1. Original research: Second IVIg course in Guillain-Barré syndrome with poor prognosis: the non-randomised ISID study
- Author
-
Verboon, C, van den Berg, B, Cornblath, Dr, Venema, E, Gorson, Kc, Lunn, Mp, Lingsma, H, Van den Bergh, P, Harbo, T, Bateman, K, Pereon, Y, Sindrup, Sh, Kusunoki, S, Miller, J, Islam, Z, Hartung, Hp, Chavada, G, Jacobs, Bc, Hughes, Rac, van Doorn PA, Ajroud-Driss S, IGOS Consortium., Antonini, G, Attarian, S, Barroso, Fa, Benedetti, L, Bertorini, Te, Brannagan, Th, Briani, C, Bhavaraju-Sanka, R, Butterworth, S, Casasnovas, C, Cavaletti, G, Chen, S, Claeys, Kg, Cosgrove, Js, Davidson, A, Dardiotis, E, Dornonville de la Cour, C, Faber, Cg, Feasby, Te, Fujioka, T, Galassi, G, Gilchrist, Jm, Goyal, Na, Granit, V, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, G, Hadden, Rdm, Holt, Jkl, Htut, M, Jericó Pascual, I, Karafiath, S, Katzberg, Hd, Kiers, L, Kieseier, Bc, Kimpinski, K, Kuwabara, S, Kwan, Jy, Ladha, Ss, Lawson, V, Lehmann, H, Manji, H, Marfia, Ga, Márquez Infante, C, Mattiazzi, Mg, Mcdermott, Cj, Monges, Ms, Morís de la Tassa, G, Nascimbene, C, Nobile Orazio, E, Nowak, Rj, Osei-Bonsu, M, Pardo Fernandez, J, Querol Gutierrez, L, Reisin, R, Rinaldi, S, Rojas-Marcos, I, Rudnicki, Sa, Schenone, A, Sedano Tous MJ, Shahrizaila, N, Sheikh, K, Silvestri, Nj, Sommer, Cl, Varrato, Jd, Verschuuren, J, Vytopil, Mv, Zhou, L, Bella, Ir, Bunschoten, C, Bürmann, J, Busby, M, Chao, Cc, Conti, Me, Dalakas, Mc, Van Damme, P, Doets, A, van Dijk GW, Dimachkie, Mm, Doppler, K, Echaniz-Laguna, A, Eftimov, F, Fazio, R, Fokke, C, Fulgenzi, Ea, Garssen, Mpj, Gijsbers, Cj, Gilhuis, J, Grapperon, A, Hsieh, St, Illa, I, Islam, B, Jellema, K, Kaida, K, Kokubun, N, Kolb, N, van Koningsveld, R, van der Kooi AJ, Kuitwaard, K, Landschoff Lassen, L, Leonhard, Se, Mandarakas, M, Martinez Hernandez, E, Mohammad, Qd, Pulley, M, Rajabally, Ya, Reddel, Sw, van der Ree, T, Roodbol, J, Sachs, Gm, Samijn, Jpa, Santoro, L, Stein, B, Vermeij, Fh, Visser, Lh, Willison, Hj, Wirtz, P, Zivkovich, Sa., Neurology, Public Health, Immunology, and ANS - Neuroinfection & -inflammation
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,second IVIg course ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Poor prognosis ,Time Factors ,Guillain-Barre Syndrome ,Original research ,Drug Administration Schedule ,Disease course ,Disability Evaluation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Immunologic Factors ,Medicine ,In patient ,Aged ,treatment ,Guillain-Barre syndrome ,business.industry ,Immunoglobulins, Intravenous ,Middle Aged ,poor prognosis ,Prognosis ,Guillain-Barré syndrome ,medicine.disease ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Treatment Outcome ,Immunoglobulin G ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Surgery ,Observational study ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare disease course in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) with a poor prognosis who were treated with one or with two intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) courses.MethodsFrom the International GBS Outcome Study, we selected patients whose modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score at week 1 predicted a poor prognosis. We compared those treated with one IVIg course to those treated with two IVIg courses. The primary endpoint, the GBS disability scale at 4 weeks, was assessed with multivariable ordinal regression.ResultsOf 237 eligible patients, 199 patients received a single IVIg course. Twenty patients received an ‘early’ second IVIg course (1–2 weeks after start of the first IVIg course) and 18 patients a ‘late’ second IVIg course (2–4 weeks after start of IVIg). At baseline and 1 week, those receiving two IVIg courses were more disabled than those receiving one course. Compared with the one course group, the adjusted OR for a better GBS disability score at 4 weeks was 0.70 (95%CI 0.16 to 3.04) for the early group and 0.66 (95%CI 0.18 to 2.50) for the late group. The secondary endpoints were not in favour of a second IVIg course.ConclusionsThis observational study did not show better outcomes after a second IVIg course in GBS with poor prognosis. The study was limited by small numbers and baseline imbalances. Lack of improvement was likely an incentive to start a second IVIg course. A prospective randomised trial is needed to evaluate whether a second IVIg course improves outcome in GBS.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF