. The most common presentation was repeated or unhealable chronic ulcers with sinus formation or purulence either within the bypass area or along the graft conduit route (43, 89.6%). Occlusion of the infected bypass graft occurred in nearly all cases (46, 95.8%). Severe hemorrhage occurred in only 1 case (2.1%). After graft removal, the stumps were ligated in the majority of patients (33, 68.8%) with 15 patients (31.2%) not amenable to ligation due to a difficult dissection. The average time of operation was 35.4 ± 8.7 min with an average blood loss of 35.8 ± 6.7 mL. There were no significant complications such as infection reoccurrence, severe limb ischemia, amputation, or death observed postoperatively. Conclusions Patients who receive bypass surgery with prosthetic conduit for IFAPs carry a high incidence of graft infection and subsequent occlusion. However, the presenting symptoms are generally mild, and the incidence of fatal complications is rare. This study suggests that a safe treatment option consists of direct graft removal without reconstruction. Additionally, the procedure proved to be relatively convenient and straightforward, which provides further support toward the strategy of treating IFAPs in IVDUs with pseudoaneurysm resection and prosthetic conduit bypass surgery.

Congenital absence of the inferior vena cava is an uncommon venous anomaly with treatment algorithms consisting of predominately medical management. We present a case of a 36-year-old man with venous ulcers who had failed conservative treatment for recurrent venous ulcers. From a catheter directed approach, we were able to develop an extravascular retroperitoneal space and perform an iliocaval reconstruction with Wallstents. At 1-year postoperatively, his leg pain and edema had resolved, and had achieved resolution of his venous ulceration.

Although sex differences in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes have been increasingly reported, the determination of contributing factors has not reached a consensus. We investigated the disparities in sex-specific outcomes after elective EVAR at our institution and evaluated the factors that might predispose women to increased morbidity and mortality.We performed a retrospective medical record review of all patients who had undergone elective EVAR from 2011 to 2020 at a suburban tertiary care center. The primary outcomes were 5-year survival and freedom from reintervention. The Fisher exact test, t tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis using the rank-log test were used to investigate the associations between sex and outcomes. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model controlling for age and common comorbidities evaluated the effect of sex on survival and freedom from reintervention.A total of 273 patients had undergone elective EVAR during the study period, including 68 women (25%) and 205 men (75%). The women were older on average than were than the men (76 years vs 73 years; P ≤ .01) and were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (38% vs 23%; P = .01), require home oxygen therapy (9% vs 2%; P = .04), or dialysis preoperatively (4% vs 0%; P = .02). The distribution of other common vascular comorbidities was similar between the sexes. The 30-day readmission rate was greater for the women than for the men (18% vs 8%; P = .02). The women had had significantly lower survival at 5 years (48% ± 7.9% vs 65% ± 4.3%; P .01) and significantly lower 1-year (women, 89% ± 4.1%; vs men, 94% ± 1.7%; P = .01) and 5-year (women, 69% ± 8.9%; vs men, 84% ± 3.3%; P = .02) freedom from reintervention. On multivariable analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.9), congestive heart failure (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9), and older age (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1) were associated with 5-year mortality. Female sex remained as the only variable with a statistically significant association with 5-year reintervention (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-4.9).Female sex was associated with decreased 5-year survival and increased 1- and 5-year reintervention after elective EVAR. Data from our institution suggest that factors beyond patient age and baseline health risk likely contribute to greater surgical morbidity and mortality for women after elective EVAR.

