Search

Objectives: Coordinated care plans (CCPs) for high-cost health care system users aim to improve system-level performance. We evaluated health care resource use and costs among CCP patients (enrollees) versus a control group that did not receive coordinated care (comparators) in Southeastern Ontario. Methods: A difference-in-differences analysis of a quasi-experimental, double propensity score-matched and adjusted cohort was conducted. Linked population-based administrative data were used to measure health care utilization and costs and to identify comparators for two enrollee groups who began CCPs between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019. Enrollees were recruited from hospitals in Quinte or community care centres in Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands, and were 1:1 propensity score matched to comparators. Difference-in-differences estimates were calculated using generalized estimating equations for hospitalization rates, homecare visits, primary care visits, other health care resources and total costs. Results: A total of 558 enrollees in Quinte and 538 in Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands were identified and matched to comparators. Difference-in-differences estimates were significant in both enrollee groups for number of homecare visits ([IRR 1.72; 95% CI (1.44, 2.06)] and [IRR 1.73; 95% CI (1.45, 2.06)], respectively). Number of primary care visits were 1.76 times greater for Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands enrollees versus comparators [IRR 1.76; 95% CI (1.32, 2.35)]; total costs increased by 23% ([IRR 1.23; 95% CI (1.09,1.39)]. Conclusions: Homecare use significantly increased for enrollees versus comparators, indicating specific priority areas of Ontario CCPs were met. However, no reductions were shown for other health system performance indicators. We also showed increased 7-day primary care follow-up visits for community care centre-recruited patients, but not for hospital-recruited patients. Decision-makers may wish to target patients who are less advanced in their chronic disease trajectory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore variation in rates of acute care utilization for mental health conditions, including hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits, across high‐income countries before and during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Data Sources and Study Setting: Administrative patient‐level data between 2017 and 2020 of eight high‐income countries: Canada, England, Finland, France, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States (US). Study Design: Multi‐country retrospective observational study using a federated data approach that evaluated age‐sex standardized rates of hospitalizations and ED visits for mental health conditions. Principal Findings: There was significant variation in rates of acute mental health care utilization across countries. Among the subset of four countries with both hospitalization and ED data, the US had the highest pre‐COVID‐19 combined average annual acute care rate of 1613 episodes/100,000 people (95% CI: 1428, 1797). Finland had the lowest rate of 776 (686, 866). When examining hospitalization rates only, France had the highest rate of inpatient hospitalizations of 988/100,000 (95% CI 858, 1118) while Spain had the lowest at 87/100,000 (95% CI 76, 99). For ED rates for mental health conditions, the US had the highest rate of 958/100,000 (95% CI 861, 1055) while France had the lowest rate with 241/100,000 (95% CI 216, 265). Notable shifts coinciding with the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic were observed including a substitution of care setting in the US from ED to inpatient care, and overall declines in acute care utilization in Canada and France. Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of understanding and addressing variation in acute care utilization for mental health conditions, including the differential effect of COVID‐19, across different health care systems. Further research is needed to elucidate the extent to which factors such as workforce capacity, access barriers, financial incentives, COVID‐19 preparedness, and community‐based care may contribute to these variations. What is known on this topic: Approximately one billion people globally live with a mental health condition, with significant consequences for individuals and societies.Rates of mental health diagnoses vary across high‐income countries, with substantial differences in access to effective care.The COVID‐19 pandemic has exacerbated mental health challenges globally, with varying impacts across countries. What this study adds: This study provides a comprehensive international comparison of hospitalization and emergency department visit rates for mental health conditions across eight high‐income countries.It highlights significant variations in acute care utilization patterns, particularly in countries that are more likely to care for people with mental health conditions in emergency departments rather than inpatient facilitiesThe study identifies temporal and cross‐country differences in acute care management of mental health conditions coinciding with the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the initial wave of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), patients were rapidly discharged from acute hospitals in anticipation of an expected influx of patients with COVID-19. Patients that were no longer receiving acute medical care but were waiting for their next destination (i.e., delayed hospital discharge) were particularly affected. The objectives of this study were to examine the impact of COVID-19 onset on healthcare utilization and mortality among those who experienced delayed discharge from acute care. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data. We included persons discharged from acute care who experienced a delayed hospital stay between April 1, 2019 and September 30, 2020. The onset of COVID-19 was the exposure (March 1, 2020), while the period of April 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 was considered as a comparator. Primary outcomes included healthcare utilization and mortality following discharge, stratified by care setting (homecare, inpatient rehabilitation or long-term care). Multivariable logistic, zero-inflated Poisson regressions, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the impact of COVID-19 on outcomes while adjusting for covariates. Those discharged home were more likely to receive homecare and physician visits within 30 days during COVID-19. The type of visits examined included both in-person as well as virtual visits. Individuals discharged to inpatient rehabilitation experienced lower rates of general physician visits but higher rates of specialist and homecare visits. Patients discharged to long-term care were significantly less likely to receive a physician visit following COVID-19, and significantly more likely to be readmitted within 7-days. There were no significant differences in mortality irrespective of discharge destination during the two time periods. Overall, the onset of the initial wave of COVID-19 significantly impacted healthcare utilization among those with a delayed discharge but varied depending on destination, with those in long-term care being most impacted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Individuals who experience a hip fracture have numerous care transitions. Improving the transition process is important for ensuring quality care; however, little is known about the priorities of different key interest groups. Our aim was to gather recommendations from these groups regarding care transitions for hip fracture. Methods: We conducted a concept mapping study, inviting persons with lived experience (PWLE) who had a hip