Search

Abstract Debates persist regarding the impact of Stain Normalization (SN) on recent breast cancer histopathological studies. While some studies propose no influence on classification outcomes, others argue for improvement. This study aims to assess the efficacy of SN in breast cancer histopathological classification, specifically focusing on Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) grading using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The null hypothesis asserts that SN has no effect on the accuracy of CNN-based IDC grading, while the alternative hypothesis suggests the contrary. We evaluated six SN techniques, with five templates selected as target images for the conventional SN techniques. We also utilized seven ImageNet pre-trained CNNs for IDC grading. The performance of models trained with and without SN was compared to discern the influence of SN on classification outcomes. The analysis unveiled a p-value of 0.11, indicating no statistically significant difference in Balanced Accuracy Scores between models trained with StainGAN-normalized images, achieving a score of 0.9196 (the best-performing SN technique), and models trained with non-normalized images, which scored 0.9308. As a result, we did not reject the null hypothesis, indicating that we found no evidence to support a significant discrepancy in effectiveness between stain-normalized and non-normalized datasets for IDC grading tasks. This study demonstrates that SN has a limited impact on IDC grading, challenging the assumption of performance enhancement through SN.

This project employs artificial intelligence, including machine learning and deep learning, to assess COVID-19 readmission risk in Malaysia. It offers tools to mitigate healthcare resource strain and enhance patient outcomes. This study outlines a methodology for classifying COVID-19 readmissions. It starts with dataset description and pre-processing, while the data balancing was computed through Random Oversampling, Borderline SMOTE, and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling. Nine machine learning and ten deep learning techniques are applied, with five-fold cross-validation for evaluation. Optuna is used for hyperparameter selection, while the consistency in training hyperparameters is maintained. Evaluation metrics encompass accuracy, AUC, and training/inference times. Results were based on stratified five-fold cross-validation and different data-balancing methods. Notably, CatBoost consistently excelled in accuracy and AUC across all tables. Using ROS, CatBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.9882 ± 0.0020) with an AUC of 1.0000 ± 0.0000. CatBoost maintained its superiority in BSMOTE and ADASYN as well. Deep learning approaches performed well, with SAINT leading in ROS and TabNet leading in BSMOTE and ADASYN. Decision Tree ensembles like Random Forest and XGBoost consistently showed strong performance.

Palm oil industry is an important economic resource for Malaysia. However, an oil palm tree disease called Basal Stem Rot has impeded the production of palm oil, which caused significant economic loss at the same time. The oil palm tree disease is caused by a fungus known as Ganoderma Boninense. Infected trees often have little to no symptoms during early stage of infection, which made early detection difficult. Early disease detection is necessary to allow early sanitization and disease control efforts. Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning technology, 88 grey-distribution canopy images of oil palm tree were obtained. The images were pre-processed and augmented before being used for training and testing of the deep learning models. The capabilities of the Convolution Neural Network deep learning models in the classification of dataset into healthy and non-healthy class were tested and the best performing model was identified based on the Macro-F1 score. Fine-tuned DenseNet121 model was the best performing model, recorded a Macro F1-score of 0.798. It was also noted that Baseline model showed a relatively remarkable macro-F1 score of 0.747, which was better than all the feature extractor models and some of the fine-tuned models. However, fine-tuned models suffered from model overfitting due to dataset limitations. For future work, it is recommended to increase the sample size and utilize other CNN architectures to improve the model performance and progress towards detecting Basal Stem Rot at the early stage of infection by classifying sample images into multiple classes.

Abstract Computer-aided Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) grading classification systems based on deep learning have shown that deep learning may achieve reliable accuracy in IDC grade classification using histopathology images. However, there is a dearth of comprehensive performance comparisons of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) designs on IDC in the literature. As such, we would like to conduct a comparison analysis of the performance of seven selected CNN models: EfficientNetB0, EfficientNetV2B0, EfficientNetV2B0-21k, ResNetV1-50, ResNetV2-50, MobileNetV1, and MobileNetV2 with transfer learning. To implement each pre-trained CNN architecture, we deployed the corresponded feature vector available from the TensorFlowHub, integrating it with dropout and dense layers to form a complete CNN model. Our findings indicated that the EfficientNetV2B0-21k (0.72B Floating-Point Operations and 7.1 M parameters) outperformed other CNN models in the IDC grading task. Nevertheless, we discovered that practically all selected CNN models perform well in the IDC grading task, with an average balanced accuracy of 0.936 ± 0.0189 on the cross-validation set and 0.9308 ± 0.0211on the test set.