Objective Despite numerous recent pivotal and small-scale trials, real-world endovascular management of juxtarenal aneurysms (JRA), suprarenal aneurysms (SRA), and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) remains challenging without consensus best practices. This study evaluated the mortality, graft patency, renal function, complication, and reintervention rates for fenestrated and parallel endografts in complex aortic aneurysms repairs. Methods This retrospective review of consecutive included patients with JRA, SRA, or TAAA who underwent complex endovascular repair from August 2014 to March 2017 at one high-volume institution. Treatment modality was a single surgeon decision based on patients anatomy and the urgency of the repair. Patient demographics, hospital course, and follow-up visits inclusive of imaging were analyzed. Ruptured aneurysms were excluded. Survival rates and outcomes were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results Seventy complex endovascular aortic repairs were performed; 38 patients with TAAA were treated with snorkel/sandwich parallel endografts (21 celiac, 28 superior mesenteric arteries, 58 renal arteries) and 32 patients with JRA/SRA were treated by fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) with 94 total fenestrations (2 celiac, 30 SMA, 62 renal). The mean patient age was 74.8 ± 10.0 years. Sixty percent were male, and the mean aortic aneurysm diameter was 6.0 ± 1.4 cm. Perioperative mortality was 3.1% (1/32) for FEVAR compared with 2.6% (1/38) for parallel endografts (P = .9). All-cause reintervention rates were 15.6% in FEVAR (5/32) vs 23.6% with parallel endografts (9/38; P = .4). Branch reintervention rates per each branch endograft were 4.3% for FEVAR (4/94; 2 renal stent occlusions, 1 colonic ischemia without technical issue found on reintervention, 1 perinephric hematoma) vs 3.7% for parallel endografts (4/107; 2 renal and 1 celiac stent thromboses, and 1 renal stent kink; P = .41). The endograft branch thrombosis rate was 2.1% in FEVAR (2/94) vs 2.7% in parallel endografts (3/109; P = .77). Reinterventions owing to endoleaks were performed in five patients (2 type I, 2 type III, and 1 gutter endoleak; 13.1%) with parallel grafts vs no endoleak reinterventions in FEVAR. The overall survival and freedom from aneurysm-related mortality at 24 months was 78% and 96.9% in FEVAR vs 73% and 93.4% for parallel endografts (P = .8 and P = .6). The median follow-up was 12 months (range, 1-32 months). Conclusions Parallel and fenestrated endografts have acceptable and comparable mortality and patency rates in endovascular treatment of JRA, SRA, and TAAA. This study reaffirms that parallel endografts are a safe and viable alternative to fenestrated devices for complex aortic aneurysmal disease despite often treating more urgent patients and more complicated anatomy unable to be treated with FEVAR.

Carotid ultrasound is a screening modality used by physicians to direct treatment in the prevention of ischemic stroke in high-risk patients. It is a time intensive process that requires highly trained technicians and physicians. Evaluation of a carotid ultrasound requires segmentation of the vessel wall, lumen, and plaque of the carotid artery. Convolutional neural networks are state of the art in image segmentation yet there are no previous methods to solve this problem on carotid ultrasounds. We evaluate here a U-net convolutional neural network for lumen segmentation from ultrasound images of the entire carotid system. We obtained de-identified images under IRB approval from 226 patients. We isolated the internal, external, and common carotid artery ultrasound images for these patients giving us a total of 2156 images. We manually segmented the vessel lumen in each image that we then use as ground truth. With our convolutional U-Net we obtained a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 94.3%. We see that the U-Net correctly segments the lumen even in the presence of significant plaque, calcified wall, and ultrasound shadowing, all of which make it difficult to outline the vessel. We also see that the common carotid artery vessels are easiest to segment with a 96.6% cross-validation accuracy whereas internal and external carotid are harder both with 92.7% and 91.9% cross-validation accuracies respectively. Our work here represents a first successful step towards the automated segmentation of the vessel lumen in carotid artery ultrasound images and is an important first step in creating a system that can independently evaluate carotid ultrasounds.