fracture, care partners, healthcare providers, and decision-makers to share their thoughts about 'what is needed to improve care transitions for hip fracture'. Individuals were subsequently asked to sort the generated statements into conceptual piles, and then rate by importance and priority using a five-point scale. Participants decided on the final map, rearranged statements, and assigned a name to each conceptual cluster. Results: A total of 35 participants took part in this concept mapping study, with some individuals participating in multiple steps. Participants included 22 healthcare providers, 7 care partners, 4 decision-makers, and 2 PWLE. The final map selected by participants was an 8-cluster map, with the following cluster labels: (1) access to inpatient services and supports across the care continuum (13 statements); (2) informed and collaborative discharge planning (13 statements); (3) access to transitional and outpatient services (3 statements); (4) communication, education and knowledge acquisition (9 statements); (5) support for care partners (2 statements); (6) person-centred care (13 statements); (7) physical, social, and cognitive activities and supports (13 statements); and (8) provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviours (8 statements). Conclusions: Our study findings highlight the importance of person-centred care, with active involvement of PWLE and their care partners throughout the care journey. Many participant statements included specific ideas related to continuity of care, and clinical knowledge and skills. This study provides insights for future interventions and quality improvement initiatives for enhancing transitions in care among hip fracture populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: A common strategy to reduce COPD readmissions is to encourage patient follow-up with a physician within 1 to 2 weeks of discharge, yet evidence confirming its benefit is lacking. We used a new study design called target randomized trial emulation to determine the impact of follow-up visit timing on patient outcomes. Methods: All Ontario residents aged 35 or older discharged from a COPD hospitalization were identified using health administrative data and randomly assigned to those who received and did not receive physician visit follow-up by within seven days. They were followed to all-cause emergency department visits, readmissions or death. Targeted randomized trial emulation was used to adjust for differences between the groups. COPD emergency department visits, readmissions or death was also considered. Results: There were 94,034 patients hospitalized with COPD, of whom 73.5% had a physician visit within 30 days of discharge. Adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause readmission, emergency department visits or death for people with a visit within seven days post discharge was 1.03 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.01–1.05) and remained around 1 for subsequent days; adjusted hazard ratio for the composite COPD events was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–1.00) and remained significantly lower than 1 for subsequent days. Conclusion: While a physician visit after discharge was found to reduce COPD events, a specific time period when a physician visit was most beneficial was not found. This suggests that follow-up visits should not occur at a predetermined time but be based on factors such as anticipated medical need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Among the challenges in delivering integrated health and social care services is the need to attend to the coordination of tasks, roles, activities, and operations, while considering how these efforts are experienced by patients, carers and communities. The literature has noted an important disconnect between how providers and leaders view their efforts to coordinate service delivery, and how patients perceive these efforts on the receiving end. Our team has provided guidance to integrated care efforts in Ontario, Canada by drawing on Goffman's theory of Dramaturgy to help classify the actions of integrated care delivery as linked to the roles individuals play in the delivery of care. Using this framing helps to uncover how "backstage" processes (such as team-functioning, funding models, and digital infrastructures) create a necessary foundation on which "frontstage" actions (or performances) can be effectively delivered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundOlder adults with multimorbidity and complex care needs (CCN) are among those most likely to experience frequent care transitions between settings, particularly from hospital to home. Transition periods mark vulnerable moments in care for individuals with CCN. Poor communication and incomplete information transfer between clinicians and organizations involved in the transition from hospital to home can impede access to needed support and resources. Establishing digitally supported communication that enables person-centered care and supported self-management may offer significant advantages as we support older adults with CCN transitioning from hospital to home. ObjectiveThis protocol outlines the plan for the development, implementation, and evaluation of a Digital Bridge co-designed to support person-centered health care transitions for older adults with CCN. The Digital Bridge builds on the foundation of two validated technologies: Care Connector, designed to improve interprofessional communication in hospital, and the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePRO) tool, designed to support goal-oriented care planning and self-management in primary care settings. This project poses three overarching research questions that focus on adapting the technology to local contexts, evaluating the impact of the Digital Bridge in relation to the quadruple aim, and exploring the potential to scale and spread the technology. MethodsThe study includes two phases: workflow co-design (phase 1), followed by implementation and evaluation (phase 2). Phase 1 will include iterative co-design working groups with patients, caregivers, hospital providers, and primary care providers to develop a transition workflow that will leverage the use of Care Connector and ePRO to support communication through the transition process. Phase 2 will include implementation and evaluation of the Digital Bridge within two hospital systems in Ontario in acute and rehab settings (600 patients: 300 baseline and 300 implementation). The primary outcome measure for this study is the Care Transitions Measure–3 to assess transition quality. An embedded ethnography will be included to capture context and process data to inform the implementation assessment and development of a scale and spread strategy. An Integrated Knowledge Translation approach is taken to inform the study. An advisory group will be established to provide insight and feedback regarding the project design and implementation, leading the development of the project knowledge translation strategy and associated outputs. ResultsThis project is underway and expected to be complete by Spring 2024. ConclusionsGiven the real-world implementation of Digital Bridge, practice changes in the research sites and variable adherence to the implementation protocols are likely. Capturing and understanding these considerations through a mixed-methods approach will help identify the range of factors that may influence study results. Should a favorable evaluation suggest wide adoption of the proposed intervention, this project could lead to positive impact at patient, clinician, organizational, and health system levels. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04287192; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04287192 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/20220