1. Outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery with miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass
- Author
-
Simo-Pekka Koivisto, Fausto Biancari, Wistbacka Jo, Jussi Rimpiläinen, Kari Teittinen, Riikka Rimpiläinen, Pertti Loponen, and Juha Nissinen
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Logistic euroscore ,law.invention ,Coronary artery bypass surgery ,Postoperative Complications ,law ,Internal medicine ,Cardiopulmonary bypass ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,In patient ,Cardiac Surgical Procedures ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,Cardiopulmonary perfusion ,Adverse effect ,Aged ,Advanced and Specialized Nursing ,Cardiopulmonary Bypass ,Miniaturization ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Intensive care unit ,Cardiac surgery ,surgical procedures, operative ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Safety Research ,circulatory and respiratory physiology - Abstract
We have reviewed the results of our experience with the use of miniaturized (Mini-CPB) versus conventional (C-CPB) cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). This study included 365 patients who underwent CABG with C-CPB and 101 patients with Mini-CPB. In-hospital mortality was lower in the C-CPB group (1.4% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.38). A better, but not statistically significant, immediate outcome was observed in the C-CPB group as indicated by a shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit as well as a lower incidence of combined adverse end-point. However, this was probably due to significantly higher operative risk in the Mini-CPB group (logistic EuroSCORE: 8.5 ± 10.0 vs. 4.6 ± 7.1, P
- Published
- 2009