Carotid ultrasound is a screening modality used by physicians to direct treatment in the prevention of ischemic stroke in high-risk patients. It is a time intensive process that requires highly trained technicians and physicians. Evaluation of a carotid ultrasound requires segmentation of the vessel wall, lumen, and plaque of the carotid artery. Convolutional neural networks are state of the art in image segmentation yet there are no previous methods to solve this problem on carotid ultrasounds. We introduce two novel convolutional U-net models for both vessel and plaque from ultrasound images of the entire carotid system. We obtained de-identified images under IRB approval from 226 patients. We isolated a total of 500 ultrasound images spanning the internal, external, and common carotid arteries. We manually segmented the vessel lumen and plaque in each image that we then use as ground truth. In 10-fold cross-validation all models attain over 90% accuracy for vessel segmentation. With a basic convolutional U-Net we obtained an accuracy of 66.8% for plaque segmentation. With our dual-decoder model we see an improvement to 68.8% whereas our two-stage model falls behind at 65.1% accuracy. However, if we gave our two-stage model the true correct vessel as input its plaque accuracy rises to 81.7% suggesting that the method has potential and needs more work. We ensemble our U-Net and dual decoder U-Net models to obtain confidence scores for segmentations. By considering high confidence outputs above the 60% and 80% thresholds the accuracy of our dual decoder U-Net rises to 75.2% and 87.3% respectively. Our work here shows the potential of dual and two-stage methods for vessel and plaque segmentation in carotid artery ultrasound images and is an important first step in creating a system that can independently evaluate carotid ultrasounds.

Background Frailty has gained prominence as a predictor of postoperative outcomes across a number of surgical specialties, vascular surgery included. The role of frailty is less defined in the acute surgical setting. We assessed the prognostic value of frailty for patients undergoing surgery for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Methods A single-institution retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing surgical intervention for rAAA between January 1, 2011 and November 27, 2019 was performed. Frailty was assessed for each patient using the modified frailty index (mFI), a validated frailty metric based on the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Frailty was defined as an mFI ≥0.27. The performance of the mFI was compared to that of the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) rAAA mortality risk score. Chi square, Fisher's exact, and t tests, were used to evaluate for associations between frailty and in-hospital outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to obtain odds ratios for in-hospital mortality. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to compare the predictive value of the mFI and VSGNE score for in-hospital mortality. Results Sixty patients were identified during the study period with an in-hospital mortality rate of 37%. Twenty-one patients were deemed frail by mFI metric and included all patients with known myocardial infarction, stroke with a neurologic deficit or dependent functional status, however the mortality rate did not differ significantly based on frailty status (33% nonfrail vs. 43% frail, P= 0.47). Frailty status was not significantly different for patients with acute kidney injury (10% nonfrail vs. 10% frail), prolonged intubation (13% vs. 5%), abdominal compartment syndrome (8% vs. 10%), and Type I or Type III endoleak (8% vs. 19%). On multivariate analysis controlling for systolic blood pressure 2.0 mg/dl, the mFI produced an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2–3.0). The ROC curve for the mFI produced an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.55 (P= 0.55) for in-hospital mortality while that of the VSGNE score produced an AUC of 0.69 (P= 0.02). Conclusions The mFI did not significantly predict in-hospital outcomes after rAAA in this cohort. This suggests that the baseline health status of a patient with rAAA may play a less significant role in their postoperative prognosis than their acuity on presentation.

Giant Common Iliac Artery Aneurysms (CIAA) are an uncommon pathology that may present as a late complication after endovascular aortic repair secondary to aneurysmal degeneration with endoleak. We present an unusual case of a patient presenting nine years after index endovascular CIAA exclusion with a painless abdominal mass found to be a 20+ cm CIAA secondary to type II endoleak from a recanalized coil embolized hypogastric artery. The patient underwent open aneurysmorrhaphy with ligation of the hypogastric artery.

