Search

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a high prevalence neurodegenerative disorder without a disease-modifying therapy. Up to now, a number of systematic reviews have been conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal Medicine (CHM) for PD patients. Here, we aimed to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of systematic reviews using an overview, and then synthesize and evaluate the available evidence level of CHM for PD. Six databases were searched from inception to September 2018. The literatures were selected and data were extracted according to prespecified criteria. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) was used to evaluate the quality of methodology, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to determine the evidence quality of the primary outcome measures. A total of 11 systematic reviews with 230 RCTs of CHM for PD were included. AMSTAR scores of the included reviews were range from 4 to 9. Compared with conventional western medicine (WCM), CHM paratherapy showed significant effect in improving UPDRS score, Webster scale score, PDQ-39, NMSQuest, CHM Syndrome Integral Scale, and PDSS. However, CHM monotherapy showed no difference relative to WCM according to various outcome measures. Adverse events were reported in 9 systematic reviews. The side effect in CHM paratherapy group was generally less than or lighter than that in WCM group. The quality of the evidence of primary outcomes was moderate (42%) to high (54%) according to the GRADE profiler. The present finding supported the use of CHM paratherapy for PD patients but we should treat the evidence cautiously because of the methodological flaws, whereas there is insufficient evidence of CHM monotherapy for PD.

Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) and the herb medicine borneol can both facilitate the delivery of therapeutic agents to diseased brain regions and serve as promising adjuvant neuroprotective therapies. Our preliminary experiments showed that UTMD could exacerbate ischemic blood–brain barrier (BBB) opening, while borneol can protect the BBB. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the combination of UTMD and borneol could attenuate UTMD-induced injury to the BBB under ischemic stroke conditions. Male albino mice were subjected to 60-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) with reperfusion. Borneol and UTMD was given to mice 3 days before and 24 h after MCAO induction. BBB permeability, brain water contents, ultrastructural changes of the BBB and histopathological alterations were evaluated. Our data demonstrated that UTMD aggravated the leakage of Evans blue dye, ultrastructural alterations of cerebral microvasculature, brain edema, and even induced cerebral hemorrhage in ischemic stroke mice. Pretreatment with borneol significantly attenuated the above detrimental effects of UTMD on the BBB. This study indicates that under ischemic stroke conditions, the BBB becomes vulnerable to UTMD intervention, and the combination of borneol can help to maintain the integrity of the BBB.