Search

Among large-span bridges, arch bridges have relatively high stiffness, which may lead to large dynamic amplification factors (DAFs). The DAFs suggested by current codes mostly originate from common simply supported beam bridges. Previous DAF studies on dynamic vehicle–bridge solutions for arch bridges have mainly focused on one or two side-by-side vehicles. However, complex traffic flows with randomness rather than one or two vehicles act on bridges. DAFs that consider the effects of random traffic flows have not previously been reported. In this study, a random traffic–bridge vibration solution was established to explore the DAFs of arch bridge components. The randomness of the traffic parameters and road roughness was explored. The randomness of the external excitation, including traffic flow and road roughness, resulted in random dynamic responses and DAFs of the arch bridge components. Normal distributions could be used to fit the DAF distributions of each arch bridge component under random vehicle spacing, weight, speed, and road roughness. Under random traffic parameters, the coefficients of variation of the DAFs exceeded the 5% accepted level. The shortest suspenders were more sensitive to the randomness of the traffic flow parameters. Both the mean and coefficient of variation of the DAFs increased with worsening of the road conditions. The influence of the randomness of the road roughness on the DAFs of arch bridges must be considered, particularly for the shortest suspender. The 95% upper confidence limits of the DAFs for all components may be greater than the suggested values in the code. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several factors could affect the function of the electromagnet control system when a high-speed maglev train runs over a bridge. To enhance the robustness of the electromagnet control system to the high-speed maglev train running over the bridge, a fuzzy active control rule is introduced into the currently used proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control system. Numerical analyses are then conducted with a high-speed maglev train passing through a series of simply supported beams. The numerical results with the fuzzy PID active control are compared with the maglev train–bridge system with the equivalent linearized electromagnetic forces. The comparative results show that the introduction of the fuzzy PID control system has improved the comfort of the maglev train and that the overall dynamic response of the bridge is reduced. There is an obvious time delay for the maximum dynamic response of the bridge to the high speed of the train. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]