Background This study aims to investigate the effect of diabetes on post-endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods A total of 1,479 consecutive patients who underwent AAA EVAR were reviewed. The cohorts were divided based on their diabetes status and compared. Preoperative demographic and comorbidity data were analyzed using the t -test and chi-squared test, whereas post-EVAR outcomes were analyzed using Probit multivariate model, followed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression. Results Of our 1,479 patients, 993 met inclusion criteria. One hundred eighty-three were diabetics (18.4%) compared with 810 nondiabetics (81.6%). Coronary artery disease (CAD; diabetics: 70.49%, nondiabetics: 60.76%, P = 0.014) and hypertension (HTN; diabetics: 90.16%, nondiabetics: 79.46%, P = 0.0008) were the only comorbidities analyzed, including follow-up length, which had any significant differences between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups. Probit multivariate analysis using a combined cohort follow-up mean of 51 months showed a significant decrease in aneurysm sac enlargement in diabetic patients (diabetics: 13.11%, nondiabetics: 19.43%, model estimate: 0.3058; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0486–0.5629, Pr > ChiSq = 0.0198) and trended toward significantly fewer reinterventions (diabetics: 23.50%, nondiabetics: 28.41%, model estimate: 0.1990; 95% CI: −0.0262 to 0.4243, Pr > ChiSq = 0.0833). In the Cox regressions, diabetes had a significant protective factor on reinterventions (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.697, Pr > ChiSq = 0.0151), and was trending toward significance for aneurysm sac enlargement (HR: 0.750, Pr > ChiSq = 0.1961). There was no significant difference across diabetic status in any other outcomes, including mortality and endoleak occurrence. Conclusions Although a higher proportion of diabetic patients present with HTN and CAD, they have decreased long-term rates of aneurysm sac enlargement after EVAR. As a result, this cohort trends toward a lower need for reintervention after EVAR.

Anesthesia modalities for carotid endarterectomy continue to vary nationally. We evaluated and compared short-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy with general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.The 2011-2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files (PUFs) with merged Vascular Procedure-Targeted PUFs for carotid endarterectomy were queried for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing GA or RA were compared.A total of 14,447 patients were evaluated: 12,389 (85.7%) with GA and 2,058 (14.3%) with RA. The use of GA was inversely associated with patients' age (88.0% in patients aged 22-64 years vs. 83.4% in patients aged ≥80 years, P 0.0001) and with symptomatic presentation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.38). There were no differences between GA and RA for in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, or postoperative complications of transient ischemic attack, stroke, bleeding, acute renal failure, or restenosis. However, rates of cranial nerve injury were significantly higher in GA than in RA (2.9% vs. 1.7%, respectively; P 0.002) and confirmed by multivariable analysis (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.19-2.39). Total operative time was also longer for GA than for RA (median: 115 minutes; Interquartile range (IQR): 89-145 versus median: 93 minutes; IQR: 76-119, respectively; P 0.0001). Hospital length of stay was greater in GA than in RA (median: 1 day; IQR 1-2 vs. median: 1 day; IQR 1-1, respectively; P 0.0001), as were 30-day readmission rates (6.7% vs. 5.4%, respectively; P = 0.02).Iatrogenic nerve injury is a feared complication of carotid endarterectomy, especially in elective asymptomatic patients. RA reduces the rate of cranial nerve injury compared with GA. RA is also not inferior to GA for postoperative complications with the benefit of shorter operative times, lengths of hospital stay, and decreased 30-day readmission rates. Consideration should be given to more widespread adoption of this underused anesthesia modality.

Background Transfemoral access is the traditional gold standard for uterine artery angiography; however, transradial access is gaining in popularity because of its decreased complication profile and patient preference. We present a case of a patient who underwent successful total abdominal hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids with ambiguous pelvic vasculature that would have been otherwise aborted if it were not for intraoperative transradial access angiography. Case presentation A 52-year-old Caucasian woman presented to her gynecologist for an elective total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. During preoperative imaging, a 15-cm mass consistent with a uterine fibroid was identified, and the patient’s gynecologist decided to treat her with surgical resection, given the fibroid’s size. The procedure was halted upon discovery of a complicated vascular plexus at the fundus of the uterus, and an intraoperative vascular consult was requested. The vascular operator used a transradial access to perform pelvic angiography in real time to identify the complicated pelvic vasculature, which allowed the gynecologist to surgically resect the uterine fibroid. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 4 without any complications. Conclusions Intraoperative imaging is a useful technique for the identification of complicated anatomical structures during surgical procedures. The successful outcome of this case demonstrates an additional unique benefit of transradial access and highlights an opportunity for interdisciplinary collaboration for management of complicated surgical interventions.

Introduction Leiomyosarcoma of the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) is a rare smooth muscle neoplasm typically presenting in the fifth to sixth decades of life with both intraluminal and extraluminal growth patterns. Surgical resection remains the gold standard for non-metastatic disease and often requires vascular reconstruction. We present an atypical case of leiomyosarcoma involving both the IVC and infrarenal abdominal aorta necessitating reconstruction with intraoperative veno-venous bypass. Methods A 63-year-old man initially presenting with back pain was found to have a large mass adjacent to the IVC on MRI, subsequently confirmed to be leiomyosarcoma by biopsy. After six months of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy the patient was taken for resection. However, intra-operatively the tumor was found to involve the aorta necessitating combined aorto-caval reconstruction. To facilitate en-bloc resection of the tumor, the aorta was reconstructed first followed by the inferior vena cava using veno-venous bypass. Results Post-operatively, the patient was taken to the intensive care unit for resuscitation and had an uncomplicated hospital course. He was discharged to rehab six days post-operatively and at one year remains free of significant tumor burden with patent aorto-caval bypass grafts. Conclusion Primary leiomyosarcoma of the IVC is estimated to have aortic involvement in

Purpose: To report an investigation of a purely endovascular procedure to address access-induced hand ischemia in dialysis patients. Case Report: Two dialysis patients presented with stage III steal syndrome consisting of severe pain and numbness in their fingers. Preoperative fistulograms distal to the anastomosis showed alternating antegrade and retrograde flow. Under ultrasound guidance, the fistula was accessed and a 4-F micropuncture sheath placed. An angled guidewire was then advanced proximally into the brachial artery. A 6-F short sheath with marker was placed followed by a 4-F straight guide catheter inserted into the proximal brachial artery. A 9-F Flair endovascular stent-graft was advanced over a 0.035-inch stiff angled Glidewire into the fistula just distal to the arterial anastomosis and deployed. Postoperatively, pain and numbness resolved in both patients immediately. Postoperative fistulograms documented antegrade flow. Access flow velocity readings decreased significantly and pulse oximetry readings increased significantly in both patients, who were followed for >6 months with no reported complications. Conclusion: These 2 cases suggest that this endovascular approach to access-induced hand ischemia may be a viable alternative to open/hybrid surgery.

Renal artery anastomotic pseudoaneurysms, an uncommon complication of transplantation, may result in aneurysm rupture and loss of allograft. We report the case of 50-year-old female with back pain 3 weeks post renal transplantation. CT scan revealed transplant renal artery anastomotic pseudoaneurysm arising from anastomosis of two renal arteries joined together to form a single renal artery that was joined to the aorta. Successful endovascular treatment was achieved with covered stents, resulting in preserved renal function. Follow-up ultrasound at one-day post procedure and CT at 2 months revealed satisfactory renal perfusion with no pseudoaneurysm. Endovascular treatment of transplant renal artery pseudoaneurysms with covered stent and ostial flare balloon technology may be preferred in patients with extensive prior pelvic surgery, as illustrated in this case.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a viable alternative for patients who are too high risk for traditional surgical aortic valve replacement, but it is not without risk of vascular complication. We report a case in which a hybrid stent and bypass graft technique was used to repair a complete iliofemoral artery avulsion after a transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure. We believe that particular caution should be taken with patients with peripheral arterial disease in access vessels. Access vessel diameter must be considered in planning of procedures, and preprocedural preparation for potential major vascular complications is crucial for reducing morbidity and mortality.